Forum home · Politics & War · search

The Hillary Clinton thread

📄 Rendered from the archive database (the original static capture of this page wasn't kept). Content is complete; styling is simplified.
Pages: 1 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 240
philosophical_recovery · 2016-10-11 08:21:00 · #3551
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5213

Quote:From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2012-01-04 19:43 Subject:

I just received a call from a close friend of wjcs who said that cvc told one of the bush 43 kids that she is conducting an internal investigation of money within the foundation from cgi to the foundation The bush kid then told someone else who then told an operative within the republican party I have heard more and more chatter of cvc and bari talking about lots of what is going on internally to people Not smart
CynicalContrarian · 2016-10-11 08:22:00 · #3552
Does Hillary Clinton "hate everyday Americans" ?
Is that what John Podesta wrote?

[Image: CufV9l4VMAAkrt4.jpg]
philosophical_recovery · 2016-10-11 08:28:00 · #3553
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4574

Quote:> On Dec 10, 2014, at 12:57 AM, Dan Schwerin <[email protected]> wrote: > > John, wanted to give you a brief update. Pete and his team continue to revise their paper with the goal of getting a draft to HRC by Dec. 17. If we can work it out, they will meet with WJC before then to be sure his thoughts are incorporated. And we're hoping you will be able to take another look as well. Also, we wanted to follow up with you on the question of what (in broad strokes) we can expect from the administration over the coming year or two in terms of carbon pricing and crude exports, because that will do so much to shape the landscape going forward. > Will let Pete add to this if there are additional questions to put on the table. > Thanks > Dan >


https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4694
Quote:From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2015-10-01 21:19 Subject: RE: Benghazi - paid media update

I am for IA and NH. I know the boss wants a national cable buy to reach the inside the beltway types, press and donors. But press will hate this. We will lose ground with them because of it. (I am still for doing it). Actual voters should see and see before the hearing. *From:* Robby Mook [mailto:[email protected]] *Sent:* Thursday, October 1, 2015 7:17 PM *To:* Oren Shur <[email protected]> *Cc:* John Podesta <[email protected]>; Jennifer Palmieri < [email protected]> *Subject:* Re: Benghazi - paid media update Let's def discuss when we review scripts but I think we gotta do this in IA and Nh. Our thesis is that our stuff doesn't cut through as well because it doesn't intersect w the crap they hear about her on the news. I feel like this is the kinda stuff we need to do to actually move numbers right now. At least worth trying this month. If numbers don't move then we can go back to plan A. On Oct 1, 2015, at 7:13 PM, Oren Shur <[email protected]> wrote: Just wanted to send a quick update on where we are following today’s HRC call: Ø All three TV firms are script writing, we’ll review drafts tomorrow afternoon. Research had pulled for us some of our best news clips. The trick, of course, is to connect Benghazi to emails in a way that’s credible. But we discussed different ways to do it. Ø The difficult part here is testing – if we want to ship something early next week, our testing options are very limited, and I feel like we really need to understand whether voters will believe that we can credibly conflate Benghazi and emails. But we do have groups tonight and tomorrow afternoon – so tonight, we’re testing some video clips tonight in the groups and this spot that the digital team mocked up: https://app.frame.io/f/2Kh530dn Ø GMMB is working on a more polished spot for tomorrow afternoon’s groups. Looking ahead to next week, I think we still need to resolve whether this is limited to a national cable buy or whether we’re really going into IA and NH with this (currently mixed opinions on team). To do the latter, we’d be pulling other spots off the air before otherwise planned. Please let me know if you’d like to further discuss any of this. Oren
philosophical_recovery · 2016-10-11 08:29:00 · #3554
[Image: Cuc4hYTWIAAANF7.jpg]
Blaster · 2016-10-11 08:30:00 · #3555
fwiw I read that to mean Hillary did not want to use the term "everyday Americans" in her rhetoric, not that she actually hated "everyday Americans." (Not that I care whether people are getting this wrong. Deliberate misinterpretation of far more obvious English has been a standard tactic of the MSM for a long time now.
Rush87 · 2016-10-11 08:31:00 · #3556
(10-11-2016 08:22 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Does Hillary Clinton "hate everyday Americans" ?
Is that what John Podesta wrote?

Well that's certainly what is about to be shitposted all over the internet.

Gamerecognized
philosophical_recovery · 2016-10-11 08:31:00 · #3557
Leaked Emails Expose Tight Link Between CNBC And Clinton Campaign

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-10...ton-fanboy
philosophical_recovery · 2016-10-11 08:33:00 · #3558
philosophical_recovery · 2016-10-11 08:33:00 · #3559
Ok this looks to be huge. Have to do real work now. That just killed an hour of my early morning.
Rush87 · 2016-10-11 08:35:00 · #3560
   
Handsome Creepy Eel · 2016-10-11 08:35:00 · #3561
Jesus, that bit about Muslims and Africans being "professional never-do-wells" was devastating. How do we make this spread to as many people as possible, since it's obvious that the MSM won't touch this with a 10-ft pole?
philosophical_recovery · 2016-10-11 08:36:00 · #3562
Twitter is flagging wikileaks as unsafe.

Holy shit am I ready for the happenings.
CynicalContrarian · 2016-10-11 08:38:00 · #3563
(10-11-2016 08:30 AM)Blaster Wrote:  fwiw I read that to mean Hillary did not want to use the term "everyday Americans" in her rhetoric, not that she actually hated "everyday Americans." (Not that I care whether people are getting this wrong. Deliberate misinterpretation of far more obvious English has been a standard tactic of the MSM for a long time now.

You're probably correct.
Yet if the association causes people to double take or the Hillary camp needing to waste time putting out a statement, it's of some benefit.

Besides. Even as rhetoric, it's probably not far from the truth.

That's why I put it as a question.
It almost appears too good to be true that she would in some capacity admit to that.
Even though she probably thinks it.
CynicalContrarian · 2016-10-11 08:40:00 · #3564
(10-11-2016 08:36 AM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  Twitter is flagging wikileaks as unsafe.

Holy shit am I ready for the happenings.

Al Gore - "Serial...?"
TravelerKai · 2016-10-11 08:41:00 · #3565
(10-11-2016 08:14 AM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433

Quote:I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion.

KATIE COURIC https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4836

Quote:Hi John, Well, I know you had a good weekend! We've been working with the campaign folks to reschedule my interview with Secretary Clinton. I wanted to write you about some of the metrics that we are getting and let you know through placement on Facebook we can guarantee 1.5 million views in addition to Yahoo engagement which has been close to 1 million for my political interviews. I'd also like to do a separate piece of business through social media along the lines of "10 things you don't know about Hillary Clinton" that would showcase her personality and has a lot of viral potential. I know there is a lot of demands on her time, but we have been waiting patiently to schedule something and I'm sure we've been driving the campaign staff crazy, but the reach and engagement will be significant and I'm very much looking forward to having the opportunity to talk to her. I have been assured the campaign wants this as well. Can you help make this happen? I'd really appreciate your help. Thanks, John. Look forward to hearing from you. Best, Katie

Something that probably goes deeper:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4818

Quote:Philippe, You got to stop this. The press is trading in rumors that can easily originate in their own newsrooms. If someone wanted to leak juicy tidbits, they have a lot more to work with than our press planning. If we are going to be at each others throats before we start, we are going nowhere. John On Mar 9, 2015 1:13 PM, "Philippe Reines" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Ok, this has gone too far. The email below is from Craig to Nick to me where someone knows an interview with Andrea was on the table. Seperately, Andrea just sent Nick this: "we are hearing news conference tomorrow?" ýThe Andrea part especially should only have been known to 10-12 people, 3 of whom are John, Cheryl & me.

That last one was a very interesting read! That guy Phillipe is currently Hillary's debate prep guy because his personality matches Trump the most! This dude doesn't work for them anymore, but they are still using him even today to prepare for Trump! HAHA
TravelerKai · 2016-10-11 08:52:00 · #3566
(10-11-2016 08:21 AM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5213

Quote:From:[email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Date: 2012-01-04 19:43 Subject:

I just received a call from a close friend of wjcs who said that cvc told one of the bush 43 kids that she is conducting an internal investigation of money within the foundation from cgi to the foundation The bush kid then told someone else who then told an operative within the republican party I have heard more and more chatter of cvc and bari talking about lots of what is going on internally to people Not smart

I think that was Jenna Bush she was talking too loosely to. Still trying to figure out who is Bari.
Jaydublin · 2016-10-11 08:56:00 · #3567
(10-11-2016 08:30 AM)Blaster Wrote:  fwiw I read that to mean Hillary did not want to use the term "everyday Americans" in her rhetoric, not that she actually hated "everyday Americans." (Not that I care whether people are getting this wrong. Deliberate misinterpretation of far more obvious English has been a standard tactic of the MSM for a long time now.

Yea and Donald Trump didn't mean he was literally running around grabbing women by the pussy...
Blaster · 2016-10-11 09:05:00 · #3568
(10-10-2016 11:15 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  2. I understand the politics of it, but does anyone else think this "OMG, Bill Clinton is a rapist!!" stuff just just adopts feminist "Rape Culture" narrative?

This is a case where the politics of it are very important. It's about Trump in the White House:

Donald J. Trump Wrote:Beauty and elegance, whether in a woman, a building, or a work of art, is not just superficial or something pretty to see.

Vs Hillary Clinton:

Hillary Rodham Clinton Wrote:Well, I have to say that I highly admire Angela Merkel. I’ve known Angela since the 1990s, she and I actually appeared on a German TV show together. I have spent personal time with her. She is, I think, a really effective strong leader and really right now the major leader in Europe, not just in Germany.



Savage · 2016-10-11 09:10:00 · #3569
(10-11-2016 08:52 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  I think that was Jenna Bush she was talking too loosely to. Still trying to figure out who is Bari.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bari_Lurie
Blaster · 2016-10-11 09:33:00 · #3570
(10-11-2016 09:05 AM)Blaster Wrote:  
(10-10-2016 11:15 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  2. I understand the politics of it, but does anyone else think this "OMG, Bill Clinton is a rapist!!" stuff just just adopts feminist "Rape Culture" narrative?

This is a case where the politics of it are very important. It's about Trump in the White House:

Donald J. Trump Wrote:Beauty and elegance, whether in a woman, a building, or a work of art, is not just superficial or something pretty to see.

Also, it's looking more and more like WJC actually did assault at least some of those women.

And then there's Kathy Shelton (who was not a WJC victim, she's the one HRC abused in court with lies). She is one of the best examples of what a genuine rape victim looks like. You read her story, you watch her interviews-- you know that poor girl was horribly victimized. Shelton talks about her experiences with a simple acceptance, tinged with regret and sadness, that comes from years and years of private therapy to cope with the physical and psychological damage from the traumatic experience. She is the opposite of an XoJane attention whore. She's the opposite of Mattress Girl. She's clearly a genuine victim who deserves support and sympathy.
C-Note · 2016-10-11 09:36:00 · #3571
The MSM will try to kill this story. One way to beat them is to highlight all the anti-Sanders stuff in the emails because Sanders still has many supporters in the media.
Rush87 · 2016-10-11 09:40:00 · #3572
Quote:From: Darnell Strom
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 3:13 PM
To: Tulsi Gabbard ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>)
Cc: Michael Kives
Subject: Disappointed
Representative Gabbard, We were very disappointed to hear that you would resign your position with the DNC so you could endorse Bernie Sanders, a man who has never been a Democrat before. When we met over dinner a couple of years ago I was so impressed by your intellect, your passion, and commitment to getting things done on behalf of the American people. For you to endorse a man who has spent almost 40 years in public office with very few accomplishments, doesn't fall in line with what we previously thought of you. Hillary Clinton will be our party's nominee and you standing on ceremony to support the sinking Bernie Sanders ship is disrespectful to Hillary Clinton. A woman who has spent the vast majority of her life in public service and working on behalf of women, families, and the underserved. You have called both myself and Michael Kives before about helping your campaign raise money, we no longer trust your judgement so will not be raising money for your campaign.
TravelerKai · 2016-10-11 09:45:00 · #3573
The Bushes and the Clintons are alot closer than most probably knew. W has his daughter(s) fraternizing and spying on Bill's. Bill and John have Republican spies to watch them. They must have something of an awkward relationship. One foot in different political parties, but they both have their other foot in various realms (The Saudis, Wall Street, Globalist Agendas, Foreign Policy is the exact same, etc.)

Bill caught alot of flak for trying to kill Bin Laden back during his sex scandal, for trying to avoid his drama (mostly from Social Conservative Republicans). From Reagan down to him they had the exact same foreign policy of arming the fighters in Afghanistan against the Russians. He tried to clean up their collective mess but failed to do so and ran out of time. Bush Jr fails to clean up the mess, and 9/11 happens. He sat there with a blank stare as if someone had royally fucked him over. The Saudis probably are the key to all this. Obama cleans up the mess and ties up all the loose ends for the most part then tries to shield Saudi Arabia from lawsuits. The Saudis in 2015-16 (maybe earlier) start diversifying their wealth and assets out of oil and into other things. American and Western Oil production (upstream wise) is huge now and the market is less influenced by Saudi oil now. (still strongly influential, just not as strongly as before)

9/11 may have been an inside job, but was it a Saudi financed inside job, instead of a Bush Administration/CIA inside job? Or another variation/mix of any of those groups?

It might take another 10 years or more, but there might be some stronger links as to why these guys protect each other so much instead of actually being separate parties with separate agendas and foreign policy. Blanket statements like "This is just standard US Foreign Policy" lacks substance. It's alot more to it than this.
Jaydublin · 2016-10-11 09:49:00 · #3574
^^^^ Damn Can anybody highlight the first and the last sentences? I don't know how to do that. We could do some damage with that one.
CynicalContrarian · 2016-10-11 09:52:00 · #3575
BenGarrison of [email protected] Cartoons with the new Twitter trend for the day:

#HillaryHates

Should resonate, cause everyone can think & see how hateful she can be.
Pages: 1 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 240