Post: #51

Looks like Breitbart is going to start covering tech more and go against tech crunch and the like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yI4Z5gLvW3w

Also I saw Milo when he was in LA. Smart guy, super gay.

Post: #52

(10-27-2015 09:59 PM)talvesh Wrote:  

(10-27-2015 11:52 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Every sexual morality has to go.

Also I might add - the social planners work in cycles testing the water for blowback. If they see that too many people resist pedophilia (inter-generational sex as they call it now), then they put it on hold for a few years or even a decade, then they start again after the new generation has been brainwashed better and families are more destroyed. I guess the Muslim population brought into the West will change the dynamic too in that respect as pedophilia and bestiality are no biggies for some of them. (Of course for everyone except their daughters.)

Do you have evidence to back up these specific claims? I see a lot of claims like this and they are never verifiable.

Go verify them yourself with your own understanding.

Don't be the guy chucking a spanner in the works of conversation because you don't agree with it but have insufficient understanding to explain why.

People who know about a subject talk in generalisations and stereotypes because they already know the data and therefore it's efficient to do so.

Check out the Rogan Milo podcast where Milo coins Rogan as the "Dreary Nitpicker" for doing exactly this - trying to halut conversation by any means because he knows he's losing.

Post: #53

(10-28-2015 04:38 AM)Sooth Wrote:  

(10-27-2015 09:59 PM)talvesh Wrote:  

(10-27-2015 11:52 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Every sexual morality has to go.

Also I might add - the social planners work in cycles testing the water for blowback. If they see that too many people resist pedophilia (inter-generational sex as they call it now), then they put it on hold for a few years or even a decade, then they start again after the new generation has been brainwashed better and families are more destroyed. I guess the Muslim population brought into the West will change the dynamic too in that respect as pedophilia and bestiality are no biggies for some of them. (Of course for everyone except their daughters.)

Do you have evidence to back up these specific claims? I see a lot of claims like this and they are never verifiable.

Go verify them yourself with your own understanding.

Don't be the guy chucking a spanner in the works of conversation because you don't agree with it but have insufficient understanding to explain why.

People who know about a subject talk in generalisations and stereotypes because they already know the data and therefore it's efficient to do so.

Check out the Rogan Milo podcast where Milo coins Rogan as the "Dreary Nitpicker" for doing exactly this - trying to halut conversation by any means because he knows he's losing.

The problem with nitpicking and "prove it all" arguments is that of course none of us has seen top elite plans of for example feminism, where they state clearly why they support it:

1. destruction of family unit
2. taxation of females - pushing them into the work force
3. lowering of wages due to internal female competition
4. destruction of social morals - female fake empowerment ans sexual liberation

There may be some documents out there, but usually there are just statements, books, some minor white papers and the realization that it indeed works that way. The closest we have is the Reece commission on foundations, but even there was the fact that the lawyer permitted entry into the Ford foundation archives could not make copies or take papers outside.

But when you have a smoking gun and a body in front of it, then we don't have to see bullet flying and have it on film and 10 witnesses to make the conclusion.

Everyone has to make up his mind based on the information out there. And there is plenty of data which support our statements. Those demands of proof usually are not raised when a university speaks about feminism, gender crap or the media and politicians repeat one lie after another. As soon as you have the cash and the mainstream behind it, then you can make up any lie you want, because you have the official authority backing it. Infinite money does not equate infinite truth though.

Post: #54

Zelcorpion wrote : "+ he is highly intelligent and well connected having worked for interesting NGOs - for example falsifying climate change data for one to fit the global warming scam - that's why he does not believe in it - also there is plenty of actual researching debunking the whole crap"

If this Milo chap speaks out against the climate change scam then he could very well be one of the good guys, despite being gay.

The fact that he disagrees with gay marriage is a good sign too.

Post: #55

Milo digging his claws into Gawker again mocking their attempts to become a more respectable, serious outlet rather then the half tabloid rag it is:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/...op-trying/

Quote:Bar one beta male mangina, the entire staff of Jezebel consists of bitter, angry third-wave female bloggers. You can just imagine what Gawker‘s coverage of Hollywood is going to be like. If you can’t imagine, and need to simulate the feeling, wash down a mixture of Ipecac and Xanax with some cheap gin and jump up and down for a while.

Post: #56

Gawker can't afford not to hire female journalists. Doubtless they get paid less.

Post: #57

Any London based RVFers going to this?

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2015/11/20...e-invited/

Post: #58

Milo has done a lot of good things against SJWs.

There is just one big mistake which he did: Milo supported the diversity officer who was tweeting Kill All White Men

Death threats (to kill) are not "freedom of speech", the criminal laws have very clear punishments for the death threats which that diversity officer did

Post: #59

(11-20-2015 06:13 PM)bronet Wrote:  Milo has done a lot of good things against SJWs.
There is just one big mistake which he did: Milo supported the diversity officer who was tweeting Kill All White Men
Death threats (to kill) are not "freedom of speech", the criminal laws have very clear punishments for the death threats which that diversity officer did

I understand your assertion.
Yet I'd say that uncensored, absolute freedom of speech allows for a much easier distinction between the
retards & the righteous.

Post: #60

(11-20-2015 06:13 PM)bronet Wrote:  Milo has done a lot of good things against SJWs.

There is just one big mistake which he did: Milo supported the diversity officer who was tweeting Kill All White Men

Death threats (to kill) are not "freedom of speech", the criminal laws have very clear punishments for the death threats which that diversity officer did

There is a difference between supporting someone, and accepting that they have a right to express their views, however fucked up.

Free speech means we're going to hear things we disagree with or don't like.

Post: #61

Viewers can tell who will win this one before the debate even starts.

Also - why does this chick keep bringing up foreskin?

Post: #62

(12-12-2015 02:24 PM)redbeard Wrote:  



Viewers can tell who will win this one before the debate even starts.

Also - why does this chick keep bringing up foreskin?

She reminds me of these chicks.

Post: #63

(12-12-2015 02:24 PM)redbeard Wrote:  

Milo's speech from 13:26 is absolutely incredible and needs to be seen by as many young men as possible.

Milo is apparently doing an AMA on the Red Pill subreddit today at 12 pm EST / 5 pm London time: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comm...pm_london/

Post: #64

(12-17-2015 07:10 AM)player Wrote:  Milo's speech from 13:26 is absolutely incredible and needs to be seen by as many young men as possible.

That speech was fantastic.

Post: #65

(12-17-2015 07:10 AM)player Wrote:  Milo is apparently doing an AMA on the Red Pill subreddit today at 12 pm EST / 5 pm London time: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comm...pm_london/

Actually, it's here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comm...oulos_ama/

Post: #66

Post: #67

Some quotes from the AMA:

On fighting Feminism without ruining your career prospects:

Quote:For most people, the answer is: don't try. At least not yet. It's too soon. Let people like me clear the way first. We're winning, and we're pushing the boundaries of what it's acceptable to say, and before long you'll be able to speak more freely too. The best way you can help at the moment is support the work of those you think are pushing in the right direction.

Why are sjw and feminists so very entitled? What generational shift has happened to make them think they are such victims and how can we prevent it in the next generation?

Quote:Millennials are the first entirely middle-class generation in history. None of them have ever wanted for anything, so they invent grievances and manufacture trauma. No one--not parents, teachers or professors--ever told them they were being ridiculous or challenged their assumptions, so they have grown up into foolish, poorly-educated and egotistical young adults spouting nonsense dogma about oppression.

Universities bear most of the responsibility for this. Safe space and trigger warning culture should be stamped out; free speech should be rigorously enforced. And space must be made for libertarian, classical liberal and right-wing professors, so students have access to a range of views.

On the tolerance for progressivism and SJW ideology in the media:

Quote:I genuinely think we're about to see a big shift away from crazy feminist progressivism. The public is starting to catch on now, and they are incensed by the lunacy and unfairness of what they see. Most women don't hate men, and they are appalled by misandrist feminists who do.

There will always be a vocal minority of lunatics, but from my interactions with journalists and TV producers, the appetite for outrage-led, fact-free stories about confected feminist grievances is coming to an end. When that happens, men and arguments in favour of men will naturally begin to reassert themselves, because our views are based on facts, not feelings.

Post: #68

And it takes a faggot to point out this shit for the mainstream to listen?

Not having a go at Milo. But I have a bad taste in my mouth.

Post: #69

Quote:For most people, the answer is: don't try. At least not yet. It's too soon. Let people like me clear the way first. We're winning, and we're pushing the boundaries of what it's acceptable to say, and before long you'll be able to speak more freely too. The best way you can help at the moment is support the work of those you think are pushing in the right direction.

Post: #70

(12-18-2015 01:21 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  And it takes a faggot to point out this shit for the mainstream to listen?

Not having a go at Milo. But I have a bad taste in my mouth.

As long as Milo isn't pushing a highway rest stop gangbangs as part of normal, historical male behavior being persecuted by feminism, I don't really care if he's gay. Much better than a woman spouting off the same talking points.

But yes, it takes a faggot for the mainstream to listen.

Post: #71

@Nero · 50m
This guy is a massive troll and I love it http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-b...uper-sewer

Gender equality in construction: getting women to build London’s super sewer

' A few weeks in to my new role as chief executive at Thames Tideway Tunnel, I announced that I wanted to achieve
gender parity by the time we finished construction of London’s “super sewer” in 2023.

A few faces around the table dropped visibly; there was a sense of disbelief as those around me started fretting
about how on earth we were going to achieve the seemingly unachievable. We are a construction project,
after all. We are going to be building a 25-km concrete tunnel up to 65 metres below the River Thames to transport
the raw sewage that currently discharges in to the river away for treatment. This is a distinctly unglamorous
project in a “man’s world”. '

Post: #72

Post: #73

The guy is a massive troll.

Post: #74

(12-23-2015 03:26 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

I was certain this was a joke...but his twitter activity over the last day suggests it's for real. What the fuck?!

Post: #75

Could be real.

Buzzfeed needs a change from being the main degenarate leftist pusher.


Also the hufpost:


Take a look what he is leaving behind: BREITBART



Meanwhile fox news primetime beats (cnn+msnbc)*2
"Oscar(ish)" films are making 1/10 of what they cost due to extreme leftist agenda.
Wienstien is looking for investors, fired hundreds of people.
While Lionsgate(studio that is not concerned with sjw films) revenue increases, They even hired mel gibson to direct one of their films, he is in talks to direct another.
ESPN(Disney) loses 7 million suscribers. While Fox business gains on CNBC.
There is something happening, we will find out what the studio/network execs will do come november. If trump continues to dominate and even wins the election then we are about to see some serious turnout in content.