Now we know who "ekim" "cshaw" et al are.

Article from May 2016:

Bill Clinton was frequent flier on pedophile’s private jet ‘Lolita Express’

Quote: Newly released flight logs show former US president Bill Clinton flew on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous “Lolita Express” jet at least 26 times.

Initial reports in January suggested Clinton was on board the billionaire’s Boeing 727 on “only” 11 occasions, but documents obtained by Fox News show he flew with Epstein more than two dozen times.

Quote: I am not at all surprised the known rapist J. Epstein and one William Jefferson Clinton chilled together many times on Epstein's rape plane

— benedetto (@benedetto) May 14, 2016

Between 2001 and 2003, while Hillary was serving as a US Senator, Bill took a number of “extended junkets” around the world with the hedge fund manager.

There were also a number of other passengers identified on the manifests, usually with their initials or first name, including one named “Tatiana.”

Clinton reportedly ditched his Secret Service detail for at least five flights, even though there does not appear to be any of the required paperwork for signing the detail off.

Epstein served 13 months for soliciting “prostitutes” as young as 14 and is now a registered sex offender.

The flight logs showing those traveling with Clinton on board the plane, which reportedly had a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls as young as 12, included socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, who prosecutors believe procured underage girls for Epstein.

The FBI began investigating Epstein in 2006 when evidence emerged showing dozens of young girls may have been used as sex slaves by him and his famous friends.

A total of 40 women were identified by the FBI as having been illegally procured by Epstein, but a "sweetheart deal" in 2008 led to his single solicitation charge and short sentence.

The arrangement saw authorities agree not to press any criminal charges against "any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.”

The billionaire was also registered as a “Tier 1” sex offender.

More questions arose over the relationship between Epstein and the Clintons, leading him to plead the fifth when asked if he knew the former president personally during a separate case in 2010 and 2011 when he was sued by some of his alleged victims.

Last year, it emerged that Epstein allegedly transferred $3.5 million from his secret Swiss bank account to the Clinton Foundation around the same time as the FBI began investigating him.

One of the prosecutors involved in Epstein’s “sweetheart deal,” Matt Menchel, contributed $1,000 to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid and $2,500 to Democratic Florida Senator Bill Nelson, who in April was tipped to be Hillary’s running mate.

He also sent $25,000 to a separate Clinton charity in July 2006, reported Radar.

Beyond the powerful couple, Epstein is linked to other well-known public figures such as former Clinton Press Secretary George Stephanopoulos, Britain’s Prince Andrew, TV personality Katie Couric, actor Kevin Spacey, and filmmaker Woody Allen.

^^^

All those (young) CTR broads are more or less the talent level you find in D.C. on a regular basis.

So imagine you're stuck drinking only luke warm tap water for the rest of your life, it gets the job done but isn't satisfying at all.

That is D.C. women for you in an nutshell.

   

Jake Tapper interview in which they discuss the emails:

https://audioboom.com/boos/5160226-wmal-...ce=twitter

Says that the email with Donna Brazille is "troubling...to find out that someone was unethically helping the clintons, tipping them off."

"I don't know for 100%, I know that I had nothing to do with it, my understanding is that the email to donna came from rolan martin or someone else."

http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C0...4115/sb/29

No fucking way.

So we have evidence here that they've weaponised the NSA against Trump supporters in order to rig the election.

I thought with the Scalia wet works assassination leak we'd discovered the bottom of their corruption but yet again they have a new way of surprising us with their sheer depth of their evil.

Trump needs to know about this immediately.

You know what would be a fun project.

Get a bunch of /pol people together and have them apply to the "CTR" superpac and then secretly post pro Trump stuff all day long while drawing a salary.

(10-13-2016 10:27 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  You know what would be a fun project.

Get a bunch of /pol people together and have them apply to the "CTR" superpac and then secretly post pro Trump stuff all day long while drawing a salary.

Until they get Seth Rich'd

(10-13-2016 10:29 PM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  

(10-13-2016 10:27 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  You know what would be a fun project.

Get a bunch of /pol people together and have them apply to the "CTR" superpac and then secretly post pro Trump stuff all day long while drawing a salary.

Until they get Seth Rich'd

The establishment has so thoroughly corrupted various institutions and the media it's going to become necessary in the future to have more and more people infiltrate these organizations.

Yes it's probably dangerous at the higher levels but without treating these groups like enemy states and using counter intelligence the right will eventually lose over time.

(10-13-2016 10:20 PM)Valentine Wrote:  




http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C0...4115/sb/29

No fucking way.

So we have evidence here that they've weaponised the NSA against Trump supporters in order to rig the election.

I thought with the Scalia wet works assassination leak we'd discovered the bottom of their corruption but yet again they have a new way of surprising us with their sheer depth of their evil.

Trump needs to know about this immediately.

How do they have access to this? They're peons aren't they?

(10-13-2016 10:20 PM)Valentine Wrote:  




http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/forms/C0...4115/sb/29

No fucking way.

So we have evidence here that they've weaponised the NSA against Trump supporters in order to rig the election.

I thought with the Scalia wet works assassination leak we'd discovered the bottom of their corruption but yet again they have a new way of surprising us with their sheer depth of their evil.

Trump needs to know about this immediately.

Seriously, What in the Fuck.

Also, there's an Elliot Fink on that payroll at the bottom....efink. But he's the lowest guy on the payroll....weird.

There is also a Justin Price & a Joshua Dolin on the payroll.

jprice and jdolin are in the chat room as well.

(10-13-2016 11:06 PM)Fisto Wrote:  How do they have access to this? They're peons aren't they?

Elliot Fink (efink) described FOXACID in the Slack chat, David Brock (brock) is the one requesting all of the info is given to him. He's the head of Correct The Record.

Brock has close ties with Hillary as illuminated in the Podesta emails and Hillary has close ties to higher-ups in national security so it wouldn't be a stretch to assume that they gave her access to this software.

We've known, or at least suspected, for a long time that the govt, NGO's, PAC's, and orgs like this exist to influence and direct public opinion and more. I want to believe. I want to believe that its fake as fuck because if its real then it is some next level NKVD type shit going on right here in the US. The more and more shit comes out, the more and more I realize this election really is the last chance for the USA and western civilization as a whole to peacefully (mostly so anyway) alter course, even momentarily. We will all have some very hard choices to make.

Relevant "fiction" essay from Matt Bracken, I thought he was crazy until I read his stuff. Now I think he's fucking psychic.

Excerpt below much more at the link. This was written in 2012. The parallels are beyond fucking terrifying. Fiction you say? I hope so.

Bracken: What I saw at the coup

Matt Bracken Wrote:This is the first time in many years that I have put pen to paper for a lengthy letter, so please forgive my misspellings, poor handwriting or any other errors. I will probably do this in one go and be finished with it. I won’t need much of this new notebook. It’s a nice room, desk and chair, but really, no computer? I just wish they would stop the hammering outside. I need to focus in order to write well.

No one person could possibly expect to know the full truth about such a complex history, so near to its time. But I know what I know, saw what I saw, and heard what I heard. Now it’s time to set the record straight, at least about what transpired between some of the key players in the lead up to the recent events.

What I have heard called “the plan” began as idle office chat, nothing more. (Of course, not much chat is ever truly idle at the very highest levels of power, between senior presidential advisors.) The first time I heard it mentioned was over lunch with Dennis in the White House Mess, down in the basement next to the situation room. We were at a quiet corner table of the wood-paneled dining room, tossing ideas for the next talking points back and forth. Routine.

One of right-wing hate radio’s loudest and most poisonous voices was conducting an embarrassing public feud with our press secretary. The President had trapped himself in a seeming contradiction. The video and audio were both damning, and one must admit, very funny—if one’s goal was to make the President look and sound like a liar and a fool. The Youtube videos were getting millions of hits; the TV comics were not letting it go. We had been knocked completely off message, the optics were horrible, and our favorability ratings were collapsing at a crucial moment. (It seems like an ice-age ago when such trivialities actually mattered to me.)

I said something offhandedly to Dennis. “I just wish we could get rid of those bastards, once and for all.”

He stared at me for a long time, chewing on his second BLT sandwich until the Navy steward retreated from range, and then he said, “Actually, Jacinda, there is sort of a plan for that.”

“What do you mean, ‘a plan for that’?”

He explained that it was nothing formal, and there was nothing in writing. Nor would there ever be. It was just a concept he had come up with, along with a few other trusted colleagues and advisors. An idea. They had gamed out various scenarios. We could solve our problems with molding public opinion if we removed just a few dozen key right-wing opinion makers. That was the exact word he used, “removed.” That was last spring, and I put it off as a harmless thought experiment. I didn’t hear anything more about it for several months.

Then one day after another media talking points session in the mess, Dennis said, “Remember the plan we were talking about? You know, we really could do it.”

“Are you serious?”

“The timing would have to be just right. Mainly, it would depend on external events.”

Remembering the numbers from our earlier conversation, I told him that removing a few dozen of the worst reactionaries wouldn’t change anything. Other fast-talking right wingers would just take their places. Except they would be angrier than ever.

“Not dozens.” He paused. “Around two thousand, actually.”

The new number shocked me. “That’s not possible.”

“No, it’s very possible. We’ve studied it from every angle.”

Clearly, he knew more about a plan than he was letting on. Nobody was closer to the President than the two of us and his wife, and I had heard nothing from the boss, not even a hint. “You’re making this up. You’re not serious. Is it a joke, or a test? I wasn’t born yesterday.” I had to be careful. This was dangerous territory, when any spoken word could be recorded almost anywhere. Trust in a man like Dennis was a very slender reed upon which to cling.

“No, I’m very serious,” he said. “Here’s how we came up with two thousand. I was given a copy of a new law enforcement software program, one that Justice had for testing and evaluation. A refinement of the social networking analysis stuff. Data-mining, all of that. We put it on a clean computer, adjusted it for our own parameters, and made the list. We tried it at different levels from ten up to ten thousand. The optimal number for the greatest effect with the least initial disruption came in at about two thousand.”

I shook my head and said, “Dennis, it’s crazy to even talk about it.”

He continued with what, I saw later, was a canned pitch. “Do you want everything we’ve worked for to be lost? What if it came to striking boldly, or losing all of the progress we’ve made over the last fifty or a hundred years?”...

(10-12-2016 09:00 PM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  

Holy fuck, WW3 pretty much just started on the internet.

I have lost count of the amount of 'conspiracy theories' that became conspiracy facts with these rounds of email and data dumps.

If the US electorate follows CNN and the Pharisees to the polling booths, then to war with Russia, then we have to...

If any of this sticks, I have a feeling Podesta will be sleeping with the fishes.

(10-13-2016 11:54 AM)Rigsby Wrote:  This sounds pretty sinister:

RE: The cleaning company at LaGuardia

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8697

From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2015-11-16 23:00 Subject: RE: The cleaning company at LaGuardia

Well done, Schake!

*From:* Kristina Schake [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2015 7:56 PM *To:* John Podesta <[email protected]> *Cc:* Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]>; Sara Latham < [email protected]>

*Subject:* Re: The cleaning company at LaGuardia

That company better hope Hollande's Daesh catches on.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:47 PM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote:

Has the unfortunate name ISS.

-- Kristina Schake | Communications

------------------------------------

Sounds a bit Watergate send in the cleaners type of thing to me. But probably innocent.

But what does That company better hope Hollande's Daesh catches on. mean?

Intriguing.

ISS is a company based out of San Antonio. Couldn't find anything about Chicago, but they seem large enough to have operations there. They just landed a new contract with John Crane company, the largest subsidiary of the Smiths Group Plc, who tie in with JP Morgan based off quick research. link to news about recently awarded contract

My best guess to all this is the cleaning contract at La Guardia was up for bid, Clinton Network got it done for one of their 'companies in the funnel' for a trade off or more likely a kick back, and they are talking about ISS being too close to ISIS in verbiage.

There is a somewhat recent push by "global politicians" - Francois Hollande of France, likely referred to in that email- to refer to ISIS as Daesh.

Quote:D.A.E.SH is a transliteration of the Arabic acronym formed of the same words that make up I.S.I.S in English: ‘Islamic State in Iraq and Syria’, or ‘لدولة الإسلامية في العراق والشام’ (‘al-dowla al-islaamiyya fii-il-i’raaq wa-ash-shaam’). That’s the full name chosen by the organisation, and – when used in full – it’s definitely how they want to be referred to.

reference

Well fuck. I'm watching CBC news this morning and they have Gen. Hayden former NSA director on. Here is the way the conversation went:

hosts: So, russia is hacking hillary's email?
hayden: yes, and they are sending the docs to wikileaks for distribution
hosts: well then, thats not just a 'leak' thats espionage...
hosts: well, if thats espionage, we should treat it like any other attack on our country.. WITH MILITARY AND ECONOMIC RETALIATION...LIKE HILLARY HAS SUGGESTED?
hayden: ....
hosts: So, do you think that Russia has been emboldened to do this because the US hasn't gotten involved in Syria?
hayden: yes

These cunts. If Hillary gets in, she is going to start a war with Russia to compensate for her embarrassment.

The elites want the term DAESH to be used because "Islamic State" kind of puts a bummer on their "Islamic migrant invasion".

Trouble is, DAESH is harder to pronounce without sounding like an idiot, so the mainstream anchors stick with ISIS.

(10-14-2016 07:15 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  Well fuck. I'm watching CBC news this morning and they have Gen. Hayden former NSA director on. Here is the way the conversation went:

hosts: So, russia is hacking hillary's email?
hayden: yes, and they are sending the docs to wikileaks for distribution
hosts: well then, thats not just a 'leak' thats espionage...
hosts: well, if thats espionage, we should treat it like any other attack on our country.. WITH MILITARY AND ECONOMIC RETALIATION...LIKE HILLARY HAS SUGGESTED?
hayden: ....
hosts: So, do you think that Russia has been emboldened to do this because the US hasn't gotten involved in Syria?
hayden: yes

These cunts. If Hillary gets in, she is going to start a war with Russia to compensate for her embarrassment.

It's so surreal that I can't believe it's happening sometimes.

It's the year 2016 and we have people in high positions in the government as well as the military talking about waging war with Russia like it's going out to get a cappucino.

America has avoided going to war with Russia post WW2 up until now but because of stupid political bullshit conspiracy theories started by an ugly old white hag the U.S. might get into a nuclear conflict with history changing devastating consequences.

It's pure insanity.

Very interesting -- Donna Brazile has been shelved by CNN after the leak of the debate question. This now puts CNN in a position where they are now giving Wikileaks credibility.

Assange knows what he is doing. Start off with the smaller leaks that don't deliver a knockout blow but are easily provable so the media cannot question their validity.

Hit the hardcore leaks closer to Election Day?

Alright fellas, part 7 just dropped. Let's hope there is something useful in there. It's Friday and we need to get paid today because the media is trippin.

(10-14-2016 07:43 AM)komatiite Wrote:  Very interesting -- Donna Brazile has been shelved by CNN after the leak of the debate question. This now puts CNN in a position where they are now giving Wikileaks credibility.

Assange knows what he is doing. Start off with the smaller leaks that don't deliver a knockout blow but are easily provable so the media cannot question their validity.

Hit the hardcore leaks closer to Election Day?

I could give a fuck less about Donna. They should have fired her a long ass time ago. They only fired her because she got caught. They know she was a paid mole. Her being there was arraigned, like how the Republicans had George Will on that other channel.

How do you get your news channel to have "Our Sources Say"? Have paid shills like Donna or Will. CNN is only mad because they are taking a beatdown in ratings and they probably are under legit pressure for once. Tapper is a tool and I don't believe a word out of his lying mouth. Playing dumb like he did not know Donna was feeding intel. He isn't fooling me with that.

Julian better not screw this shit up. Donna is small potatoes. Catholics biting Podesta, is meh. The only thing that counts is Hillary losing. That's it. Nothing else matters and I am not convinced, he shares that goal with us. If he does, show me some proof of it, because it doesn't exist.

If he fails to do this, he won't see 2018 because she will kill him. Hell, we might all be dead as well. Russia last night went over bunker evac plans on public TV for the nearest bunkers. Alot is riding on Julian, he better not let the worst of his narcissism get the best of him.

^Yes that is a good point TK. Theories have been floated but at the end of the day we don't know his true motivation and who he wants to win...

So after Trump wins, what becomes the next course of action regarding all this information?

(10-14-2016 08:09 AM)MKDAWUSS Wrote:  So after Trump wins, what becomes the next course of action regarding all this information?

Too soon to churn too many mental cycles on it, but the following will happen:

1. The House will need to appoint a special investigator
2. The FEC will maybe open an investigation into CTR. If not, Trump will have to make the DOJ/FBI do it.
3. Maybe the IRS will investigate on a directive. Doubt it though.
4. The FBI and new DOJ head will conduct or reopen investigations(after Trump gets them confirmed by the Senate) (If he picks Trey Gowdy for DOJ, that one might go through very quickly)

Hopefully none of the good FBI agents that were on the original case will retire before the election ends, like they are threatening to do. I think they are waiting it out.

Trump, if he wants to be a complete and utter dick, can also request additional resources and go after MSM and investigate them as well, which is not likely to turn up anything, but you never know. He could also go after Soros and Saban as well, but that would be part of the FBI's main investigations.

I would wager this stuff taking 1-2 years to complete, depending upon how bad it is, and what they find.

Again, way too soon to really dig into this. We don't even know the full extent of how bad the leaks are.