(11-19-2015 12:07 AM)N°6 Wrote:  Great interview which holistically links geopolitical machinations to the inability of European countries to resist US and Turkish inspired migration.

He cited this article:

Greenhill (2008) Strategic Engineered Migration as a Weapon of War

Here is a search link to PDFs:
https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=...0war%20pdf

I like a connected document by them: http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/...ll_116.pdf

NGOs are the movers and shakers behind our political systems and guess how they call the migrant crisis?

Quote:Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement as an
Instrument of Coercion

Weapons of Mass Migration - this is how the globalist strategists call this and it is so fitting.

As to Germany and Dresden. Back then they brutally firebombed women, children and elderly men. It was only partly a depopulation measure.

They wanted to destroy the German nation as a competition. Even WWI partly aimed at that, since the Germans, but also the Japanese had to be cowed into submission as a future threat to the globalist status quo.
(There are even books on the topic that part of the reconstructive WIRTSCHAFTSWUNDER was based on the fact that Nazi financiers transferred large amounts to Switzerland and after the war back to Germany. Those funds were so massive that the entire Marshall fund was peanuts in comparison to it. Without that it would have taken decades longer.)

Obviously the globalist powers think that Germany is not destroyed enough as their manufacturing base is still standing and they continue to produce disciplined workers, potential soldiers and world-class engineers.

Now the new Weapons of Mass Migration shall finish the job.

---

On a lighter note - when I saw the US "refugees welcome" protesters I thought of this:



They probably subconsciously thought that an Arabian stallion is going to delve into those aging putrid fat folds, since they absolutely love older fatter women in North Africa:









True love has no borders. Respect - those men must have balls and cocks of iron will - early on they must tell their sugarmommas that they have an erectile condition and need a ton of Viagra each and every time. Even now in Europe those women are their asylum parachutes - worst case they have to bang one of those for a while.

Brutal - this conflict waged by Weapons of Mass Migration.

(11-18-2015 10:05 AM)JWLZG Wrote:  

(11-18-2015 07:58 AM)Hades Wrote:  ^^^ It's unreal how insane these comparisons are. Gotta call bullshit right away.

I'm still not sure how a political ideology and recipe for totalitarian theocracy like Islam with an enormous following in the billions managed to shoehorn into Jewish identity politics but the Not All X argument is powerful for the retarded SJW crowd.

They're implying that if we do nothing, we're Nazis, and furthermore - by extension - if we capitulate wholly and unquestioningly in our hand-in-hand cultural autogenocide it makes us good people.

Now the US is not under that much of a threat compared to Sweden, but who really knows where politics will be going in the years to come.

I think what the WP is trying to infer is isn't so much that Europeans are Nazis as drawing parallels to the non-Nazi West being culpable in the Holocaust by turning back Jewish refugees from Palestine, Britain and the US in the lead-up to WW2. The idea that we are repeating history by falling, once again to the Bystander Effect in turning our back to the plight of the poor, hapless, defenceless refugee. For where is the Christian charity of Love Thy Neighbour that we like to preach when it's most in need, the parable of the Good Samaritan that the West likes to hawk as a social responsibility towards the less fortunate worldwide?

That meme is currently doing the rounds on Facebook:



The Righteous Gentile is currently being exhorted of the West again.

Except that, back in 1938, an enormous number of Jews in Europe were vile communists and the USA did not want mass-murdering terrorists in their country.

Sorta like how we don't want Muslims today.

(11-18-2015 10:55 PM)durangotang Wrote:  I wonder what he'd think of the outcome of the war if he could look at the state of the west today - drenched in cultural Marxism and being replaced by third world immigrants?

I read this article a couple of days ago. I thought it was very poignant and I recommend everyone here should read it.

'This isn't the Britain we fought for,' says the 'unknown warriors' of WWII

Quote:Sarah Robinson was just a teenager when World War II broke out.

She endured the Blitz, watching for fires during Luftwaffe air raids armed with a bucket of sand.

Often she would walk ten miles home from work in the blackout, with bombs falling around her.

As soon as she turned 18, she joined the Royal Navy to do her bit for the war effort

Hers was a small part in a huge, history-making enterprise, and her contribution epitomises her generation's sense of service and sacrifice.

Nearly 400,000 Britons died. Millions more were scarred by the experience, physically and mentally.

But was it worth it? Her answer - and the answer of many of her contemporaries, now in their 80s and 90s - is a resounding No.

They despise what has become of the Britain they once fought to save. It's not our country any more, they say, in sorrow and anger.

Sarah harks back to the days when 'people kept the laws and were polite and courteous. We didn't have much money, but we were contented and happy.

'People whistled and sang. There was still the United Kingdom, our country, which we had fought for, our freedom, democracy. But where is it now?!'

The feelings of Sarah and others from this most selfless generation about the modern world have been recorded by a Tyneside writer, 33-year-old Nicholas Pringle.

Curious about his grandmother's generation and what they did in the war, he decided three years ago to send letters to local newspapers across the country asking for those who lived through the war to write to him with their experiences.

He rounded off his request with this question: 'Are you happy with how your country has turned out? What do you think your fallen comrades would have made of life in 21st-century Britain?'

What is extraordinary about the 150 replies he received, which he has now published as a book, is their vehement insistence that those who made the ultimate sacrifice in the war would now be turning in their graves.

There is the occasional bright spot - one veteran describes Britain as 'still the best country in the world' - but the overall tone is one of profound disillusionment.

'I sing no song for the once-proud country that spawned me,' wrote a sailor who fought the Japanese in the Far East, 'and I wonder why I ever tried.'

'My patriotism has gone out of the window,' said another ex-serviceman.

In the Mail this week, Gordon Brown wrote about 'our debt of dignity to the war generation'.

But the truth that emerges from these letters is that the survivors of that war generation have nothing but contempt for his government.

They feel, in a word that leaps out time and time again, 'betrayed'.

New Labour, said one ex-commando who took part in the disastrous Dieppe raid in which 4,000 men were lost, was 'more of a shambles than some of the actions I was in during the war, and that's saying something!'

He added: 'Those comrades of mine who never made it back would be appalled if they could see the world as it is today.

'They would wonder what happened to the Brave New World they fought so damned hard for.'

Nor can David Cameron take any comfort from the elderly.

His 'hug a hoodie' advice was scorned by a generation of brave men and women now too scared, they say, to leave their homes at night.

Immigration tops the list of complaints.

'People come here, get everything they ask, for free, laughing at our expense,' was a typical observation.

'We old people struggle on pensions, not knowing how to make ends meet. If I had my time again, would we fight as before? Need you ask?'

Many writers are bewildered and overwhelmed by a multicultural Britain that, they say bitterly, they were never consulted about nor feel comfortable with.

'Our country has been given away to foreigners while we, the generation who fought for freedom, are having to sell our homes for care and are being refused medical services because incomers come first.'

Her words may be offensive to many - and rightly so - but Sarah Robinson defiantly states: 'We are affronted by the appearance of Muslim and Sikh costumes on our streets.'


But then political correctness is another thing they take strong issue with, along with politicians generally - 'liars, incompetents and self-aggrandising charlatans' (with the revealing exception of Enoch Powell).

The loss of British sovereignty to the European Union caused almost as much distress. 'Nearly all veterans want Britain to leave the EU,' wrote one.

Frank, a merchant navy sailor, thought of those who gave their lives 'for King and country', only for Britain to become 'an offshore island of a Europe where France and Germany hold sway. Ironic, isn't it?'

As a group, they feel furious at not being able to speak their minds.

They see the lack of debate and the damning of dissenters as racists or Little Englanders as deeply upsetting affronts to freedom of speech.

'Our British culture is draining away at an ever increasing pace,' wrote an ex-Durham Light Infantryman, 'and we are almost forbidden to make any comment.'

A widow from Solihull blamed the Thatcher years 'when we started to lose all our industry and profit became the only aim in life'.

Her husband, a veteran of Dunkirk and Burma, died a disappointed man, believing that his seven years in the Army were wasted.

'It is 18 years since I lost him and as I look around parts of Birmingham today you would never know you were in England,' she wrote.

'He would have hated it. He also disliked the immoral way things are going. I don't think people are really happy now, for all the modern, easy-living conveniences.

'I disagree with same-sex marriages, schoolgirl mothers, rubbish TV programmes, so-called celebrities and, most of all, unlimited immigration.
'I am very unhappy about the way this country is being transformed. I go nowhere after dark. I don't even answer my doorbell then.'

A Desert Rat who battled his way through El Alamein, Sicily, Italy and Greece was in despair.

'This is not the country I fought for. Political correctness, lack of discipline, compensation madness, uncontrolled immigration - the "do-gooders" have a lot to answer for.
'If you see youngsters doing something they shouldn't and you say anything, you just get a mouthful of foul language.'

Undoubtedly, some of the complaints are 'grumpy old man' gripes, as the veterans themselves recognise - from chewing gum on pavements and motorists using mobile phones to the march of computerisation ('why can't I just go to the station and buy a railway ticket?') and the dearth of pop music tunes you can hum.

But it is the fundamental change in society's values which they find hardest to come to terms with.

Bring back birching and hanging, the sanctions they grew up with, they say. Put more bobbies back on the beat.

'We were rigidly taught good manners and respect for older people,' said a wartime WAAF, 'but the nanny state has ruined all that. Television programmes are full of violence and obscene language.
This Land of Hope and Glory is in reality a land of yobs, drug addicts, drunkard youths and teenage mothers who think they are owed all for nothing.'

Aged 85, she has little wish to go on living.

For others, the strength of character that got them through the war is still helping them to survive the disappointments of peacetime.

A crofter's son from Scotland who served on the Arctic convoys taking supplies to Russia found the immediate post-war years hard.

'In those days we had no welfare support from any source. It was as though we had served our country to the full and were then forgotten.

'However, we were very resilient and determined to make a go of it, and many of us, including myself, succeeded.
'How times have changed now, with the countless many clamouring to get welfare benefits for the asking.'

A medic who made it through Dunkirk and D-Day thought the fallen would be appalled by the lack of manners in modern life and the worship of celebrities, plus 'the patent dishonesty of politicians'.

Another common issue was their bemusement at the idea anyone could live in constant debt.

'We were brought up to believe that if you hadn't the money, you waited till you had!' one wrote.

However, this particular man was unusual among the 150 respondents in believing that there were many pluses to modern life.

He even had a good word to say about the European Union and felt it would appeal to the fallen 'if only for maintaining the peace in Europe over the past 60 years or so'.

He praised the breaking down of class barriers in Britain compared with the years when he was young and 'infinitely' increased prosperity.

'More clothes, cars, holidays abroad, home ownership. As a young teacher in the Fifties I had one suit (Army issue) and the luxury of a sports jacket and flannels at the weekend.

'Education has made vast progress. In my early days I taught classes of 50. Only five per cent of children went on to further education compared with over 40 per cent today.

'The emancipation of women has also been a huge plus, with the introduction of the Pill a large contributor. Before the war, women teachers were dismissed as soon as they married.'

A Land Girl who laboured on farms in Devon during the war agreed that 'we have so much to be grateful for.

'So much progress has been made to transform the standard of living since the war.'

But she could not help asking whether people were any happier.

She bemoaned the advent of the Pill and the collapse of sexual morality. 'In my day, drugs were unknown, families remained together, divorce was a rarity and children felt secure.

'Were our sacrifices made so hooligans may run wild? And aggressive behaviour be accepted as the norm by TV interviewers and society in general?'

A captain with a Military Cross for valour under fire thought Britain was still the best country in the world.

The 'occasional' sight of parents and nicely dressed children gave an otherwise gloomy veteran of the Italian campaign a sense that 'what we did all those years ago was not for nothing'.

A grandmother, the widow of a Royal Marine who took part in the D-Day landings, felt the National Health Service had descended into chaos but was grateful for a pensioner's free television licence, 'which brings art, travel and animals into my home', and being able to text her grandchildren.

Just being alive was a bonus. 'Although I hate what is happening to our country, I am so happy to be here, grumbling, but remembering better, happier days,' she wrote.

But one of the bitterest complaints of the veterans was that their trenchant views on many of the matters aired here were constantly ignored by those in authority.

Their letters of complaint to councillors and MPs went unanswered.

It was as if they didn't matter, except when wheeled out for the rituals of Remembrance Day.

'Why do so many of the British public confuse sentimentality with genuine concern for others?' asked one letter-writer.

But this was the generation honoured in Remembrance services last weekend, showered with gratitude and teary-eyed sentiments as their dwindling ranks marched unsteadily past the Cenotaph and other war memorials throughout the UK.

The overall impression any reader of the letters gets is that this generation feel unheard, unwanted and unimportant.

This remarkable collection of their thoughts should give us pause for reflection.
They may be deemed beyond their sell-by date (and many of their views may seem unacceptable, flouting every sort of 'ism' imaginable) but, by their deeds of 60-plus years ago, they have won the right to be listened to and their disillusionment noted with respect.

In one letter in this collection, an RAF mechanic quoted a poem about comrades who fell in battle: 'I mourned them then, But now surviving in a world, Indifferent to their hopes and dreams, I grieve more for the living.'

(11-19-2015 12:07 AM)N°6 Wrote:  

(11-18-2015 02:57 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Nice vid by an analyst who calls this "engineered coerced migration" where the elite is using the victims of globalisation and promoted wahhabism to destabilize another nation thus causing more victims of globalization. Migrants are being used as a weapon here.

In the end only a tiny ruling elite will profit from it:

Great interview which holistically links geopolitical machinations to the inability of European countries to resist US and Turkish inspired migration.

He cited this article:

Greenhill (2008) Strategic Engineered Migration as a Weapon of War

Here is a search link to PDFs:
https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=...0war%20pdf

I almost missed this video from RT, but only noticed it thanks to Zelcorpion's recent post.
This is one of the most important videos I've seen so far in the thread.
This guy Gearóid (pronounced Garr-ode) has spoken more truths in these ten minutes than most politicians or mainstream journalists do in their entire careers.
If you are going to share one video on social media, about this whole clusterfuck of a situation, I suggest you share this one.
It's unlikely to happen, but if such a clip were to be shared en masse on social media, we might just see the start of people starting to question the narrative they're being fed on a daily basis by the leeches and lemmings of the mainstream media and establishment.

(11-19-2015 01:57 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  







True love has no borders. Respect - those men must have balls and cocks of iron will - early on they must tell their sugarmommas that they have an erectile condition and need a ton of Viagra each and every time. Even now in Europe those women are their asylum parachutes - worst case they have to bang one of those for a while.

Brutal - this conflict waged by Weapons of Mass Migration.

These are 'European' women? They look like they are from a trailer park in West Virginia. I'd rather wait for the 71 virgins.

(11-19-2015 03:04 AM)quino_16 Wrote:  I read this article a couple of days ago. I thought it was very poignant and I recommend everyone here should read it.

'This isn't the Britain we fought for,' says the 'unknown warriors' of WWII

SO I see that "Mama" Merkel has been in power for 10 years now...are there any term limits in German politics or how does the election process work there? What is the election cycle like there, how long is one term, and how many more years can she possibly stay in power? She is a prime example of a politician who has stuck around far too long and has been corrupted by such a long term in office. It makes me very glad we only allow American Presidents 8 years to change things.

Briefly log into facebook very recently. Lots of bleeding heart bullshit.

I want to call all these people out. Like "all you people advocating for more refuges don't seem to be volunteering your paychecks and spare rooms for these people, nor are you likely willing to accept imprisonment if the people you vouch for commit crimes. So, shut the fuck up already."

Just tired of all this. Have to give away 40% of my earnings in taxes already. But what's the point with these brainwashed people.

^^^ Yep.

These folks just want to feel good about themselves by "supporting" it, but when push comes to shove they all have nothing but excuses for why they don't give a red cent to charity or volunteer at a soup kitchen.

Europe on edge: Copennhagen airport is evacuated, London Tube security scare, Germany abandons its football match and the Vatican is even searching NUNS

Quote:Copenhagen was evacuated when a suspicious package was discovered
Germany's game against Holland was called off 90 minutes before kick-off
Tooting Broadway tube station evacuated following a security alert today
Security was tightened ahead of the Pope's general audience at the Vatican

I hope all the liberal Europeans felt really good for welcoming all the migrants into countries because the price they have to pay for their cuckoldry and ignorance is to live in a permanent state of fear.

(11-19-2015 11:56 AM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  SO I see that "Mama" Merkel has been in power for 10 years now...are there any term limits in German politics or how does the election process work there? What is the election cycle like there, how long is one term, and how many more years can she possibly stay in power? She is a prime example of a politician who has stuck around far too long and has been corrupted by such a long term in office. It makes me very glad we only allow American Presidents 8 years to change things.

Elections come in 4 year cycles. There is no upper limit for the possible terms a Bundeskanzler can be elected for. Next elections are 2017.

But it's like many have said before. It's not Merkel which is the problem. She will get replaced by the next puppet and on we go.

What changed when Bush went?

There couldn't be a bigger contrast between Bush and Obama yet things have stayed virtually the same. One could argue they got worse.

Kohl, Schröder, Merkel, Gabriel ... whatever.


///


Reading that article about British war veterans had me fighting off tears. I can't even imagine how betrayed these people must feel.

I'm seething with anger myself over how this country has turned out. Had I fought for it in a war as brutal as WWII and now struggle with my pension while Pakistanis can claim welfare for showing up I'd probably shoot up parliament and torture some politicians.

Oh, no, wait. Had I been raised during the 1920's I'd have a sense of morals and decency. So I would do just what they did. Write some letters.

(11-19-2015 02:13 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(11-18-2015 10:05 AM)JWLZG Wrote:  

(11-18-2015 07:58 AM)Hades Wrote:  ^^^ It's unreal how insane these comparisons are. Gotta call bullshit right away.

I'm still not sure how a political ideology and recipe for totalitarian theocracy like Islam with an enormous following in the billions managed to shoehorn into Jewish identity politics but the Not All X argument is powerful for the retarded SJW crowd.

They're implying that if we do nothing, we're Nazis, and furthermore - by extension - if we capitulate wholly and unquestioningly in our hand-in-hand cultural autogenocide it makes us good people.

Now the US is not under that much of a threat compared to Sweden, but who really knows where politics will be going in the years to come.

I think what the WP is trying to infer is isn't so much that Europeans are Nazis as drawing parallels to the non-Nazi West being culpable in the Holocaust by turning back Jewish refugees from Palestine, Britain and the US in the lead-up to WW2. The idea that we are repeating history by falling, once again to the Bystander Effect in turning our back to the plight of the poor, hapless, defenceless refugee. For where is the Christian charity of Love Thy Neighbour that we like to preach when it's most in need, the parable of the Good Samaritan that the West likes to hawk as a social responsibility towards the less fortunate worldwide?

That meme is currently doing the rounds on Facebook:



The Righteous Gentile is currently being exhorted of the West again.

Except that, back in 1938, an enormous number of Jews in Europe were vile communists and the USA did not want mass-murdering terrorists in their country.

Sorta like how we don't want Muslims today.

It let in the Frankfurt School which got the boot from Germany for obvious reasons. How this school would alter the next generations is beyond measure.

(11-19-2015 07:53 AM)MdWanderer Wrote:  These are 'European' women? They look like they are from a trailer park in West Virginia. I'd rather wait for the 71 virgins.

British women whose SMVs are already grossly inflated. Now even the most hideous and penniless of harridans have little motivation to remain in marriages with so many thirsty soulmates running about.

I remember reading here or the other thread in which the Polish foreign minister sarcastically joked that Poland should take in the refugees, train them as soldiers, and send them back to Syria.

Well it turns out that some former "French" soldiers join ISIS after they are discharged from the military. In effect, France trains ISIS soldiers, and yet Hollande president refuses to close its borders and declares he will rage a "pitiless war" against ISIS.

I just want to ask Hollande how exactly is he going to rage a "pitiless war" against ISIS if the enemy is not only inside the gates, but they have also infiltrated the French military?

Here's the article.

France admits soldiers have deserted to ISIS, including ex-elite special forces and French foreign legionnaires

Quote:Several French former soldiers have joined the ranks of jihadists fighting in Syria and Iraq, the country’s government confirmed on Wednesday, as it outlined a series of new anti-terrorism measures following the Islamist attacks in Paris.

Most of the ex-soldiers, reportedly numbering around 10 and including former paratroopers and French foreign legionnaires, are said to be fighting on behalf of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).

Most worrying is the reported presence of an ex-member of France’s elite First Marine Infantry Parachute Regiment, considered one of Europe’s most experienced special forces units and which shares the “Who Dares Wins” motto of the SAS.

The unnamed individual, of North African origin, had received commando training in combat, shooting and survival techniques. He served for five years before joining a private security company for which he worked in the Arabian peninsula, where he was radicalised before heading for Syria, according to L’Opinion, a news website.

One of the defectors had become the leader of a group of a dozen or so French-born Islamists operating in the Syrian region of Deir Ezzor who had all received combat training, reported Radio France International, or RFI.

Others, apparently in their twenties, were explosive experts. Some were Muslim converts while others were radicalised French from an “Arab-Muslim” background, said RFI.

Jean-Yves Drian, the French defence minister, confirmed the existence of a handful of ex-French military personnel among jihadist fighters in the Middle East, but tried to play down their presence, saying the phenomenon was “extremely rare”.

However, they will raise fears over the risk of a French version of the 2009 gun rampage at Fort Hood, the U.S. military base in Texas, where Nadal Hasan, a U.S. army major who turned to radical Islam, killed 13 servicemen scheduled to leave for Afghanistan.

Drian said that the French armed forces’ internal security and protection unit, DPSD, would “reinforce its vigilance and see its means increased.”

News of the defections came as Manuel Valls, the French prime minister, unveiled anti-terrorism measures worth over $600 million after France’s worst Islamist attack in which 17 people were killed earlier this month.

It coincided with a government pledge to cut 7,500 fewer defence jobs in the next five years than previously planned.

Valls said 2,680 new jobs would be created to fight terrorism by 2018 – around half in intelligence.

France now has to monitor almost 3,000 people involved in “terrorist networks” following a 130 per cent jump in those linked to jihadists in Iraq and Syria in the past year, he said.

An extra 60 Muslim clerics would be recruited to work with potential militants in France’s overcrowded prisons, while five units would be created to isolate radicalized inmates.

Valls said the idea of stripping offenders of certain civic rights – a measure mirroring a post-war law barring Nazi collaborators from voting, holding office or working for the state – would be debated.

Other moves included the creation of “cyberpatrols” to track jihadists and recruitment online and the launch of a website dedicated to countering Islamist indoctrination.

The decision to boost web surveillance came after a group of hackers loyal to Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president, broke into the Twitter account of Le Monde.

The attack by the Syrian Electronic Army forced Le Monde to suspend temporarily its Twitter account, which has 3.3 million followers, but the paper later said it had regained control of its computers, adding: “We apologize for any fraudulent posts on our behalf.”

Before that, the hackers managed to post messages including: “Je ne suis pas Charlie” (I am not Charlie). This was reference to the now famous “Je suis Charlie” message brandished by millions in tribute to the 12 people killed at the offices of Charlie Hebdo, the satirical weekly, earlier this month.

They were shot dead by Cherif and Said Koachi, two French brothers of Algerian origin with links to al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula. The same week, Amedy Coulibaly, a home-grown Islamist, killed a police officer and four hostages at a Jewish supermarket east of Paris. Four men aged 22 to 28 were placed under formal investigation yesterday over the Coulibaly killings.

The whole migrant crisis can be summed up as follows

Yahoo Matrix front page today:

(11-02-2015 08:15 AM)72 and sunny Wrote:  As far as Jewish mainstream media is concerned,

the foot soldiers in the destruction of Europe refugees are made up solely of women and children.

To the extent they are shown at all, adult males are portrayed as dotting fathers and/or war-cripples.

And one wonders, how deep the rabbit hole goes.

^^^US and Britain numbers are very concerning, the rest are obvious.


I heard the US only has the capability to place 24/7 surveillance on 70 targets at a time. But there are literally thousands of terrorist targets on the watch list. Only matter of time before one slips through the cracks.

Whats really concerning about these attacks in France was that some of the terrorists weren't even on the watch list!

(11-19-2015 02:33 PM)quino_16 Wrote:  Well it turns out that some former "French" soldiers join ISIS after they are discharged from the military. In effect, France trains ISIS soldiers, and yet Hollande president refuses to close its borders and declares he will rage a "pitiless war" against ISIS.

I just want to ask Hollande how exactly is he going to rage a "pitiless war" against ISIS if the enemy is not only inside the gates, but they have also infiltrated the French military?

Here's the article.

France admits soldiers have deserted to ISIS, including ex-elite special forces and French foreign legionnaires

Quote:Several French former soldiers have joined the ranks of jihadists fighting in Syria and Iraq, the country’s government confirmed on Wednesday, as it outlined a series of new anti-terrorism measures following the Islamist attacks in Paris.

Most of the ex-soldiers, reportedly numbering around 10 and including former paratroopers and French foreign legionnaires, are said to be fighting on behalf of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).

Most worrying is the reported presence of an ex-member of France’s elite First Marine Infantry Parachute Regiment, considered one of Europe’s most experienced special forces units and which shares the “Who Dares Wins” motto of the SAS.

The whole migrant crisis can be summed up as follows

Many units within Western militaries probably won't be able to be trusted. However the higher levels and important personnel like pilots or engineers will remain locals in all countries.

Still - we know that heritage, religion and culture must be taken into account - especially when the US or France is actively waging war against Muslim countries and I might say - is often engaged in killing plenty of civilians. War is a broadsword and no scalpel.

For example I remember reading about US and UK secret services and their reluctance to hire Chinese-heritage men for any vital positions. The reason was simply that they found that many would start working for the Triads and their allegiance to the Chinese tribe was stronger than to the country they were born and grew up in. It was nothing personal, they just avoid hiring them for the secret service.

But we all know that the military has to have blinders on and does not get the same non-PC treatment like the CIA. In the military female Army Rangers are equally capable as 200 pound male super-soldiers. I bet that the CIA black ops never hires women for their dirty jobs.

Ah well - what can you do - it was to be expected.

(11-19-2015 05:13 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  I bet that the CIA black ops never hires women for their dirty jobs.

There had been an female agent that was hired to surveillance Denis Cuspert, a German high rank ISIS member.
Some men have a crush for women, so why not use a female agent?

I also worry about the German army - not only because the army is not up to date - also many russian - germans serve there. A few of them joined the fights in Ukraine.

(11-19-2015 05:30 PM)Parzival Wrote:  

(11-19-2015 05:13 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  I bet that the CIA black ops never hires women for their dirty jobs.

There had been an female agent that was hired to surveillance Denis Cuspert, a German high rank ISIS member.
Some men have a crush for women, so why not use a female agent?

I also worry about the German army - not only because the army is not up to date - also many russian - germans serve there. A few of them joined the fights in Ukraine.

What I meant was pure combat missions not surveillance or assassinations - women have been used very successfully for those tasks. But that James Bond fantasy of hiring female bodyguards or warriors is just pure fantasy.

Important informations about islamic influence in the White House and the rest of USA and Europe as well, by the "moderates" as they are called by the media. In the video the guest Erick Stakelbeck discuss about secret documents that were found with members of muslim brotherhood were they lie down actions that must be performed to destroy the western civilization, keys priorities:
1- Mass immigration.
2- Construction of mosques in America coast to coast with Saudi Arabia money and imams provided by the muslim brotherhood.
3- Infiltration in USA government, media and academia.

He also discuss about muslim fluence in the current administration as consultants(that's right, muslim brotherhood members working as consultants) in foreign affairs in the middle east.
And the alliance between the left and islam, common goal between them destruction of traditional America.

Amazing how these poor downtrodden war "refugees" are able to cross several bodies of water, several countries and continents to get where they want to go.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...ium=social

Quote:8 Syrians Caught at Texas Border in Laredo

Two federal agents operating under the umbrella of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) are claiming that eight Syrian illegal aliens attempted to enter Texas from Mexico in the Laredo Sector. The federal agents spoke with Breitbart Texas on the condition of anonymity, however, a local president of the National Border Patrol Council (NBPC) confirmed that Laredo Border Patrol agents have been officially contacting the organization with concerns over reports from other federal agents about Syrians illegally entering the country in the Laredo Sector. The reports have caused a stir among the sector’s Border Patrol agents.

Not the first time this has happened in Texas either.

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/09/2...as-border/

http://taylormarshall.com/2015/11/islami...-both.html

Frankly, a pretty good article by a Christian, on accepting refugees or not.

According to some, this migrant invasion (or, gimmegrants invasion) is under way because the global "elites" want "cheap labor force"..

Problem is.. less than 4% of these "refugees" actually work! Less than 4% are productive :

Yesterday, Germany has had to release official figures (because of disclosure laws) about the refugees and the workforce..

http://www.20minutes.fr/economie/1733177...oi-faibles

So : Between September 2014 and October 2015, among the migrants having obtained refugees status, only 3,8% have found a job. Precisely, in Germany : only one male refugee in 26 has found a job during last year, and one female refugee in 43.

It's real proof that these migrants do not come to work "and drive labor prices down, to please the Elites".. They come to make many, many children, to colonize and replace us. Certainly not to work. Their only purpose is, colonizing us by making children!

Gimmegrants?