Post: #1

In 2013, Japan’s Ministry of Justice (MOJ) approved only six asylum seekers’ applications for refugee status out of 3,777 cases (0.1 percent approval rate), the lowest number in 16 years.

– German news outlet DW‘s report on Japan’s horrendously strict refugee policy. This month, on the other side of the world, Germany permitted 8,000 Syrians on trains to enter its territory for local resettlement.

The European illegal migrant crisis has “evolved” from epidemic proportions to plain farcical and surreal ones. With the Germans and Austrians opening their front doors to whomever wishes to come and the Prime Minister of Finland now offering his home for so-called refugee settlement in a calculated electoral stunt, Europe’s elites are continuing a very sad tradition of Europe (and, by extension, majority-European America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) being forced to show a tolerance (and overt indulgence) that is never expected anywhere else in the world.

White-majority countries must accommodate millions of foreigners, whether as immigrants, illegal immigrants or genuine refugees, as other non-white countries can pursue objectively and highly ethnocentric immigration policies with absolute impunity. Keen to secure a future voting base that will strangle their conservative or traditionalist enemies and eliminate indigenous European cultures, socialists, other leftists, and SJWs see national or supranational borders such as those of the EU as bigoted and oppressive demarcations, instead of sensible boundaries that make able government and local prosperity (plus intra-European cultural diversity) possible.

Any problem found outside Europe is paradoxically perceived as both Europe’s problem and Europe’s responsibility to fix.

European banks crush the Greeks, but the EU is indulging every arriving non-European

Ironically, one of the two major entry points for the tens of thousands of illegal migrants arriving every month into Europe, Greece, is the same economy where unemployment is higher now than it was for many Western countries during the Great Depression. The European Central Bank and other “institutions” will happily deny and put onerous condition after onerous condition on the Greeks, but the EU and many of its member states are demanding the resettlement of potentially millions of non-Europeans setting foot upon Europe’s shores and crossing its countries’ borders. Brussels shows more loyalty to illegal migrants than it does to Greeks, in many ways Europe’s oldest recognizable community.

Return of Kings‘ many critics will label this website, once again, as a supposed hotbed of inveterately “racist” activity. Yet they won’t proffer any explanation as to why SJWs are not devoting 0.0001% of the attention to combating actual, institutionalized ethnocentrism in a host of non-white countries where GDP is north of US$35,000.

If the situation was really about the betterment of people suffering outside Europe, SJWs and European elites would be vociferously castigating those countries that refuse to maintain even a semblance of a proper humanitarian program, particularly Japan, Korea, Taiwan and the oil-rich Gulf countries. They would also be holding individual regimes, such as Saudi Arabia and its exclusionary Sunni Arab policies, accountable for inflaming nearby conflicts on the basis of religious or ethnic sectarianism. That sectarianism is a significant reason why Syrians and others have departed for Europe in massive numbers.

Welcome to South Korea, where copious foreign blood was spilled to keep it racially pure in 2015

Despite white, African-American, Indian and other blood having coated the fields, mountains and forests of Korea between 1950 and 1953 to keep South Korea independent, the nominally “Western” government in Seoul defiantly keeps its population homogeneous. This is what a typical Korean classroom looks like:

Contrast that with a class from London’s suburban Risley Avenue Primary School, where all but four (or five?) in the photograph are Middle Eastern, mixed-race, or “pure” black:

I raise Korea as a prominent example because, unlike Japan, it does not have a modern history dominated by the colonial conquest of neighboring lands. Rather, it was saved twice from the ignominy of foreign subjugation by non-Koreans, firstly by American might in the 1940s to end Japanese rule and secondly by a US-led coalition force during the Korean War to spare it from the grasp of a Soviet and Chinese-controlled Stalinist dictatorship in Pyongyang.

Successive governments in Seoul have shown “gratitude” for both the historical and ongoing non-Korean underwriting of South Korean security by refusing to countenance any possibility of a cosmopolitan society, including additions from Syria or comparable war-torn states. That generosity is left to the same sorts of nations that sacrificed their young men to keep South Korea an independent nation.

Japan’s highly racist programs pertaining to refugees and general immigration are similarly inexcusable but for different reasons. Even as its former wartime ally Germany is the most financially generous place for illegal migrants in the world, accepting more than a thousand times more asylum seekers on a single day than the government in Tokyo did in an entire year, Japan is free to keep itself as the one race nation many of its Prime Ministers have called for.

The EU illegal migrant disgrace is about internal politics, not a safer world

The modus operandi of SJWs and others is that “white privilege” means Europeans cannot celebrate their cultures like other races and ethnicities. They will turn a blind eye to very wealthy non-European nations like Korea applying the most exclusionary measures possible to avoid cosmopolitanism but expect Hungary or Greece to foot the bill of unrestricted illegal migrant movement. This has everything to do with diluting local European cultures to the point of irrelevance, so that SJW “cultural” uniformity can be painted over what remains.

There is, fundamentally, one rule for Europeans, who have contributed more to the affluence and stability of the world than any other continent in human history, and a bunch of other “rules” for everyone else. The European-founded United States will accept Iranian-Armenian families like Roosh’s as legal immigrants, but would you expect Japan, Korea, Taiwan or the Gulf Arab oil states to do the same, let alone welcome illegal migrants or refugees? No, of course not.

As illegal migrants throng at the entry points of Europe and stampede across its recession-ridden heartland, the white man’s burden of Rudyard Kipling is very much alive and well in 2015.

Read More: 10 Best And Worst Countries For An American Man To Find A Wife

Posted on Mon, 07 Sep 2015 20:00:03 +0000 at http://www.returnofkings.com/70467/only-...l-migrants
Comments: http://www.returnofkings.com/70467/only-...s#comments

Post: #2

Koreans never really expanded their realm outside culturally Korean lands. They have every right to keep out foreigners as much as they want to.

At the other hand, Britains main goal last centuries was world domination and they destroyed many nations in the process. In world war I they together with the French invented a bunch of nations in the Arab-Ottoman territories. One British invention called Iraq is one of the most instable nations on earth and that's no surprise. One look at the ethnic and religious make up of the country makes clear that such a country is doomed to fail. Lebanon same story. The Sykes-Picot agreement and the Balfour Declaration are still the foremost reasons why the Middle East is a mess. Complaining about the presence of people from former colonies is retarded because those immigrants could never damage their host countries in a way the 'bad guys' of history did in their countries of origin.

About the United States, it's a country built on colonialism, immigration, slavery and mass genocide. It would be simply retarded, shameless and sickly indecent to only accept immigrants of Western European origin.

I am not blaming the white man for the problems of the world, but a natural and decent sense of accountability of some nations should be demanded.

Post: #3

(09-09-2015 05:54 AM)Alexandrian Wrote:  Koreans never really expanded their realm outside culturally Korean lands. They have every right to keep out foreigners as much as they want to.

At the other hand, Britains main goal last centuries was world domination and they destroyed many nations in the process. In world war I they together with the French invented a bunch of nations in the Arab-Ottoman territories. One British invention called Iraq is one of the most instable nations on earth and that's no surprise. One look at the ethnic and religious make up of the country makes clear that such a country is doomed to fail. Lebanon same story. The Sykes-Picot agreement and the Balfour Declaration are still the foremost reasons why the Middle East is a mess. Complaining about the presence of people from former colonies is retarded because those immigrants could never damage their host countries in a way the 'bad guys' of history did in their countries of origin.

About the United States, it's a country built on colonialism, immigration, slavery and mass genocide. It would be simply retarded, shameless and sickly indecent to only accept immigrants of Western European origin.

I am not blaming the white man for the problems of the world, but a natural and decent sense of accountability of some nations should be demanded.

don't be a fool. You're telling me that these western countries "owe" these refugees something because of something that happened to their ancestors in the past? Thats the same argument people make for slave reparations in america, residential school payments in Canada and on and on. Should Germany owe Greece some sort of debt for the Gauls sacking rome? Maybe the jews should give me something because they killed Jesus?

There is no world court of national guilt, nations can do whatever they want and if another nation doesn't like it they can go to war with them. Get over your idea that somehow the middle eastern people are flower tossing pacifists that have never harmed a hair on anyone's head and are 'owed' something. Remember the persian empire? How did they build that...not war and colonialism?! Say it ain't so!

Post: #4

I think aside from some Asian countries and a few oil countries most of the wealth and prosperity in the world is in the West and mainly white countries. So it seems very unlikely for someone to go to a country that is the same or worse than their current country. Then you factor in the culture (how accepting they are) and logically reduces the pool to the west.

But don't forget not all contributors of western society's success is due to whites. Check the patents and see the last names and a lot of them are "foreign" even though they may be working in the US.

Edit and in the name of fairness. The western cultures have used capitalism to extract what they can from poorer countries and used some as pawns in the name of politics. Sure these countries could have fought it but when money is offered in the form of aid and you are poor what do you do? Plus they are not democracies generally so the ones in power steal a lot of the aid. But my point being the west has created some of these problems. I love my country but I know the U.S. is not some saint.

There are no victims in this. So no one can be surprised at what is happening. These are series of events created together by multiple parties.

Post: #5

^ I had enlarged the screen to read the text, yet successfully guessed the poster after three sentences. His victim/entitlement complex is a big part of the problem.

Post: #6

(09-09-2015 06:16 AM)Rutting Elephant Wrote:  ^ I had enlarged the screen to read the text, yet successfully guessed the poster after three sentences. His victim/entitlement complex is a big part of the problem.

Huh?

Post: #7

Post: #8

Sorry, the "^" refers to Alexandrian. He posted in the same vein on the Swedish immigrant thread.
/thread-50289.html

When I asked where the Arab guilt is for invading North Africa, he called the Ummayad hordes freedom fighters consisting of "a couple of desert tribes from Hijaz." Never mind the razing of cities to the ground or that the caliphate already included most of the Middle East.

Post: #9

(09-09-2015 06:37 AM)Rutting Elephant Wrote:  Sorry, the "^" refers to Alexandrian. He posted in the same vein on the Swedish immigrant thread.
/thread-50289.html

When I asked where the Arab guilt is for invading North Africa, he called the Ummayad hordes freedom fighters consisting of "a couple of desert tribes from Hijaz." Never mind the razing of cities to the ground or that the caliphate already included most of the Middle East.

Which cities are you talking about? In Egypt Alexandria grew immensely and Cairo (originaly Fustat) was born. Furthermore the Ummayads established universities, caravan routes, bazars and cultural centres throughout Northern Africa. It brought civilisation to Iberia after a dark Visigothic period.

Post: #10

(09-09-2015 06:16 AM)Rutting Elephant Wrote:  ^ I had enlarged the screen to read the text, yet successfully guessed the poster after three sentences. His victim/entitlement complex is a big part of the problem.

We don't have a " victim/entitlement complex". Historical point of view just lets us live in UK, US and France unapologetically while recieving state subsidies. It's something personal and not to be enforced by any international organisation. It's more an idea of "Britain and France did some horrible things to us in the 1960's, now I squeeze every penny out of them as much as I can".

Post: #11

(09-09-2015 03:01 PM)Alexandrian Wrote:  

(09-09-2015 06:16 AM)Rutting Elephant Wrote:  ^ I had enlarged the screen to read the text, yet successfully guessed the poster after three sentences. His victim/entitlement complex is a big part of the problem.

We don't have a " victim/entitlement complex". Historical point of view just lets us live in UK, US and France unapologetically while recieving state subsidies. It's something personal and not to be enforced by any international organisation. It's more an idea of "Britain and France did some horrible things to us in the 1960's, now I squeeze every penny out of them as much as I can".

By "Us" do you mean that you were born in the 1960 or earlier and remember these alleged abuses? If you were born in say 1955...you're probably one of the oldest forum members.

You cannot claim part of "Us" you can claim your ancestors, but you are not one of them in the same way I can't say "I can't believe they persecuted us in the 1660s" about my english ancestors that left for america for freedom of religion. Am I going to go and lay around the UK to seek my ancestral revenge on welfare because of that?

Post: #12

(09-09-2015 03:45 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(09-09-2015 03:01 PM)Alexandrian Wrote:  

(09-09-2015 06:16 AM)Rutting Elephant Wrote:  ^ I had enlarged the screen to read the text, yet successfully guessed the poster after three sentences. His victim/entitlement complex is a big part of the problem.

We don't have a " victim/entitlement complex". Historical point of view just lets us live in UK, US and France unapologetically while recieving state subsidies. It's something personal and not to be enforced by any international organisation. It's more an idea of "Britain and France did some horrible things to us in the 1960's, now I squeeze every penny out of them as much as I can".

By "Us" do you mean that you were born in the 1960 or earlier and remember these alleged abuses? If you were born in say 1955...you're probably one of the oldest forum members.

You cannot claim part of "Us" you can claim your ancestors, but you are not one of them in the same way I can't say "I can't believe they persecuted us in the 1660s" about my english ancestors that left for america for freedom of religion. Am I going to go and lay around the UK to seek my ancestral revenge on welfare because of that?

Well if you still feel the effects of a certain event that happened in the past, you can claim part of "us". It's the law of causality. It's natural for people to be frustrated about things that happened long before they were born, the champions being the Jews who think that the Holocaust is still a thing, or Armenians who lobby for genocide recognition in other countries.

Post: #13

Article only. Profound analysis.

'baller

Post: #14

(09-09-2015 05:54 AM)Alexandrian Wrote:  Koreans never really expanded their realm outside culturally Korean lands. They have every right to keep out foreigners as much as they want to.

At the other hand, Britains main goal last centuries was world domination and they destroyed many nations in the process. In world war I they together with the French invented a bunch of nations in the Arab-Ottoman territories.

The unintentional irony in that statement is incredible. You unwittingly mention lands that were first colonized by one power (the Ottoman Empire), then you blame the later, shorter and far less brutal colonial powers for the problems of the region. It's the classic double standard leveled against Europeans from those without sufficient historical knowledge to even know it's a double standard.

Quote:One British invention called Iraq is one of the most instable nations on earth and that's no surprise.

Other legacies of the British Empire include Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Ghana and a number of other rather successful countries. The abolition of the slave trade is also an accomplishment of that empire. Unsurprisingly this escapes your analysis completely.

Quote:One look at the ethnic and religious make up of the country makes clear that such a country is doomed to fail.

Practically any permutation of lines drawn in that region would have been doomed to fail. The religious animosity and tribal/ethnic divisions responsible for that result existed long before Britain became a country much less an empire. You're not blaming the British and French for messing up the region so much as blaming them for not pulling off a geopolitical miracle...obviously this is completely unreasonable.

Quote:About the United States, it's a country built on colonialism, immigration, slavery and mass genocide. It would be simply retarded, shameless and sickly indecent to only accept immigrants of Western European origin.

Strawman. The US never only accepted immigrants of western European origin...Italian immigrants are one of the largest groups that came into the US from the 19th Century onward and they're southern European Catholic. Greeks, Poles, Russians, Japanese, Armenians and Lebanese are other examples of significant non-western European immigrant groups.

That aside, the US has absolutely no moral obligation to allow immigrants from certain regions into its borders simply to make you feel better.

Quote:I am not blaming the white man for the problems of the world, but a natural and decent sense of accountability of some nations should be demanded.

Precisely. You demand "accountability" (aka shame and injurious policies) for some nations...but not others.