Post: #576

(12-04-2015 01:57 PM)Jesus Christ Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 01:42 PM)Dipar Wrote:  Your 6 is way too ugly. Would not bang. Not even when I am drunk and on a 10 year dry spell. According to your scale I only fucked girls that are at least a 7. I would say your 7 is a 6 and a real 7 is missing on your scale.

Anybody who says my 7 is a 6 is kidding themselves. The pure definition of a 7 is an average girl you wouldn't be ashamed of but neither proud of. That is probably 80% of young girls. Men like to change the standards to make themselves feel better, bloating up the hotness of girls they've fucked, and decreasing the hotness of the girls they haven't.

When I look at your 6 I come to the conclusion that your scale is bloating up the hotness of girls.

Post: #577

(12-04-2015 02:10 PM)Dipar Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 01:57 PM)Jesus Christ Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 01:42 PM)Dipar Wrote:  Your 6 is way too ugly. Would not bang. Not even when I am drunk and on a 10 year dry spell. According to your scale I only fucked girls that are at least a 7. I would say your 7 is a 6 and a real 7 is missing on your scale.

Anybody who says my 7 is a 6 is kidding themselves. The pure definition of a 7 is an average girl you wouldn't be ashamed of but neither proud of. That is probably 80% of young girls. Men like to change the standards to make themselves feel better, bloating up the hotness of girls they've fucked, and decreasing the hotness of the girls they haven't.

When I look at your 6 I come to the conclusion that your scale is bloating up the hotness of girls.

Why would I bloat up a 6? That is something you would hide from your friends. Is my 9 also bloated up?

Post: #578

Quote: I come to the conclusion that your scale is bloating up the hotness of girls.

JC at the bar...



   

Post: #579

(12-04-2015 02:12 PM)Jesus Christ Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 02:10 PM)Dipar Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 01:57 PM)Jesus Christ Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 01:42 PM)Dipar Wrote:  Your 6 is way too ugly. Would not bang. Not even when I am drunk and on a 10 year dry spell. According to your scale I only fucked girls that are at least a 7. I would say your 7 is a 6 and a real 7 is missing on your scale.

Anybody who says my 7 is a 6 is kidding themselves. The pure definition of a 7 is an average girl you wouldn't be ashamed of but neither proud of. That is probably 80% of young girls. Men like to change the standards to make themselves feel better, bloating up the hotness of girls they've fucked, and decreasing the hotness of the girls they haven't.

When I look at your 6 I come to the conclusion that your scale is bloating up the hotness of girls.

Why would I bloat up a 6? That is something you would hide from your friends. Is my 9 also bloated up?

Like I said, acccording to your scale I have never fucked a girl below 7 which sounds nice but is not true for me. So your scale is bloating up the hotness of every 7, simply because the difference between your 6 and your 7 is too big. For example, there is no girl in your scale that I would only bang when drunk or on a dry spell.

Your 9 is a 9. Your 8 is an 8 (with a bit makeup). But your 6 ist definitely not 6. The 7 might be a 7 but is debatable.

For me a 6 is an average girl I wouldn't be ashamed but also not proud of. A 7 is a slightly better looking 6. An 8 has model potential and a 9 is close to perfection.

Anyway, I prefer a scale like this:

1 - would not bang under any circumstances
2 - would only bang when drunk and/or on a dry spell
3 - would bang sober
4 - would bang 24/7

Post: #580

We seem to disagree on the lower end of the scale. Perhaps we have different definitions of the scale. Remember:

6: Wouldn't mind fucking though still shameful.
7: Average, not shameful nor generates pride.
8: Generates pride.
9: Near-perfection.

All the girls on that scale fit these criteria for me. Perhaps your standards are higher than mine. I personally fucked a 9 this summer in Moscow, on par with the example provided in my post. I have also fucked 6s, also on par with the example provided in my post. I guess every guy has his lower limit.

Post: #581

JC has only been with us a few days but posts like he's been here for an eternity.

Who was Jesus Christ in a previous life?

Post: #582

(12-04-2015 04:49 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  JC has only been with us a few days but posts like he's been here for an eternity.

Who was Jesus Christ in a previous life?

Hopefully either Bigbootyluvr, Little Dark, or Skip's Steps. He doesn't write like either of thise first two, though.

Post: #583

Reminds me of Turkish Republican. Turkmenistan is an adventurous place to live though, maybe he can drop us a datasheet from there.

Post: #584

I think this "what do you guys consider an X" thing is already beat to high heavens.

Can't we just agree on Return of Kings' standard chart?

http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/...lscale.jpg

(12-04-2015 05:00 PM)godzilla Wrote:  Reminds me of Turkish Republican. Turkmenistan is an adventurous place to live though, maybe he can drop us a datasheet from there.

Also what was the deal with that guy? I PM'd him a little, sounded like the regular ass turkish trust fund kid, and now he's banned, I have no idea what happened.

Post: #585

(12-04-2015 05:00 PM)godzilla Wrote:  Reminds me of Turkish Republican. Turkmenistan is an adventurous place to live though, maybe he can drop us a datasheet from there.

I think it's Skip's Steps. The girl Skip is calling a "9" is quality. The "8" is average at best and the "7" is average or a little above. All the rest of the girls he posted are hideous.

Post: #586

(12-04-2015 02:32 PM)Jesus Christ Wrote:  I personally fucked a 9 this summer in Moscow, on par with the example provided in my post.

It wouldn't count as a notch if someone else fucked her on your behalf.

Post: #587

(12-04-2015 05:04 PM)the Thing Wrote:  I think this "what do you guys consider an X" thing is already beat to high heavens.

Can't we just agree on Return of Kings' standard chart?

http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/...lscale.jpg

(12-04-2015 05:00 PM)godzilla Wrote:  Reminds me of Turkish Republican. Turkmenistan is an adventurous place to live though, maybe he can drop us a datasheet from there.

Also what was the deal with that guy? I PM'd him a little, sounded like the regular ass turkish trust fund kid, and now he's banned, I have no idea what happened.

No idea. I thought he was trolling though. A lot of vague comments and a lot posts early on, but I really have no idea.

Skip's steps is not banned actually but maybe he likes trolling anyway.

Post: #588

(12-04-2015 04:56 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 04:49 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  JC has only been with us a few days but posts like he's been here for an eternity.

Who was Jesus Christ in a previous life?

Hopefully either Bigbootyluvr, Little Dark, or Skip's Steps. He doesn't write like either of thise first two, though.

Libertarian booty? I find it funny he went silver member. Prolly trying to look legit but doesn't want to lose that much cash if ip ban.

Post: #589

(12-04-2015 05:15 PM)godzilla Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 05:04 PM)the Thing Wrote:  I think this "what do you guys consider an X" thing is already beat to high heavens.

Can't we just agree on Return of Kings' standard chart?

http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/...lscale.jpg

(12-04-2015 05:00 PM)godzilla Wrote:  Reminds me of Turkish Republican. Turkmenistan is an adventurous place to live though, maybe he can drop us a datasheet from there.

Also what was the deal with that guy? I PM'd him a little, sounded like the regular ass turkish trust fund kid, and now he's banned, I have no idea what happened.

No idea. I thought he was trolling though. A lot of vague comments and a lot posts early on, but I really have no idea.

Skip's steps is not banned actually but maybe he likes trolling anyway.

I could have sworn that Skip was banned after he had that meltdown on the Best City for Black American Guys thread. I'm not sure what happened. He stopped posting very soon after that meltdown. I still think Jesus Christ is Skip. LBH has a completely different style.

Post: #590

(12-04-2015 01:57 PM)Jesus Christ Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 01:42 PM)Dipar Wrote:  Your 6 is way too ugly. Would not bang. Not even when I am drunk and on a 10 year dry spell. According to your scale I only fucked girls that are at least a 7. I would say your 7 is a 6 and a real 7 is missing on your scale.

Anybody who says my 7 is a 6 is kidding themselves. The pure definition of a 7 is an average girl you wouldn't be ashamed of but neither proud of. That is probably 80% of young girls. Men like to change the standards to make themselves feel better, bloating up the hotness of girls they've fucked, and decreasing the hotness of the girls they haven't.

Actually no. The average between 1-10 on the scale is actually somewhere around a 5.5 ((1+10)/2 = 5.5)). Even if you throw out the 1's and 10's from the scale and just go from 2-9 the average is still 5.5. It's basic math. I know I'm getting nerdy here. On my scale a 5.5 is the edge of bangable for me. 6+ is cute. 7+ is pretty. 8+ is hot. 9+ is stunning. But to each their own...

Post: #591

Here are the correct designations for each numeral:

1 grotesque
2 repulsive
3 ugly
4 unattractive
5 plain
6 cute
7 pretty
8 hot
9 gorgeous
10 beautiful

Post: #592

(12-04-2015 04:49 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  JC has only been with us a few days but posts like he's been here for an eternity.

Who was Jesus Christ in a previous life?

I guess it certainly does feel like Christ has been with us for eternity.

Post: #593

(12-05-2015 12:31 AM)Jesus Christ Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 04:49 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  JC has only been with us a few days but posts like he's been here for an eternity.

Who was Jesus Christ in a previous life?

I guess it certainly does feel like Christ has been with us for eternity.

Especially when he doesn't deny my claims that he is Skip's Steps. I'll just leave it alone. Enjoy your time here, Skip.

Post: #594

Holy scale jumps. The 7 looks better than the 8, the 8 has something fucked up with her face that I just can't place. Maybe the eyes are too far apart or something. The 4 is like a 1 or 2, and 5 he posted is like a 3-4. 5 being the middle of the scale is something you could do when you're thirsty but wouldn't wanna admit to your friends about.

Dudes 9 is a touched up photo so of course she looks bangin.

Had to weigh in on that shit.

Post: #595

(12-05-2015 01:33 AM)cascadecombo Wrote:  Holy scale jumps. The 7 looks better than the 8, the 8 has something fucked up with her face that I just can't place. Maybe the eyes are too far apart or something. The 4 is like a 1 or 2, and 5 he posted is like a 3-4. 5 being the middle of the scale is something you could do when you're thirsty but wouldn't wanna admit to your friends about.

Dudes 9 is a touched up photo so of course she looks bangin.

Had to weigh in on that shit.

Shows that men adapt to their environment. It happened to me when I got to Russia. First time I saw a real 9 I was shocked, I could feel it all throughout my body. If I see one today it does nothing to me. The 8 is a supermodel and saying she looks worse than an average college girl is ridiculous. But again shows that men adapt to their environment.

Post: #596

Yes, because the "supermodel" tag means so so much.

Post: #597

(12-04-2015 05:04 PM)the Thing Wrote:  I think this "what do you guys consider an X" thing is already beat to high heavens.

Can't we just agree on Return of Kings' standard chart?

http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/...lscale.jpg

That one has a pretty big jump from 7 to 8 too.

Post: #598

(12-05-2015 08:24 AM)Fomalhaut Wrote:  

(12-04-2015 05:04 PM)the Thing Wrote:  I think this "what do you guys consider an X" thing is already beat to high heavens.

Can't we just agree on Return of Kings' standard chart?

http://www.returnofkings.com/wp-content/...lscale.jpg

That one has a pretty big jump from 7 to 8 too.

Respectfully disagree. ROK chart looks to me like a paint matching chart. As the colours of a paint chart blend subtly from one end of the spectrum to the other, so too does the attractiveness of girls on that chart. Sure, for some there will be 7s in the 8 column, and 5s in the 4. But there's a wide enough selection, and it paces evenly enough through 1-10 in my book.

JC appears to be some kind of big baller troll. He's told us he's 6'5 and jacked in about a dozen different posts.

Post: #599

(08-09-2011 12:34 AM)_DC_ Wrote:  Wow, this thread has blown my mind! If a "5" is indeed "fuckable" then I'd say I'm very surprised. There are a few hot/cute girls here, notably the first OK cupid girl and the blonde girl (middle right) (both attached). These are the kinds of girls I would approach in a bar.

Some of the girls deemed "fuckable" on here, honestly, not only would I not be able to get it up, I'd probably yak on myself.

To each his own though, I was just shocked at some of the suggestions. I guess it would be better to be turned on by a larger amount of girls. I agree with a previous poster that for me fat = ZERO, and chubby at best is a 2 or 3. There is no amount of bj skill, cooking skill, money, fame, etc. that will help me see around it; chubby girls do not turn me on at all, plus I see it as a manifestation of bad personality traits as well e.g. laziness, lack of willpower, etc.

I prefer the "binary system" which was alluded to before. 0 = not fuckable; 1 = fuckable.

I haven't slept with that many girls (relative to some people in the forum anyway, about 30-40), however if even half of these girls posted were "fuckable" or a "5" to me, jesus, I'd be swimming in it.

Haha I banged the girl in the first pic.

Post: #600

Felicia Day, without a ton of makeup and fancy lighting and professional photography, is what here in the Boston area we call a "Standard Issue 6-ish." The type of girl that shows up on an OKC date day in, and day out.

A "5" is basically kinda like her, but with "regular" colored hair in a short hairstyle and like 15-20 pounds overweight.