Delete, will fix post

FIX:

A sum up of most articles about Germany this graceful year of 2016:

(10-02-2016 02:11 AM)Pride male Wrote:  Is there any chance the Middle East can become a peaceful region first so the Muslims can be encouraged to go home? I dont know, put a Saddam 2.0 in place? A strong dictator to keep the radicals at bay.

Good question.


Unfortunately, the Middle East will never, ever experience true peace. I know, it is unfortunate, but...nothing can be done. We can spend trillions of dollars, or drops trillions of bombs to bring "Democracy", but one thing is certain.


People want to live either under a theocracy of some sort (Iran, Saudi Arabia...) or under a strongman (Syria, Jordan...). If you somehow manage to "persuade" a country to do elections...guess who will ALWAYS (!!!) win? Some Islamist figure who will make a country Islamist (and that means heavily policed elections, or none at all), or some "reformer" who will, after elections, issue an "Emergency Law" (thus becoming a strongman) - which means no elections (seen in Egypt and Syria). And what happens to the opposition? They simply...disappear.




Want examples?


Elections in Gaza (2006/7 I think). Who won? Hamas (Islamists). What happened to many Fatah members? Nothing...they suddenly started jumping of the buildings. For the lulz. Were they any further elections? Yes, heavily policed. You can vote for either Hamas, Hamas or Hamas. Which Pokemon you will chose?


Egypt in 2012? Muslim Brotherhood won under Morsi. What happened to the opposition? Nothing, they got bored and decided to disappear. Thankfully, the Army saw that Morsi was insane (he wanted to cancel Camp David accords, which means goodbye Sinai peninsula), and took him out. Now, a former General is in charge (who rigged elections). No elections until further notice.




So, the only way to keep order of some sort is to keep stongmen (kings, generals...) in charge . All things considered...they can keep the islamists at bay, by pure terror (that is sadly the only language Islamists understand. Appeasement will never work). It is not the best (or prettiest) solution, but the alternatives are far, far worse.

(10-04-2016 03:21 AM)Irenicus Wrote:  

(10-02-2016 02:11 AM)Pride male Wrote:  Is there any chance the Middle East can become a peaceful region first so the Muslims can be encouraged to go home? I dont know, put a Saddam 2.0 in place? A strong dictator to keep the radicals at bay.

Good question.


Unfortunately, the Middle East will never, ever experience true peace. I know, it is unfortunate, but...nothing can be done. We can spend trillions of dollars, or drops trillions of bombs to bring "Democracy", but one thing is certain.


People want to live either under a theocracy of some sort (Iran, Saudi Arabia...) or under a strongman (Syria, Jordan...). If you somehow manage to "persuade" a country to do elections...guess who will ALWAYS (!!!) win? Some Islamist figure who will make a country Islamist (and that means heavily policed elections, or none at all), or some "reformer" who will, after elections, issue an "Emergency Law" (thus becoming a strongman) - which means no elections (seen in Egypt and Syria). And what happens to the opposition? They simply...disappear.




Want examples?


Elections in Gaza (2006/7 I think). Who won? Hamas (Islamists). What happened to many Fatah members? Nothing...they suddenly started jumping of the buildings. For the lulz. Were they any further elections? Yes, heavily policed. You can vote for either Hamas, Hamas or Hamas. Which Pokemon you will chose?


Egypt in 2012? Muslim Brotherhood won under Morsi. What happened to the opposition? Nothing, they got bored and decided to disappear. Thankfully, the Army saw that Morsi was insane (he wanted to cancel Camp David accords, which means goodbye Sinai peninsula), and took him out. Now, a former General is in charge (who rigged elections). No elections until further notice.




So, the only way to keep order of some sort is to keep stongmen (kings, generals...) in charge . All things considered...they can keep the islamists at bay, by pure terror (that is sadly the only language Islamists understand. Appeasement will never work). It is not the best (or prettiest) solution, but the alternatives are far, far worse.

That is a fair assessment.

The globalists have thus 2 options:

1) Enforced secularization while keeping Islam alive - they could pull it off, but it might take a while

2) War and banning of Islam.

Remember - they want to rule it all and have obedient worker-consumers in their future One World Government Brave New World. So a strongman and a theocracy they control behind the scenes is only a short-term solution for them. Even the gulf states will have to go one day, when they have served their time. Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein were their puppets, they helped Gaddafi come to power and they dethroned him when he did not heed their orders of stepping down. The same happened with the Shah, but he was sane enough to go without much of a fight (for all we know, because he may have wanted to do something later on).

@Zel So Saddam and the Shah and Assad and all these Middle East rulers are (or were) aware of what the plan is by the Globalists?
And they either go along with it or face being ousted forcibly and perhaps killed if they do not adhere to their wishes?
I take it Netanyahu is fully on board with them and will be rewarded handsomely once he eventually stands down?

(10-04-2016 06:03 AM)amity Wrote:  @Zel So Saddam and the Shah and Assad and all these Middle East rulers are (or were) aware of what the plan is by the Globalists?
And they either go along with it or face being ousted forcibly and perhaps killed if they do not adhere to their wishes?
I take it Netanyahu is fully on board with them and will be rewarded handsomely once he eventually stands down?

No - it does not mean that they were fully aware of things. Otherwise they would be making certainly different decisions. Assad would not be fighting back and Saddam would have left. Though who knows - his body doubles may have died and he is having a good time in the Caribbean for all we know.

Also I am not saying that Netanyahu is truly initiated. Most politicians - even top-level ones know who is truly ruling and what the agenda is. As long as they follow that, then they get their backs scratched, get rewarded with power and money and the rest is irrelevant. I doubt that Netanyahu is one of the upper crust of decision makers.

In fact in Israel you have a strong interest free money movement and the issue was even discussed in the Knesset. Apart from Iceland this is the only country I know where the issue of interest free money creation by the state was even discussed. Of course nothing will come out of it....

Either way - I am certain that some of the dictators were just the usual useful tool, being aided when it served their goals (Saddam in the 1970s and 80s) and being dethroned when it was time to usher in the next step on the agenda (Saddam in the 1990s until 2000s). The House of Saud will follow along the same line.

As for many Israeli politicians - my bet is that most of them would not even be on board at what the true elite has in store for their country, but that is how the cookie crumbles.

I do not think that Bibi is their guy. The Globalists really did try to take him out - in 2011 (Housing protests) and last year (when they invested millions to take Lapid out. Google V15 as well).


Not that I defend him but...if he could oppose the Globalists whilst having much less money and influence, I can only imagine what Trump will do to their plans.

(10-04-2016 06:23 AM)Irenicus Wrote:  I do not think that Bibi is their guy. The Globalists really did try to take him out - in 2011 (Housing protests) and last year (when they invested millions to take Lapid out. Google V15 as well).


Not that I defend him but...if he could oppose the Globalists whilst having much less money and influence, I can only imagine what Trump will do to their plans.

I am too little versed in the matter. I just know that some countries certainly give the globalists way more opposition than they would like to have. Japan and some Eastern European ones have those politicians - Israel would not surprise me there.

You see it when politicians do things diametrically opposed to globalist plans - though it is not always a sound decision. But often I see them not even being aware of who is actually ruling this world. The Polish politicians are such bozos - opposing the migrant invasion, giving the poorest married couples with children added income, but then alienating womenfolk by trying to ban abortion completely or making 100.000+ people unemployed by banning Sunday opening hours. Those are the hallmarks of not real globalist opposition - but just the usual unaware fool at the top guided by smarter predators.

At least the Israeli and Japanese tribes have a massive nationalistic perception and want to upkeep their culture, so even for a fully-on-board globalist it is hard to bring in many changes fast, since so many people would oppose it.

An example: If Japan had started to bring in 500.000 Muslim immigrants, then not only the people, but also part of the government would have rebelled against it. Such a decision would not be possible there. Only the Westerners are brainwashed enough to even believe that this is a good thing. Christians are unfortunately can be manipulated by extorting their guilt complex which is part of the religion.

@Zelcorpion. What do the globalists have in store for Israel?

What Zelcorpion is talking about touched on something that occurred to me a few years ago.

A lot of people get caught up in the idea that globalism is a massive organised conspiracy, and others rightly suggest that such a hugely scaled top-down undertaking would be impossible.

The truth is that when you have as much money as the globalist elite have you don't need to issue orders. You simply reward people for acting in a certain manner, like the mouse that pushes the button being rewarded with a food pellet. That's why the elite don't spend much time punishing behaviour that goes against their wishes, because when you punish someone it gives them something to fight back against.

Nope. You just reward those that behave as you wish and more will inevitably line up to follow along. It's simple mammalian behaviour. Meanwhile the holdouts get left in the dust.

What will be interesting to see in the years ahead is if the elites are indeed running out of cash and credit or if it's truly just another psyop scam to keep holdouts in their bunkers hoping for a day of reckoning that will never come.

There is an interesting article about the birth rates in Israel.

https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/arti...inder.html

Quote:According Balas' latest report, 42 percent of Israel's first years either Muslim Arabs or ultra-Orthodox Jews. For the first, Israel itself as a Jewish state is a problem, a lot of the other would prefer to live in a case governed by rabbis theocracy instead in a liberal democracy.

In the future they could if their high birth rates are the majority of voters. The growth of the Arab population is twice as high as that of the Jewish with 2.2 percent. Ultra-Orthodox, the "Haredim" call (the righteous), have an average of 6.53 even children - three and a half times more than secular mothers with 2.07 children.

Quote:Nevertheless, 21 percent of Israelis live below the poverty line - more than in Turkey or Mexico. Most of them are Arabs or Haredim. Around 80 percent of poor children belong to both groups.

Beside that two articles about Germany. One shows how the mood is changing and the other one a well know problems with those arab family clans. When I look at my state, Bavaria we don't have those issues. It is very strange for me why the just let it happen in other states and do nothing. It seems to be by full intention. Over the years I can have no other conclusion.

https://www.welt.de/regionales/hamburg/a...rkehr.html

Quote:Many devout Muslim women wear a headscarf. On the road they have to increasingly take over attacks, insults and hostility in purchasing, report affected women in Hamburg.


According to the federal government, the number of attacks on mosques and assaults involving violence fell to Muslims in the first half of 2016. 29. In the second half of 2015, there were 44 incidents.


The women's representative of the Arab Al-Nour community, Olfa Elouardi reported of insults and "negative views", which must often endure as wearing a headscarf, in the S-Bahn.

Maybe the tensions against Muslims is at a peak still I see those Islamic communities critical. They are light the anti racist organisations. Always play the victim card to get more money from the government. There is now a big discussion going on about one SJW woman that did reach nothing in her life and just create a liberal Islam organisation. She is a muslim and now a host in many TV shows and talk about her version of Islam. People did call her out for the fake and show she did create. Of course all of her critics are racist and Islamophobic.

https://www.welt.de/vermischtes/article1...tmund.html

Quote:100 people surround two policemen in Dortmund

Its not direct mention in the article but in the video. Arab family clan. My time for "understanding" is long gone. Deport them all. Even the babies.

(10-04-2016 06:49 AM)Pride male Wrote:  @Zelcorpion. What do the globalists have in store for Israel?

Nothing of course. Globalists are jews. Israel are the globalists. There is nothing else, no second tier, jews are the final boss.

(10-04-2016 10:51 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(10-04-2016 06:49 AM)Pride male Wrote:  @Zelcorpion. What do the globalists have in store for Israel?

Nothing of course. Globalists are jews. Israel are the globalists. There is nothing else, no second tier, jews are the final boss.

Not quite.

First let me explain why not.

1. The globalists financed the NSDAP and knew what was about to happen. The goal was to entice the European Jewry to move to Israel - something that they tried to do for almost a century with little success. The holocoust and the millions of Jews dying in it helped it (irrelevant how many millions exactly died in it and under what circumstances). The globalists also refused to spend a few million on purchasing the European Jews from the Nazis (a rabbi was entrusted with the negotiations and he wrote a book about it - later realizing that the top Jewish money families were obviously fully on board with the war and genocide. They did not mind millions of lesser brethren being killed.)

2. Israel will utterly continue to be dismantled culturally in terms of feminism, gender-craziness, SJW-liberal-craze and the usual destruction going on. The link by Parzival of the orthodox Jews being among the poorest tells it all really.

Now - on the plus side for Israel. Yes - some globalists may have Jewish roots and the Jewish people are certainly useful future servants and participants in the coming Brave New World. The globalists also like the Chinese by the way who are industrious, obedient and materialistic while making little demands in terms of clinging to the old. Also many Chinese as well as Jews would not mind living in cultural marxism while having a capitalist economic system - also a good selling point. (Nevermind that both tribes have higher IQs, are strongly k-selected, outbreed little and only with worthy folk, are mercurial and competitive - also they have a strong affinity for their tribe. If they were also individualistic or rebellious like the Western Christians, then they would be dangerous, but they also cling to certain mental engrams which lets the globalists feel in ccontrol of them.)

But make no mistake here - Masons, Jewish folk and industrious top-level Chinese - they may feel initiated in some things and may get many perks, but they are dispensable. The globalist Eyes Wide Shut families have no qualms at sacrificing them all for their gains. (In fact they often did in history as with the Masons during the French revolution - while the very same Masons helped start it all.) They can always breed more of whatever they need later on.

From what I take looking at the info and the situation in the area I expect the following for Israel:

1) The bad: full feminism, gender crap, SJW marxism galore, old-school Judaism diluted with each year

2) The good: it is likely that they will take over the entire Middle East if a war comes with Islam. In fact I fully expect their military to prepare for it. Many Israelis will give their lives in that war, but the globalists don't care. Enough of them will survive to reign over the entire depopulated Middle East while Islam is banned. (By the way - the Chinese are destined to reign over Africa as their new colonial overlords (though it will be a less glaring form of colonialism, so the rebellions will be kept to a minimum.)
A form of Judaism will remain, but I doubt it will be the same - it might turn towards the very dark sect that the globalists seem to be fond of, but we will see. It certainly won't be the Orthodox conservative old-school Judaism - I have read enough statements from the globalists to know that they are not into that. Also the Eyes Wide Shut families are interbreeding with highly performing goy families - on th mother side as well which would not even make some Rothschilds Jewish.

So Israel is on the up and up just as China.

But ultimately you will only profit from it decently if you belong to the very top.

(10-01-2016 04:09 PM)Pride male Wrote:  A Christian Europe might have stood up to Judaism and Islam. Atheism and liberalism seemed to have destroyed the Wests religious unity.

Those who dont stand for something will fall for anything.

(10-02-2016 09:40 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Quote:Saudi Princesses partying on the #FrenchRiviera and ordinary saudi women at home

https://twitter.com/jo_seeker/status/779061916186533888





The Saudis are no different. Some Saudi I know once said that the royal family is not overly religious. They just uphold the system for power (and because they probably are told to do what their masters tell them to do or else). When their country is about to be color revolutioned, then they will pack up their shit and go live on the French Riviera with some 200 bio. $ in cash.

Cernovich wrote about how the USA if wanted could use propaganda to destroy ISIS:

Quote:How do you depress the morale of ISIS? There are two ways.

First you show them what and who they are fighting for. Here is Saudi prince and terrorism funder Alwaleed partying with women. If you fight for “Islam” and it’s leaders, you’re in a rat hole while he’s living the good life!

Cernovich used the same yacht pictures.

Some gore NSFW pictures inside
http://www.dangerandplay.com/2016/07/12/...s-edition/

I know this might not be related to the current Migrant Crisis in Europe, but rest assure that they have been trying to cuck/degenerate China/Asia/Latam for a while now but no success thus far in China, except for feminist/LJBT movement going on atm. But here is the thing....give them an inch and they will take a mile, and before you know it the country in on the path of degeneracy and cuck to oblivion with men taking a beating while breaking the family unit apart.

Why you think Zuck and many others has been going in hard in China? Its not business reasons, it infiltration.

This is a global issue and the word "progressive", "tolerance", "anti-racist", etc is used so people don't question it and if somebody does try to question it than you will be shame and shun from public light.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/31/asia/china...ensorship/

Quote:Hong Kong (CNN)New guidelines issued by China's top media regulator have prohibited TV shows that promote "Western lifestyles," adding to a long list of banned items.
According to the state-run Xinhua news agency, shows should refrain from content that expresses "overt admiration for Western lifestyles," jokes about Chinese traditions or defiles "classic materials."
"They should also avoid putting stars, billionaires or internet celebrities on pedestals; or sensationalizing private affairs, relationships or family disputes," Xinhua said.

Here's what else is on China's blacklist.

Cleavage

After "The Saga of Wu Zetian," a TV drama about China's only female emperor, attracted great viewership figures, it was abruptly pulled from broadcast in January 2015 for "technical reasons."
Nicknamed "The Saga of Wu's Breasts" due to the generous amounts of cleavage shown by the actresses' Tang dynasty period costumes, the show returned a few days later, with a lot less skin.
Censors ordered the show's editors to crop the footage to hide any cleavage, resulting in much tighter shots on stars' faces, and widespread outrage online.
China cracks down on cleavage at cosplay convention

Celebrity kids

In a move that might be welcomed by some US television audiences tired of certain reality dramas, China's censors in April banned the use of celebrities' children on screen, killing one of the country's most popular shows in the process.
Regulators said minors should be kept out of the spotlight to allow them to enjoy a normal childhood.
The ban came after the breakout success of "Dad, Where Are We Going?", a weekly series in which celebrity fathers took their kids on trips around China, and raked in millions of viewers in the process.

Drinking and smoking

A directive released in March slapped stringent new guidelines onto online shows, which have been steadily growing in popularity in recent years.
The "General Rules for Television Series Content Production" were drafted in order to "thoroughly implement (Chinese President) Xi Jinping's speech at the national forum on literature," in which he stressed that art must serve a social purpose.
Some of the first things to be hit by the new rules were shows that promote "smoking and drinking, fighting, and other unhealthy behavior."
China has severe problems with both smoking and alcohol. Around 68% of Chinese men are smokers, with one million Chinese people dying from smoking related diseases in 2010, according to The Lancet.

Homosexuality

Though China has come a long way since homosexuality was declassified as a mental illness 15 years ago -- with several cities across the country hosting gay pride parades and prominent LGBT celebrities making waves -- the censors haven't got the memo.
Guidelines released this year categorize homosexuality as an "abnormal sexual behavior" unfit for China's TV screens, alongside incest, sexual abuse and other "perversion."
"Addiction," a popular web drama about romantic relationships between teenage boys, was pulled in February, despite attracting almost 10 million views in its first 24 hours of release.

Time travel

Too many science fiction dramas "casually make up myths, have monstrous and weird plots, use absurd tactics, and even promote feudalism, superstition, fatalism and reincarnation," China's regulators complained in a March 2011 diktat.
Speaking to the Hollywood Reporter at the time, film critic Raymond Zhou suggested another reason the censors were so keen to kill sci-fi shows: "Most time travel content that I've seen ... is actually not heavy on science, but an excuse to comment on current affairs."
Indeed, the regulation said that in many instances "producers and writers are treating serious history in a frivolous way, which should by no means be encouraged anymore."

South Koreans

Following the deployment of the US-South Korean THAAD missile defense system last month, some of Korea's most successful exports may have found their fortunes waning in China.
A fan event in Beijing with South Korean TV stars Kim Woo-bin and Suzy Bae was postponed due to "forces beyond our control," the organizers said on Weibo. Two concerts by the popular boy band EXO in Shanghai were also canceled.
According to multiple media reports, Chinese TV stations were also warned to put South Korean projects on hold.
The alleged ban on South Koreans came after an edict issued by the media regulator in June imposed "strict limits on foreign-inspired TV programs in a bid to boost innovation of homemade programs," according to Xinhua.

(10-05-2016 12:29 PM)ChemicalFreezer Wrote:  I know this might not be related to the current Migrant Crisis in Europe, but rest assure that they have been trying to cuck/degenerate China/Asia/Latam for a while now but no success thus far in China, except for feminist/LJBT movement going on atm. But here is the thing....give them an inch and they will take a mile, and before you know it the country in on the path of degeneracy and cuck to oblivion with men taking a beating while breaking the family unit apart.

Why you think Zuck and many others has been going in hard in China? Its not business reasons, it infiltration.

This is a global issue and the word "progressive", "tolerance", "anti-racist", etc is used so people don't question it and if somebody does try to question it than you will be shame and shun from public light.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/31/asia/china...ensorship/

Quote:Hong Kong (CNN)New guidelines issued by China's top media regulator have prohibited TV shows that promote "Western lifestyles," adding to a long list of banned items.
According to the state-run Xinhua news agency, shows should refrain from content that expresses "overt admiration for Western lifestyles," jokes about Chinese traditions or defiles "classic materials."
"They should also avoid putting stars, billionaires or internet celebrities on pedestals; or sensationalizing private affairs, relationships or family disputes," Xinhua said.

Here's what else is on China's blacklist.

Cleavage

After "The Saga of Wu Zetian," a TV drama about China's only female emperor, attracted great viewership figures, it was abruptly pulled from broadcast in January 2015 for "technical reasons."
Nicknamed "The Saga of Wu's Breasts" due to the generous amounts of cleavage shown by the actresses' Tang dynasty period costumes, the show returned a few days later, with a lot less skin.
Censors ordered the show's editors to crop the footage to hide any cleavage, resulting in much tighter shots on stars' faces, and widespread outrage online.
China cracks down on cleavage at cosplay convention

Celebrity kids

In a move that might be welcomed by some US television audiences tired of certain reality dramas, China's censors in April banned the use of celebrities' children on screen, killing one of the country's most popular shows in the process.
Regulators said minors should be kept out of the spotlight to allow them to enjoy a normal childhood.
The ban came after the breakout success of "Dad, Where Are We Going?", a weekly series in which celebrity fathers took their kids on trips around China, and raked in millions of viewers in the process.

Drinking and smoking

A directive released in March slapped stringent new guidelines onto online shows, which have been steadily growing in popularity in recent years.
The "General Rules for Television Series Content Production" were drafted in order to "thoroughly implement (Chinese President) Xi Jinping's speech at the national forum on literature," in which he stressed that art must serve a social purpose.
Some of the first things to be hit by the new rules were shows that promote "smoking and drinking, fighting, and other unhealthy behavior."
China has severe problems with both smoking and alcohol. Around 68% of Chinese men are smokers, with one million Chinese people dying from smoking related diseases in 2010, according to The Lancet.

Homosexuality

Though China has come a long way since homosexuality was declassified as a mental illness 15 years ago -- with several cities across the country hosting gay pride parades and prominent LGBT celebrities making waves -- the censors haven't got the memo.
Guidelines released this year categorize homosexuality as an "abnormal sexual behavior" unfit for China's TV screens, alongside incest, sexual abuse and other "perversion."
"Addiction," a popular web drama about romantic relationships between teenage boys, was pulled in February, despite attracting almost 10 million views in its first 24 hours of release.

Time travel

Too many science fiction dramas "casually make up myths, have monstrous and weird plots, use absurd tactics, and even promote feudalism, superstition, fatalism and reincarnation," China's regulators complained in a March 2011 diktat.
Speaking to the Hollywood Reporter at the time, film critic Raymond Zhou suggested another reason the censors were so keen to kill sci-fi shows: "Most time travel content that I've seen ... is actually not heavy on science, but an excuse to comment on current affairs."
Indeed, the regulation said that in many instances "producers and writers are treating serious history in a frivolous way, which should by no means be encouraged anymore."

South Koreans

Following the deployment of the US-South Korean THAAD missile defense system last month, some of Korea's most successful exports may have found their fortunes waning in China.
A fan event in Beijing with South Korean TV stars Kim Woo-bin and Suzy Bae was postponed due to "forces beyond our control," the organizers said on Weibo. Two concerts by the popular boy band EXO in Shanghai were also canceled.
According to multiple media reports, Chinese TV stations were also warned to put South Korean projects on hold.
The alleged ban on South Koreans came after an edict issued by the media regulator in June imposed "strict limits on foreign-inspired TV programs in a bid to boost innovation of homemade programs," according to Xinhua.

HEADLINE: FREE SPEECH CRACKDOWN: EU orders British press NOT to reveal when terrorists are Muslims
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/717627/...nce-terror

Quote:In a sweeping statement, he said: “The Brexit referendum seems to have led to a further rise in ‘anti-foreigner’ sentiment, making it even more important that the British authorities take the steps outlined in our report as a matter of priority.”

The report lays into the British press and urges the government to “give more rigorous training” to reporters.

Ah yes, the Islamophobia phobia.

(10-05-2016 07:39 PM)ElFlaco Wrote:  ...
The report lays into the British press and urges the government to “give more rigorous training” to reporters.

...


Even the Soviet Union baulked at this kind of outright, in-your-face admission of how state propaganda was conducted.

Incredible.

From the you-just-can't-make-this-shit-up-file:

   

Jew gonna jew.

(10-05-2016 10:46 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(10-05-2016 07:39 PM)ElFlaco Wrote:  ...
The report lays into the British press and urges the government to “give more rigorous training” to reporters.

...

Even the Soviet Union baulked at this kind of outright, in-your-face admission of how state propaganda was conducted.

Incredible.

I also don't recall anything like this from Yugoslavia.

Discreetly sanctioning and/or threatening reporters that got out of line? Sure.
Openly creating "journalist training camps" and bragging about it? No way.

Why do (((they))) hate white people?

(10-05-2016 11:27 PM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  From the you-just-can't-make-this-shit-up-file:

I have Jewish ancestors as well as family now, but this is frankly ridiculous. Servants of the globalists through and through.....

But we should be frank here - 53%+ of Jews voted for Brexit. It is only the scheming ones at the top you have to be aware of.

----------------------

But here the fruits of those policies:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z4MD8YO4bZ

9/11 dress sold by Muslims in London:



--------------


http://metro.co.uk/2016/10/05/husband-mu...n-6174236/

Quote:Husband murdered care worker wife because it was ‘not halal’ for her to work with men

Read more: http://metro.co.uk/2016/10/05/husband-mu...z4MITQHf3o

Quote:A controlling husband murdered his wife because he couldn’t accept the fact she worked with other men.
Imran Khan, who considers himself a devout Muslim, stabbed his wife Nasreen eight times at their home with a kitchen knife after they argued about her job as a care worker.
Earlier he had text his wife, aged 38, that it was ‘haram’ (forbidden) for her to interact with other men, and ordered her to quit her job if she could not get a rota with only women.


Another text from her spouse read: ‘I have told you 10 times there are three people whose prayers will not be accepted by Allah – a fleeing slave until he returns to his master, a woman whose husband is angry with her, until he is pleased with her, and a drunkard until he becomes conscious.
‘If you don’t listen to me I get angry.’
He accused her of ‘playing games’ saying ‘If you go to men’s houses and lie to me I get angry.’

Read more: http://metro.co.uk/2016/10/05/husband-mu...z4MIWRQR5S

Nah - he should have first beaten her according to Islam, only later is killing appropriate, if she still refuses to listen to him. Mohammed would have done the same, so no big deal.

----------------------

But I fear metro.co.uk has been doing a transgression here - should have redacted all data that point to the man being Muslim:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/717627/...nce-terror

Quote:FREE SPEECH CRACKDOWN: Europe tells British press NOT to reveal if terrorists are Muslims

But on the other hand this was no terrorist - just a proper devout Muslim. Most of the hundreds of thousands of crimes done by the rapefugees are not terror crimes - just the usual crap when you let those people in unchecked.

Quote:The truth is that when you have as much money as the globalist elite have you don't need to issue orders. You simply reward people for acting in a certain manner, like the mouse that pushes the button being rewarded with a food pellet. That's why the elite don't spend much time punishing behaviour that goes against their wishes, because when you punish someone it gives them something to fight back against.

Exactly that.

If you have billions of dollars, politicians will come to you and ask for your endorsement (or, in more blunt terms, your money). And you, logically, will not give them a cent unless they promise to do something for you.



That is why, for example, various banks fund Hillary. They will give her lots of money, and in turn, she will bail them out if needed if she becomes POTUS.

Similar with Jeb!. He got plenty of money from the CEO of Johnson&Johnson company (according to Trump). We can easily presume what they asked in return from Jeb.



When we take this into account, for American voters it is absolutely essential that they vote Trump. He did not get any money from big corporations and thus, he can do what he wishes. He does not owe them anything.

How do these people live with themselves selling out their nation for dirty banker Skype money?

I often think back to my home country/community (which I can't mention for fear of being ID'd), for such a small community the demographic statistics are beyond fucked, completely emulates typical western big city trends even for a sub 50k population, the breakdown is something like:

7% muslim
3% jewish
90% native + other expats

That 7% muslim population causes 95% of the crime according to publically available police statistics. That 3% jewish community holds the majority of wealth in the form of big expensive law firms and banking branches. The richest skype (and richest person in this community) is a known sponsor of whatever the current locally elected party is, this is why although only comprising 3% of the local population, the skypes have their own Cynagogue, their own School and their own segregated gated community comprising of housing estates and shops.

Despite the above for the duration of my life, the government officials have become more lax on muslim immigration, continue to take the dirty skypes money and in turn continue to allow developments for their parallel society. Corruption in the West even happens on this small a scale, and no doubt the money been thrown around is pennies compared to what is getting used at the highest end of the political spectrum.