Bill Maher is a dumb ass. They all think Clinton is going to go cunt factor 12 on Republicans to push some kind of liberal/progressive agenda. She'll be that much of a cunt, but it will be to load the pockets of the Clinton Foundation. The Clintons are a prime example of why you should ignore what a person says, and focus on what they do.
I don't know what would be the hardest part about being a guest on Maher's show: having to suffer the ideologues you're forced to debate, enduring the sycophantic applause of the granola fag audience, or mustering the ability to feign cackles at Bill's painfully unfunny "new rules."
Quote:Melbourne (AFP) - An Australian mural of US presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in a revealing, stars and stripes swimsuit may be taken down, after it has reportedly been deemed offensive.
The creator of the painting, the street artist who goes by the name Lushsux and who has also painted murals of the likes of Donald Trump and Kim Kardashian, branded calls to remove it "pathetic".
The provocative mural is on the wall of a small business in the Melbourne suburb of Footscray, and reports say the business has been asked by the local Maribyrnong Council to remove it.
"We believe it is offensive because of the depiction of a near-naked woman, not on the basis of disrespect to Hillary Clinton, in accordance with the Graffiti Prevention Act 2007," the council's chief executive Stephen Wall told Fairfax Media on Friday.
I'm watching Red Eye on Fox News right now. They were talking about how bad Hillary is at public speaking. They mentioned:
1. Her bobble head.
2. Crazy eyes.
3. They said her voice could set off volcanic activity in the south pacific because it's so shrill.
4. Her speaking cadence is about the same as a computer automated translator.
Personally I think Crazy Eyes Clinton has a nice ring to it.
The Koch's have been public enemy #1 in the eyes of the Democrats for some time now. But now that the Koch's are effectively supporting her, I wonder how the Democrats will rationalize this?
(07-30-2016 10:26 PM)porscheguy Wrote: I'm watching Red Eye on Fox News right now. They were talking about how bad Hillary is at public speaking. They mentioned:
1. Her bobble head.
2. Crazy eyes.
3. They said her voice could set off volcanic activity in the south pacific because it's so shrill.
4. Her speaking cadence is about the same as a computer automated translator.
Personally I think Crazy Eyes Clinton has a nice ring to it.
Particularly because if it caught on it would get inside her head, no pun intended.
Someone tells you you've got crazy eyes. Will trying NOT to have crazy eyes make it worse. It well might.
The Koch's have been public enemy #1 in the eyes of the Democrats for some time now. But now that the Koch's are effectively supporting her, I wonder how the Democrats will rationalize this?
They won't care. They don't have morals they just hate Republicans.
All those people against the Iraq War during Bush? Not anymore.
What about the Wall Street bailouts? Doesn't matter, no Republican should be in the White House.
These people don't have any moral guidance, they're just tribalistic hate mongers. That's why when people say Trump needs to bridge the gap to get votes is complete bullshit.
These people have shown their true colors, repeatedly. And those colors are stabbing you in the back to get their way, whenever possible.
You will notice that the militant sjw democrats don't really give a crap about whether they'll get a chicken in every pot. Talk about free education or welfare for single mothers and their eyes glaze over.
The second someone says "and we're going to punish so and so..." then BANG, they sit bolt upright and start frothing at the mouth like attack dogs that'd just heard someone rattling the gate. BLM in particular are the worst for this. They don't even have any definable demands because for them the fight is the prize, not the change it would bring.
There is no point in trying to win over those sorts. Unless you promise them the blood of their enemies then they will never be satiated.
(07-31-2016 08:30 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote: ^This here.
You will notice that the militant sjw democrats don't really give a crap about whether they'll get a chicken in every pot. Talk about free education or welfare for single mothers and their eyes glaze over.
The second someone says "and we're going to punish so and so..." then BANG, they sit bolt upright and start frothing at the mouth like attack dogs that'd just heard someone rattling the gate. BLM in particular are the worst for this. They don't even have any definable demands because for them the fight is the prize, not the change it would bring.
There is no point in trying to win over those sorts. Unless you promise them the blood of their enemies then they will never be satiated.
This is why the cuck class will lose every time. They have no understanding of their opposition. They are invited to dinner by cannibals.
Assange continues to lay the hurt on the Clinton campaign. If there ever was proof of Trump riding on divine mandate, I'd say the WikiLeaks on the DNC may the top contender.
Chuck Todd, who is mentioned in many of the emails leaked and is revealed to be a total corporate whore who does whatever his masters in the Democratic Party ask of him, shamelessly tries to make Assange reveal who leaked the emails and if indeed Russia was behind the hack.
Assange refuses to budge even an inch, and calmly states that WikiLeaks takes pride in releasing 100% true information, and that there can be no question that the DNC rigged the primary election for the Clinton campaign. He said the sources on WikiLeaks are good enough any every court in the world and have been successfully used in hundreds of cases.
Todd, in desperation, asks if Assange wants Trump to win But Assange just brushes him off and says it's irrelevant.
Assange clearly shows that the Clinton campaign is out to smear his character (with the rape charges mentioned at the start) and corrects Todd several times throughout the interview. It's clear that the Clinton campaign only engages in the dirtiest tactics possible to discredit their opponents in order to distract people from the obvious corruption.
The WikiLeaks have been the ultimate black swan event of the election.