Post: #1

http://totalfratmove.com/rutgers-fratern...ge-ensues/

Some of the responses to this frat hanging up "Save the Ta-Tas" signs on their house

Post: #2

Save the ta tas

Post: #3

I never understood these initiatives anyway.

Breast cancer and Testicular cancer (I have cases of both in my family) are the types of cancer that are the easiest to detect, naturally the easiest to remove and treat, and have the highest survival rate amongst female/male cancer patients respectively, if memory serves me right.
The amount of awareness campaigning is in no reasonable relation to their lethality and the severity of the problem.

There are many other fairly common types of cancer that would need more "awareness" (=money, donations, research funding), as they are far more dangerous and at the moment equal a death sentence.
For example, a few years ago a family friend was diagnosed with Pancreatic cancer. The doctors detected it in its early stages and he could afford the best treatment money can buy in Germany. He was death within 6 months.
No chance.

Post: #4

Prostate cancer doesn't get even a fraction of the attention that breast cancer does. Men need to look out for themselves before they decide to devote themselves to the causes of unknown women.

Of course there's a social media post about men sexualizing breast cancer. Only women are allowed to do that. I won't link to it because frankly it's low quality, but boobiethon is still a thing that tries to get thirsty dudes to pledge to a breast cancer foundation to see some titties. Women send in sexualized pictures of their breasts to the site to encourage people to save the boobies. I do not know if they still do it, but pledges used to get access to bare-breast gallery of volunteer-submitted pictures. Thirst is only acceptable when women are in control of it.

(10-21-2015 05:50 PM)Celtic_Austrian Wrote:  For example, a few years ago a family friend was diagnosed with Pancreatic cancer. The doctors detected it in its early stages and he could afford the best treatment money can buy in Germany. He was death within 6 months.
No chance.

There's at least one company working on pancreatic cancer that seems to have a solution: http://www.halozyme.com/Products-And-Pip...fault.aspx

Pancreatic cancer is nasty because it's resistant to most cancer treatment. The above link details what the company has in development to break through pancreatic cancer's resistance.

Post: #5

It was women's groups that first sexualized breast cancer with their "Save the Tatas," "Save the Boobies," and "Save Second Base" memes and bumper stickers.

In fact, this has become the de facto way to promote breast cancer awareness. That and "go pink," which itself if a subtle form of sexualizing breast cancer.

And if frat guys did show up at a Take Back the Night Rally, they'd probably find themselves thrown out like Milo What's-His-Name recently was from a Slut Walk.

Post: #6

(10-21-2015 08:23 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  It was women's groups that first sexualized breast cancer with their "Save the Tatas," "Save the Boobies," and "Save Second Base" memes and bumper stickers.

In fact, this has become the de facto way to promote breast cancer awareness. That and "go pink," which itself if a subtle form of sexualizing breast cancer.

And if frat guys did show up at a Take Back the Night Rally, they'd probably find themselves thrown out like Milo What's-His-Name recently was from a Slut Walk.

It ties into they whole "rape culture" nonsense. Women are allowed to dress as slutty as they want, show as much boob as they want and act as sexual as they want but men aren't supposed to even notice...and we're certainly not supposed to comment on it.

In same way, women can make jokes about boobs, sexualize boobs and even talk about how boobs are a sign of their womanhood - but God help the man who suggests the same. He'll be hit with the "you should love me for ME!" chorus. And he might, if her personality was lovable.

Post: #7

No one is sexualising cancer. If they were, cancer-porn would be a category on pornhub. Last time I checked, it wasn't. However, this isn't what anybody should be pointing out, as to do so tacitly implies that it would be okay for these wretched cunts to act as thought police, had people actually been jerking off to tumors.

What is truly bizarre, however, is how these women are using cancer as a means to advertise and propagate their own ideology, by attacking people raising money for charity. It's cruel, petty and shows a lack of empathy, and general humanity.

If 'the correct way to raise money for a charity that fights cancer' is the property of the feminist ideology, then the message is clear: the more power these people are allowed to seize, the less you will be able to do without their 'permission'. As such, they can kindly fuck off.