Now we're talking. Back in the game please anon you better deliver.

Holy shit! I've been away for more than a day and I come back to this forum with shitload of leaks everywhere!

This morning, I took some time to read through some of Podesta's hacked emails via WikiLeaks. There is this one particular individual who was not pleased with the mess that Clinton & DNC made.

His name is Brent Budowsky ([email protected]), a one time U.S. Senate staffer for the late Texan Lloyd Bentsen. Some of his emails were fascinating because he gave this vibe of "I'm tired of defending HRC". He got fed up with her constant lying and lack of honesty. He look like he was about to give up!

Edited: Just found that that he is currently a columnist for The Hill.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3990


https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2301


https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3990


http://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6900


More leaked emails under the name of "brentbbi":
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6984
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1840
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1768
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1181
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/712
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/627
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/198

Additional Source
Leaked emails show how the Clinton campaign deals with the press

Part 6 was just dropped. Let's see what we can use in today's batches. Anything Trump's campaign can use is still good. That Catholic thing is starting to boil over and get worse. Not sure how much worse, but there are more Catholics coming out the woodwork pissed off and demanding those staffers and Podesta be removed or fired. Trump seems to have taken Karl Rove's advice as well.

About to bail but just saw this. Something something la raza. Don't have time to process it

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7536

Quote:Re: Hi

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2015-07-03 17:33 Subject: Re: Hi

Si si. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Huma Abedin <[email protected]> wrote: Good plan Thanks so much Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2015, at 1:43 PM, Amanda Renteria <[email protected]> wrote: Xochi, Lore, Pao and I are talking. Will be back in a couple hrs. Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote: Amanda can you captain a quick plan that we can discuss? On Jul 3, 2015, at 1:11 PM, Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]> wrote: Good idea Sent from my iPhone On Jul 3, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Lorella Praeli <[email protected]> wrote: agreed. On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote: > How much pickup with anything this weekend get? > If we think this is a dead weekend, my gut would be to get a week-long > plan put together leading up to La Raza. Call to action to the groups, > ask CHC members to write op eds, Univision interview, etc. then we need > to make more news at La Raza. > In any case, I'd rather focus on getting lots of pickup and organizing > around some news at La Raza than getting some one offs that don't penetrate > as much. > > > > On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Lorella Praeli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Alex, who works for Haim, called a few minutes ago. Same message- Haim > thinks HRC needs to be on the forefront of this and show that she's an > integral part of the community, lift up and be proud of the contributions > Latinos make. I shared what she has said and reminded him that all of this > happened in the wake of Charleston. He asked to call him and share our plan > and get input from them. let me know how you feel about that. > > Agree with all that's been said. Would be good to have HRC do a Univision > interview soon and say something to English media. > > Amanda, myself, and others can also be on SLM delivering the message. > Other surrogates can really hammer the GOP and make this about the *Party > of Trump*. It's about condemning Trump and the lack of R leadership. It's > not just his comments, but the policy implications that all the Rs agree > with. > > Espuelas is on Face the Nation (see below)- if we have a good relationship > with him, can we make sure he's seen what HRC has said on this ? > (Face the Nation": Sen. Bob Corker ... Sen. Amy Klobuchar ... Rick > Santorum ... Panel: Mike Allen, Ruth "The Truth" Marcus, Peter Baker and > talk-show host Fernando Espuelas) > > Other thoughts: > -Do we have anyone going on TV this weekend? > -Thinking about the early 4, there is the Trump International Hotel in > Vegas. Maybe there is an organizing opportunity next week. Would be good to > reach out to UNITE HERE. > -Online: Engage Latinos and give them something to do so we can galvanize > them against the GOP and affirm their values for the contributions they > make. And let them know that we stand with them--that the platform of HRC > is the platform that stands with Latinos and lifts up their contributions. > > > > *Rick Dunham (@rickdunham > <https://twitter.com/rickdunham?refsrc=email&s=11>)* > 7/3/15, 8:16 AM > <https://twitter.com/rickdunham/status/616943567848615936?refsrc=email&s=11> > An Hispanic GOP activist on Donald Trump: "It's a level of idiocy I > haven't seen in a long time." apne.ws/1eoJrch <http://t.co/X6wGAk2DeC> > h/t @AP <https://twitter.com/AP> > > > > On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Kristina Schake < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> July 13. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Jul 3, 2015, at 12:21 PM, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> What day is La Raza? >> >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Amanda Renteria < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We can't do enough on this issue honestly. So my answer is yes on all >>> of if - which is about resources. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Xochitl Hinojosa < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Univision was actually really happy about her comments and the tweets >>> coming from Amanda. They would obviously love an interview with her >>> whenever we're ready. >>> >>> I think she should proactively mention it tomorrow, but happy to work >>> with NH on trying to get a question in. Let me know what everyone prefers. >>> >>> On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:17 AM, Huma Abedin <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Haim hit all of us >>> Called me yesterday afternoon with same message. I told him she had said >>> something but he says he's only heard her talk about immigration. And if >>> Haim is raising it, it means he's hearing it from his Univision colleagues. >>> I told him I'd send what we had said so Kristina if you have that, would be >>> great. >>> Also told him about la raza but he thought that was too late. Do you >>> think we would get it as a question at the press avail tomorrow? Cause it >>> would be perfect opportunity. >>> >>> On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:14 AM, Xochitl Hinojosa < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I really like the idea of a challenge on the 4th and mentioning it in >>> the media avail- press will love it. It should also be in her speech at >>> NCLR. >>> >>> On Jul 3, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Kristina Schake <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Maybe we could issue a challenge on social on the 4th, she could say in >>> the media avail to get it in video on Saturday and hit it again with >>> Brianna on Tuesday. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Jul 3, 2015, at 10:54 AM, Jennifer Palmieri < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Adding Amanda and Xotchil. >>> >>> Haim is right - we should be jamming this all the time. >>> >>> A and X - can we think about what else we should do? Issue a broader >>> challenge? Do something tied to Fourth of July were we declared all equal? >>> Get CHC to do a letter? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Jul 3, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Kristina Schake <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> She has spoke about his comments, but didn't say his name. She also >>> condemned republicans for not attacking him. Want us to pull the examples >>> of when she did? She could hit it again because he's still out there saying >>> it. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Jul 3, 2015, at 10:39 AM, John Podesta <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Haim thinks we are under reacting to Trump/Hispanics. Thinks we can get >>> something by standing up for Latinos or attacking R's for not condemning >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: *Haim Saban* <[email protected]> >>> Date: Friday, July 3, 2015 >>> Subject: Hi >>> To: Robby Mook <[email protected]> >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> . >>> >>> All good tx >>> >>> John can share with you. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Robby Mook [mailto:[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 02, 2015 7:01 PM >>> *To:* Haim Saban >>> *Subject:* Re: FW: Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> Perfect. Let me know if you need anything from me! >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Haim Saban <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On the phone with him >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Robby Mook [mailto:[email protected]] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 02, 2015 6:50 PM >>> *To:* Haim Saban >>> *Subject:* Re: FW: Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> Just talked to John. He's calling you shortly. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Haim Saban <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Resending to your current email. Tx. >>> >>> +1 (310) 557-5111. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Haim Saban >>> *Sent:* Thursday, July 02, 2015 12:27 PM >>> *To:* 'Robby Mook ([email protected])'; [email protected]' >>> *Subject:* Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> Can one of you please call me at your earliest convenience? Tx >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Lorella Praeli > Director of Latino Outreach > Hillary for America <http://www.hillaryclinton.com> > 203.417.1436 > @lorellapraeli <https://twitter.com/lorellapraeli> > > -- Lorella Praeli Director of Latino Outreach Hillary for America <http://www.hillaryclinton.com> 203.417.1436 @lorellapraeli <https://twitter.com/lorellapraeli>

These leaks have been extremely interesting.
We found out how they operate and with whom they operate.
Unfortunately we also found out that the average person simply doesn't really give a shit until the media airs it.

What do the Catholics in America think about LGBT stuff? I know what the Pope wants, but there is even more stuff about a meeting where they discussed equality for LGBT in the Catholic Church

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7389

Quote:[big campaign] Catholics for Equality Invites You to A Catholic Family Conversation on LGBT Issues

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2010-11-30 20:35 Subject: [big campaign] Catholics for Equality Invites You to A Catholic Family Conversation on LGBT Issues

This is going to be HOT, HOT, HOTTEST hater on gay on hater action this town has seen since... well, ever! http://catholicsforequality.org/news_rel...gbt-issues [image: Take me to the Catholics for Equality homepage!]<http://www.catholicsforequality.org/> ------------------------------ For Immediate Release Tuesday, November 30, 2010 Contact: Phil Attey Phone: (202) 657-6097 Email: [email protected] Media Advisory [image: Andrew Sullivan] [image: Maggie Gallagher] *(Catholic Voices: Andrew Sullivan and Maggie Gallagher)* [image: E.J. Dionne] *(Moderator: E.J. Dionne)* Catholics for Equality Invites You to A Catholic Family Conversation on LGBT Issues Wednesday, December 8, 2010 8:30 - 10:00 PM (ET) Georgetown University Intercultural Center Auditorium *WASHINGTON - *LGBT issues are at the forefront of discussions in Catholic families, parishes and communities across the United States. Catholic families find themselves supporting their LGBT family members and friends, while at the same time are aware of the increasingly political role the US Bishops have taken against marriage equality, employment and military service, and immigration rights for LGBT people. This national "Catholic Family Conversation" will bring together leading voices on these issues to answer questions from college students preparing to return home for the Holidays. The event will be livecast online at catholicsforequality.org/georgetown, with a live chat for Cathlolic college students from across the country to pose questions and add comments. *Who:* *Andrew Sullivan*, Atlantic senior editor, political commentator, author, blogger *Maggie Gallagher*, National Organization for Marriage spokesperson, political commentator, writer *E.J. Dionne*, Washington Post columnist, Brookings Institute senior fellow, political commentator, author *Hanna Lomax-Vogt*, Georgetown College Democrats *Joel Knowles*, Georgetown College Republicans *What:* A Catholic Family Conversation on LGBT Issues Sponsored by the Georgetown College Republicans and Georgetown College Democrats *When:* Wednesday, December 8, 2010; 8:30 - 10:00 PM ET *Where:* Georgetown University Intercultural Center (ICC) Auditorium (get map<http://maps.georgetown.edu/interculturalcenter>) *Why:* To engage as a diverse American Catholic family in a civil discussion around LGBT issues currently being debated in U.S.politics. *###*

Twitter locked James O'Keefe out of his account.
Doesn't mean he doesn't have other avenues or that we can't spread this video's.
The latest from Project Veritas.
Democrat crowd discuss Hillary's widespread Executive Order gun bans if elected :

CNBC and The Clinton Campaign coordinated on questions to ask Trump at a debate.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7710

Trump's campaign needs to see this asap so that he can have even more proof that the MSM is crooked and is helping Hillary.

(10-13-2016 04:18 AM)Genghis Khan Wrote:  HCE, I have friends with PhDs in engineering from the best schools in the US who are sharing the 'russia is hacking US elections' articles. The smarter they are, the more they tend to fall for utter bullshit.

College or post-college education doesn't make anyone smart.

Your intelligence level is decided by genetics and early childhood education and stimuli.

College today is mostly indoctrination

Wise Old Brent has more piss and vinegar to share:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8698

Quote:From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2015-12-07 03:35 Subject: Obama addresses the nation

Quote:Here is the text of a note I sent to a very high level official of the Obama Administration, which understates my views. I would add that he could well do to Hillary Clinton what he accomplished with Democrats losing control of the House, the Senate, major governorships and state legislatures on his watch. Here is my note to the high level official, and if I seem bitter and angry I am because more terror attacks on American soil are coming: Tonight the president took up space in the Oval Office on national television to say nothing, praised himself for a job well done, promised to stay the course, vowed to do more of the same, was eloquent in saying we can win a war by bombing alone, subcontracted the prevention of any coming terror attacks on American soil to Middle East despots and Vladimir Putin, and to demonstrate the gravity of the situation about which he addressed the nation in the Oval Office, he then proceeded to the Kennedy Center Awards ceremony for his most important business of the evening. Throughout the day his White House was putting out the word that the purpose of addressing the nation was to educate the American people who do not understand what a great job Obama is doing against ISIS and in Syria, and to reassure the nation that the president is on top of events, and should not be worried after Americans were attacked by terrorists again on his watch. Perhaps he should be president of the Kennedy Center?

I cannot believe he types all these messages on a freakin Ipad. For a 60 something year old dude that is kinda impressive. I cannot post anything here hardly past 2 lines on my phone or tablets. I always grab my laptop or get on the desktop.

^^he's probably using a wireless keyboard.

I laugh at n00bs who don't edit their signatures to remove that "iPad" line.

Hillary presidency insurance: if you guys have any salty exes, now is the time to get on record that all touching & penetration was consensual, as I fully expect HRC to roll back the statute of limitations on rape.

(10-13-2016 09:15 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  What do the Catholics in America think about LGBT stuff?

I was raised Catholic and I can tell you that, no matter what Catholics tell you in public, in private they are disgusted by homosexuality. Traditional Catholics can put up with a lot of liberal bullshit but the homosexuality makes us physically nauseous. Even the bending of the gender roles is offensive to a lot of us. When I used to drive my devout Catholic grandmother to church before she died, we once discussed the prospect of women being allowed to become priests. She said, "The day that happens you don't drive me to church any more." And this was a woman who wrote columns for her local newspaper and had a very dominant personality.

Anyone seen this? It came out a few days ago.... I may watch it tonight
Rotten Tomatoes has 4% of the critics liking it, and 82% of the audience liking it

Here's what's interesting. I've worked for large consulting firms and also large public companies.

Not in any part of my career have I written long ass emails like that to discuss "strategy." One because it's a waste of time, and two because there's no open dialogue between two or more parties which is where the best ideas come from. My point is that this is coming from one source.

So the goal of these emails is to "dictate" what to do from what someone wants. No negotiation. Just do what I say.

Now, my biggest problem with this is that the country will be run this way under Hillary, akin to a dictatorship.

Thoughts welcome.

(10-13-2016 09:15 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  What do the Catholics in America think about LGBT stuff? I know what the Pope wants, but there is even more stuff about a meeting where they discussed equality for LGBT in the Catholic Church

Never mind what the Catholics think, they're going to get their 'Catholic Spring' whether they like it or not! Diktat has ordered it (or is at least seriously considering it).

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6293

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2012-02-11 11:45 Subject: Re: opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing . . .

We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up. I'll discuss with Tara. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is the other person to consult.

On 2/10/12, Sandy Newman <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, John, > > This whole controversy with the bishops opposing contraceptive coverage even > though 98% of Catholic women (and their conjugal partners) have used > contraception has me thinking . . . There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in > which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and > the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the > Catholic church.

Is contraceptive coverage an issue around which that could > happen. The Bishops will undoubtedly continue the fight. Does the Catholic > Hospital Association support of the Administration's new policy, together > with "the 98%" create an opportunity? > >

Of course, this idea may just reveal my total lack of understanding of the > Catholic church, the economic power it can bring to bear against nuns and > priests who count on it for their maintenance, etc. Even if the idea isn't > crazy, I don't qualify to be involved and I have not thought at all about > how one would "plant the seeds of the revolution," or who would plant them. > Just wondering . . . > > Hoping you're well, and getting to focus your time in the ways you want. > > Sandy > > Sandy Newman, President > Voices for Progress > 202.669.8754 > voicesforprogress.org

-----------------------------------

Catholic Spring


"democracy and respect for gender equality in the Catholic church."


"plant the seeds of the revolution,"

These people are megalomaniacs who are giddy and drunk on power. Enough said.

Even Iraqveteran8888 which is usually apolitical spoke the truth here

(10-13-2016 11:22 AM)Cobra Wrote:  Here's what's interesting. I've worked for large consulting firms and also large public companies.

Not in any part of my career have I written long ass emails like that to discuss "strategy." One because it's a waste of time, and two because there's no open dialogue between two or more parties which is where the best ideas come from. My point is that this is coming from one source.

So the goal of these emails is to "dictate" what to do from what someone wants. No negotiation. Just do what I say.

Now, my biggest problem with this is that the country will be run this way under Hillary, akin to a dictatorship.

Thoughts welcome.

I used the word 'diktat' loosely in my previous post, but had not seen your post when doing it. I think you are right. These people are all emailing each other back and fore with tidbits and 'he said/she said' gossip. But fair play to them, they have definitely created a lot of jobs for people who do god knows what otherwise.

I also found this:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8738

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2015-03-16 11:29 Subject: Re: Trafficking//Loretta Lynch

Yes, of course - silly me. Wasn't thinking of venue. Makes sense to me. (Although this Catholic crowd ain't your typical Catholic crowd!) >

On Mar 16, 2015, at 9:25 AM, Mandy Grunwald <[email protected]> wrote: > >

Good call.

> > Mandy Grunwald > Grunwald Communications > 202 973-9400 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kristina Schake <[email protected]> > To: Jake Sullivan <[email protected]> > Cc: Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]>; Huma Abedin <[email protected]>; John Podesta <[email protected]>; Jim Margolis <[email protected]>; Joel Benenson <[email protected]>; Mandy Grunwald <[email protected]>; Jesse Ferguson <[email protected]>; Robby <[email protected]>; Dan Schwerin <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, Mar 16, 2015 9:22 am > Subject: Re: Trafficking//Loretta Lynch > >

Should we be bringing up trafficing/choice piece at all to an audience of all catholics? Maybe we do Lynch/trafficing just in a tweet, and leave the Iran topper only in the Irish speech? > >>

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Jake Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote:

>> >> + Schwerin who can add something to the lunch. >> >> Seems like it's a dual message of confirm a qualified nominee and pass a crucial trafficking bill without trying to wage ideological war against a woman's right to choose, right? >> >> >>

On Mar 16, 2015, at 9:10 AM, Jennifer Palmieri < [email protected]> wrote:

>> >> Oh, shit. I thought it was a dinner. I would recommend she say something at lunch - is it too late to do that, Huma? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>

On Mar 16, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Huma Abedin < [email protected]> wrote: >> >> HRC on camera with Irish Americans for a lunch today >> >> On Mar 16, 2015, at 9:06 AM, "Jennifer Palmieri" < [email protected]> wrote:

>> >> Yes, need to do something on her and trafficking which is also hung up. She could also raise one or both of these tonight. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>

On Mar 16, 2015, at 8:52 AM, Huma Abedin < [email protected]> wrote:

>> >> She knows Loretta. Not an extremely close relationship and don't remember last time they connected. >> She was in running to be Spitzer LG years ago. Hrc wanted Leecia Eve, others pushed Lynch. Regardless, definitely a cordial relationship. >> I would vote for a tweet. >>

From: John Podesta <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 8:35:43 AM >> To: Kristina Schake >> Cc: Jim Margolis; Joel Benenson; Mandy Grunwald; Jesse Ferguson; Jennifer Palmieri; Robby Mook; Jake Sullivan; Huma Abedin >> Subject: Re: Trafficking//Loretta Lynch >> >>

Pretty sure she knows her, but not certain. +Huma >>> On Mar 16, 2015 8:32 AM, "Kristina Schake" < [email protected]> wrote:

>>> We weren't planning to, but with the new development think we should. We could do a tweet today. Does she know Lynch? If so, we could make it more personal or do it as a statement . Copying in Jesse too. >>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:55 AM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> We doing anything on this today? >>> >

-------------------------

I put spaces in there to make it more readable but I might have messed it up. See the original for accuracy. Don't forget you have to read it backwards as it's LIFO (last in, first out) order - so start from the bottom and work up to the top.

No idea what it means really. But I found it funny none the less.

Should we be bringing up trafficing/choice piece at all to an audience of all catholics?

Yes, of course - silly me. Wasn't thinking of venue. Makes sense to me. (Although this Catholic crowd ain't your typical Catholic crowd!)

[IDI AMIN CRACKING UP.GIF]

This sounds pretty sinister:

RE: The cleaning company at LaGuardia

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/8697

From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2015-11-16 23:00 Subject: RE: The cleaning company at LaGuardia

Well done, Schake!

*From:* Kristina Schake [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2015 7:56 PM *To:* John Podesta <[email protected]> *Cc:* Jennifer Palmieri <[email protected]>; Sara Latham < [email protected]>

*Subject:* Re: The cleaning company at LaGuardia

That company better hope Hollande's Daesh catches on.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:47 PM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote:

Has the unfortunate name ISS.

-- Kristina Schake | Communications

------------------------------------

Sounds a bit Watergate send in the cleaners type of thing to me. But probably innocent.

But what does That company better hope Hollande's Daesh catches on. mean?

Intriguing.

Watching CNN waiting for Trump, right now Michelle O is on.

"She (Hillary) withstood eleven hours of a congressional hearing..."

(Crowd cheers).

She lied and obfuscated for 11 hours straight!

^^^ For the love of GOD, stop watching CNN!

Just use alternative sources for news and entertainment. Don't give them your money.

The right has to get back to mass boycotts the way christian organizations used to do it decades ago. Just remove the religious element. It already started with Target, the remake of the ghostbusters, but we need to get more coordinated to really cause damage. The movement has to become so big and the executions so precise that a content distributor wouldn't even dare pull this shit again or face annihilation.

Once there are a couple of successful boycotts, you can then apply that same playbook to virtually everything, Media/Tech/Sport/Academia etc.

Michelle Obama hated Hillary before she loved her.

(10-12-2016 04:03 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  I'm a little stumped on this one. You guys have any ideas on what they meant on this?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/6008

Quote:RE: Thanks

From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2016-02-09 20:56 Subject: RE: Thanks

I am all in Sounds like it will be a bad nite , we all need to buckle up and double down

From: John Podesta [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 4:36 PM To: Steve Elmendorf <[email protected]> Subject: Thanks

Didn't think wet works meant pool parties at the Vineyard.

EDIT: Using some custom search queries there was a New Hampshire primary that day/night and Trump and Bernie won that night. That might have something to do with it.... I dunno.

Looks like guys on 4Chan and Reddit are going crazy over this being code talk about Scalia's death.

I'm not so sure about this, but Alex Jones and other tinfoil types might jump all over this like a dog in heat.



They are also pairing it with this email as well:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4774

(10-13-2016 12:44 PM)Menace Wrote:  Michelle Obama hated Hillary before she loved her.

She doesn't love her now. The Clintons and Obamas have so much dirt on each other that they have no choice but to cooperate with each other.