(09-11-2016 06:15 PM)Huey Wrote: You guys are overreacting. I didn't get a hint of superiority from anyone in that thread. As for the topic of the thread, who cares? So what if blacks as a group score lower than other races on IQ tests? It says nothing about you as an individual.
That's all good and well until they start talking about "regression to the mean" (read: individual intelligence is irrelevant) while insisting that IQ is 90% genetically hardwired and unaltered by nurture/environment.
Guys love to hold out hope that there's some sort of exception carved out for them by these people in discussions like this. There really isn't - you're all the enemy, no matter how excellent you may be as an individual. In fact, the more excellent you are, the bigger an enemy you may be. All of this is weaponized against you regardless of who you are - nobody gets a pass. They're not taking any prisoners.
(09-12-2016 06:28 AM)Sourcecode Wrote: http://www.returnofkings.com/93785/what-...-black-men
This is much more interesting.
He speaks in one breath in a very respectful tone for his "colleague" Donovan Sharpe and shows great appreciation for his perspective.
In the next breath, he insists that he'd consider it a red flag if he ever ran into a white woman who had been in any sort of relationship with a man who looked like Donovan. He says that such a red flag is justified because it might show that woman was genuinely attracted to men who looked like Donovan (not good!), had an independent/rebellious spirit that would allow her to disregard all of the possible social consequences of getting with a man like Donovan (very not good!), was willing to disregard what people thought about her because she wanted to be with Donovan, or some combination of all of the above.
In short, the author says he's cool with Donovan, but would consider any woman who associated with Donovan to be damaged goods.
At some point, if you're a black male in the shadows of the new "alt-right", you think you'd have to ask: are guys with views like that really capable of being friends? Or are they merely proponents of an ideology that is fundamentally hostile to me and only really intended to fully benefit them?
Food for thought.
(09-12-2016 08:25 AM)coverdoc Wrote: Would you guys consider being serious with someone older than yourself? What about a woman who was previously engaged or divorced? I know the golden rule of never wife up a chick who cheated on her BF, but how far removed does this apply? I mean in the sense of if she cheated on her first BF when she was 19, do you not consider her as LTR material when she is 27?
-CD
Older - possibly. Not much older. I've been more open in the past to 3/4 year+ gaps but I've become less open over time as I've realized that a) closer in age or younger is probably better for me long-term and b) those older women don't usually take a guy seriously when he's that much younger than them - women generally want guys their age or older. That being said, if I met a great girl 1 or 2 years my senior I could be open to it. I'm still young, so a yes is more feasible for me than some others here.
Previously Engaged - I'd be open to it. Would be somewhat dependent on why the engagement went south, however. I don't run into a lot of women with this kind of history at my age so I can't speak from experience.
Divorced - Maybe when I'm older.
Cheated on previous BF - Probably not.