Post: #26

(05-06-2016 12:57 PM)Zep Wrote:  How does a course like this come into existance?

Does this woman propose a course to the university and it gets okayed?

Does an outside agency ask/pay the university to offer a course like this and then find a teacher for it?

See this Archive screenshot. It will answer all of your questions.
https://archive.is/R9tro

How was this funded and paid for? British taxpayers.

Also, this is Debbie Ging's bio at Dublin City University.

Post: #27

I feel there should be more of an active effort to troll leftists like this. Are any of you guys finding feminist forums and trolling them, explaining why they are such loser dead-end pieces of shit etc? I think I should try some of this.

Post: #28

(05-06-2016 12:24 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Large vocabulary signifies intelligence when used clearly and smoothly, as if part of the writer's natural thought process.

Going out of your way to work in ridiculous jargon you know your audience isn't familiar with, on the other hand, looks fucking pathetic and doesn't fool anyone.

Post: #29

From Wikipedia: "Hermeneutics (/hɛrməˈnuːtɪks/ or /hɛrməˈnjuːtɪks/) is the theory and methodology of text interpretation, especially the interpretation of biblical texts, wisdom literature, and philosophical texts. Hermeneutics was initially applied to the interpretation, or exegesis, of scripture"

WTF are the hermeneutics of suspicion, and how do you hijack them?

Post: #30

http://journal.media-culture.org.au/inde...e/view/431

Quote:The “hermeneutics of suspicion” is a phrase coined by Paul Ricoeur to capture a common spirit that pervades the writings of Marx, Freud, and Nietzsche. In spite of their obvious differences, he argued, these thinkers jointly constitute a “school of suspicion.” That is to say, they share a commitment to unmasking “the lies and illusions of consciousness;” they are the architects of a distinctively modern style of interpretation that circumvents obvious or self-evident meanings in order to draw out less visible and less flattering truths (Ricoeur 356).

Sounds like "hermeneutics of suspicion" refers to the red pill/blue pill stuff.

Post: #31

(05-06-2016 04:21 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  I feel there should be more of an active effort to troll leftists like this. Are any of you guys finding feminist forums and trolling them, explaining why they are such loser dead-end pieces of shit etc? I think I should try some of this.

No real need to troll them. A White Woman claiming over 109,000 pounds from the UK government in a time of resource scarcity during a time of massive immigrant migration is an obviously-racist use of Taxpayer money that could have gone to resettling, housing and educating genuine minorities.

Feminists have been trying to hijack Minority Status for years - I've mentioned previously my Mother's Second Wave Feminist friends would all make statements wishing they were black, and you'd be hard to find a White Lesbian Comic in the 80's where she isn't depicted with Black Best Friend, sometimes in a Wheelchair. You only have to look at the language Fourth Wave Feminist use in their Victimhood Narrative: Women and Minorities. Women and Minorities.

They believe they're more victimised than actual minorities.

I saw an interesting comment yesterday re: Hillary where a guy mentioned how the time of corrupt, rich, privileged white men was over, so why should it be handed off to corrupt, rich, privileged white women?

Leftists are ready to eat each other at the best of times. Simply point out how White Feminists are 'Thieving Minority Status' to actual Minorities at every opportunity. Resentment over the reality of resource scarity will do the rest.

Realistically, who cares what some Academic with the standard-issue Subversive Hair maps out? I expect that Feminism will be dead in the UK due to the reality of demographic change within 15 years, and those groups that are coming up aren't going to listen to some old Cracker, particularly when they come from societies where the population overthrow governments. This will happen with or without our input.

Post: #32

Her bio makes me want to puke. All about sexism and sexualising children in Ireland, but nothing about the government which would include her covering up and taking the monetery responsibility for priests banging little boys in the ass. Fuck her.

Post: #33

(05-06-2016 06:25 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Feminists have been trying to hijack Minority Status for years - I've mentioned previously my Mother's Second Wave Feminist friends would all make statements wishing they were black, and you'd be hard to find a White Lesbian Comic in the 80's where she isn't depicted with Black Best Friend, sometimes in a Wheelchair. You only have to look at the language Fourth Wave Feminist use in their Victimhood Narrative: Women and Minorities. Women and Minorities.

They believe they're more victimised than actual minorities.

Feminists have always tried to make it sound like they stood in solidarity with minorities, as if the "suffering" of upper-middle class white women was on par with institutionalized slavery.

As David Horowitz noted in The Feminist Assault on the Military:

Quote:To question – to question – the role of women in the military is now regarded as bigotry by the military itself.

The word "bigot" has resonance. It is meant to invoke the specter of racism and, simultaneously, to appropriate the moral mantle of the civil rights movement for the feminist cause. This feminist attempt to hijack the civil rights movement has always struck me as spurious and offensive. Women, as a gender, were never oppressed as American blacks and their ancestors were oppressed. It is the big lie of feminism to speak of "patriarchy" as a system of oppression comparable to slavery, and to see women's restricted role in society as fundamentally unrelated to restrictions imposed by their biology and the state of technological development.

Black people were enslaved for centuries. Their slavery was justified by whites who judged them to be less than human. "Three-fifths of a man." That was bigotry. That was racism. Sexism, by contrast, is an inane and meaningless term invented by Marxist radicals to stigmatize their opponents. Its primary function aside from abuse, is to appropriate the moral legacy of the struggle against racism. No western civilization, let alone western democracy, has ever regarded women as inferior beings in the sense that blacks were considered inferior. None has ever failed to value and cherish them.

Post: #34

Who is she trying to 'educate'? lol And even more scary? Who is funding this nonsense? The British Government? AKA British taxes?

Post: #35

(05-06-2016 12:31 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:  For those that are curious the hermeneutics of suspicion:

Quote:The “hermeneutics of suspicion” is a phrase coined by Paul Ricoeur to capture a common spirit that pervades the writings of Marx, Freud, and Nietzsche.

I don't understand what she means by the hijacking part.

I think she means hetero males are not allowed to be suspicious of "the illusions of consciousness".

It's something like how a third wave feminist might think that because of rape culture making a woman feel "unsafe", it's impossible for a man to ever feel unsafe.

Or if not impossible, then inauthentic.

The left is obsessed with perceived authenticity. Poverty is "more authentic" than wealth. Making a snap decision is "more authentic" than planning ahead. Struggling is "more authentic" than executing with calm confidence. And so on.

The authenticity fallacy is the lynchpin behind the hatred/dismissal of pickup. And as you get further away from the norm, it starts to motivate negative feelings towards women wearing makeup and doing their (long) hair, men going to the gym, learning new things beyond what your uni profs / huffpo told you, etc.

I'll bet we can trace most of our disagreements with women and manginas to the authenticity fallacy and the deep psychic ire it draws out.

Post: #36

Shift toward visual and meme-based expression?

Post: #37

Quote:Shift towards visual and meme-based expression.

My misogyny prevents me from expressing my reaction to that cunt's appearance using anything other than visual and meme-based expression. I pity the poor guy who has to come home to that thing each night.

Post: #38

AB is absolutely right. In 2008 when Obama first ran Blacks and feminist agitators got into screaming matches where white women tried to school black men on how they were more oppressed than us and how we owed Hillary our vote. To this day it is just as AB says, woman and (and then, after women) minorities is how they tell us to view social issues- since Obama became president the only time that white feminist's game becomes evident is when they try to co opt black women, except black women hate white feminist women, so the black women call them out on all their bullshit.

On a separate but related note the primary recipients of affirmative action are white women,do you think black women like that twist of federal legislation?

Post: #39

Is it a coincidence that her Venn diagram takes that same general shape as a profile picture of Lindy West?

Post: #40

(05-06-2016 01:03 PM)Red_Pillage Wrote:  What word is her arm covering up next to the left of the PUA sphere? "....Gamer"

This is what's hidden

Post: #41

Where did these photos originate?

I'm not doubting their veracity, I'm just wondering how they ended up on the Internet?

Post: #42

That venn diagram is worse than the intentionally bad one that Ali G uses in this video about business when he interviews Trump (4 minutes in)

Post: #43

PH.D.= Piled Higher and Deeper

Post: #44

Another case of Venn Diagram fail worth pointing out, courtesy of the HRC campaign (the gift that keeps on giving):



which got the following answers:









https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/statu...52/photo/1