Post: #51

Quote:[quote='Sooth' pid='1155052' dateline='1448183201']
When I was young I always thought Miley Cyrus would grow up to be a good girl because her dad was around in the Hannah Montana thing.

He admitted that he had not control over his daughter career and life, he being around was not that important, his wife cucked him Bret Michaels and then started to get atention whoring as possible, these parents that sell their kids to Hollywood know that if they want the kids be famous they have to let studios and companies to have as much power over their kids as possible.

Post: #52

Her mom & dad are still living together and both are co-managers. That's why she feels so synthetic, it's all staged & managed. Besides, any player with notches can watch her with a black dildo for 30s and realize her BJ's would....be mediocre.

You have to remember her demographic, and selling CD's in Walmart gets her nowhere near the $$$ that a 1mil iTunes downloads will. And they eat this shit up in the flyover states, every 14yr old girl that wants to be cool in Wisconsin has atleast one of Miley's songs on their phone.

And Gaga was touring wearing a strapon a couple years ago. Only under a skirt, almost. Just enough showing to give the underskirt photogs in perverts row a good shot. Now that's strapon classy, lulz.

Post: #53

The problem with young famous singer with a huge pre-teen and teen audience is that once that youth milestone passes , the audience is gone, just like a girl will get over Dora the Explorer once she grows up, Cyrus has to keep doing shit like this, her audience that was 8-12 many years ago is now is grow up already 18-22. This is just like Boys Band fade away.

Post: #54

Bets on when her eventual debut porn video will be released? Because let's not kid ourselves, it's gonna happen.

I say February 2016.

Post: #55

What I don't understand is.. If she was trying to be edgy.. why would she use such a small dildo?

Post: #56

(11-22-2015 08:49 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(11-22-2015 02:46 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(11-22-2015 09:12 AM)Ice Wrote:  If it helps Miley sell records & create an interesting brand for herself, I say go for it.

She wouldn't have to try so hard if her songs if she just wrote some better songs.

Fixed that for you. Cyrus has never recorded one song she wrote entirely herself. In her Miley Cyrus persona she's recorded 89 songs. Of those, she has a writing credit on 31 -- just over 1 in every 3. You can't tell how much input a single writer has just from the writing credits, of course, but, of those 31, I could see only 6 where she is listed as one of two writers -- i.e. signalling that she had significant input into writing the song in only 6 cases of her 89 total songs. And in none of those cases was the track released as a single, which indicates she doesn't know how to write stuff that sells. In all cases where she's had a hand in writing otherwise, there's at least 3 writers and up to five in total.

And that's just discounting her Hannah Montana persona. She wrote none of those songs, not even as a co-author.

I think this further solidifies the idea that her image/persona as being completely manufactured and carefully marketed by those behind the scenes, i.e. not her own doing in any way shape or form.

She'd merely be paid to do what she is told, having next to no creative or artistic freedom/input; for if she did, it probably wouldn't sell.

Post: #57

(11-22-2015 07:06 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(11-21-2015 05:16 PM)robreke Wrote:  If she's not full on crazy, she sure as hell must be driving her dad, Billy Ray, full crazy - To have an exhibitionist, attention whoring, slut of a daughter like that parading herself like that.

Damn that must be tough.

You're assuming William Raymond Cyrus wasn't whoring his daughter
out to all the other Hellywood paedophiles during her youth...

That's an extremely ugly and serious speculation, do you have any evidence that this is the case?

Post: #58

Windom Earle dateline't ive a shit what anything ='1448275542' Wrote:  I think this further solidifies the idea that her image/persona as being completely manufactured and carefully marketed by those behind the scenes, i.e. not her own doing in any way shape or form.

She'd merely be paid to do what she is told, having next to no creative or artistic freedom/input; for if she did, it probably wouldn't sell.

I think if she was really controlled her songs wouldn't suck. "We rolling..." etc are very boring songs. There's no story development, just a statement and restatement of a fact.

The '60s group the Monkees was an example of a group that was manufactured but they had serious songwriters and the songs are still listenable. Last Train to Clarksville, I'm a Believer....

She must have something like 100 million dollars by this time, if I was her I'd also be "I don't give a shit what anyone thinks."
Shit, with money like that you can have an oceanfront house in Malibu AND one on the Mediterranean.

Post: #59

It would be good if the locked MC thread could be merged with this since it has some quality posts that deserve a 'like'.

Post: #60

South Park called it:

Post: #61

(11-23-2015 06:03 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  She must have something like 100 million dollars by this time, if I was her I'd also be "I don't give a shit what anyone thinks."
Shit, with money like that you can have an oceanfront house in Malibu AND one on the Mediterranean.

If she has that kind of cash it's unlikely she'll retain much or any of it.

If her descent into depravity is being dictated to her by her management, she is likely getting it eroded away by a combination of inflated fees, drug use, and "looking like I'm living large" expenses. Anyone who lacks sufficient will to stand up to her promoters and say "Fuck you, I'm not wearing a fucking dildo and fake tits on stage" necessarily lacks sufficient will to question where the money's going beyond the next dime bag of blow.

If she's in full control of her image and doing it deliberately as a means of "self expression", it reflects a severely damaged psyche that lacks sufficient long term thought and planning to manage money. Or it reflects a likely future where said money is pissed away: if Cyrus is doing this of her own free will and choice it only indicates a severe addiction to attention with probably a concordant and severely damaged self-image and self-esteem beyond what a crowd gives her. When the crowds stop coming, she likely would have to fall back on drug habits to get the adrenaline high she previously got from the attention.

Superficially Cyrus appears to be trying to run the Madonna road: keep shocking them until you've got sufficient cash to retire somewhere poofy and pretentious like the south of France and release the odd uninteresting album now and then. Cyrus's problem is that Madonna's real talent was neither her singing nor her body: it was her capacity to reinvent herself and use the (decidedly female, or perhaps decidedly feminine) trait of leveraging other people's talents and resources to her own ends. Cyrus doesn't seem able to do that since she's basically controlled by her management and seems pretty used to that idea since it's the paradigm she grew up with.