^^ Solid move if actually true. If they are going to accept refugees anyway then it may as well be genuine women and children.

One of the 3 terrorists (from the Paris attacks) who previously entered Europe through Greece, received help, clothes and food, from... French SJW volunteers!

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/new...teers.html

"A PARIS suicide bomber was helped on to a Greek island and clothed by French volunteers before making his way through Europe to his target, it emerged yesterday.

The IS fanatic, known as Ahmad Almohammad from a fake Syrian passport found at Stade De France, had sailed to Leros with a group of English-speaking pals.

Officials said they were helped ashore with nearly 200 refugees after deliberately driving a knife through their boat as they neared land on October 3. Two were then discovered with fake Syrian passports and arrested"

"But Almohammad, 25, was ushered through and moved to a camp staffed by French charity Médecins Sans Frontières.

Less than 24 hours later, in a black tracksuit given to him by the volunteers, he was in a group of six buying tickets to Athens."

Extreme SJWs Médecins Sans Frontières should be prosecuted for aiding and abetting. SJWism kills!

Here on this thread, Zelcorpion had warned us about the criminal responsibility and irresponsible behaviour of Médecins Sans Frontières:
https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-50253...pid1129440

By the way... Philippe de Villiers, a famous and courageous French conservative writer, businessman, former politician and friend of V. Putin, has asked for French president Hollande to be prosecuted for High Treason (yesterday in an interview with LeFigaro's Yves Threard)

Public calls for SJW Western presidents to be prosecuted for High Treason... Also, day before yesterday, the Bavarian conservative leader told Merkel, to her face, for the tenth anniversary of her election, that she was destroying Germany's future with her migrants' policies:

(11-22-2015 09:16 PM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  

(11-22-2015 01:24 PM)Krum Wrote:  

(11-21-2015 03:34 PM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  

(11-21-2015 09:14 AM)Krum Wrote:  It is no surprise they call it Globalization
It's one rule, one system EVERYWHERE.

China is not a part of that system. In fact, very few if any non-white countries are. Our defeat lies in the fact that the fifth column in white nations resembles our native population. In non-white nations they cannot blend in and exercise subversion nearly as effectively.

Of course it is.
You don't think that the powers in West woke up one day
and decided to export 90% of their manufacturing base
in a communist countries for the fun of it, do you?

No, it's not. I live here. The decision to offshore was made almost entirely for simple profit seeking. China is not controlled by some shadowy globalist cabal. This kind of thinking is inane. There are no Rockefellers with "trillions" under the bed. You can talk about that all you want and the worst that will happen is that people will think you're a kook. Ask yourself what is the one group you cannot accuse of conspiring when you're in polite society and that is your answer. And they do not control China.

It's your wishful thinking
because you live there.

And your logic is totally flawed.
China is about the become the economic No.1 power
So if the Westerns elite exported their production purely for profit
and later realized that they've created a monster
That would have been very naive and stupid of them
but sadly it's not the case.

The build up of China was/is part of program of
the de-industrialization of the West, particularly America.
What has been given to China, was taken from elsewhere.

The US technology and money was used to built up the USSR
to help them defeat the Germans and
to create a credible 'threat' in the Cold War.

Hitler is another example. He was used to build strong
and nationalistic Germany which later he sent
for slaughter in a yet another reckless European war.

Saddam Hussein is another example.
He was made strong to be taken down later
as part of the strategy to conquer the Middle East.

Another indicator is China's money supply.
The Chinese Government officially owns the money supply.
It is not entirely clear where the interest goes.
The Emperors printed debt-free cash.

Have you ever wondered when somebody spouts the "Islam is Peaceful line", they never ask Hindus, Buddhists or Sikhs about their interactions with Islam?

Here's a lesson from history with my comments included:

The Last Hindu Ruler Of Sindh (First Islamic conquest of Indian Subcontinent by Arabs)

Quote:Raja Dahir (Sindhi: راجا ڏاھر Sanskrit: राजा दाहिर Urdu: راجہ داہر, 661–712 CE) was the last Hindu ruler of Sindh and parts of the Punjab in modern day Pakistan.He was a Pushkarna Brahmin king, son of Chach of Aror, who ascended the throne after the death of his uncle, Chandar. Eight years later, Dahir’s kingdom was invaded by Ramal at Kannauj. After initial losses, the enemy advanced on Aror and he allied himself with Alafi, an Arab. Alafi and his warriors (who were exiled from the Umayyad caliphate) were recruited; they led Dahir’s armies in repelling the invading forces, remaining as valued members of Dahir’s court. In a later war with the caliphate, however, Alafi served as a military advisor but refused to take an active part in the campaign; as a result, he later obtained a pardon from the caliph. [Alafi put down his arms and refused to fight his fellow Muslims when the shit hit the fan. He betrayed the non-Muslim Hindu he was working for]

The primary reason for the expedition by the governor of Basra, Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, against Raja Dahir was a pirate raid off the coast of Debal resulting in gifts to the caliph from the king of Serendib (modern Sri Lanka) being stolen.[4] The chronicles reported that when he heard about the matter, Hajjaj wrote a letter to Dahir and launched a military expedition when no resolution could be reached. Other reasons for the Umayyad interest in a foothold in the Makran, Balochistan and Sindh regions were the participation of Sindhi armies with the Persians in battles (such as those at Nahawand, Salasal and Qādisiyyah) and granting refuge to fleeing rebel chieftains.

Hajjaj’s campaign was launched under the aegis of Muhammad bin Qasim. In 711 CE, bin Qasim attacked Debal and on the orders of Al-Hajjaj.Other than this instance, the policy was generally one of enlisting and co-opting support from defectors and defeated lords and forces. From Debal, bin Qasim moved on to Nerun for supplies; the city’s Buddhist governor had acknowledged it as a tributary state of the Caliphate after the first campaign and capitulated to bin Qasim. [The Buddhist governor acknowledged Islamic Rulership - so let's see how Buddhsits were treated...]

The rule by successors of the Rai Dynasty as characterized by persecution of Buddhists, Jats and Meds from the time of Chach; a prophecy of Raja Dahir’s fall encouraged defections to bin Qasim’s army. Sociologist U.T. Thakur suggested a more complex dynamic: Hinduism (the religion of the dominant castes), Buddhism (the religion of the lower castes) and high Buddhists were descended from Bactrian migrants. The king was a Brahmin, and the majority of his advisers were from his family. The ruler of Alor (a Jat) professed Buddhism. Nonetheless, there was a sense of “ideological dualism” between them; Thakur considered this the inherent weakness exploited by the Arabs when they invaded the region.

By enlisting the support of local tribes (such as the Jats, Meds and Bhuttos) and Buddhist rulers,Muhammad bin Qasim defeated Dahir and captured his eastern territories for the Umayyad Caliphate.[Non Muslims helped the Muslim invaders - how many of these communities kept their original religion?] Dahir then tried to prevent Qasim from crossing the Indus River, moving his forces to its eastern banks. Eventually, however, Qasim crossed and defeated the forces led by Jaisiah (Dahir’s son) at Jitor. Qasim fought Dahir at Raor (near modern Nawabshah) in 712 CE, killing him; [b]Dahir’s wife immolated herself (with other women in her household) in accordance with the Hindu tradition of Jauhar.[The wife would rather kill herself than be raped, forcibly converted to Islam and/or a sex slave]

Muhammad bin Qasim demise is attributed to the daughters of King Dahir who had been taken captive during the campaign. Upon capture they had been sent on as presents to the Khalifa for his harem. The account relates that they then tricked the Khalifa into believing that Muhammad bin Qasim had violated them before sending them on and as a result of this subterfuge, Muhammad bin Qasim was wrapped and stitched in oxen hides, and returned to Syria, which resulted in his death en route from suffocation. This narrative attributes their motive for this subterfuge to securing vengeance for their father’s death. [Perhaps one of the few "good" examples of a false rape accusation in history]Upon discovering this subterfuge, the Khalifa is recorded to have been filled with remorse and ordered the sisters buried alive in a wall.[Sisters paid for the false rape accusation in the end]

The period of Qasim’s rule has been called by U.T. Thakkur “the darkest period in Sind history”, with the records speaking of massive forced conversions, temple destruction, slaughters and genocides; the people of Sindh, described as inherently pacifist due to their Hindu/Buddhist religious inclinations, had to adjust to the conditions of “barbarian inroad”.Secondly as for the treatment of women the invaders were nothing less than tyrants,when sind was finally conquered by Qasim he enslaved many women of sind, his noblemans harem was filled with enslaved women and so was his noblemans, They looted and plundered sind.[As we can see, Islam "peacefully" entered India - how many Buddhists are left in that part of the world nowadays...?] A historian madani confirms that when Dahir’s severed head was presented to Hajjaj, a courtier sang: “we have conquered Sindh after enormous trouble. Betrayed is Dahir by Mohammed Bin Qasim’s masterly strategy. Rejoice, the evil doers are disgraced. Their wealth has been brought away . They are now solitary and brittle as eggs and their women, fair and fragrant as musk-deer, are now asleep in our harems.”[Warning for Europe, a lot of the Hindu/Buddhist men were pussies due to non-violent religion, and their women were taken away and are now in the Muslim's bedrooms. Substitute non-violent religion with today's hipster SJW faggotry to see how much fighting spirit a lot of younger men have nowadays...]

Bawarij the famous sailors at that time embraced Islam and became known as Sindhi Sailors; they became famous due to their skills in navigation, geography and languages.Due to this Islam started propagating to South East Asia along with Arab Sailors/Merchants.

(11-23-2015 10:38 AM)Going strong Wrote:  Extreme SJWs Médecins Sans Frontières should be prosecuted for aiding and abetting. SJWism kills!

Here on this thread, Zelcorpion had warned us about the criminal responsibility and irresponsible behaviour of Médecins Sans Frontières:
https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-50253...pid1129440

MSF is a Rockerfeller operation. Bankers or big oil doesn't want frontiers and they'll dress up as philanthropists.

(11-23-2015 03:39 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  Have you ever wondered when somebody spouts the "Islam is Peaceful line", they never ask Hindus, Buddhists or Sikhs about their interactions with Islam?

Indeed.
The Muslim conquest of India may have been the greatest genocide in human history.

The AfD held a speech recently and the German evangelical cuck church tried to disrupt it by tolling the bells when the speaker started. The result was quite contrary to what the church had hoped for: an epic atmosphere for the speech - the speaker said he welcomed the bells and they fit perfectly as he started by talking about the deaths of the Paris attacks:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-xNYOqbG6uE

(11-23-2015 03:39 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  Have you ever wondered when somebody spouts the "Islam is Peaceful line", they never ask Hindus, Buddhists or Sikhs about their interactions with Islam?

The war between islamists and the east has been going on for far longer than the war between islamists and the west. A lot of the conflicts from the subcontinent all the way to the western border of China predates the crusades. People always forget that Afghanistan, the territory that is Iran, and the traditional central asian countries were not muslim originally.

Several Chinese dynasties had a very strong diplomatic silk road relationship with various Persian rulers who were at the time Zoroastrian and later communities of Nestorian Christians but they were not muslim.

It wasn't until muslim bandits and warlords started to creep into the scene that the Chinese dynasties started to fortify and militarize the western border. The 7th-10th century Tang dynasty took a particularly hard stance against muslim warlord incursion.

This is why the silk road had so many trader cities that were also fortified as first alert stations for an invasion. If you look at ancient buddhist artifacts and ancestral burial grounds on the western border of China a lot of them were defaced by muslim bandits who would take over a border city-state for awhile and then start destroying everything.

Some things never change.

This is why China does not fuck around with muslim terrorists. People in charge tend to know the past a bit better and aren't willing to suck arab muslim cock like the liberal west.

(11-23-2015 07:39 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  People always forget that Afghanistan, the territory that is Iran, and the traditional central asian countries were not muslim originally.

For Afghanistan The Buddhas in Bamiyan predated Islam by around 100 years. Genghis Khan left them alone, But Aurangzeb (17th century Emperor of India) tried to blow them but couldn’t.

Quote:In 1221 with the advent of Genghis Khan "a terrible disaster befell Bamiyan", nevertheless, the statues were spared. Later, the Mughal emperor, Aurangzeb, tried to use heavy artillery to destroy the statues. Another attempt to destroy the Bamiyan statues was made by the 18th century Persian king Nader Afshar, directing cannon fire at them.

The Taliban blew them up in 2001, here’s a before and after picture:



I guess that was very "tolerant and peaceful" of them to blow up statues older than Islam..

Aurangzeb the former Emperor of India wasn’t a very nice guy:

Quote:As emperor, Aurangzeb enforced morals and banned the consumption, usage and practices of: alcoholism, gambling, castration, servitude, eunuchs, music, nautch and narcotics in the Mughal Empire. He learnt that at Sindh, Multan, Thatta and particularly at Varanasi, the Hindu Brahmins attracted large numbers of indigenous local Muslims to their discourses. He ordered the Subahdars of these provinces to demolish the schools and the temples of non-Muslims. Aurangzeb also ordered Subahdars to punish Muslims who dressed like non-Muslims. The executions of the antinomian Sufi mystic Sarmad Kashani and the ninth Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur bear testimony to Aurangzeb's religious intolerance; the former was beheaded on multiple accounts of heresy, the latter, according to Sikhs, because he objected to Aurangzeb's forced conversions.
….
Another instance of Aurangzeb's notoriety was his policy of temple destruction, for which figures vary wildly from 80 to 60,000. Indian historian Harbans Mukhia wrote that "In the end, as recently recorded in Richard Eaton's careful tabulation, some 80 temples were demolished between 1192 and 1760 (15 in Aurangzeb's reign) and he compares this figure with the claim of 60,000 demolitions, advanced rather nonchalantly by 'Hindu nationalist' propagandists,' although even in that camp professional historians are slightly more moderate." Among the Hindu temples he demolished were the three most sacred: the Kashi Vishwanath temple, Kesava Deo temple and Somnath temple. He built large mosques in their place.[29] In 1679, he ordered destruction of several prominent temples that had become associated with his enemies: these included the temples of Khandela, Udaipur, Chittor and Jodhpur.[

I have personally been to the Krishna Janambhoomi temple in Mathura, where Hindus belive Lord Krishna is born. The temple is surrounded by loads of armed soldiers since it’s been destroyed by Muslims a couple of times. They built a mosque in the complex:



How about the oldest mosque in Delhi?

Quote:Quwwat-ul-Islam mosque(Arabic: قوة الإسلام ) (might of Islam) (also known as the Qutub Mosque or the Great Mosque of Delhi) was built by Qutb-ud-din Aibak, founder of the Mamluk or Slave dynasty. It was the first mosque built in Delhi after the Islamic conquest of India and the oldest surviving example of Ghurids architecture in Indian subcontinent.

According to a Persian inscription still on the inner eastern gateway, the mosque was built by the parts taken by destruction of twenty-seven Hindu and Jain temples built previously during Tomars and Prithvi Raj Chauhan, and leaving certain parts of the temple outside the mosque proper.

I guess they "peacefully" destroyed the temples to build the mosque...

(11-23-2015 07:39 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  Several Chinese dynasties had a very strong diplomatic silk road relationship with various Persian rulers who were at the time Zoroastrian and later communities of Nestorian Christians but they were not muslim.

The last non-Muslim rulers of Iran actually moved to China:

Bahram VII

Quote:Bahram VII (Middle Persian: ?????, Wahrām, Persian: بهرام یکم‎‎, Bahrām) was the son of Yazdegerd III, the last Shahanshah of the Sasanian Empire. After the death of his father at Merv in 651, Bahram fled to China along with many other Sasanian nobles, where he and his brother Peroz III asked the Chinese Emperor Gaozong to support them in their fight against the Arabs. Bahram repeatedly tried to recapture the occupied Iranian territories from the Arabs, which he did not succeed in.

Bahram died in 710, his son, Prince Khosrau (Chinese: Juluo), continued his father's military efforts. However, Khosrau's campaigns and his first successful invasion into Persia were eventually unsuccessful.

The Chinese lost the Battle of Talas in 751 against the Arabs, and Central Asia went Islamic.

Quote:The Battle of Talas, Battle of Talas River, or Battle of Artlakh (Chinese: 怛羅斯會戰; Arabic: معركة نهر طلاس‎) was a military engagement between the Arab Abbasid Caliphate along with their ally the Tibetan Empire and the Chinese Tang Dynasty, then under Emperor Xuanzong. In July 751 AD, Tang and Abbasid forces met in the valley of the Talas River to vie for control of the Syr Darya region of central Asia. After a stalemate in several days of combat, the Tang lost the battle because the Karluks defected from the Tang side to the Abbasid side. The battle was a defeat for the Tang and marked the end of their westward territorial expansion, resulting in Muslim control of Transoxiana for the next four hundred years.
...
The Tang army was subjected to a devastating defeat. The Tang dynasty's defeat was due to the defection of Karluk mercenaries and the retreat of Ferghana allies who originally supported the Chinese. The Karluks forces composed two-thirds of the Tang army changed to the Abbasid side while the battle was ongoing so that Karluk troops attacked the Tang army from close quarters and the main Abbasid forces attacked from the front so that the Tang troops were unable to hold their positions.
...
A small minority of Karluks converted to Islam after the battle. The majority of Karluks did not convert to Islam until the mid 10th century under Sultan Satuq Bughra Khan when they established the Kara-Khanid Khanate. This was long after the Tang dynasty was gone from Central Asia.
...
The culture of Central Asia, once a mixture of Persian, Indian, and Chinese influences, disappeared under the power struggles between the empires of the Arabs, Chinese, Turks, Tibetans, and Uyghurs. Islam grew as the dominant cultural force of Central Asia.

The Chinese got backstabbed by Turks...I guess this is similar to what happened with the Romans towards the end, when their army was full of mercenaries.

[DELETE]

Thanks for the informative post walterblack. Indian massacres at the hand invading muslims seems to be very taboo subject. It is said to be the biggest slaughter the world has seen. I found this video that explains the situation all the way to our time:







This shows how much of a fatal mistake it is to tolerate invaders in your social fabric. India of course is still suffering more than ever today. Please notice the parallels between the Indian government promoting tolerance while its population is being massacred and the western government we have now.

Also, it shows how British colonialism got unfairly blamed for creating the tensions between Pakistan and India when nothing could be further from the truth. Indians lived much better under the british who contributed by building the infrastructure of the country and bringing secular ruling that allowed Indians to escape from the Muslim systemic abuse.

I have the same perspective on colonialism in the middle east, in fact I would argue that Syria saw some of its better days under the French...

I do again report that r/Europe has gone pretty much fully anti-immigration. And I report it because Reddit is really left wing normally and the mods have tried really hard to keep it that way (I am shadowbanned pretty hard for example. New accounts I make are shadowbanned right out of the gate somehow).

Proof that the narrative is dying, so much so that the cockroaches are trying to save themselves.

Remember this fellow? Head of Germany's Jewish Council? Who said Germany had to take refugees to atone for its past?



Well he changed his mind. These migrants are hostile to Jews... and homosexuals, women, etc.

I'll take his admission that the Far Right was correct all along.

http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/3bf336fa-...z3sNp3osiV

Quote:The leader of Germany’s Jewish community has backed calls for refugee quotas, warning that many asylum-seekers are from cultures marked by “hate towards Jews and intolerance”.

Quote:“Many refugees are fleeing the terror of the Islamic State and want to live in peace and freedom, but at the same time they come from cultures in which hate towards Jews and intolerance are fixed components. Don’t only think about the Jews, think about equal rights for women and the treatment of homosexuals.”

Quote:Dr Schuster, 61, was born in Israel to German Jewish refugees. Unusually, the family returned to Germany and settled in 1956 in its home region of northern Bavaria. Germany’s Jewish community — once composed mainly of the descendants of pre-1939 German Jews — has swelled from 30,000 in 1990 to about 250,000 largely due to immigration from the former Soviet bloc.

Quote:His appeal has divided Jewish opinion in Germany. Supporters praised him for voicing their fears but critics expressed concern that he had sided with the only party in parliament that backs quotas — the CSU — and against all the other parties which do not, including the CDU, the SPD and the Greens.

Quote:Germany recorded more anti-Semitic attacks than any other EU state, including France and the UK, which have larger Jewish communities. However, analysts caution that the figures may not be comparable as recording standards vary and Germany is scrupulous in its record-keeping.

Not that I don't believe you, but how do you know r/Europe has gone right?

I know /r/European pretty well and they post about them constantly and what got them banned there etc.

Has /r/Europe stopped banning everyone who doesn't fully agree?


Also I'm noticing that the screws on the positive immigrant image in Germany media are being loosened. It's starting with actual open debates, politicians openly disagreeing and now the Jews coming out of the woodwork.

This is conspiracy talk again, but to me it seems very much planned. As if the Jews out of all people had needed to wait for 2 years and 2 million muslim, arab and african invaders before they thought of the implications. If he is a person who actually cares about his people, he has been wanting to say this for years but was kept silent. If not, then this is just the time he picked to sway public opinion. After all, who do we Germans want to please the most?

"Let's do it for the Jews" is the perfect excuse for leftists to give up on their endeavor without looking like fools.

And in the end, no matter what happens, it will look as if the public had decided.

(11-24-2015 04:53 AM)LE50 Wrote:  Not that I don't believe you, but how do you know r/Europe has gone right?

I know /r/European pretty well and they post about them constantly and what got them banned there etc.

Has /r/Europe stopped banning everyone who doesn't fully agree?


Also I'm noticing that the screws on the positive immigrant image in Germany media are being loosened. It's starting with actual open debates, politicians openly disagreeing and now the Jews coming out of the woodwork.

This is conspiracy talk again, but to me it seems very much planned. As if the Jews out of all people had needed to wait for 2 years and 2 million muslim, arab and african invaders before they thought of the implications. If he is a person who actually cares about his people, he has been wanting to say this for years but was kept silent. If not, then this is just the time he picked to sway public opinion. After all, who do we Germans want to please the most?

"Let's do it for the Jews" is the perfect excuse for leftists to give up on their endeavor without looking like fools.

And in the end, no matter what happens, it will look as if the public had decided.

I would have to agree with Leo here. Having observed this unfolding migration train wreck from afar over the past year or so I couldn't help but wonder why European jews would be supporting the unmitigated influx of a people/culture who has been extremely clear and verbose about wanting to exterminate them for over a 1000 years. I mean - being a chess player myself - I just don't see a positive outcome in this scenario. What is the upside here? Saturate Germany with extreme Muslims for the coming decades and then find an excuse to drop a neutron bomb and then take it all over? Or develop a genetic weapon that kills anyone with an Arab DNA strain? Come on - that's a bit of a stretch.

FACT: Once the Muzzies dig in there is no way to get them out of that place short of overwhelming military force and strategic genocide. Meaning you have to kill ALL of them - including women and children. Because if you let them live you're fighting another war within less than one generation.

The one and only proactive defense is to kick them ALL out while you can and then build a wall. The Chinese learned that the hard way, so did Europe, the Afganis didn't which is why this former Christian country is now in the hands of Islam.

I have for a long time now tried to figure out what possible scenario would lead to a positive outcome for the native Europeans and the Jews living there. Either I'm not smart enough or there is an agenda at work that does not include me and my kind. Meaning more likely than not Europeans and their culture are now considered expendable. Just pull up some pictures of Beirut during the war or Syria, Iraq right now - that's how Germany is going to look like in about 20 years, and I may be optimistic regarding the timing.

If anyone can offer a theory as to who is on the receiving end of the 'cui bono' here then I'm all ears.

It's happening.

Russian Su-24 fighter jet shot down over Syria by Turkish Air Force.

Putin: Russia will not tolerate such crimes as attack against its Sukhoi-24 plane

Путин: Су-24 был сбит над Сирией ракетой "воздух-воздух" ВВС Турции

EDIT: This may deserve its own topic, i don't know where to put it. What do you think mods?

I thought about posting it as a topic, yes indeed it deserves it's own topic. The pilot was killed by terrorists, I've seen a video.

There's the "Russia entering the Syrian conflict" thread, where this matter is already being discussed:
https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-50338.html

(11-24-2015 04:53 AM)LE50 Wrote:  Not that I don't believe you, but how do you know r/Europe has gone right?

I know /r/European pretty well and they post about them constantly and what got them banned there etc.

Has /r/Europe stopped banning everyone who doesn't fully agree?

I browse both /r/Europe and /r/European quite frequently: The mods of /r/Europe are still giant cucks with those bans but I can confirm the comment section itself has been quite red pilled ever since the refugee crisis broke out, before that it was pretty much a marxist hugbox.

Two underage (Or ''underage'') asylum seekers raped a 14 -year old girl in Finland yesterday. Now our PM has called an emergency meeting concerning the issue. Coincindicentally the rape happened in his home county. The same county where he gave away his house for ten refugees to use freely a while ago. I wonder how media will spin this.

----------------------------------------

(11-24-2015 10:41 AM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

(11-24-2015 10:08 AM)dHerblay Wrote:  Two underage (Or ''underage'') asylum seekers raped a 14 -year old girl in Finland yesterday. Now our PM has called an emergency meeting concerning the issue. Coincindicentally the rape happened in his home county. The same county where he gave away his house for ten refugees to use freely a while ago. I wonder how media will spin this.

Not just county, but his hometown. It won't affect anything, though.

Ah, yes. My bad. Yeah it'll be just couple of cheap words and then back to wrecking this country up as usual .

(11-24-2015 11:59 AM)dHerblay Wrote:  

(11-24-2015 10:41 AM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

(11-24-2015 10:08 AM)dHerblay Wrote:  Two underage (Or ''underage'') asylum seekers raped a 14 -year old girl in Finland yesterday. Now our PM has called an emergency meeting concerning the issue. Coincindicentally the rape happened in his home county. The same county where he gave away his house for ten refugees to use freely a while ago. I wonder how media will spin this.

Not just county, but his hometown. It won't affect anything, though.

Ah, yes. My bad. Yeah it'll be just couple of cheap words and then back to wrecking this country up as usual .

Just swept under the rug, without the media being muzzled, I wonder what the crime statistics are in Europe and if the bad trend is increasing with rape, robbery, unprovoked attacks, attack on LEO's.

I'm not entirely sure, but I'm hearing that the "refugees" are now "protesting" in Macedonia, because they are starting to control their border (I said they began building a fence the other day), and that anyone that can't prove they're from a war-torn region is not being allowed through.

(11-24-2015 10:08 AM)dHerblay Wrote:  Two underage (Or ''underage'') asylum seekers raped a 14 -year old girl in Finland yesterday. Now our PM has called an emergency meeting concerning the issue. Coincindicentally the rape happened in his home county. The same county where he gave away his house for ten refugees to use freely a while ago. I wonder how media will spin this.

14 years old? Meh - the Germans have you guys beat. A few weeks ago a 7 year old was 'culturally enriched' my a North African:

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/09/08...m-invader/

Of course it didn't even make the MSM headlines - all being suppressed as it may 'offend people' or give credence to critics of unmitigated illegal migration.

(11-24-2015 11:59 AM)dHerblay Wrote:  Ah, yes. My bad. Yeah it'll be just couple of cheap words and then back to wrecking this country up as usual .

That's the spirit!! Enjoy the decline - unless you're a 14 year old girl in Finland that is...