Post: #126

(08-25-2016 05:52 PM)Irenicus Wrote:  Damn Roosh. My beard (smaller than yours) attracted the attention of the DHS when I was traveling to the US - I am not joking .

Did you experience the same?

No I don't have any problems at all... they use good lube during the anal cavity search.

Post: #127

(08-25-2016 03:42 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  ^
So in a weeks time when the public at large have forgotten about Alex Jones & the Alt Right & what not (cause they didn't really get it the first time).
All the while Trump continues to do well.
Then what?
Is she going to call him racist again...?

Does she and her fellow traveling media ever stop calling him a racist?

Post: #128

pundits are coming out on this one. I watched the PBS news hour and they had two cuck faggots talking about the 'alt right'. One guy was from the washington post and looked like a pedophile and the other guy was from...I can't remember...but was bill Kristol's son in law. So, totally unbiased.

They threw out the usual talking points, that the alt right is racist AND sexist AND connected to the men's rights movement. The Bill Kristol cuck was also worried that the alt right would destroy traditional conservatives. So true, fuck the cucks.

This is a limp wristed attack, like an ineffective meetup outrage.

Post: #129

(08-25-2016 06:41 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  They threw out the usual talking points, that the alt right is racist AND sexist AND connected to the men's rights movement. The Bill Kristol cuck was also worried that the alt right would destroy traditional conservatives. So true, fuck the cucks.

"Traditional conservatives"... the ones that start wars against countries that are no threat to the United States for the benefit of their donors, the ones that put corporations first instead of the people, the ones that constantly suck Israel's dick, the ones that don't have a backbone and are just controlled opposition for the Democrats.

Yes the "Traditional conservatives" need to be destroyed.

Post: #130

What is the new over/under on Hillary's next public appearance?

Post: #131

(08-25-2016 02:34 PM)Valentine Wrote:  Someone just shouted "Pepe!" as soon as she said Alt-Right

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/86560682

(archive if deleted: http://archive.is/EwaO8)

This guy had to have been the guy...

search for post 86568852 that's when the first realization that Pepe was just shouted gets mentioned. Good times.

Post: #132

Alex went in on her. Popcorn is needed to watch this one.

Post: #133

(08-25-2016 02:23 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(08-25-2016 02:21 PM)Polo Wrote:  Low energy! Even more so than her usual speeches.

I can feel sperm dying listening to her.

At least you can generate new sperm.

Hillary's eggs are gone forever.

Post: #134

The attack on Alex was laughable, he never actually said the Sandy Hook thing never happened he just investigated it. On 9/11 - the 28 pages proved there was a cover up.

I think Trump might be on his show tomorrow -
Infowars.com/show if you guys want to check it out starting 12 pm et - should be an interesting response.

Post: #135

This is the twitter account of the hero of the people who yelled out "pepe" in the Hillary rally. He also yelled "infowars.com" also. He was there to periscope the rally to have live visual proof of what was actually going on there. Love how people are following what Mike is doing.

https://twitter.com/SeanLewandowski

Post: #136

Breitbard reporter asks Hillary supporters outside the Reno venue, what their thoughts are about the alt-right.

Post: #137

^@2:16 I think "oh, a young white male of who's not over or under-weight. This'll be interesting."

@2:20 (hears voice) "Fag..."

Post: #138

Re: Alt Right.

"They're not reasonable anymore."

Ha!

Post: #139

This speech... Welp, for the sheeple, I think might be far more effective than damaging. Yes, she brings up the Alt Right and Breitbart, but how many are actually going to go online and do serious research?

After all the super negative exposure Roosh got, did that actually affect his sales one way or another? I believe he said, but I can't recall. Anyhow, I think bluepill moderates, nominal and uneducated conservatives/republicans... This might be more persuasive than not.

Post: #140

I haven't read the thread, but I just wanted to say, fuck Hillary.

Post: #141

(08-26-2016 12:50 AM)Tytalus Wrote:  This speech... Welp, for the sheeple, I think might be far more effective than damaging. Yes, she brings up the Alt Right and Breitbart, but how many are actually going to go online and do serious research?

After all the super negative exposure Roosh got, did that actually affect his sales one way or another? I believe he said, but I can't recall. Anyhow, I think bluepill moderates, nominal and uneducated conservatives/republicans... This might be more persuasive than not.

@Cernovich 8h
"Data tell the truth of paranoid Hillary's speech today. None of the names she mentioned trended on Twitter afterwards. She is losing."

Post: #142

(08-26-2016 01:05 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 12:50 AM)Tytalus Wrote:  This speech... Welp, for the sheeple, I think might be far more effective than damaging. Yes, she brings up the Alt Right and Breitbart, but how many are actually going to go online and do serious research?

After all the super negative exposure Roosh got, did that actually affect his sales one way or another? I believe he said, but I can't recall. Anyhow, I think bluepill moderates, nominal and uneducated conservatives/republicans... This might be more persuasive than not.

@Cernovich 8h
"Data tell the truth of paranoid Hillary's speech today. None of the names she mentioned trended on Twitter afterwards. She is losing."

I mean it could very well be. Any stats on the tv viewership size of the speech? It seems often only diehards watch full speeches like this to begin with. I wonder how the media will run with it over the next few days.

I checked the youtube #'s, 110k viewers with ~10,500 dislikes and only ~350 likes. I bet half of the views are people who identify as alt-right to begin with.

Post: #143

(08-26-2016 02:24 AM)Tytalus Wrote:  I checked the youtube #'s, 110k viewers with ~10,500 dislikes and only ~350 likes. I bet half of the views are people who identify as alt-right to begin with.

Where did you get that number? I see under 28k viewers on her version of the speech (YouTube Hillary Clinton Channel).

She has her own channel which pulls up #1 for her on YouTube and she only gets 28k viewers after the speech is delayed well into many people's off-work hours.

SAD!

This is the video I'm talking about (don't click it, don't give her more views, just for Tytalus to reference):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_soeyHVrawY

EDIT: Also, Roosh's beard for Trump's Pepe Secretary.

Post: #144

Post: #145

(08-25-2016 09:14 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  



Alex went in on her. Popcorn is needed to watch this one.

I'm starting to come to the realization that people tune in to watch Alex Jones not because they agree with all of the theories and ideas he is throwing out, but because he is more of a showman and wacky, high energy entertainer. He always seems sincere about what he is talking about, I'd be disappointed if he ever wrote some sort of tell all biography that it was all just an act and to get attention and he never really thought there was any sort of conspiracy of 9/11(or any other example).

Post: #146

Alt-right article on BBC: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-37021991

Post: #147

I'm really annoyed that I don't see a "fact checking" of Hillary's speech yesterday. Oh they'll drop everything in a heartbeat to correct any syllable that comes out of Trump's mouth, but Hillary maligns Nigel Farage, brings in a ludicrous (and hilariously wrong) linking of Putin to the Alt Right, and more generally-maligning statements and from the peanut gallery? Absolutely nothing.

Shit, I've been following Nigel Farage and each one of her three "examples" against him I know would be pants-on-fire on Politifact, or "four Pinnochios" on Washington Post. Nothing from either of them - but WP has a fact checking of Trump's critique of the AP Clinton Foundation news story, of course.

Post: #148

(08-26-2016 12:06 AM)Lizard King Wrote:  Breitbard reporter asks Hillary supporters outside the Reno venue, what their thoughts are about the alt-right.

It's fucking frightening to see & hear these ignorant sheeple. Damn, there's a lot of truly ignorant fucktards in existence. I'll stop there.

Post: #149

(08-26-2016 08:07 AM)YossariansRight Wrote:  It's fucking frightening to see & hear these ignorant sheeple. Damn, there's a lot of truly ignorant fucktards in existence. I'll stop there.

Rather amusing is it not?
They'll decry Trump cause he's 'nasty' or 'raciss!'.

Yet they'll gladly queue in hot sun for two hours outside (at least), wait a further hour or so inside.
Then sit & cheer a decrepit old woman.
All the while, she lies & spits hyperbole directly to their faces.

Post: #150

(08-26-2016 08:13 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(08-26-2016 08:07 AM)YossariansRight Wrote:  It's fucking frightening to see & hear these ignorant sheeple. Damn, there's a lot of truly ignorant fucktards in existence. I'll stop there.

Rather amusing is it not?
They'll decry Trump cause he's 'nasty' or 'raciss!'.

Yet they'll gladly queue in hot sun for two hours outside (at least), wait a further hour or so inside.
Then sit & cheer a decrepit old woman.
All the while, she lies & spits hyperbole directly to their faces.

"Useful idiots" is a perfect description/characterization of them.