Post: #451

(07-13-2016 10:03 PM)Manaway Wrote:  Hmm...

What about space travel technology? In the 70's, I remember a large atom sucking spaceship with a dish on the backend(where the atoms were either repelled or attracted) was the newest hot stuff. I forget the capabilities, but I think it did or got close to light speed... It wasn't quite fast enough for travel to pluto, but still an attractive thought to use for the situation. Honestly wish I actually remembered more about it...

There have been UFO sightings as early as the 1950s, at least for the small grey rotating kind, and I believe I've heard accounts as early as the 20s. There is also quite a few reports on other strangely built entities, some of them featuring "people" with really unique... features.

There has been some debate on crop circles, their origins, and what really made them. Eitherway, even if aliens didn't exist and we researched the technology all by ourselves, its here now and is pretty advanced. What's most alarming is how its not at all available or being accessed by the general public. Even something like over unity is being suffocated out of the hands of the masses. There was also a finding on a deep sea organism that co-existed inside another organism, which was using biologically developed cold fusion, that ultimately was wiped out by some corporate entity. Reason? After dissecting and researching the organism, they felt their research had to remain private, as well as the source. I really wish I could find the report on that one...

Its interesting to me that all across the states, there is no citizen funded project that is working with city counsels and states, to provide education and accessibility to all this new technology. There are lots of inhibiting and restricting laws however, that make getting what you want a living hell. Very uncooperative, unintelligible, and depraving to the average joe who wants to get somewhere. People are great at paying taxes, no so great on paying taxes that benefit themselves.

I wish I could piece together what's happening and how, but am at a loss so far. There is enough crazy shit going on in every aspect of government and corporate control... From aggressive snooty bitches irradiating their brains with constant cell phone use, from gmo testing done since the atomic gardens, I don't believe any of what's going on today was an unintentional plan. And I really find it hard to believe that something like bapohmet was an idea conceived by a bunch of homo butt fuckers as some kind of mascot to keep the homo dream alive and indoctrinating. Maybe it is that simple, but something just feels wrong about it, and its not just the concept. We most certainly have interdimensional UFOs, or at least capable of light speed travel, and a world FILLED with negativity generating concepts, ideas, people, and structures. And Hollywood is definitely in on it somehow.

The topic of UFOs is thorny enough by itself, it's not very helpful to slap that on top of this already loaded one.

For the record, I seriously doubt the validity of UFO theories. Crop circles for one are totally ludicrous, when you stop and think about it. If you're an alien species with advanced technology and wanted to leave your print or communicate with us feeble humanoids, crops would be the last medium you'd use. I mean why not instead carve up a 5-mile long 500ft deep message like "Xotwyx wuz here!" on a granite plateau with your awesome quark plasma ray cannons?

In any case bro no discouragement meant, this is just a bit of constructive criticism.

Post: #452

There is an undeniable pattern of ritual child abuse and pedophilia among elite circles. When exposed, these events are quickly covered up, key witnesses and even prosecutors are killed under extremely suspicious circumstances, and great efforts are made to sabotage further inquiries.

People as high as State senators, even CIA directors have died while attempting to blow the lid off the extent of these circles. I've covered some of this already in previous posts:
/thread-53191...pid1288918
/thread-53191...pid1294158

The Marc Dutruox case is perhaps the most blatantly obvious example of a well documented case of an inquiry into vast child abuse networks, which after coming to light was covered up and the trial completely circumvented.

There were over a dozen key witnesses or prosecutors that died under extremely questionable circumstances directly before they were set to testify or preside over the case.

I've come across a very lengthy, but extremely thorough and informative article series covering the incident:
https://infrakshun.wordpress.com/2014/03...dutroux-i/
https://infrakshun.wordpress.com/2014/03...his-lover/
https://infrakshun.wordpress.com/2014/03...nic-signs/
https://infrakshun.wordpress.com/2014/03...d-justice/

In addition to this case, there are a number of child abuse scandals that saw the light of day:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elm_Guest_...se_scandal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunblane_s...erpetrator
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_...on_scandal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_c...llegations

Additionally, during the 80s and 90s there was a wave of child abuse scandals in the US involving a number of prominent members of government and the military. News coverage of the events were largely dismissive, including a widely accepted excoriation from Col Michael Aquino, who was implicated in the abuse.

However, the dismissal failed to address key concerns raised in the abuse allegations, particularly the suspicious burning of records keeping buildings which were later regarded as arson by fire experts, and the extremely accurate description of the premises where the abuse took place, but which the defendants insisted the children would have had no knowledge of. Further, multiple different children were able to provide extensive detail on the nature of the abuse independently and consistently.

The following is an article from 1988 which describes some of the events and legal proceedings surrounding the case, including the inexplicable legal white washing of Gary Hambright's involvement.
http://whale.to/b/aq2.html

I would also like to point out something that NovaVirtu posted, but I think didn't receive the visibility it deserves here.

I'm sure you've all heard of the recent opening of the world's largest tunnel in Europe recently. But I doubt most of you have seen the opening ceremony of the tunnel. It's replete with in your face luciferian symbolism that it's clear they're not even trying to hide it anymore.





Skip to 3:13 where you can see a depiction of the workers bowing down to a baby lucifer. Followed by 4:12 where people are depicted carrying effigies of horns and goats.

Part 2 includes allusions to ritual sacrifice, the all seeing eye, and more goat men:





Analysis here: http://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantrepor...lt-ritual/

All purely a coincidence, I'm sure.

Post: #453

Georgia guidestones:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

Post: #454

(05-25-2016 10:53 AM)debeguiled Wrote:  They would have even more power than they do if they kept it quiet about their true intentions, and yet they always seem to have to give some nonverbal sign of what they are really all about.

What motivates this? Arrogance and overconfidence? Or is there some part of their soul that is warning us not to trust them?

While I'm not firmly convinced on it, I have a working theory that part of their cult dogma involves the necessity of free will among the people they rule over.

The idea is that by blatantly showing their symbolism hiding in plain sight, they are showing the people who their masters are, and inviting them to expose and retaliate against them.

The fact that people don't do so to them is a form of consent, where even silence or lack of reaction is interpreted as an expression of free will to be ruled over by them. This helps them to rationalize that their rule is legitimate, even while ruthlessly stamping out attempts at exposing or opposing them.

I'm not saying I agree with it (I don't), but a large part of esoteric society practice involves consent on the part of the initiate, even when he's not aware of what he's consenting to, before he's allowed to proceed further into the hierarchy. It's possible that point of view extends to other areas of their doctrine.

Post: #455

Kind of like how all the migrants in Europe take lack of retaliation by Germans and Swedes as a sign of weakness and consent.

Post: #456

A wiccan/druid friend once explained something similar: apparently, vampires and other "cursed beings" (for ignorance of the right terminology) cannot enter a spiritually clean home without being invited in.

Which reflects Thoughtgypsy's point about gaining consent without knowing what is being consented to, doesn't it? "Hey, you invited me in, so obviously you're okay with me being here and getting my devilry on."

Post: #457

I have read this as well, in some strange way they are still goverened by certain "rules", the main one being that they have to let you know what they are doing to you.
The trick is that they explain/express this in a ridiculous and unvelievable way, so that the common public either laughs it off as a joke or rejects it entirely.

The phrase "abra cadabra" has esoteric origins that ties into this.

Post: #458

Hollywood is definitely a Satanic cult. The actors,producers,directors and studio owners are all enmeshed willingly or not in the web. From 2011 to 2013 a Louisiana native and ex Marine,Nicholas du Plessis ran a fascinating site,hollywoodilluminati.com. As a bloodline illuminati he had the files on everyone in Hollywood.

Quote:It was the year 2001 and I attended an exclusive party in Hollywood, located high up in one of the most secluded parts of the Hollywood Hills and Hollywood Canyons. I have no idea how I was invited or why this Hollywood Big Wig was able to find out that I was related to a sitcom actress, who worked at another studio and track down my cell phone number but he did. I was excited and like Hell Yeah, I wanna go to the gathering but Hollywood Hills has unnamed dirt roads, it was like rural Louisiana, where one had to simply know their way because there is simply no system or Thomas Guide Maps that can ever really navigate one through Hollywood Hills but the Hollywood Big Wig said that he would send a car to pick me up.

http://whale.to/c/inside.html

Quote: Illuminati from France actually colonized very large parts of the New World and for the first time in Illuminati history, we saw Illuminati Blood Lines produce off spring with peasants and slaves, which were the Native American/African Mixed Creoles (Beyonce is from a La. French-Creole Family).

http://illuminatimindcontrol.com/lil-way...-satanist/

I swear this dude had some amazing shit. Apparently Rihanna set up Chris Brown for a hit- when it failed she punched herself getting the black eye. That was only the start-she's a demonic witch who used her powers to make him levitate in his sleep!
-Arnold has million dollar 'artwork' in his Kali home of hi def photos of babies boiled alive
-Heath Ledger was killed by a hooker/professional assassin via a drug overdose
-Hollywood Jews bathe in the blood of sacrificed Hispanic kids in the basement of their Kali synagogues
-J Lo,Eve Longoria and other Hispanic starlets also consume blood to remain young. Its no secret ;Houston pd knew this and his cousin was married to Eve-she openly threatened the cops!
..and much much more.
However,in all his writings my impression was he was simply revealing what he felt was truth.

Quote:It will take you from the time that the first Fallen Angels appeared on Earth, to the migration of Jews out of Lower South-East Africa,

http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theo...27873.html

Without getting lost in too much detail,todays Jews have much African heritage including personal names.

Post: #459

(07-20-2016 04:01 AM)kikuyu1 Wrote:  ...Rihanna...she's a demonic witch...

Knowing that actors would always prefer a role that intrigues them or inspires them in some way.
It's one thing to appear as a fictional character in a fictional film.

Yet for that Seth Rogen film - This Is The End, to appear as yourself despite being killed off in some hellish fashion.
I would not be surprised if it was a way to laugh at the idea of one's destruction.
Or to revel in the idea of one's destruction.

Post: #460

I would just like to remind everyone that because a lot of this information is extremely damaging to powerful people, they will take great effort to attempt to discredit it.

One of the methods of doing so is to insert a certain amount of fantastical stories (like aliens, for instance) so that your average person will write off all of the related stories as ridiculous nonsense.

A lot of the people who participate in these rituals probably don't believe they're actually doing anything "satanic", but using the whole process to sate their masochistic desires while simultaneously ensuring that anyone hearing the testimony of their victims will dismiss them as crazy.

Post: #461

I don't particularity think this information (satanic rituals, Hollywood, politics, sacrifice, etc) might be damaging to the elite since they are powerful enough to silence absolutely anybody (including top ppl of the FBI and CIA). On the other hand, if top dogs like Trump do it then we are going to see a literal shitstorm.

But, Trump is no fool so it seems his campaign is doing it subtly (how he is able to do it without him being whack is beyond me...but I have a theory about it....it deals with Law of Serving Oneself vs Law of Serving Other...AKA Law of One). Carson yesterday drop some MAJOR information yesterday, and the funny thing was that nobody in the CNN panel was going to touch or comment on the satanic subject. They wanted to make it seem as they were "above" this, and it was "childish" to talk bout Lucifer/Satan, etc. Heck even the Pro-Trump panel try to make it seem as a "joke" from their part. But anybody that has done their research of the rabbit hole, it seems all leads to this and spirituality.

I think this quote from /pol recently sums it it pretty nicely on

Quote:OP here. I have been thinking about this all for hours.

I've concluded that you're right though. regardless of which party, these people are all so closely intertwined it doesnt make a difference.

as for the ritual sacrifice, I don't know what to make of it. it's either real, or very, very carefully orchestrated. obvious enough that if you actually look you will see, but at the same time, farfetched enough that nobody will believe anyone you tell.

it's pretty clever actually. anyone who looks realizes these people are terrible, but thats just the tip of the ice(((berg))). look even closer and there's evidence of satanic rituals and demonic worship. but by the time you've looked that far, you've been redpilled to the point of no longer being a threat. anyone you tell will think you are mentally ill. the rest will come to these conclusions only if they choose to put in the research while maintaining an open mind. most won't ever.

fuck man. this all fucks with my head.Im not at all religious, but I'm gonna go talk to a priest later today, and connect the dots for him. its the only person I feel like I could present this all to without facing social backlash, or risk of being institutionalized. I want to just let it all go, but cant seem to do that. if this is real...fuck. I hope he tells me I'm delusional as fuck.

We should make a thread on how this ties up with the Law of One (if this is true or false it doesn't really matter since we can't never know....it is for the purpose of understanding the information better and making new connection that were not seem, just like we can't know if any Satanic stuff is true or false, all we can do is speculate on wtf is going on)

But Like I said, if there is smoke, then most likely there is a fire somewhere there.

Post: #462

(07-16-2016 04:05 PM)HonantheBarbarian Wrote:  I have read this as well, in some strange way they are still goverened by certain "rules", the main one being that they have to let you know what they are doing to you.
The trick is that they explain/express this in a ridiculous and unvelievable way, so that the common public either laughs it off as a joke or rejects it entirely.

The phrase "abra cadabra" has esoteric origins that ties into this.

From all my research, it seems this is true. So far from what I have gather I have only come across three things that ties this together, only one of them I'm 99.9% sure of and that is Saturn symbology across time. The other two might be a little too out there....like the Law of One (gives you a better perspective on philosophical ideas like good/evil), and Elite Family Insider thread bunch of years back (troll or not the information is really good, if it was a troll than it is a 10/10 troll).

Post: #463

(07-20-2016 04:01 AM)kikuyu1 Wrote:  Without getting lost in too much detail,todays Jews have much African heritage including personal names.

Actually, when making a statement of such large significance, I'd appreciate it if you'd go into detail.

The link you posted makes some rather bold claims without supporting them. I see this kind of theme in a lot of content which is critical of deep state power structures. I think the purpose of this is to discredit those who seriously research hidden power structures, or to distract people from attempting to understand the big picture.

I'm not accusing you of doing this or anything, and I understand the desire to seek out alternative sources. It's demonstrated to us on a daily basis that our politicians and official academians lie to us so thoroughly, so persistently, that we can safely discard anything they tell us. One of the dangers of this is to latch on to sources that are critical of the historical narrative we've been taught, and ease our demand for evidence for sources that seem to be "on our side". It's through this process that those who wish to throw us off their trail will insert disinformation.

As an example in the link above, it makes the claim that Jews originated in southeast Africa by tying Nimrod to a Cushitic lineage. While it's true that there are supporting details to the idea that some Jewish lineage has Cushitic roots, I think it's rather reckless to use this loose mythological description (Nimrod being the grandson of Ham, where Ham represents the Hamitic (African) language groups) to confidently conclude that the origin of ancient Judeans were southeast African. Cushites are actually east African in origin, not southeast, but that's a minor detail.

There are indeed signs that point to a cultural overlap between areas that the early Jews historically traveled through, though the artifacts seem to point towards a cultural origin further east. There are pyramids deeper into Africa than Egypt, though they appear later: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nubian_pyramids

The theory of Egyptian origin for what we collectively label freemasonry actually appears to be the most well researched, and well supported theory that I've seen. There is architecture and symbolism that is absolutely bursting with Egyptian imagery nearly everywhere you look. Just by taking a look at any $1 bill will reveal a seal showing an Egyptian pyramid capped by the eye of Horus, and even a $ sign that represents the Egyptian cadeucus. The Washington monument is a near identical depiction of an Egyptian monolith (representative of a phallus), such as Cleopatra's needle, and it sits within a path depicting a vesica pisces. There are similar links to ancient Egyptian culture in London, Paris, Brussels, Vatican city, and nearly all of them are commissioned by Freemasons or similar esoteric groups.

The links are simply too numerous to list, but for those that are interested, I would highly recommend the following video. It is rather long, so watch it a few parts at a time:





Based on the above, it's well supported that the current power structures of the media, state, and military/intelligence regard ancient Egyptian culture with great significance.

The ancient Egyptian priestly class possessed very ancient knowledge, which they only shared with initiates into their order. They believed in monotheism while preaching polytheism to the rest of the populace, which they despised. In order to undergo initiation into their order, (which many influential Greeks such as Plato, Pythagorus, and Solon underwent) one had to become circumcised to be considered one of them. In short, they were an esoteric system of power which practiced a hidden religion, something which modern Freemasonry could be perfectly described as.

Based on my research though, I believe their origin is of much greater antiquity. Esoteric priestly groups have been associated with the building of ancient monolithic architecture (such as stone henge, the Pyramids, and so on) which are aligned to astronomical phenomena that span many thousands of years. This demonstrates a knowledge of the precession of the equinox (a 25,920 year cycle) that would have required thousands upon thousands of years of observation, extremely advanced technology, or both.

I believe that many aspects of Judaism originate from the influence of the Levite priestly class, which was passed to them during their period of Syrian rule, and further back, from the influences of Zoroastrianism and early Hinduism.

Prior to the 10th century BC, there was no Jewish state, though there was the kingdom of Israel, which was a vassal kingdom of the Persian empire. Judea was a small territory of a minor tribe, and in fact waged conflicts with the kingdom of Israel often. Around the same time period, there's little historical mention of Jews, as we know them today. It is my belief that much of ancient Jewish history was borrowed from the Persians, who were the rulers of the kingdom of Israel for hundreds of years. Only later did Israelites flee to Judea, where they may have created a historical narrative that would create greater cohesion between Judeans and Israelites. There are many similarities in the Torah with historical figures, such as king Solomon most likely describing Syrian king Shalmane-sar, whose name in semetic would have been spelled SLMN.

The Syrians were influenced by the Magi, which were said to have arrived with the Chaldeans in the 2nd millenium BC. The Magi practiced Zoroastrianism, which was a monotheistic religion which shares many similarities and religious accounts with early Judaism. It is here I'd like to suggest that the early Jews likely traced their history from the Syrian, and further back, the Magiaen/Iranian traditions. The Brahmins, whose haplogroup is R1a, is the same as the priestly classes of the Levite Jews, showing a shared DNA lineage.

All of these factors point towards the priestly tradition of the region originating further to the East. The Torah says that Abraham came from Ur of the Chaldees. Note that there are some close similarities between the story of Abraham and the story of Brahma. Abraham had a sister/consort named Sarai, whereas Brahma had a sister/consort named Saraisvati.

Also, in Zoroastrianism and the in the Vedas, they describe a conflict between the Asuras/Ahuras and the Devas. It seems to suggest that the Asuras were the early Israeli Levites which later settled further west. The overemphasis on materialism, and as described in the Vedas, their practice of black magick ultimately created a schism between the Asuras (proto Jews/Magi) and Devas (Brahmin). As Abraham rejected the Brahmin faith, he would have been regarded as A-brahma (not a Brahma), which could have morphed into the name of Abraham over time.

There is additional support for this theory in the link below:
http://www.hyksos.org/index.php?title=Who_Was_Abraham

Post: #464

How does Transsexualism fit in to all of this?

Something just clicked for me. I was on a podcast last night, where we were discussing transsexualism and the occult amongst other things, and one of the other guys sent me a link which led into a number of pieces falling into place.

Hermaphroditism has a long history throughout the occult; of course there's the Greek Hermaphroditus, there's the Tarot's World card of the Major Arcana(1), and I'm sure you can come up with many other examples. It's long been a fascination of humanity. And yet, hermaphroditism (not intersex genetic damage - which actually serves to prove the following statement) is impossible! It is "fried ice". I covered this in a video a couple of months back, the nature of sex is complementary and binary, there is no position between the two.

The promotion of hermaphroditism is a foul lie; it's a tricky math joke, using fallacies to prove that 2=1. It promotes a blindness to God.

Now, what does this have to do with the occult? And why is it being pushed so hard in the media of late? Typically we've been assuming that it's just hedonism/degeneracy/et cetera - there are various reason people become trannies - but I think there's more to it than this.

Here's the article my friend linked me to the other day.

Quote:Jenner’s transformation was not intimate nor personal. It was a grand, ceremonial, ritualistic event that symbolizes a change in society as a whole. An important part of the elite’s agenda is to debase, confuse and mix up the natural, harmonious order of things. It is about steering away from what is real, pure and authentic to move towards to the fake, artificial and the constructed. For this reason, there one aspect of the Agenda that is becoming increasingly apparent : The feminization of the male and the masculinization of the female. Under the guise of “empowerment”, men who act like females and females who act like men are not only accepted, but celebrated. I personally do not have a problem with that. I DO have a problem with the other side of this agenda: Men who act like traditional men (and do not feel the need to apologize for it) are now portrayed as evil and wrong. And, all of a sudden, portraying a stay-at-home mom who takes pride in cooking for her family is considered “sexist”.

In other words, it is about a complete reversal of gender roles. Simply by looking at our genetic make-up and the behavior of most mammals, one can observe that males are engineered to hunt, provide and protect while females are made to “nest”, care and nurture, While modern living has made these traits less dominant, they are nevertheless part of our core being. And mass media is heavily focusing on promoting the exact opposite of this. It is about the attacking the mind with messages that conflict with our natural inclinations….”

One thing I have been pointing out recently is that Vasquez from Aliens is not masculine - she's just an rare sort of feminine (think about it; even though she's a tough chick, she's still very much a woman). Similarly the dandy - take Oscar Wilde for example - is a distinct sort of masculine. It's funny that the left is pushing the idea that "gender roles are constricting", when they're the very ones making them constricting!

Transsexualism isn't about transsexuals; it's about transforming society into a twisted version of what it's supposed to be, and introducing the "hermaphroditic god" into reality (a god based upon a lie). It's also a wedge shoved into people's souls to confuse them - suggesting that you have a "male half" and a "female half" inside of you.

Just look at what's happening with Will Smith; his son is named after his mother, his daughter named after him, and he's dressing both of them in drag. Sexless vessels ready to be 'inhabited' by the hermaphroditic god.

1. Note: the Tarot was actually just a card game re-purposed to the occult in the 19th century; it's a bit of a joke. But as I've commented elsewhere, the occult (hidden knowledge) comes from Satan, and ultimately it's all bunk. There *is* no occult - God made the universe eminently understandable. The only "magical" rituals which exist, he explicitly told us about - the Eucharist for example. Other spiritual practices - say, Druidism - use various symbolisms to celebrate creation (Oak for this, Ash for that), but it's not *occult* - it's meant to complement knowledge, not hide it. The "hidden keys to the universe" is always bunk, and so it's perfectly fitting that a card game would be re-purposed for divination. It's a cruel joke. I doubt that The World was a hermaphrodite in the original game, that was merely an add-on in recent years. The older cards don't make it obvious.

Post: #465

Studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane, while government dupes are crazy and hostile

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

...

In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” – that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information.

The extreme irrationality of those who attack “conspiracy theories” has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion,” they wrote:
“If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid… By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.”

http://21stcenturywire.com/2013/07/17/ne...d-hostile/

Post: #466

(07-21-2016 08:28 AM)Aurini Wrote:  Transsexualism isn't about transsexuals; it's about transforming society into a twisted version of what it's supposed to be, and introducing the "hermaphroditic god" into reality (a god based upon a lie). It's also a wedge shoved into people's souls to confuse them - suggesting that you have a "male half" and a "female half" inside of you.

Something implied in all this, never mentioned, though nonetheless present, is the fact that the tranny narrative turns the golden rule on its head, thereby misusing and perverting it.

The whole idea of unconditional love in imitation of God's love for us, or even the lesser concept of loving your neighbor as yourself, introduced by Jesus and the New Testament, have been with us for 2000 years now, and have become interwoven not only in Christianity, but the larger template of Western Culture.

To love another person unselfishly is one of our highest cultural ideals, and what the trannies and SJWs have done is misuse this concept to turn it into a weakness for the culture at large.

Rather than a concept that is a vehicle for introspection (Am I being as loving to my neighbor as I can be?), the self mutilators and the screechers have turned the concept of unconditional love into an imperative for everyone but themselves!

They are free to judge others in the harshest possible terms, and yet they expect others to love them unconditionally. This is a powerful perverting of a concept that relies to a large degree on the social norm of reciprocity.

Trannies are volunteering everyone but themselves to work on their unconditional love. They are facing all of their introspective powers outwards, into the souls of others, and leaving their own internal darkness unexamined.

If that isn't a perversion of what is truly holy, nothing is. They have turned love into something that they are free to receive and even demand, and they are under no obligation to love anyone in return.

For me, the renunciation of your own sex, something that is not yours to renounce, really, is obviously a perversion, and what greater test of someone else's capacity to love is there then to turn yourself into a horror show?

Can I humiliate myself and mutilate myself to the point where by any reasonable standard I am completely unlovable, and yet still be loved?

This is the question of the selfish and the unloving narcissistic person.

Becoming a tranny is only the mode by which these golems suck the love out of mortals.

The important thing is wasting love.

Post: #467

(07-21-2016 08:28 AM)Aurini Wrote:  How does Transsexualism fit in to all of this?
...
Hermaphroditism has a long history throughout the occult; of course there's the Greek Hermaphroditus, there's the Tarot's World card of the Major Arcana(1), and I'm sure you can come up with many other examples. It's long been a fascination of humanity. And yet, hermaphroditism (not intersex genetic damage - which actually serves to prove the following statement) is impossible! It is "fried ice". I covered this in a video a couple of months back, the nature of sex is complementary and binary, there is no position between the two.
...
Transsexualism isn't about transsexuals; it's about transforming society into a twisted version of what it's supposed to be, and introducing the "hermaphroditic god" into reality (a god based upon a lie). It's also a wedge shoved into people's souls to confuse them - suggesting that you have a "male half" and a "female half" inside of you.

All good points. I would like to add that the themes of dualism, and the integration of opposing forms is one of the central concepts of their hermetic doctrine. Not only is it reflected in their architecture, symbolism, and pop culture, they also seem to apply the concept to the political arena. Unfortunately, there are many levels to their symbolism, and it is difficult to get an accurate picture of their system of morality (for lack of a better word).

The famous Professor and Scholar Carroll Quigley was given the opportunity to document a brief history of the Milner group, a geopolitically active Anglo American secret society financed by various international bankers. He confirmed that in order to achieve their political aims, they make use of the dialectic process.

What this process is, in a nutshell, is the creation of two opposing forces, both of whom are under the control of the same group. A conflict is orchestrated between the two groups in order to create emotional investment in the issue, and thus sew division between otherwise neutral groups. Once this artificial problem has been accepted as a serious issue by both sides, an artificial solution is offered up.

In simplest terms, creating a poison to get the patient to accept an antidote.

Take for example, sexual identity in the West. We have rapidly moved from an environment of defined gender roles, strong families, and social satisfaction, to the destruction of the nuclear family and marriage, in your face public homosexual BDSM parties, and now the situation where grown men can use the same private bathrooms as little girls.

Throughout this whole process, your mainstream conservative news anchors no longer allow any discussion about the nuclear family in society, the public displays of sexual deviancy, or the mental health of transexuals. No, the only discussion allowed is the officially approved narrative of the artificial conflict they wish you to participate in. And, guaranteed, the false opposition they've created to the issue will surely fail, it is just another way to condition you into slowly accepting their end scenario. No matter the party in the white house, politics always moves one way.

This process drives people into a binary, black and white pattern of thinking where there are only two sides to every debate, and you can only pick one of the two options they've spoon fed you. It encourages self censorship, and prevents people from thinking independently, and considering the possibility of a third issue.



I believe this is the symbolism of the dualism contained in hermeticism. It is the gradual erosion of our unique identities, to include our ability to reason independently, our sense of historical and family ethos, even our very sexuality, a necessary affirmation of our ability to create and celebrate new life into this world. As our historical, sexual, and spiritual identity is rendered meaningless and incoherent, we will have nothing sovereign worth protecting. We will all be easily controlled androgynous drones, driven only by materialistic hedonism.

Indeed, if you pay attention, you will see allusions to this system of morality nearly everywhere.

Action and Reaction, Black and White

IRS Building



Masonic checkerboard in every lodge, and in much of hollywood





Boaz and Jachin



Become one

Quote:There *is* no occult - God made the universe eminently understandable. The only "magical" rituals which exist, he explicitly told us about - the Eucharist for example. Other spiritual practices - say, Druidism - use various symbolisms to celebrate creation (Oak for this, Ash for that), but it's not *occult* - it's meant to complement knowledge, not hide it. The "hidden keys to the universe" is always bunk, and so it's perfectly fitting that a card game would be re-purposed for divination. It's a cruel joke. I doubt that The World was a hermaphrodite in the original game, that was merely an add-on in recent years. The older cards don't make it obvious.

Respectfully, I would disagree here on detail, though I agree with the overall message. I believe that there is indeed much about our history, our biology, and our place in the universe that our ancestors were well aware of, but has been hidden from us in order to confuse us, and more easily condition us into accepting a narrow historical and spiritual narrative which deprives us of discovering our nature.

At the same time, most occult (which means hidden) groups use this censorship of ancient knowledge to seduce the initiate further and further into the destruction of their personal sovereignty. By luring them with the promise of knowledge and power, it pushes them deeper into a scenario where there is no turning back.

Though, I also believe our distant ancestors possessed immense knowledge about our universe and our place in it. Many millenia ago they were able to construct megalithic architecture to observe the movement of the Sun and the heavenly bodies through the night sky, successfully documenting phenomena that spans tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of years. As attested in the Vedas, they developed a system of time which nearly perfectly predicts astronomical phenomena over time scales of millions of years.





The true purpose of monoliths were sun dials, and the purpose of their surrounding stone circles tracked the length of the shadows they projected, or tracked the gradual movement of the stars in the night sky. Early agricultural societies were deeply affected by the legnth and severity of winter, long term planetary climactic cycles, and other phenomena which may have forced them to develop novel methods of astronomical observation

In Baalbek, Lebanon, one of the world's oldest archaelogical sites, there are stone blocks weighing over 200 tons which cannot be moved with today's technology.



Gravitational bodies were ascribed significance of events on Earth, an idea which sounds ridiculous at first blush, though which science is beginning to confirm affects the behavior of not only animals, but also humans
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16407788

We can also prove through Electroencephalography that not only are our brains extremely magnetosensitive, but that the electrical impulses generated in our brain are precisely attuned to the ionosphere's resonant frequency (Schumann Resonance). Not only that, but exposure to different electromagnetic frequencies in the ELF spectrum can directly alter our mood.

In the Vedic tradition, they describe different Chakras, or regions of our body that affect our biology in relation to longevity, emotion, and cognition. While it may sound like a bunch of new age quakery, science has confirmed that these areas contain organs and glands which regulated our hormone levels, directly affecting the way we experience the world around us.



Our ancestors were much more advanced than we give them credit. To acknowledge this would break the narrative of linear progression towards a materialist utopian world.

Post: #468

thoughtgypsy, have you ever looked into the possibility that many of these monolithic stones are cast in place geopolymers?

Post: #469

It is possible, but even then it would imply a level of technological advancement far beyond what we currently attribute to antiquity.

Post: #470

(07-22-2016 03:20 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  It is possible, but even then it would imply a level of technological advancement far beyond what we currently attribute to antiquity.

As I understand geopolymers, it is all a matter of combining the right substances in the right measure, so, not off limits to ancient cultures:

Quote:As long ago as 50 BC Diodorus Siculus wrote in his book Bibliotheca Historica about the Nabataeans, “They are conspicuously lovers of freedom and flee into the desert, using this as a stronghold. They fill cisterns and caves with rainwater, making them flush with the rest of the land. They leave signals there which are known to themselves and not understood by anyone else. They water their herds every third day, so that they do not constantly need water in waterless regions, if they have to flee.” The information that Diodorus gathered was already common knowledge in the Middle East. The Nabataeans had been building hidden water cisterns for years.

As with the Romans, the Nabataeans secret to waterproof cement was the material known as pozzolan. Where the Romans used volcanic ash to create their waterproof cement, the Nabataeans had a much easier source. In the Hisma desert near Wadi Rumm are major surface deposits of silica, which geologists today claim is nearly 100% silicon.

https://geopolymerhouses.wordpress.com/2...an-cement/

Unless you are referring to not having the tech to make the molds for the cast stones?

Post: #471

(07-22-2016 03:05 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  thoughtgypsy, have you ever looked into the possibility that many of these monolithic stones are cast in place geopolymers?

I've never even heard of the concept until you mentioned it.

Are you suggesting that extremely precise architecture, like the stones in Baalbek, or the Pyramid of Giza, are the result of being cast in-situ instead of quarried, transported, and set?

If so, that would be an interesting theory, and I'd be curious to check out any additional info which supports it.

Post: #472

(07-22-2016 04:01 PM)thoughtgypsy Wrote:  

(07-22-2016 03:05 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  thoughtgypsy, have you ever looked into the possibility that many of these monolithic stones are cast in place geopolymers?

I've never even heard of the concept until you mentioned it.

Are you suggesting that extremely precise architecture, like the stones in Baalbek, or the Pyramid of Giza, are the result of being cast in-situ instead of quarried, transported, and set?

Yes.

I am not an expert, I have only read this in passing, and thought it interesting that I had never heard of it.

Basic idea is that we have lost the technology to make better cement, the Romans had it too, and that you are casting stones from formwork and, if the mix is rough enough, the cast blocks are indistinguishable from rocks, like, say, sandstone:

http://www.livescience.com/1554-surprisi...built.html





I first heard about geopolymers at this website:

https://geopolymerhouses.wordpress.com/


were-ancient-structures-made-with-geopolymer/

Post: #473

I seriously doubt those blocks were cast, for one there is too much work done in the fitting. As well, the microstructure would have revealed it, and there would be some records of the process itself.

Post: #474

(07-22-2016 06:21 PM)911 Wrote:  I seriously doubt those blocks were cast, for one there is too much work done in the fitting. As well, the microstructure would have revealed it, and there would be some records of the process itself.

If you think about it, it's rather brilliant in it's simplicity.

First, you eliminate the necessity of quarrying massive stones, transporting them, and developing massive engineering works to handle them.

Second, it is much easier to produce clean, square, perfectly straight geometries by constructing a simple wooden cast than it would be diligently cut and finely shape massive stone blocks to millimeter precision.

Third, it would be much less labor intensive. Instead of employing hundreds of people to haul megalithic blocks up massive ramps (which require massive construction efforts in themselves, despite being only temporary), you simply need a steady stream of people able to haul up mortar in individual bags or containers.

Fourth, as the mortar is not solid prior to hardening, it would naturally create a level surface due to the force of gravity. It would be much, much easier to achieve a perfectly level structure using a building material that naturally self equalizes every layer, compared to a solid material which must be perfectly level over dozens of layers. Otherwise, minute errors could become cumulative.

By constructing casts next to and on top of each other, the mortar would settle perfectly flush with the preceding layer.

As they would only pour into casts that were sized based on the cure rate of the mortar, they would be forced to limit their size for structural integrity and for ease of tamping down the material. The separate texture and discontinuities created by individual cast pours would create the appearance of blocks.

Some of the largest structures existing today seem to use similar construction methods:

Post: #475

(07-22-2016 06:21 PM)911 Wrote:  I seriously doubt those blocks were cast, for one there is too much work done in the fitting. As well, the microstructure would have revealed it, and there would be some records of the process itself.

It is the improbability of the idea that makes it interesting to discuss.