Apparently Finland is getting around 500 invaders a day, which is ~180,000 on a yearly basis and that's just on top of the regularly scheduled legal immigration. So let's round up to 200k a year, for an aging country of a little over 5 million people. 80-90% are young males between 18-30. How many young males between 18-30 are there in Finland? I can't be arsed to find exact figures, but usually a 10 year cohort is a lot less than 20% of the overall population. So that means there are roughly 300,000 male Fins in the 18-30 age range.

In just one year-this year!- the invasion will create a virtual tie in the number of fighting age males in Finland between natives and invaders. This is unprecedented and frankly fascinating to watch. It's happening in real time, gentlemen!



Naturally, it follows that the number of males in the most sexually active age group will nearly double but the amount of blonde pussy will stay the same. What's more, the invaders have a pretty strong belief that all the blonde pussy is belong to them, and this belief is basically shared by the media and political elites. The math here is far from easy, but after careful and painstaking calculations



I can only conclude that rape culture is finally gonna become a real thing. It's a bit funny, because the rape culture hysteria we've witnessed over the last few years and that has so inappropriately reached a crescendo recently will end up actually understating the problem as it will develop in the near future. I mean, we could well be looking at a cataclysmic, systemic campaign of rapes not seen in the Western world since the waning days of WWII. I'm gonna make another bold prediction here and wager that the topic du jour will shift away from "rape culture" the moment rape culture actually begins to blossom. I further predict that Islamophobia will replace rape culture as our nearest and dearest concern the moment the Islamic rape campaigns in Europe start gathering steam in earnest.



I don't mean to pick on Finland here, I just used it as a case study. I don't know what the exact numbers are for other nations, but I'd imagine similar ratios are in play for many of them, especially the smaller ones (looking at you, Sweden!)

We're looking at history in the making here, folks. This is actually more exciting than witnessing mere wars, because the effects of wars are often transitory in nature. What we're witnessing here is complete demographic transformation, from the roots up. Imagine if you could witness the Arab takeover of North Africa or the Europeans takeover of the Americas not in the space of centuries, but in the space of months!

I almost wish I was on the ground to see this first hand, but I'll have to satisfy myself with vicariously reading first hand accounts on RVF from my exile in red China where the oppressive totalitarian government tortures me with the blocking of Facefuck and New Whore Times. Oh the humanity. Oh the missing freedoms. Oh the...hey look, did that Jihadi the democratically elected government of Sweden sicced on its people just blow that building up? Snap!

dupe

(09-27-2015 02:35 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(09-27-2015 02:16 AM)N°6 Wrote:  Sounds like you'd have liked Libya and Syria before they were bombed to pieces by Western 'progressives' which unleashed its Jihad assets against them.

Moderate Muslims are as much of a target than traditional Christian or secular Europeans.

They are and militant Islamists always want to take power and go back to the stone age.

Essentially Libya, Syria and even Iraq were secular states that battled non-stop against militant Islam. I knew guys who grew up in Iraq in the 1970s until early 1980s and they described Baghdad as a wonderful place to live in (spent their childhood in Baghdad). Many Westerners enjoyed their life there with their families. Personally I would not call those countries even Muslim countries since the government was secular. Some Middle Easterners do understand that little tidbit. The "reform" of Islam is to push it back and limit it to the religious function - and even then support mainly the good sides of it.

Rulers like Gaddafi, Assad or the king of Jordan understood that contrary to Western moronic liberals who think that "letting them be" is going to work out via magic.

A decent article on the standard of living in Libya before NATO/IMF and the World Bank usurers destroyed it with the Jihad and Qatari special forces (the defeated Libyan Army's weapons magically appeared in Syria against Assad's forces).

Many people here are against the welfare state. Of course, it is in a mess because of abuse and also because the original planners never thought that the West's productive industries would be asset stripped and sent to the East to cheaper labour.

I would say that the social states within Europe, Libya and Syria are to be taken down by the IMF. If you are usurer, then a state's social safety net is bad for business because people who've fallen on hard times have no need of loans. In other words, welfare is to be 'privatised' like the state utilities were. Privatised welfare tends to become payday loans or usurious crisis funds.

Quote:Destroying a Country’s Standard of Living: What Libya Had Achieved, What has been Destroyed

Against the backdrop of war propaganda, Libya’s economic and social achievements over the last thirty years, have been brutally reversed:

The [Libyan Arab Jamahiriya] has had a high standard of living and a robust per capita daily caloric intake of 3144. The country has made strides in public health and, since 1980, child mortality rates have dropped from 70 per thousand live births to 19 in 2009. Life expectancy has risen from 61 to 74 years of age during the same span of years. (FAO, Rome, Libya, Country Profile,)

http://www.globalresearch.ca/destroying-...oyed/26686

(09-27-2015 02:54 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  Naturally, it follows that the number of males in the most sexually active age group will nearly double but the amount of blonde pussy will stay the same. What's more, the invaders have a pretty strong belief that all the blonde pussy is belong to them, and this belief is basically shared by the media and political elites. The math here is far from easy, but after careful and painstaking calculations

I can only conclude that rape culture is finally gonna become a real thing.

It is interesting because modern anthropologists still consider the voluntary or involuntary actions of a group's women vis-à-vis other groups as an indicator of the relative strength and good fortunes of the groups.

Few academics will touch the Rotherham case which involved working class English women and compare it with middle-class English women going to other countries in their prime fertility years to help more fecund women and their children by administering medicine, food and building huts (the huts are often pulled down by the charities after the women go home so the new arrivals can rebuild them).

(09-09-2015 10:10 AM)johnfortunebg Wrote:  More propaganda on the football pitch. I knew that SJWs are running FIFA and UEFA but apparently they have strongholds in the clubs as well.

Worth the listen.

(09-27-2015 12:52 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Atheists always have hilarious Narcissistic Self-Constructs. They think they're cool, intelligent Bill Hicks types, whilst, in reality, the third picture should be this:



I'd argue that the majority of the Culture Erosion we talk about in the Everything Else forum is the fault of Atheism.

Hear me out:

Take that picture. You have three groups all saying the same thing.

"Follow the beliefs this book speaks of and an earthly paradise is possible!"

Militant Christians:



Militant Muslims:



Militant Atheists:



I've been pondering current events and my mind has wandered into another theoretical framework:

Without the concept of Utopian Socialism popularised by More, Owen, Fourier, et al, we wouldn't have had the concepts of Marxist Communism, Marxism-Leninism, Stalinism, Maoism, and, most-likely, Anarchism.

Without these concepts being explored, the rejection of Marxist ideas by thinkers wouldn't have led to the creation of Ethical Socialism, which is the category I'd place most of the SJW bullshit we're currently dealing with during this third flourishing of Political Correctness within my lifetime.

Simple Wikipedia summation:

Quote:Ethical socialism is a political philosophy that appeals to socialism on ethical and moral grounds as opposed to economic, rationalist, and materialist grounds. It emphasizes the need for a morally conscious economy based upon the principles of service, cooperation, and social justice while opposing possessive individualism.

Ethical Socialism came into being during the Weimar Republic due to the theories of Leonard Nelson, who formed the Internationaler Sozialistischer Kampfbund, (International Socialist Militant League). The ISK's core beliefs included anti-clerical atheism, vegetarianism, and animal rights.

The ISK were a spin-off from the SPD (Social Democratic Party). The first Organised Gay Rights Movements in the world started in Germany, and popularised within the SPD the theories of Magnus Hirschfeld: that homosexuals were a third, intermediate sex between men and women, and, as such, same sex-attraction was as natural as heterosexuality, and therefore, morally-just.

Once again, history simply goes around in circles, and we're in a current-wave of Ethical Socialism driven by Millenial Atheists. Millennials have largely rejected both traditional and new age religions, and observers have noticed how Atheism clusters in the Technology and Media sectors, has a large online presence, and is popular with Feminists.



The danger of Ethical Socialism is that it sounds perfectly-reasonable in theory. I mean, why would you disagree against moral and just actions? You'd have to be a bad person. This is where the Puritanical finger wagging comes into it, and the crusade to save souls cultivates a evangelistic zeal within its proponents. Note how these Atheist Propaganda ads focus on claims of moral-correctness, and it's easy to see how it and Ethical Socialism are deeply co-dependent.





Note the second paragraph here addressing the moral values of atheism, once again, tying the two concepts together.



Feminist Typist Laurie Penny, making the same appeal to moral superiority:

Quote:"The fact that I don’t believe in God might be considered an impediment. ... ... Indeed, some might consider the basic principles of compassion and charity for all men and women an obstacle to the vital duties of discouraging condom use, opposing women’s right to choose and providing cod-spiritual justification for the persecution of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people. Not being a Christian, all I have to stop me spreading dogmatic misogyny and homophobia in the name of morality is my own personal sense of what’s right and wrong, and we all know how that goes, don’t we?"

Obese Thought Sharter Lindy West, handwringing about her distaste for Militant Atheism, writes this, (and, as usual, her response to people morally-lecturing other people whom morally-lecture other people is to morally-lecture them.

Quote:I grew up with godless parents in a godless home at godless schools with godless friends, so it's not even like god is something I knew and then rejected—we don't even have that level of bitter, resentful closeness. All we have is distance, strangeness, bafflement...

...Atheism—especially in its incarnation as a movement—can so easily transform into smug hostility and dog-whistle classism. How do you avoid that? How do you find common ground? If you think you know better, how do you keep from feeling like you are better? And why does such a historically destructive force as religion deserve to be treated with kid-glove cordiality? People kill for religion. And I have to be nice?

Well, yes. If you want to be considered a nice person. I do want to be considered a nice person, so I try.

I'd suggest the absence of a sense of a sense of anything greater than their own selves makes people deeply-insecure about their status as a Goodperson, and, as such, they're obsessed with proving they possess morality. The difference between Lindy and I is that her idea of 'niceness' is so bizarrely broken - so utterly morally-flawed - that I guarantee that if we were both buried in adjacent plots, people would readily drop trou' and dump on hers, and leave mine unmolested.

This is the core problem with Ethical Socialisms co-dependence with Atheism: how can a person who believes in nothing, make any kind of objective moral judgement? Any act, with the right framework, can be morally-justified.

This is how you end up with SJW's defending pedophiles; bragging about abortion; harassing people into submission; fighting for a Stalinesque purge of the bourgeoisie White Class; and calling for the reeducation and extermination of anyone whom disagrees with them. You can't follow a moral compass if it's broken to begin with.

As such, Ethical Socialism is always doomed to fail, not only from within, but at the hands of Unethical Populations who can manipulate concern and victimhood for their own benefits, and drain resources until the societal structures that allows Ethical Socialism to flourish collapses.

Think of the coming collapse as removing the power and security of Socialists: they will be purged by the very populations they believe they're helping.

Interesting times ahead if Putin can frame himself as a steward of Christendom.



NATO's support of the Jihad pretty much everywhere before and after 9/11 might haunt it in the future.

I was thinking about how much friction/turmoil/violence there was in Northern Ireland as a result of migrants from England. The English and Irish speak the same language and the people are the same race, yet the English moving into Ireland led to war and violence. I remember during "the troubles" seeing Irish slogans such as "get the English out of Ireland!"

Imagine how much worse it will be with these vastly different people invading European countries.

   

(09-26-2015 09:07 PM)MikeS Wrote:  

(09-26-2015 08:46 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Just a question to guys here.

Do you want none of this cultural invasion? Or would you prefer it to stay a while and destroy the feminist and welfare utopia that is eroding the insides of the US and EU?

I'll take continued feminism over a potentially disastrous islamic invasion any day. As for the so called welfare utopia - whether you're taking about tax funded healthcare and education, or various unemployment benefits - I've benefited from that at many times or through periods of my life (in my original country) so I'm not one to complain about that (more than the common grumblings about high income taxes) , and I don't think it's necessarily too high a burden on a society when it's not being stressed past the breaking point - like during an islamic invasion for instance.

By welfare state I mean the leeches who take advantage of it. Not the NHS or disabled/poor people down on their luck. I don't believe in throwing people into the abyss because of the banks.

(09-27-2015 02:07 AM)N°6 Wrote:  

(09-26-2015 08:46 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Just a question to guys here.

Do you want none of this cultural invasion? Or would you prefer it to stay a while and destroy the feminist and welfare utopia that is eroding the insides of the US and EU?

You are also assuming that feminists are against the invasion of 'soulmates' and 'future spouses'.

The feminists will be at the forefront of this invasion and have already suffered casualties amongst their legion. Whether they can accept the truth and back down or stand by their beliefs will be telling.

(09-27-2015 05:32 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  Atheists always have hilarious Narcissistic Self-Constructs...

Atheists often employ the concept of progress, or history-as-a-linear-development, to bolster the idea that we are simply somehow past the era of religions and that the re-orientation of human belief systems toward the atheist ideal is inevitable.

I don't think the West is in a post-religious era. I think we are in an interregnum.

In late antiquity, there was a widespread loss of belief in the Classical gods as well. It had all become somehow untenable, especially for the intellectual class. This, I think, had two causes... the exoteric one is that it actually was untenable, that these gods were improbable and difficult to employ as the true cause of existence and the universe.

The esoteric one is that in a materialist age, peoples' capacity to speak allegorically and symbolically declines, as does the willingness of public systems to educate them in this manner (which is the only education that allows different civilizations to speak to each other across gulfs of time and culture).

Materialism prioritises itself; this is why, when we have imagined the possibility of non-human (super-)intelligence in the 20th century, we imagined physical extraterrestrials in actual spaceships.

We have lost the ability, as a culture, to talk about gods, and thus religion. The new atheist movement has made much of "the fairy-man who lives in the sky", as in "who could believe in that?".

But that was never what thinking Christians believed. That's what they taught as an approximation to small children in Sunday school.

I am not a Christian myself. Like the late Roman, I simply can't be. I can enjoy the art, appreciate the religion's historical role in Western thought, all the rest. But I do not and cannot (you can't will yourself to believe something; either you think it's true or you don't) believe in the literal divinity of Jesus of Nazareth.

What I do believe, though, is that humans are complex and human consciousness is strange. I do believe we have, whether materially or in meditative states, been "visited" by other intelligences, some of which exceeded our own.

I believe the mystic element has become undervalued. I was having a conversation with an atheist a few years ago who made the popular claim that "the Bible is basically a rule-book on how to live a good life". Which on one level it is. But on another, it is a document of contact. Anubis is a vision of contact. Most cultures have documented contact.

After the Romans lost their faith, but before Constantine made Christianity the law of the land, many visions competed. Materialist atheism was one of them, and was considered very sophisticated. But the vision of contact symbolized by a itinerant preacher whose very divinity caused mankind to execute him brutally was powerful as well, and gained many adherents in the cruelty of late Rome.

There will be other visions of contact. They might be true (I would argue that the Christ-principle contains an esoteric truth beyond the literal verity of the Nazareth story, but that's for another time) or they might be manipulations foisted on us by men in high places or even the powers of the air.

But I suspect they will come. We are not a people living after something. We are a people living before something.

I think, AnonymousBosch, that this also relates to your point concerning the "stale peace", but that, again, is a discussion for another time.

(09-27-2015 05:32 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(09-27-2015 12:52 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Atheists always have hilarious Narcissistic Self-Constructs. They think they're cool, intelligent Bill Hicks types, whilst, in reality, the third picture should be this:



I'd argue that the majority of the Culture Erosion we talk about in the Everything Else forum is the fault of Atheism.

Hear me out:

Take that picture. You have three groups all saying the same thing.

"Follow the beliefs this book speaks of and an earthly paradise is possible!"

Militant Christians:



Militant Muslims:



Militant Atheists:



I've been pondering current events and my mind has wandered into another theoretical framework:

Without the concept of Utopian Socialism popularised by More, Owen, Fourier, et al, we wouldn't have had the concepts of Marxist Communism, Marxism-Leninism, Stalinism, Maoism, and, most-likely, Anarchism.

Without these concepts being explored, the rejection of Marxist ideas by thinkers wouldn't have led to the creation of Ethical Socialism, which is the category I'd place most of the SJW bullshit we're currently dealing with during this third flourishing of Political Correctness within my lifetime....

Actually, I think ethical socialism is rooted in Rousseau and Pauline Christianity - which finds Pope Francis exhorting "Do unto others..." crap. Even Nietzsche thought so (such as in 'Will To Power').
http://www.lsus.edu/Documents/Offices%20...evised.pdf

Anarchism is really rooted in reactions to the French Revolution and William Godwin's " Enquiry concerning Political Justice, and its Influence on General Virtue and Happiness."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Godwin

And atheism failed to become respectable - Voltaire, for instance, recanted his unbelief on his deathbed - until Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection gave the godless a respectable explanation for the evidence of design in nature without a (Deity responsible for it, that is a) Designer.

Hello guys,
tomorrow it is Czech statehood day, a public holiday in the Czech Republic.
There will be a lot of protests and demonstrations in large Czech cities, Prague, Brno, Ostrava, Zlín, Plzeň. At least 3 demonstrations are reported to authorities in Prague.
At Jungmanovo náměstí (Jungmann Square), Václavské náměstí (Wenceslass square), and Hradčanské náměstí (Hradčany square). More demonstrations will follow the next day.
If you happen to be in Prague, support us.

   

Lions live here.
This is not a country of camels, sheep or cocks. We are not a Brusel's colony.
Protest against refugee quotas.

We are not sheeps, we are lions!

   

   

PS: This is Letná, 1989, Velvet Revolution. 750 000 people! We surely can gather.
   


Edit: If this invitation to public gathering is against the rules, or offends someone here, pls PM me and i will delete it. I mean no harm!

I hope you guys burn some EU flags. Maybe burn Juncker and Merkel in effigy.

Regarding richler's point, the time he was talking about was also a period known as the Crisis of the Third Century in Rome, which nearly destroyed the Empire. If you look around Western Civilization today we may be facing something quite similar. It's funny because I have recently wrote about it in a draft for my upcoming project exploring the intellectual progression to the insanity we face today.

1. Rome's economy was in shambles due to hyperinflation.
2. There were frequent civil wars and coup d'etats as different factions jostled for the imperial throne.
3. Barbarian invaders stepped up their attacks against the Empire's northern provinces, as had the Persians in the east. The tech gap between Rome and its enemies was narrowing.
4. There were secessionist movements, resulting in the Gallic and Palmyrene Empires and further civil wars.

It was during this period that Rome began to transition to monotheism. Aside from Christianity being theologically more powerful than the old pagan religions, the old gods of Rome were clearly failing.

I've been pondering Christianity and, for reasons I hope to explain on ROK, I do not believe it is a component of the way forward for masculine/feminine nationalism, not only for reasons of "not making sense," but because its philosophy simply cannot meet the present challenges.

I'm not sure what will replace it, but atheism is also not an answer. I think part of the answer might be communication with an individual higher self in pursuance of glorious deeds, and you cannot do that by falling into hedonism.

You're all mistaken about Christ. Basically the West returns to Christianity or it dies. It is the inescapable conclusion.

Also Finland might be okay after all:

http://news.yahoo.com/finlands-no-good-d...42061.html

'Finland's no good': Disappointed migrants turn back

Quote:"You can tell the world I hate Finland. It's too cold, there's no tea, no restaurants, no bars, nobody on the streets, only cars," 22-year-old Muhammed told AFP in Tornio, as the mercury struggled to inch above 10 degrees Celsius (50 Fahrenheit) on a recent blustery grey day.

He had already travelled from Tornio to the capital Helsinki almost 750 kilometres (465 miles) south, and then back up to the Tornio border again to return to Sweden.

Migrants who lack proper travel documents are unable to take the ferries that run between Helsinki and Stockholm.

Another group of around 15 Iraqi refugees waiting at the bus station that Tornio shares with its Swedish twin town Haparanda also said they wanted to go back to southern Sweden.

Gee, it's like those fair features of the Nords evolved to handle their climate or something.

----------------------------------------

There were not so peaceful demonstrations in east Germany this weekend against the invaders according to Hungarian media

(09-27-2015 07:23 AM)Wrec Wrote:  Edit: If this invitation to public gathering is against the rules, or offends someone here, pls PM me and i will delete it. I mean no harm!

Whilst I'm sure we all appreciate your deference as a new member, for me at least, being a man means not giving a fuck if your values offend someone.

As it happens, I think you're in good company here so all should be well.

(09-27-2015 05:32 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ...
This is the core problem with Ethical Socialisms co-dependence with Atheism: how can a person who believes in nothing, make any kind of objective moral judgement? Any act, with the right framework, can be morally-justified.

This is how you end up with SJW's defending pedophiles; bragging about abortion; harassing people into submission; fighting for a Stalinesque purge of the bourgeoisie White Class; and calling for the reeducation and extermination of anyone whom disagrees with them. You can't follow a moral compass if it's broken to begin with.

You are right of course. The elite plans to get rid of all religions completely - maybe they let Satanism stay since some of them have described it as atheism with an occult undertone.

Moral relativism of "everything goes" is acceptable to them since they can decide via the media and academia what the moral borders are to be for now until they push them forward once again. Thus the SJWs are the perfect communist apparatschniks.

Religions despite all their faults have some basic moral values they simply won't cross - without them anything is potentially up for grabs.

That is why they now argue for paedophelia just as a sexual proclivity like homosexuality.
http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_ped...a_monster/

That is why the new bio-ethics can argue for post-birth abortions up to age 3 when the parents are unhappy with their children (right to kill your 2 year old if you are dissatisfied - no kidding - was published in major journals):

http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03...00411.full

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/geneveith/2...-abortion/

Quote:J Med Ethics doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100411
Law, ethics and medicine
Paper
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?

Ultimately the belief into moral nothingness should make us do monstrous things, but even if people don't believe in God outwardly, then most people don't act like that. I think that all living creatures are inwardly aware of a permeating moral code and that breaking that gross line (for example taking the life of someone innocent) is wrong. Only with massive dogma can humans be convinced to go beyond that. Part of the dogma is based on destroying the moral sets being taught by most religions - as faulty as many of them are. When they are gone, then everything suddenly becomes morally possible - and that's what the elite wants in the end.

Holy shit Wrec, these are amazing messages... I hope it goes well tomorrow and the Czech Republic leads the change.

Quote:

Hodne štesti! Jdeme, Čechy!

Very encouraging news Wrec! Good luck with the demonstrations. I agree with Libertas some flag-burning is needed...

Friend just sent me this in an email, haha...someone needs to translate this and other memes in this thread into German and other European languages, then distribute it far and wide. I don't trust google translate to do it correctly.

Their narrative is collapsing. The peoples' is getting stronger.

Even your children aren't safe in the new EUSSSR

Some amateurish translation (sorry, my German is pretty horrible and Google Translate is not doing a better job):

Quote:If you post xenophobic comments on Facebook, that means your own child (custody rights) could be at risk. It is not necessary (for the posting) to be a criminal offence so that the courts consider your child to be 'at risk'

Quote:Those who spread radical or xenophobic views risk not only to lose their job and good social standing, but also to lose their custody rights to their children. This is especially true with xenophobic Facebook posts

Quote:The political or religious opinions of a parent can have an impact on his custody rights to his child, if the child's welfare is considered endangered. A merely controversial opinion is not sufficient grounds for restriction, but the Family Court has jurisdiction to decide whether an action endangers the child's welfare. The decisive factor is common sense.

'Common sense' here means 'whatever the cultural marxist posing as a judge decides'.

So, to recap:
Communist Eastern Block, 1945-1989:
-if you are against the regime, the regime blocks you from obtaining a job as all existing jobs are government jobs
-if you are against the regime, you are send to labour camp where the majority of residents died (in the first decades of communism). After that, it was changed to 'merely' prison and mental health institutions;
-free speech against the regime and its ideology is a crime punishable by prison

EUSSSR, 2015 - onward
-if you are against the regime, NGOs, cultural marxist HR departments and SJWs block you from obtaining a job as they own the narrative and can exert pressure on any employer
-if you are against the regime, you can be send to prison for 'unlawful activities'
-if you are against the regime and have children, they can be taken away from you on a whim
- free speech against the regime and its ideology is a crime punishable by prison

Welcome to 1984, just 31 years later.

(09-27-2015 10:25 AM)johnfortunebg Wrote:  Even your children aren't safe in the new EUSSSR

Some amateurish translation (sorry, my German is pretty horrible and Google Translate is not doing a better job):

Quote:If you post xenophobic comments on Facebook, that means your own child (custody rights) could be at risk. It is not necessary (for the posting) to be a criminal offence so that the courts consider your child to be 'at risk'

EUSSSR, 2015 - onward
-if you are against the regime, NGOs, cultural marxist HR departments and SJWs block you from obtaining a job as they own the narrative and can exert pressure on any employer
-if you are against the regime, you can be send to prison for 'unlawful activities'
-if you are against the regime and have children, they can be taken away from you on a whim
- free speech against the regime and its ideology is a crime punishable by prison

Welcome to 1984, just 31 years later.

Of course we knew that this was always the plan. IF the narrative is collapsing and the people no longer believe in the "free media", then the totalitarian state must start controlling the Internet sooner.

Hatespeech is everything that does not conform 100% with the mainstream opinion or one of the sanctioned fake alternatives.

Of course they are going to move against anonymity (though that does not really exist, since the secret services always know who is doing what) and they are going to use children or your job to pressure you. So posting anti-immigration comments will just cost you your parental rights and your kids may be given to a lesbian serial rapists and it may just cost you your job, so you can no longer support yourself.

The system is not very far off from the Stasi wonderland.

(09-27-2015 10:50 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Of course we knew that this was always the plan. IF the narrative is collapsing and the people no longer believe in the "free media", then the totalitarian state must start controlling the Internet sooner.

Hatespeech is everything that does not conform 100% with the mainstream opinion or one of the sanctioned fake alternatives.

Of course they are going to move against anonymity (though that does not really exist, since the secret services always know who is doing what) and they are going to use children or your job to pressure you. So posting anti-immigration comments will just cost you your parental rights and your kids may be given to a lesbian serial rapists and it may just cost you your job, so you can no longer support yourself.

The system is not very far off from the Stasi wonderland.

Every system uses the same totalitarian means when it is near the end, they do not go silently to the night.

(09-27-2015 10:50 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(09-27-2015 10:25 AM)johnfortunebg Wrote:  Even your children aren't safe in the new EUSSSR

Some amateurish translation (sorry, my German is pretty horrible and Google Translate is not doing a better job):

Quote:If you post xenophobic comments on Facebook, that means your own child (custody rights) could be at risk. It is not necessary (for the posting) to be a criminal offence so that the courts consider your child to be 'at risk'

EUSSSR, 2015 - onward
-if you are against the regime, NGOs, cultural marxist HR departments and SJWs block you from obtaining a job as they own the narrative and can exert pressure on any employer
-if you are against the regime, you can be send to prison for 'unlawful activities'
-if you are against the regime and have children, they can be taken away from you on a whim
- free speech against the regime and its ideology is a crime punishable by prison

Welcome to 1984, just 31 years later.

Of course we knew that this was always the plan. IF the narrative is collapsing and the people no longer believe in the "free media", then the totalitarian state must start controlling the Internet sooner.

Hatespeech is everything that does not conform 100% with the mainstream opinion or one of the sanctioned fake alternatives.

Of course they are going to move against anonymity (though that does not really exist, since the secret services always know who is doing what) and they are going to use children or your job to pressure you. So posting anti-immigration comments will just cost you your parental rights and your kids may be given to a lesbian serial rapists and it may just cost you your job, so you can no longer support yourself.

The system is not very far off from the Stasi wonderland.

They built Facebook, they can do whatever the fuck they want with it. Don't post shit on Facebook you don' want "them" to know. Obvious shit is obvious.

We need to stop bitching about what they do with their platforms and create our own. RVF is a good first step. The more they crack down, the more people will be driven off the mainstream platforms and seek alternatives. We just have to make sure we create the alternatives for them to jump on. How hard can it be to create a Facebook clone? Here is an idea, make a Facebook with stochastically generated "hate" speech posts. Basically like a dude with Tourettes, randomly (but infrequently) spouting shit like "I hate (insert whatever here)" or "stop the third world invasion." Give people plausible denialability that they didn't say it, the algorithm did.