Post: #1

The clash of civilizations continues, and Sweden’s immigrant neighborhoods have now become one of its battlegrounds. Several women have testified this summer to being controlled and harassed by Islamist men. One woman says that her neighborhood “increasingly resembles Afghanistan.” Leftists have responded—by calling the concerned women “racist.”

Troubling testimonies

Islamist enclaves have formed in the suburbs of Sweden, where men with beards and white dresses tell women what to do and how to dress. So says Amineh Kakabaveh in an opinion piece for Swedish tabloid Expressen.

In places like Husby, Angered and Rosengård—suburbs of Sweden’s three biggest cities—the situation for women is one of increased oppression and harassment.

Islamists and fundamentalists tell the adolescents here that they have to veil themselves, that Swedish food is ‘Haram’ (unclean), and that they have to read the Quran.

“Death to infidels”

Amineh Kakabaveh backs up her claims with testimonies from women living in those areas. Like Seve Saleh, who has lived in Husby, Stockholm for 13 years, and says that it “increasingly resembles Afghanistan.” In school, Seve Salehs children are reprimanded by fundamentalists.

Another woman who can testify to the Islamist oppresion is Helin Gül. Amineh Kakabaveh writes:

Last week one of her friends who don’t wear a veil was told at work that those who do not follow Allah’s laws deserve to die.

In some areas, women are not welcome in cafés anymore. Young women are not allowed to go outside after noontime. And boys are being recruited to jihadist organizations like ISIS (about 300 Swedes have gone to Iraq and Syria to wage holy war). Meanwhile, authorities and politicians do nothing, says Amineh Kakabaveh.

They just talk and worry—year after year.

More bad news

Several other tales of harassment and subjugation in city outskirts have become widely spread this past summer. Zeliha Dagli fled the imams of her home country to be free. But her childhood tormentors—whom she calls “bearded shadows”—followed her to Sweden.

In my area, I don’t want judgmental gazes from staring men. I want to bring home whoever I want, but today I can’t when my rights are restricted and controlled in my neighborhood.

Now she’s looking to move somewhere else.

We are many women who are very worried about the development in Husby and the threat to equality here. Isn’t Husby a part of Sweden, do the rules not apply here?

Carina Hägg, a former Social Democratic member of the Riksdag (the Swedish parliament), is also someone who’s spoken out about the rise of Islamic extremism.

We must break the dominance of radical Islam that exists in Sweden today. It is a very small group with great influence who support a caliphate in the Middle East and who want their own societies with Sharia laws in the suburbs.

Apart from women, homosexuals are another group that face harassment. Per Pettersson has lived in Husby for ten years, and has seen a change for the worse. In the street, people shout “f*cking faggots” when he walks by with his boyfriend. Eggs are thrown at his balcony.

I don’t know what’s changed in the last years, but I no longer recognize myself in Husby.

The leftist response

A week or so after Amineh Kakabaveh’s article was published, three senior representatives of the Left Party (formerly known as the Left Party-Communists, founded in 1917) responded. Don’t blame people, they say, but blame inequality.

It is in class divisions and disunion that reactionary fundamentalist and racist movements find nurishment to grow and prosper. To single out the suburb and a particular religion increases that disunion.

According to them, Islamism is not at fault whatsoever. The suburb is not unique in any sense, and women are oppressed everywhere.

As feminists we know that oppression of women and homophobia exists all over the world, in all social classes and contexts, but that it manifests itself differently.

Islamists are not to be held accountable for issues facing women in the suburbs, right-wing politics is.

For at the same time as the right have paved the way for reactionary movements by increasing segregation and poverty, they have—then as now—opposed progress that contributes to equality and women’s liberation. That is—if anything—a betrayal.

Racism and class hatred

Dan Jerrestam, writing for the socialist magazine Clarté, makes the case that pointing the finger at Islamists is hateful.

The sweeping generalizations that Amineh makes, which everyone understands are referring to male Muslims, devalue them as a group as the guardians of honor cultures and natural candidates to become jihadists. This is racism if anything!

In the same magazine, Dine Malmsten calls what Amineh Kakabaveh wrote a case of “class hatred.” The real problems at hand are unemployment, low wages and a “welfare state in decline.” The middle class is “licking upwards and kicking downwards.”

In a perhaps somewhat surprising turn, she puts the blame on “inner city feminists” who “target the men in the working class”.

They want to divide and conquer, they say they defend the ‘poor immigrant women’ who are to be pitied, because they have such evil men.

Her litany over the plight of the working man (i.e., Islamists) ends with a reference to Nazi Germany.

When Zeliha […] describes men as ‘staring bearded shadows’ it is hate speech plain and simple. It is the same rhetoric that was used in the thirties in Germany about Jewish, Polish and Russian men.

Preserving freedom

It’s hard to decide which is more sickening—the religious fundamentalists who deprive native citizen of their freedom, or the leftists who cover their backs. Both form an unholy alliance to take away the freedom of not just women but men as well.

The ironic thing is, the same ideology that aims to destroy Western civilization was created within it. Leftism is like a cancer that forms and grows inside the body. It is a part of it, yet at the same time alien. Slowly the internal organs weaken and deteriorate, until ultimately the parasitical tumor dies with the rest of the body. That is, if not treated properly.

In comparison, Islamic fundamentalism is like a contagious, deadly disease which the Western world risks contracting. If the immune system of the West is weak—perhaps on account of another ailment—the risk is elevated.

Never abandon Western values

Freedom is a key Western value, and with it comes pluralism and openness. Pluralism in the sense that people are allowed to think differently, and to speak their mind openly and without fear of repercussions. This means that different ideas can be tested and compared, until one proves to be superior.

As Western men, we want to defeat the evil beings who come here to destroy our great society. These Islamists hate our way of living, and some would even cut our throats if they only had the power to do so. But let’s not let our anger get the best of us. Let us be guided by reason, truth and freedom—and let us remain true Westerners.

People like Zeliha Dagli didn’t come here to live the same life as she did in the Middle East. She came here because she saw that life in the West was better. Because freedom is better than tyranny, many like her are now fleeing tyranny as well.

We can perhaps consider welcoming them as new members of our team—but only when they assimilate into the native culture, obey our laws, and stop leeching off of the wealth and social support systems built by the very culture they rage against.

Until that time, they will remain unwelcome to any thinking person.

Read More: Swedish Feminists Campaign For Fatties In Clothing Ads

Posted on Sun, 06 Sep 2015 23:00:11 +0000 at http://www.returnofkings.com/70129/islam...sh-suburbs
Comments: http://www.returnofkings.com/70129/islam...s#comments

Post: #2

I like the immune system metaphor.

The infection of extreme feminism has weakened the host against the moron masculinism of extreme Islam.

Post: #3

Sweden will soon be a leftist dystopia, and what a shame that is. It was once a beautiful Scandinavian country, or so I hear. Orthodox Islam is incompatible with 21st-century ethics, I just don't understand why politicians insist upon catering to them. Overpopulation will be the beginning of the end for Sweden.

Post: #4

I was listening to a podcast with Ann Coulter and she said that feminists ultimately don't care about women, or at least the women who don't vote for them. Their prime directive is ushering in global socialism.

The fact is is that they need the votes of these migrants whom they will NEVER criticize. This is also the reason that they are some of radical Islams biggest apologists. They see mass migration and radical Islam as easy vehicles to usher in global revolution. There own citizens, at least the ones that don't vote for them, are actually obstacles.

Post: #5

(09-06-2015 07:50 PM)mrbiggs Wrote:  I was listening to a podcast with Ann Coulter and she said that feminists ultimately don't care about women, or at least the women who don't vote for them. Their prime directive is ushering in global socialism.

The fact is is that they need the votes of these migrants whom they will NEVER criticize. This is also the reason that they are some of radical Islams biggest apologists. They see mass migration and radical Islam as easy vehicles to usher in global revolution. There own citizens, at least the ones that don't vote for them, are actually obstacles.

Ann Coulter is pretty insane, but the point that you/she stated still stands.

Post: #6

(09-06-2015 06:35 PM)EdgarAllenHoe Wrote:  Sweden will soon be a leftist dystopia, and what a shame that is. It was once a beautiful Scandinavian country, or so I hear. Orthodox Islam is incompatible with 21st-century ethics, I just don't understand why politicians insist upon catering to them. Overpopulation will be the beginning of the end for Sweden.

It has already been a leftist dystopia. It doesn't get any more "equal" than Sweden which only goes to show that the leftist politicians are scrambling to get more votes with immigration supporters under the delusion that if they just get more votes they can get more equality.

The experiment has failed.

Post: #7

(09-06-2015 08:49 PM)EdgarAllenHoe Wrote:  

(09-06-2015 07:50 PM)mrbiggs Wrote:  I was listening to a podcast with Ann Coulter and she said that feminists ultimately don't care about women, or at least the women who don't vote for them. Their prime directive is ushering in global socialism.

The fact is is that they need the votes of these migrants whom they will NEVER criticize. This is also the reason that they are some of radical Islams biggest apologists. They see mass migration and radical Islam as easy vehicles to usher in global revolution. There own citizens, at least the ones that don't vote for them, are actually obstacles.

Ann Coulter is pretty insane, but the point that you/she stated still stands.

Insanely smart and brave. She is one of the few conservative intellectuals that can get away with what she says because she's a woman.

Hell, she even argued that women should never have been given the right to vote because they only vote for more and more government spending and that's it.

Post: #8

(09-06-2015 08:55 PM)mrbiggs Wrote:  

(09-06-2015 08:49 PM)EdgarAllenHoe Wrote:  

(09-06-2015 07:50 PM)mrbiggs Wrote:  I was listening to a podcast with Ann Coulter and she said that feminists ultimately don't care about women, or at least the women who don't vote for them. Their prime directive is ushering in global socialism.

The fact is is that they need the votes of these migrants whom they will NEVER criticize. This is also the reason that they are some of radical Islams biggest apologists. They see mass migration and radical Islam as easy vehicles to usher in global revolution. There own citizens, at least the ones that don't vote for them, are actually obstacles.

Ann Coulter is pretty insane, but the point that you/she stated still stands.

Insanely smart and brave. She is one of the few conservative intellectuals that can get away with what she says because she's a woman.

Hell, she even argued that women should never have been given the right to vote because they only vote for more and more government spending and that's it.

I don't consider myself conservative nor liberal. I'm a pragmatist. An absolutist when it comes to what I believe the facts to be. Right is right, wrong is wrong and the truth of the world lies in the million gradients of grey between the two that claim to be black and white.

I agree with many of Ann Coulter's positions and arguments. The problem I have with her railing against those people "voting for more and more spending" is that she and her ilk supported the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

By some calculations the invasion of Afghanistan will have cost the US $1.6 trillion by the 2017. Since that invasion ostensibly was launched in 2001 in order to kill or capture Osama bin laden after 9/11, the fact that that stated goal was ultimately achieved in one night on May 1 2011 by a Seal Team Six mission for a cost of an estimated $14 million is... well...nothing less than shocking

Iraq...that singularly colossal clusterfuck cost and continues to cost the US a projected $2.4 trillion by some accounts. That's $2.400.000.000,000...Let that sink in and the idea of what some bunch of feminazi bleating cunts could extract through public entitlements is... laughable.

The other almost unspoken cost of going into Iraq is now manifest in our dealings (or more accurately the inability to effectively deal with)with Syria and more importantly Iran.

Imagine if the US, had not invaded Afghanistan and then Iraq. Our war weary nation would now be in an infinitely stronger position to deal with what is a real threat, the miasma of a devolving region due to the situation in Syria, and a nuclear Iran. Both are infinitely more significant than the contrived threat of Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda.

Let's not let the alarmist divisive rhetoric distract from the real issues. What those are is up to each of us to see...not let the media decide for us.

Post: #9

From what I have seen radicalisation is a reaction to xenophobia and discrimination. Human beings are inherently a bit distrustful against foreigners which often results in either explicit or implicit discrimination.

Sweden is an unfortunate victim of this since it hasn't really participated in colonialism in either Africa and Asia. Immigrant problems in the UK and France at the other hand is just bad karma.

Post: #10

(09-07-2015 05:33 AM)Alexandrian Wrote:  Sweden is an unfortunate victim of this since it hasn't really participated in colonialism in either Africa and Asia. Immigrant problems in the UK and France at the other hand is just bad karma.

I've noticed a tone in your posts. And in your first post you mentioned you like "hanging out with friends (no bars)".

In your opinion, what would you prefer the future of Europe to be?

Post: #11

(09-07-2015 05:47 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 05:33 AM)Alexandrian Wrote:  Sweden is an unfortunate victim of this since it hasn't really participated in colonialism in either Africa and Asia. Immigrant problems in the UK and France at the other hand is just bad karma.

I've noticed a tone in your posts. And in your first post you mentioned you like "hanging out with friends (no bars)".

In your opinion, what would you prefer the future of Europe to be?

Eventhough I am a non-European living in Europe, I prefer a Europe with Europeans, a Middle East with Middle Easterners, Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, etc. But the ideal world doesn't exist. Unfortunate historical events and circumstances have driven my parents (and other peoples) away from their original homeland.

So in concreto with the given present circumstances, as long as somebody behaves appropiately and stays out of trouble no politician or organisation has any legit reason to oppose presence of non-native individuals in any country.

I am just trying to make the best out of a bad situation.
I do love my country of birth until death. This country has raised me, paid for my education and provided me security. I pay my taxes from the bottom of my heart.

What tone did you notice if I may ask?

Post: #12

I don't understand why they leave their home countries if they are so great. Why leave paradise to go live in a country full of people that you hate?

They don't want to integrate or assimilate. They just want to suck up all the welfare and breed out the locals.

Post: #13

(09-07-2015 05:33 AM)Alexandrian Wrote:  From what I have seen radicalisation is a reaction to xenophobia and discrimination. Human beings are inherently a bit distrustful against foreigners which often results in either explicit or implicit discrimination.

Sweden is an unfortunate victim of this since it hasn't really participated in colonialism in either Africa and Asia. Immigrant problems in the UK and France at the other hand is just bad karma.

Bad karma? Haven't seen much Hindu terror in the UK lately.
The article is about people coming to Western countries, getting free houses and welfare without having to work, and instead of assimilating to the advanced society immediately set to work creating miniature versions of the Islamist hellholes they fled.
To respond that UK and France deserve that shows your bias. What would you see as appropriate karma for the thousand-year Arab occupation of North Africa?

Post: #14

(09-07-2015 10:53 AM)Rutting Elephant Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 05:33 AM)Alexandrian Wrote:  From what I have seen radicalisation is a reaction to xenophobia and discrimination. Human beings are inherently a bit distrustful against foreigners which often results in either explicit or implicit discrimination.

Sweden is an unfortunate victim of this since it hasn't really participated in colonialism in either Africa and Asia. Immigrant problems in the UK and France at the other hand is just bad karma.

Bad karma? Haven't seen much Hindu terror in the UK lately.
The article is about people coming to Western countries, getting free houses and welfare without having to work, and instead of assimilating to the advanced society immediately set to work creating miniature versions of the Islamist hellholes they fled.
To respond that UK and France deserve that shows your bias. What would you see as appropriate karma for the thousand-year Arab occupation of North Africa?

The Sykes-Picot Agreement and the Balfour Declaration was the first step into making the Middle East a hellhole. The second step was the establishment of the zionist entity.

The North Africans themselves joined the Arabs to get rid of the Byzantines. You can't occupy half a continent with a couple of desert tribes from Hijaz. That doesn't make sense.

Post: #15

(09-07-2015 09:50 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  

https://www.saudiembassy.net/affairs/rec...reign-aid/

Post: #16

(09-07-2015 06:08 AM)Alexandrian Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 05:47 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 05:33 AM)Alexandrian Wrote:  Sweden is an unfortunate victim of this since it hasn't really participated in colonialism in either Africa and Asia. Immigrant problems in the UK and France at the other hand is just bad karma.

In your opinion, what would you prefer the future of Europe to be?

Eventhough I am a non-European living in Europe, I prefer a Europe with Europeans, a Middle East with Middle Easterners, Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, etc. But the ideal world doesn't exist. Unfortunate historical events and circumstances have driven my parents (and other peoples) away from their original homeland.

So in concreto with the given present circumstances, as long as somebody behaves appropiately and stays out of trouble no politician or organisation has any legit reason to oppose presence of non-native individuals in any country.

I disagree that elected politicians don't have the right to control immigration. You are presumably allowed to vote where you are, that's the extent of your policy making rights unless you get a policy job. The foundation of the modern liberal democracy means the people of a country band together and agree on the rules.

That may include keeping outsiders out. I agree that someone in a country legally should not be treated badly because of their race.

You're obviously articulate and don't seem like an anti-social character. It's good that there are some advocating for immigrants, because you are needed to counter overly vicious reactionary people so there isn't needless violence. I believe there is a strong reactionhappening now to the dissolution of the original nature of the EU countries, and the politicians are out of touch and there may be needless suffering.

What you are communicating is the "drawbridge phenomenon", you got in to a better country, but now from what you're saying I think you don't want it swarming with more poorly socialized outsiders than yourself.

Do you really want ISIS-level cavemen let in harassing your daughters?

The simple practical fact is the developed countries can't let everyone in that wants to come, or they won't be developed countries any more.

These people, if they're capable, should make their own countries into developed countries - unless they can demonstrate ability like they're doctors, engineers etc.

I know it's easy to say that from my cushy perch, but that's because my ancestors worked their asses off making it clean, safe and liberal, so I don't have people hassling me everywhere I go.

Post: #17

(09-07-2015 10:53 AM)Rutting Elephant Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 05:33 AM)Alexandrian Wrote:  From what I have seen radicalisation is a reaction to xenophobia and discrimination.

Very naive. I have worked with criminals for decades. They are stupid, and have personality disorders. Some people are broken and can't be fixed, they must be isolated and others must be protected from them. As for discrimination causing problems, I quote Thurgood Marshall, first Black Supreme Court justice on the subject " Boy, you gotta be BETTER."

That's the BUILDER'S response to discrimination. "I will do so well and make myself so valuable that people will see I can be a benefit."

You'll notice the American Revolution occurred in the United States to-be, the rebels were able to build the most powerful nation in the world after their success.Where they were, with what they had, (or took from the Indians) WITH THEIR WORK.

This is diametrically different from cavemen like ISIS, whose only college grads probably have severe personality disorders or they wouldn't be hacking the heads off strangers. Any bets on Islamic State coming up with a cure for cancer soon?

Many immigrants, including my illiterate European ancestors came to the USA and adapted because they had the ability, and perhaps more importantly the agreeabilty. They didn't start riots, they worked their asses off.

A lot of people, especially from undeveloped countries, are simply unable to adapt to the demands of a modern technocratic capitalist society. They regress to the confrontational and dishonest coping mechanisms endogenous to their cultures and will simply degrade the functioning of the host organism.

Only the top , wild guesstimate 2-7%, of descendants of nomadic raider cultures can add value to a modern state.

The rest should not be coming into our carefully planned and struggled for world.