(09-29-2015 04:56 PM)WildBoar Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 04:38 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 04:04 PM)WildBoar Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 02:41 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Actually, now that I think of there is a historical parallel to today's situation. The way the moors conquered Spain but this is being done at breakneck speed. The similarities are that the moors were able to conspire with Jews to take down the Christian majority. Likewise you have a Jewish agenda to get revenge against the Germans for WW2 unfolding before our eyes in the same way Jews have conspired against many Christian countries in the past. You can find Jewish plots going back to the Byzantine times.

The Jews cooperated with the Ottomans when they were conquering the Balkans in the 14th century.

Please tell us more - that's a fascinating piece of history I've never heard about.

G

Greek and French literary sources testify that the Bulgarian Tsar Ivan Alexander was married to a Jewess Sarah, the daughter of a Venetian banker, and that this marriage was arranged by the Jews with the sole purpose to weaken the Christian faith in Bulgaria.

When the Turks first came to the Balkan Peninsula, they signed an agreement with the assistance of the wife of Ivan Alexander - Sarah which gave them the legal right to organize in Thrace fighting squads for further hikes in other Christian countries.

According to this agreement, Bulgaria was obliged to provide them with active military support. Ivan Alexander was hoping that the appetite of the Turks would be satisfied and that Bulgaria will be saved.

------

This is just one story from the top of my head but as you can see the elite back then was also not acting in the best interests of their people. But eventually it costed them their Kingdom and wealth.

There is nothing new under the sun. First was Egypt:

Exodus 1:8

Then a new king, to whom Joseph meant nothing, came to power in Egypt. “Look,” he said to his people, “the Israelites have become far too numerous for us. Come, we must deal shrewdly with them or they will become even more numerous and, if war breaks out, will join our enemies, fight against us and leave the country.”


Isaiah 19:2-3

"And I will set the Egyptians against the Egyptians: and they shall fight every one against his brother and every one against his neighbor; city against city and kingdom against kingdom. And the spirit of Egypt shall fall in the midst thereof; and I will destroy the counsel thereof:and they shall seek to the idols, and to the charmers, and to them that have familiar spirits, and to the wizards.

Next was Babylon and Persia:

Isiah 45:1

"This is what the LORD says to his anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I take hold of to subdue nations before him and to strip kings of their armor, to open doors before him so that gates will not be shut"

And thus the Gates of Babylon were opened to the invading forces.

The following excerpt is taken from The Controversy of Zion, by preeminent British war correspondent and journalist, Douglas Reed. Note: Reed believed in a long-term Zionist conspiracy to impose a world government on an enslaved humanity. I highly recommend people concerned about Europe read it:

The Controversy of Zion, by Douglas Reed [PDF]



The Controversy of Zion, Page 85:

Here the idea that "the people" should join with their hosts' enemies, in order to destroy their hosts, first appears. When the story reaches a more or less verifiable event (the fall of Babylon) it is portrayed in such a way as to foster this same notion. The Judahites are depicted as joining with the enemies of Babylon and exultantly welcoming the Persian invader. The destruction of Babylon is shown as an act of vengeance wreaked by Jehovah on behalf of the Judahites, exclusively; this vengeance is extended also to a king and the manner of his death (both apparently invented, but valid as historical precedents).

The presentation of history in the Old Testament ends with the next act of vengeance, on the Persian liberators! Western political leaders of our century, who often were flattered to be compared by Zionist visitors to good King Cyrus of Persia, the liberator of the Judahites, may not have read "The Law" with attention or have noted what then befell the Persians. Logically the Persians in their turn had to suffer for having Judahites among them."


Is this not what befell America, who "liberated" the Jews in Germany?

How have the American's been repaid?

(09-29-2015 06:14 PM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  ^^

I've read so much about the goal of destroying European people, but it's just so insane. I know it's true, but my brain can't comprehend it. I just keep asking "why? why?"

Deuteronomy 11:22

If you carefully observe all these commands I am giving you to follow—to love the Lord your God, to walk in obedience to him and to hold fast to him— then the Lord will drive out all these nations before you, and you will dispossess nations larger and stronger than you. Every place where you set your foot will be yours: Your territory will extend from the desert to Lebanon, and from the Euphrates River to the Mediterranean Sea. No one will be able to stand against you. The Lord your God, as he promised you, will put the terror and fear of you on the whole land, wherever you go.

------------

A great war was fought to preserve Europe. Hitler and the valiant Germans succeeded in stopping the Jewish Bolsheviks westward expansion as far as Berlin. They lost everything - 56 cities were were firebombed. Now, under occupation, and after 70 years of cultural Marxist indoctrination, an attempt is made at their ultimate genocide.





In order to understand WWII, we must understand that we have undergone an inversion of truth. The victors write history.

For example, my whole life people in the west have taught that it was Hitler's greatest mistake to wage a two front war. You can here the egoism in their voice as they say how stupid he was or that he should he should have listened to his generals. What we are not taught was the truth, and that is that the Jewish Communists had a vast army to invade all of Europe, and upon discovering this, the Germans had no choice but launch a preemptive military strike against Russia - the largest military campaign in world history - Operation Barbarosa (operation Red Beard - a reference to Thor):

Mannerheim Tapes:




What they were fighting against:

Ukrainian children starving in The Holodomor - the great Ukrainian Holocaust:



The Holodomor was perpetrated by Genrikh Yagoda, a Jew.



See Israeli news source Ynet News artice:

Stalin's Jews: We mustn't forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish

From the article:

And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name "Genrikh Yagoda," the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU's deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin's collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system. After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the "bloodthirsty dwarf."

(09-29-2015 06:38 PM)durangotang Wrote:  Deuteronomy 11:22

If you carefully observe all these commands I am giving you to follow—to love the Lord your God, to walk in obedience to him and to hold fast to him— then the Lord will drive out all these nations before you, and you will dispossess nations larger and stronger than you. Every place where you set your foot will be yours: Your territory will extend from the desert to Lebanon, and from the Euphrates River to the Mediterranean Sea. No one will be able to stand against you. The Lord your God, as he promised you, will put the terror and fear of you on the whole land, wherever you go.

So as long as they follow Judaism better than Europe Christianity, they'll win?

I know that's a stupid summation - would you break that down Barney style for me?

G

Libertas Wrote:I mean it's a start, but you guys in Germany really need to basically harass her wherever she goes. Make life a living hell for her.

I’m not sure you guys in the States fully realize the extend to which we are being suppressed here in modern day Nazi-Germany. Deleting of facebook-comments is nothing. People have actually lost their jobs already. One guy because he said on facebook that he was happy that the Syrian kid drowned. Not the nicest thing to say, but the guy got hunted down and the far left encouraged people in his city to “find” him. After Merkel visited a refugee center, a woman “insulted” (rather described) her as a traitor and a fat ugly pig (video of it, but in German):
http://www.welt.de/videos/article1457641...pfung.html
The police (as if they wouldn’t need every personnel to control the invaders) is now actually investigating because of “unconstitutional defamation of constitutional bodies”, trying to figure out who that woman was (the fucking irony with these motherfuckers… they suppress free speech, which is a constitutional right, thereby themselves acting unconstitutional). If they try to find her, they must intend to punish her in some way. She wasn’t even threatening her, but that doesn’t matter nowadays. I’m actually trying not to post as much on this forum even because I have no idea how far they will go in pursuing people down the road. At this point, I don't put anything past this regime.

(09-29-2015 06:56 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 06:38 PM)durangotang Wrote:  Deuteronomy 11:22

If you carefully observe all these commands I am giving you to follow—to love the Lord your God, to walk in obedience to him and to hold fast to him— then the Lord will drive out all these nations before you, and you will dispossess nations larger and stronger than you. Every place where you set your foot will be yours: Your territory will extend from the desert to Lebanon, and from the Euphrates River to the Mediterranean Sea. No one will be able to stand against you. The Lord your God, as he promised you, will put the terror and fear of you on the whole land, wherever you go.

So as long as they follow Judaism better than Europe Christianity, they'll win?

I know that's a stupid summation - would you break that down Barney style for me?

G

You are mistaking the interpretation of the text. Jews never considered it written for a Christian. In order to properly understand it, consider it delivered by rabbis as a message to the Jewish masses, whom they control, to obey the Jewish elite, and to hold fast as a group, and wherever they go they will disposes and rule the goyim - even nations greater than themselves.

(09-29-2015 05:29 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(09-29-2015 04:01 PM)Ice Wrote:  Ok, but if that is true, what is the goal of all this? If the whole thing has been planned decades in advance, what is it good for? Since - as you say - you need less and less people working to uphold a similar level of civilization, these immigrants serve no purpose. At least in terms of contributing to society in a productive way.

Aside from the main purpose of destroying the national unity and thus making future rebellion almost impossible there is the added benefit of the economic Ponzi scheme.

Read my previous posts - no - the immigrants are not needed economically. And no - they won't work with 5 mio. unemployed in Germany. But what they will do in fact is boost short-term the economic spending via increase of debt. The plutocracy owns the German debt and thus the immigrants are paid by the old tax and spend system. In addition there will be cuts for the German poor. And it's absolutely irrelevant whether they squeeze out some Germans from the labor market or are unemployed for life. The end-effect is the same - more debt to pay for them. For years GDP gets in fact boosted by it, but it's just a fake increase purely on debt and nothing more. It is ultimately a net negative effect that serves the purpose of prolonging the Ponzi scheme until the bitter end.

I disagree on this one. I don't see a reason for the parasitic banking ruling elite to deliberately harm the organism they're leeching from after they've successfully captured it and endebted it. If they want to leech more they will just add more debts to it (there are many ways to do this, no need to import other problems just to increase the debt).

That is they wouldn't want to ruin Germany if they were sure that they'll continue to own it and suck from it in the coming decades. Instead they'd want the maximum GDP and productivity in Germany.

But will they continue to own Germany in the long term as they do today???

I suspect that either they want to politically weaken Germany by creating ethnic problems in it (even if the GDP has to go down), or maybe even a scorched earth policy is conducted. The Western power is decreasing each year (in terms relative to the third world), China is still rising, they couldn't break Russia so far in spite of numerous attempts (colour revolutions, Ukraine conflict, sanctions), so maybe they're afraid that in a few years Europe might shift its policy away from English/American control, so they better infect the organism while they still have total control over it.

What if the next German leader is not as obedient as Merkel today, what if he's someone like Schroeder was or is even more disobedient?

Here's a great post by N°6 originally from this same thread:

(09-09-2015 01:46 PM)N°6 Wrote:  I don't want to derail this thread but Americans and British (I include Canadians and Australians, NZers) need to realise that Germany is not the power behind the EU.

The EU which was originally the Coal and Steel Community Treaty was formed to peg Germany to Europe and to France specifically (which since the Prussian and British defeat of Napoléon has been in decline). Since Bismark defeated France and Austria then united the disparate German states into the Second Reich, continental power went from Paris to Berlin.

This is the reason why Germany is pegged to the EU and still occupied by the US. New York and London inserted its financial system into Europe via the defeated Germany AND Germany is the point where US weaponised pop-culture enters Europe. Washington DC still clears German TV content.

If Germany was not in the EU and not occupied by the US, then it would be the power of Europe for the third time in a century and the Anglo élites know this. It remains to be seen if a brainwashed and demorilised German public will ever wake up to this. With a birthrate less than 1.7 children per woman, it seems that those who might have woken up to this will never be born in the first place.

In the past couple of pages I'm suddenly thinking I'm reading the Protocols of the Elders of Zion or something. Most Jews aren't even religious anymore and if you take a random Jew off the streets of New York and asked about these phrases, most wouldn't have a clue.

As far as Germany goes, the US isn't going to be able to afford to keep all those bases in Germany, and Europe in general eventually. So when the time comes, I wonder what will happen. Starship Troopers?

(09-29-2015 05:29 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  As far as control of the situation goes. Currently there is a very lenient treatment of all Muslims by the cops. If the situation gets worse, then the military can be used and this can and will turn deadly. Europe won't become Iraq or Afghanistan. The fundamental difference that everyone seems to be missing is that in Iraq the people were defending their homeland. In Europe it would be vice-versa and the entire military & police would be fighting with the majority of the population against some militants. That is a massive difference. The only things remaining would be bomb attacks until a total 1984 police state is in effect.

And that is in my opinion the main goal - total control through the iron fist of Big Brother. Never mind that Big Brother first created the chaos, but of course most people would choose oppressive Big Brother before living in the mayhem that is created by those wonderful soulmates.

Imposing a police state is necessary mostly when a country goes to a big war. This is most probable to happen in the US. Europe doesn't have a potent army and I don't see the European nations involved in any big wars in the foreseeable future, so I say there's a low probability that the main reason for this uncontrolled immigration is to establish a police state.

Here are the theories I see emerging on this thread:

1. The Zionists are using the refugee crisis to A. Depopulate the Middle East of Muslims and B. Generate anti-Muslim sentiments in the West. This is an pre-war tactic before Israel can declare open war on Islam and take command of the region.

2. Merkel and Co destroying Germany to atone for the sins of the holocaust.

3. The elite bringing these refugees in to destroy nationalism and keep consumerism high. This makes good business sense by keeping sales stable.

4. The elite attempting to bring the Syrian Civil War to Europe's doorstep so that citizens will support a UN intervention in Syria on behalf of Assad. This will bring stability to the region, allowing a pipeline to be constructed between Iran and Europe and reduce dependence on Russia.

Discuss.

(09-29-2015 07:27 PM)Libertas Wrote:  In the past couple of pages I'm suddenly thinking I'm reading the Protocols of the Elders of Zion or something. Most Jews aren't even religious anymore and if you take a random Jew off the streets of New York and asked about these phrases, most wouldn't have a clue.

As far as Germany goes, the US isn't going to be able to afford to keep all those bases in Germany, and Europe in general eventually. So when the time comes, I wonder what will happen. Starship Troopers?

Who cares about a random Jew on the streets of New York? The Jewish elite certainly don't. It is obvious that they operate as a racial or ethnic community with religious protection.

Eventually? We are concerned about preventing the genocide of Germany and by extension Europe right now.

If the Protocols seem too antiquated for you, perhaps this will suffice:

"Multiculturalism Is A Moral Duty For Germany” (source Fria Tider via EuropeanGuardian.com)



From the article:

According to the head of the Jewish Council, Josef Schuster it’s a moral duty for Germany to take in immigrants from the third world. This because of the “barbaric” history of Germany.

It was during the 70 year commemoration of the liberation of Dachau that Josef Schuster proclaimed his harsh “sentence” against the Germans.

He said to the German newspaper Junge Freiheit that:

“Germany has brought so much misery to the world. We owe so much to so many countries. We’re the last country that can turn back refugees.”.

...

“When I see 10.000 people cheering islamophobe and a right-wing populists such as Geert Wilders I feel sick.”.

He also declared that it was the prisoners in Dachau who witnessed a “supposedly civilised people” were transformed into a “wildlings”. That there once again are people who talk badly about immigrants and jews makes one question if Germans respect “humanity”.

As icing on the cake he ended his speech by demanding Germany to spend even more money on fighting the right-wing.

Depopulate the Middle East of Muslims? You know how insanely inconceivable that seems? I'm not bashing you or who says that, just the theory in itself. And this idea of a "Greater Israel" seems rather unpractical too.

What is it that makes it difficult to understand about jewish anti-European sentiment?

You go wrong because you consider jews European and you go wrong because you consider their viewpoint of history as European.

For example, Europeans overwhelmingly see the Moor occupation of Spain as a dark time in history. They cherish when the Moors were driven out. Jews on the other hand call this period their 'Golden Age' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_age...in_Spain).

Europeans think the Spanish Inquisition was something about witches. In the history of jews, and is the real origin, the Inquisition was to discover jewish interlopers who claimed to be Christian but weren't.

Europeans think of the Ottoman Empire as a great evil that threathened the very existense of Europe. Jews consider the Ottoman Empire a gracious host (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of...n_Empire), in fact they were well known as partaking and enjoying the trade of white sex slaves(http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007...006-9018-z)

Quote:Hundreds of Hebrew written sources, dozens of official decrees, judicial records (sijillat), and reports of European travelers indicate that slaveholding – particularly of females of slavic origin – in Jewish households in the urban centers of the Ottoman Empire was widespread from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries.

And so we can continue. Jews were expelled from every single European country in which they set foot. THAT they remember. They also clearly remember their good fortune under Islamic rule.

Jews look at history and far prefer the rule of Islamists over the rule of European Nationalists.

(09-29-2015 08:53 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  What is it that makes it difficult to understand about jewish anti-European sentiment?

You go wrong because you consider jews European and you go wrong because you consider their viewpoint of history as European.

For example, Europeans overwhelmingly see the Moor occupation of Spain as a dark time in history. They cherish when the Moors were driven out. Jews on the other hand call this period their 'Golden Age' (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_age...in_Spain).

Europeans think the Spanish Inquisition was something about witches. In the history of jews, and is the real origin, the Inquisition was to discover jewish interlopers who claimed to be Christian but weren't.

Europeans think of the Ottoman Empire as a great evil that threathened the very existense of Europe. Jews consider the Ottoman Empire a gracious host (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of...n_Empire), in fact they were well known as partaking and enjoying the trade of white sex slaves(http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007...006-9018-z)

Quote:Hundreds of Hebrew written sources, dozens of official decrees, judicial records (sijillat), and reports of European travelers indicate that slaveholding – particularly of females of slavic origin – in Jewish households in the urban centers of the Ottoman Empire was widespread from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries.

And so we can continue. Jews were expelled from every single European country in which they set foot. THAT they remember. They also clearly remember their good fortune under Islamic rule.

Jews look at history and far prefer the rule of Islamists over the rule of European Nationalists.

Of course, none of this means anything really, because if they were not malignant, they would leave to their blessed home country that they have waited nearly 2,000 years for and let everyone live in peace.

Curious how they never extrapolate on just why they have been kicked out of virtually every nation they have ever inhabited. Don't you think, if you had 109 relationships that ended badly you might take a look in the mirror and quit blaming everyone else?

Coincidence?

Why Are Israelis Moving to Germany? [Haaretz, 2011]

Waves of young Israelis find a home in the former Nazi capital [The Washington Post, 2014]

Tens of Thousands of Jews Leaving Israel for Germany [The American Free Press, 2014]

(09-29-2015 08:09 PM)durangotang Wrote:  If the Protocols seem too antiquated for you, perhaps this will suffice:

"Multiculturalism Is A Moral Duty For Germany” (source Fria Tider via EuropeanGuardian.com)

I tried to find the source for that speech and managed to trace it back to here:

https://jungefreiheit.de/politik/deutsch...chtlingen/

It appears to be a "far-right" German site and they report the speech as if they had someone there listening to it. No recording. However, there are 123 comments of which many are prophetic and were accurately predicting the death of Germany earlier this May. Many of the comments also sound like they were there to witness the speech.

It seems believable the speech happened, especially when you have photos like this one:

Here is the Swedish Source:

Mångkultur "moralisk plikt" för tyskar [Fria Tider]



The Speech occured on May 03, 2015 in Dachau Germany, to commemorate the 70th year of the "liberation" of Dachau. Next to Merkel is Josef Schuster, of Chairman of Zentrarats of Jews in Germany, Bavarian Prime Minister Horst Seehofer, and Israeli ambassador Yaakov Haadas-Handelsman.

More like a preemptive funeral for Germany. Sick bastards.

^ Amazing how that entire picture carries a heavy religious feeling to it.

It shocks me that the Talmuds could hold such a grudge for WW2, but then again it doesn't because they've rejected Christ and the teaching to forgive. Instead hatred festers in their hearts which leads to malicious actions to their neighbors.

What's crazy about the Talmuds is that they do not even consciously know the game plan, other than a few leaders at the top, with the majority of the Talmuds loyally obeying. Sometimes you do get Talmuds who disagree with the master agenda, such as guys like Peter Schiff, but they are less than 1/3 of Jews so we get the endless march of Zion's interests.

Roosh's video was right. They are trying every thing they can that isn't too blatant.

(09-29-2015 09:46 PM)Samseau Wrote:  ^ Amazing how that entire picture carries a heavy religious feeling to it.

It shocks me that the Talmuds could hold such a grudge for WW2, but then again it doesn't because they've rejected Christ and the teaching to forgive. Instead hatred festers in their hearts which leads to malicious actions to their neighbors.

What's crazy about the Talmuds is that they do not even consciously know the game plan, other than a few leaders at the top, with the majority of the Talmuds loyally obeying. Sometimes you do get Talmuds who disagree with the master agenda, such as guys like Peter Schiff, but they are less than 1/3 of Jews so we get the endless march of Zion's interests.

I think you are very correct about rejecting the lessons of Christ and forgiveness.

I think it would shock you, if you were to find out, just how many know and are on board within the Jewish community.

Of course there are a great many Jews in America who don't regularly go to synagogue and didn't attend Hebrew school. Millions - and many of them are fine upstanding people. They are consciously unaware of the geopolitical agenda to one degree or another, but when push comes to shove it seems they close ranks and consolidate from the periphery very fast. The vast majority of Jews know that Judaism is a supremacist racial or ethnic community masquerading as a religion and they remain silent about it because of the vast network and material opportunities, they lie by omission.

Most Jews are atheists.

What is interesting are men like Henry Ford. Ford is one of the most famous Americans to have ever lived and his story of becoming aware of the so-called "Jewish Question" caused him to spend many years of his life and millions of dollars trying to expose it. I would say he is probably the single most loved American of all time. His opinion was that virtuous Jews would rise up and put and put an end to the actions of the Jewish elite once their actions were made public.

He was wrong.

He purchased the Dearborne Independent and devoted it to the Jewish question.

This was later released into 4 volumes of books that sold millions of copies and that can be found here:

The International Jew — The World’s Foremost Problem (JR Books Online)









Bobby Fischer, another American, and probably the greatest Chess champion of all-time, arrived at a different conclusion than Henry Ford:





He died in exile in Reykjavik, Iceland in January of 2008 after being chased around the globe and jailed by Japan at the request of the United States government.

People here who are confused about why tptb are destroying us forget human nature. Sometimes there is no logical reason. I bet nobody here would try to assign a greater meaning to polar bear hunting. Everyone recognizes it as simple, base malice. What is happening to the west is nothing more than "their" version of polar bear hunting. Hate is a logic all of its own.

The state of Bavaria want to close its boarders if necessary because the lead Horst Seehofer disagree with Merkel the most.
Also Germany pass a law to handle all those refugees more easy. Lets see if it work and as I said before 48 % of Germans disagree with Merkels refugee politics, even in her own party the critical voices get louder.

What this siege of Germany will create is a more realistic view. There had been immigration problems before but not as bad as in other European countries. The political left wing parties now realise that not all of those refugees are real refugees and not all of them enrich the society. There are some to extreme points in Germany. Either to let all in and don't care about integration because every foreigner is better then a German. The other extreme are the far right ones that want nobody in.

Also you see a big differences in economical power by the 16 states in Germany and how they handle immigration in the past. Cities like Berlin, Frankfurt, Köln, Düsseldorf etc struggle more. Furthermore the states have to kick out more then 100,000 denied refuges. The now situation shows very clear that Germany was run very long by a happy pinky point of view. There had been critical voices out before but did not get listen too. And it had not listen to because of the far right wing people. They spread fake rape stories, fake pictures and so on. Easy to spot but they put every critical voice of immigration into an extreme point of view.
Far right wing groups get financial support by Putin and its kind of funny how Neo Nazis and "concerned citizens" march with russian flags on demonstration.

With all the struggles, I believe Germany and Europe will understand that they have for their rights, for their freedom. Wrong tolerance is one of the biggest problems in Europe. Because those fundamentalist fanatics will never back down. 70 years of peace made the people of Europe soft.
We have to make clear what Germany and Europe stands for. The question is just get this stand divided by far right wing people and the plans of the elite politicians and left wing supporters?
Furthermore I wonder abut the jews. I mean with all the muslims the anti semitic views and attack on a rise. There are reports where jews left France because of all the Muslims.

Also the government start to take away buildings and houses to occupy them for the refugees. Its a 50 - 50 % struggle at the moment and more critical voices are out there. The left wing propaganda has to face reality that more and more citizens are aware of. But this reality is not the reality of the extreme right wing people that hate every foreigner.

Back to Europe.

Most people upon learning of the Jewish plan to genocide the peoples of Europe, naturally presume it must be a reaction to Hitler. Quite the contrary. In fact the plan predates the rise of the furor and the third Reich itself.

The organization towards these ends openly began in 1922 with the founding of the "Pan-European" movement in Vienna:

The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan - The genocide of the Peoples of Europe
(Source Identa via Golden Dawn International Newsroom)






From the article:

Mass immigration is a phenomenon, the causes of which are still cleverly concealed by the system, and the multicultural propaganda is trying to falsely portray it as inevitable. With this article we intend to prove once and for all, that this is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What they want to present as an inevitable outcome of modern life, is actually a plan conceived around a table and prepared for decades, to completely destroy the face of the continent.

...

The Pan-Europe

Few people know that one of the main initiators of the process of European integration, was also the man who designed the genocide plan of the Peoples of Europe. It is a dark person, whose existence is unknown to the masses, but the elite considers him as the founder of the European Union. His name is Richard Coudenhove Kalergi. His father was an Austrian diplomat named Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi (with connections to the Byzantine family of the Kallergis) and his mother the Japanese Mitsu Aoyama. Kalergi, thanks to his close contacts with all European aristocrats and politicians, due to the relationships of his nobleman-diplomat father, and by moving behind the scenes, away from the glare of publicity, he managed to attract the most important heads of state to his plan , making them supporters and collaborators for the "project of European integration".

In 1922 he founded the "Pan-European" movement in Vienna, which aimed to create a New World Order, based on a federation of nations led by the United States. European integration would be the first step in creating a world government. Among the first supporters, including Czech politicians Tomáš Masaryk and Edvard Beneš and the banker Max Warburg, who invested the first 60,000 marks. The Austrian Chancellor Ignaz Seipel and the next president of Austria, Karl Renner, took the responsibility for leading the "Pan-European" movement. Later, French politicians, such as Léon Bloum, Aristide Briand, Alcide De Gasperi, etc will offer their help.

With the rise of Fascism in Europe, the project was abandoned and the "Pan-European" movement was forced to dissolve, but after the Second World War, Kalergi, thanks to frantic and tireless activity and the support of Winston Churchill, the Jewish Masonic Lodge B'nai B'rith and major newspapers like the New York Times, the plan manages to be accepted by the United States Government. The CIA later undertakes the completion of the project.

The essence of the Kalergi plan

In his book «Praktischer Idealismus», Kalergi indicates that the residents of the future "United States of Europe" will not be the People of the Old Continent, but a kind of sub-humans, products of miscegenation. He clearly states that the peoples of Europe should interbreed with Asians and colored races, thus creating a multinational flock with no quality and easily controlled by the ruling elite.

Kalergi proclaims the abolition of the right of self-determination and then the elimination of nations with the use of ethnic separatist movements and mass migration. In order for Europe to be controlled by an elite, he wants to turn people into one homogeneous mixed breed of Blacks, Whites and Asians. Who is is this elite however? Kalergi is particularly illuminating on this:

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals. Instead of destroying European Judaism, Europe, against her will, refined and educated this people, driving them to their future status as a leading nation through this artificial evolutionary process. It's not surprising that the people that escaped from the Ghetto-Prison, became the spiritual nobility of Europe. Thus, the compassionate care given by Europe created a new breed of aristocrats. This happened when the European feudal aristocracy crashed because of the emancipation of the Jews [due to the actions taken by the French Revolution]


Here is First President of the European Council (the EU), Count Herman Achille Van Rompuy, receiving the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize which is awarded every two years (Click here and zoom in for a large version and you can read the text yourself):



And, as expected, here is Mutti Merkel receiving the prize:



Does anyone still want to blame so-called Nazis for this?

Just Jewish revenge, huh? Yeah, right.

Eritrean migrant stabbed to Swedes to death in an Ikea because he was being deported (to Italy, not to Eritrea). Afterwards, he tried to commit suicide but failed.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morni...-refugees/

Quote:Just a few yards away from the two women, a mother and her son lay lifelessly in rapidly expanding pools of blood. A severed finger lay on the store’s linoleum floor.

Nearby lay another man, also injured: Abraham Ukbagabir, a 35-year-old Eritrean man who had arrived in Sweden only five months earlier.

Next to him lay a bloody knife.

As Söderström and Albinsson screamed for the police, a third man — like Ukbagabir, young and thin — walked past them and toward the exit.

“Stop him,” the women yelled but the man disappeared up the stairs and into the crowd of frightened customers.

The Aug. 10 attack — described in detail in police reports obtained by The Washington Post — would prove to be one of the most scandalous in recent Swedish history. The mother and son, both Swedes, died from their stab wounds. The two suspects, Ukbagabir and a fellow Eritrean named Yohannes Mahari, were quickly arrested for murder.

They were both asylum-seekers.

This attack shows what the 'refugees' are doing when they reach these rich lands of Northern Europe? Assimilating and contributing to their adopted societies? No, in fact, the exact opposite.

Here's the life of an asylum seeker (Ukbagabir is the killer. Mahari apparently wasn't involved in the attack)

Quote:Mahari had never been to Ikea before. He had lived in Sweden for 16 months but with no Swedish, English or money, his life was narrowly circumscribed. When Ukbagabir used his limited English to guide them to the big box store, the younger Eritrean witnessed his adopted country’s full cultural and consumerist power for the first time.

For several minutes, Mahari followed Ukbagabir around the store, as if overwhelmed. But he didn’t see any cellphones. And as they walked through the kitchenware department, Ukbagabir began picking up items and mumbling about needing to buy them.

First it was a pot. Then it was two razor-sharp kitchen knives.

When Ukbagabir began opening their plastic protective packaging, Mahari got nervous. He asked the older man if he was going to buy the knives, but Ukbagabir didn’t answer.

Instead, he attacked.

Here he gives his reasons for the attack:

Quote:Ukbagabir explained that he “just lost control” after learning that he was going to be sent back to Italy, according to his interview. “That’s why he committed the acts inside Ikea against these two individuals … to make people understand him.”

He said he wasn’t even sure who he attacked, but “they were just nearby, in the vicinity, and that it was just mere chance that these two individuals were struck,” according to the report. “Abraham states at the interrogation proceeding that the individuals that he attacked with a knife were innocent, and that he hoped they would reach paradise.”

Ukbagabir also told the investigators that after killing Carola and Emil Herlin, he turned his weapon on himself. “His desire is that God will receive him,” police wrote in their interview report.

Police say the attacks were not religiously motivated, however. Both Ukbagabir and Mahari are Christian, Eva Morén, assistant prosecutor for the Västmanland District Court, told The Washington Post in a phone interview.

^^That's terrible the African man was hurt in the encounter with the two swedes. I see racism is alive and well in Sweden. I wish this xenophobic incident won't dissuade other Africans from coming to Sweden, since it's pretty obvious the swedes need more exposure to other cultures before they can fully appreciate the benefits of diversity. Hopefully this man is able to overcome the physical and emotional harm he suffered at the hands of the swedes and resume his cold fusion research. Without the contributions of men like him, we have no hope of forestalling global warming/cooling/homeostasis and averting environmental catastrophe.

(09-30-2015 12:34 AM)durangotang Wrote:  Back to Europe.

Most people upon learning of the Jewish plan to genocide the peoples of Europe, naturally presume it must be a reaction to Hitler. Quite the contrary. In fact the plan predates the rise of the furor and the third Reich itself.

The organization towards these ends openly began in 1922 with the founding of the "Pan-European" movement in Vienna:

The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan - The genocide of the Peoples of Europe
(Source Identa via Golden Dawn International Newsroom)

I don't deny this. But I don't believe that the real power elite cares much about the Jewish people either. That is why so many Orthodox Jews are opposing this - they consider Israel itself a Satanic or at least occult entity.

But of course many Jewish people are participants thinking that it is just revenge for WWII and that it's self-defense to destroy the Christians before they start a new Holocoust again.

However - their culture in Israel gets equally destroyed by feminism, anti-patriarchal laws, water fluoridation until recently, LGBT agenda - you name it - they've got it all. The only thing that they do very well is k-selected breeding, strong positive tribal unity and a high degree of material intellectual resolve. But the Chinese have those mentalities too - in the past the Christian protestants did so as well.

So yes - I see the control groups and the lower and higher useful tools. In the end there won't be a Judaism of the old sort left - it will be destroyed together with the rest of the religions and all the current high- and mid-level Jewish participants will find out that they were conned themselves.

Besides - if it were as simple as that than I would advise for every man here to find himself a tolerable Jewish girl, marry her and be on the "ruling side of the future". I don't think it will be as easy as that - the real elite certainly does not consider itself Jewish anymore.