I saw a picture somewhere on Twitter where the earrings changed, I can't tell from most of the pictures though. https://twitter.com/JerrySa57233934/stat...3049184256
Like I iterated earlier, I see NO secret service around 'her' when she emerges from the apartment -- SS not required to protect stunt doubles!
(09-12-2016 05:19 PM)budoslavic Wrote: Well, well, well...she broke protocol by ditching the hospital. She's obviously hiding her real medical condition and doesn't want the public to know about it.
Quote:The US Secret Service appears to have broken its own protocol with Hillary Clinton’s early departure from Sunday’s commemoration of the 15th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks at ground zero.
In a widely circulated video of the Democratic presidential nominee’s departure from the ceremony, Clinton can be seen leaning against a security bollard and then buckling and stumbling as her security detail helps her into a black van.
According to a former Secret Service agent who reviewed the video, the detail was clearly rushing and did not expect for Clinton to leave at that time. The former agent noted that it is against Secret Service protocol for the protected individual to wait for a car to arrive. In the video, Clinton is leaning against the bollard as a black van pulls up.
It is also very unusual for a detail leader to leave the protected individual’s side, as a Secret Service agent, Todd Madison, is seen doing in the video, to open the van’s doors. Opening the van is the site agent’s job, according to the former agent; the detail leader’s proper position is next to Clinton. The agent may have had little choice given the rushed nature of the departure.
The Secret Service did not respond immediately to a request for comment.
Guys, the body double thing is silly. Not only would she have to be a body double, she'd have to do an exact impression of Hillarys voice and mannerism.
It's not a body double, seriously, here is likely what happened yesterday: Hillary spent 3 hours with her makeup artist and wardrobe getting her ready for the 9/11 ceremonies, that includes all sorts of horror film type makeup to cover up her illness, as well as an oversized pantsuit to hold all of her medical devices, That would explain the reason why she is standing differently with her toes out, she has to because of her darth vader armor.
My honest opinion is that it is not a body double, she might not even have pneumonia, but something else entirely(that they are desperately trying to cover up)
I think it is unlikely she has a body double. She went to her daughters apartment (which is actually a clinic), got pumped full of drugs and made an exit to her ambulance. She then had to lie down immediately afterwards.
I'm the local pinko socialist, I say Dems should run Bernie- proven populist over decades,voted against Iraq war from the beginning.
Hillary should reconstitute as well as possible so she looks like she can run competently, come out with Bernie and announce that for the good of the country beating Trump is more important than the Bernie/Hillary difference.
He's a legit populist and has tons of experience in government, Mayor, US Senator. He will give those who consider themselves "conservative" the type of hilarious conniptions Trump gives us pinkos.
He is--sorry guys--far more articulate than Trump. I'm actually an immigration hawk, but Trump has already fallen in line with lowering taxes on the rich so I'd rather see Bernie in power.
From a theatre POV, the debates will be a lot of fun, Hillary totally lacks charisma and is a really boring speaker.
Quote:I think it is unlikely she has a body double. She went to her daughters apartment (which is actually a clinic), got pumped full of drugs and made an exit to her ambulance. She then had to lie down immediately afterwards.
You're right this is the other alternative to the body double: some amazing drugs and health technology to resuscitate and give strength to her again.
If so, they are only attempting to cheat death by killing their host. These drugs must be some very powerful stimulants and that cannot be good for her overall health system. The "cure" could easily be as bad as the disease.
(09-12-2016 07:53 PM)iknowexactly Wrote: I'm the local pinko socialist, I say Dems should run Bernie- proven populist over decades,voted against Iraq war from the beginning.
Hillary should reconstitute as well as possible so she looks like she can run competently, come out with Bernie and announce that for the good of the country beating Trump is more important than the Bernie/Hillary difference.
He's a legit populist and has tons of experience in government, Mayor, US Senator. He will give those who consider themselves "conservative" the type of hilarious conniptions Trump gives us pinkos.
He is--sorry guys--far more articulate than Trump. I'm actually an immigration hawk, but Trump has already fallen in line with lowering taxes on the rich so I'd rather see Bernie in power.
From a theatre POV, the debates will be a lot of fun, Hillary totally lacks charisma and is a really boring speaker.
Why are socialists so obsessed with taxing the rich? Taxing the rich too highly always has the opposite effect that it intends to have, and that is that rich people eventually leave and the government actually collects less money than before increasing the tax rates.
Hollande, President of France, increased the taxes for the rich and several rich people left France for other European countries, including Russia and my home country Belgium, which is funny because our taxes are also disgustingly high. There were up to 10.000 rich French people (or should I call them fiscal refugees?) that moved to our country after Hollande got elected, resulting in a €17 billion loss for France. Gerard Depardieu is the most famous example, he eventually moved to Russia after first trying in Belgium.
Quote:More minor health problems and generally poorer working conditions may be to blame for a Finnish study's findings that women are about 50 percent more likely to take a few sick days off from work compared to their male counterparts.
Researchers at the University of Helsinki in Finland studied periods of sick leave among 5,470 female and 1,464 male municipal workers between 2002 and 2005. The employees, all of whom were between 40 and 60 years old, were also asked about their working lives and general health.
Results showed that female employees reported more physical health problems, physical work demands, and work fatigue than male employees.
Moreover, women were 46 percent more likely than men to call in sick from work for a few days. However, researchers found no statistically significant gender difference in the amount of long-term sick leave taken from work.
Although researchers asked the study participants about family-related factors which might cause an employee to take short-term sick leave from work, they found that the effects of family-related factors on sickness absence from work were minimal. After adjusting for family-related factors, self-reported chronic disease, and working conditions, researchers found that women were still about one-third more likely to take short-term sick leave from work which was certified by a doctor.
"It's hard to give a take home message for this study, but there a few things that you cannot take away from it," explained Laaksonen. "Because our doesn't show that working conditions would be an important factor or home-related problems would play an important role in affecting the number of sick days a person takes from work."
But despite the fact that the researchers wrote in the study's report that there were "no gender differences" in responsiveness to health problems and family-related factors had only a "minimal effect" on sickness absence from work, many experts believe these two factors could at least partially explain gender differences in the amount of sick days taken from work in the U.S.
"This is consistent with my experience," said Dr. Randall Longenecker, assistant dean for rural medical education at the Ohio State University College of Medicine. But despite the study's finding that women and men react no differently to illness, Longenecker believes this is one of the primary reasons women take more sick days from work than men in the U.S.
"I suspect it is related to the same reason that women are more likely to seek medical care for illness," Longenecker said. "In our culture, men are much more likely to use denial as a defense mechanism generally, and are less likely to acknowledge illness specifically."
Or perhaps men know instinctively that they won't be granted a pussy pass and that they can't afford to fail as a provider, whereas, women will and women can.
Quote:But perhaps the most culturally inconsistent finding of the study was that family-related issues failed to explain the excess of work absences among female workers.
According to data from the U.S. Labor Department released last November, both married and unmarried women with children report a higher rate of absences from work than those without children. However, Wilwerding believes this statistic provides more evidence for the need to provide working mothers with greater support in the workplace.
"As a society, we need to support our mothers, provide more flexible work schedules to accommodate the necessary activities of motherhood, provide decent child care, fair wages, comprehensive health care and adequate paid leave," Wilwerding said.
[/u]Putting aside political considerations for the moment, its obvious that Clinton is unfit for the Presidency. Her health issues have the potential to be a national security concern. She is not fit for high office. The job of the Presidency is one that will put her under incredible pressures and stress and it will put her in a position where she will have to make life and death decisions that can have a drastic impact on many people.
This is something that I believe a lot of people are going to be taking a very good hard look at. Her episode yesterday puts her in a very dangerous and compromising position. The mainstream media is covering for her big time. However, the video that emerged yesterday completely blows the lid on their cover. They can no longer claim that she was just suffering from allergies and now pneumonia. She has other medical issues that they are covering up. The Democratic Party has to be in a serious panic about this.
(09-12-2016 08:05 PM)Samseau Wrote: These drugs must be some very powerful stimulants and that cannot be good for her overall health system. The "cure" could easily be as bad as the disease.
Yeah, it's the coke she got from Bill's brother Roger.
I'm not saying that the latest "Hillary Clinton" appearance was a body double, but something looks a bit different about the miraculously recovered version. And frankly, it's going to be a big disappointment to everyone if it turns out that the first fembots to reach the market were constructed on the model of Hillary Clinton rather than Liz Hurley, as we'd all anticipated.
To be honest, something about the shape of the woman's body immediately struck me as "off". Precisely what, I don't know, but my immediate subconscious reaction was "who is that?" She's a little too structurally squatty, as opposed to merely overweight like Hillary.