Post: #101

EDIT: delete

I'll let someone else take that video on.

Post: #102

Its hilarious how these girls are so ass mad they resorted to throwing a drink at you and instigating a fight. Typical female behavior, try to get you to lose frame. Thats how you know you really hurt them in their emotional spot.

Kudos to Roosh and those guys for showing so much restraint. Couldn't say the same for me if I was in that situation.

Post: #103

The police are pursuing the case.

   

http://www.journaldemontreal.com/2015/08...s-en-cours

Post: #104

NSFW naked image of her from one of her performances: http://i.imgur.com/y0yvWCS.jpg

Post: #105

(08-10-2015 06:42 PM)Roosh Wrote:  The police are pursuing the case.



http://www.journaldemontreal.com/2015/08...s-en-cours

My French is way out of practice, but they seem to be saying they are investigating Roosh as well for posts prior to his arrival.

Quote:Ce que plusieurs ignorent, c’est qu’une deuxième plainte a récemment été déposée contre Roosh V pour des propos qu’il aurait écrits sur son blogue les 1er et 2 août. Ces propos, jugés «inquiétants» par les autorités montréalaises, ont été signalés aux policiers par «certaines personnes».

Les publications auraient été mises en ligne quelques jours avant l’arrivée du blogueur à Montréal, le 4 août.

Give me a break. Words on the internet are not a fucking crime you libtards. Assault is though...

Post: #106

(08-10-2015 06:42 PM)Roosh Wrote:  The police are pursuing the case.



http://www.journaldemontreal.com/2015/08...s-en-cours

Post: #107

Guys, post with a clear head. Everything you post should be publicly sourced and legit.

Post: #108

(08-10-2015 06:46 PM)RickyGP Wrote:  NSFW naked image of her from one of her performances: http://i.imgur.com/y0yvWCS.jpg

Lovely. Too bad she's a crazy.

Would pump and dump.

Post: #109

Fuck I'm at work, typing on my cell phone, give me an hr or 2, I need access to my Lap Top.

Post: #110

(08-09-2015 09:02 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:59 PM)Porfirio Rubirosa Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:58 PM)WanderingMan Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:20 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:15 PM)Carlos100 Wrote:  It would send a clear message too if you go back and hang out at the same bar again before you leave Montreal.

It would send an even bigger message if he went to that bar with a quality, well behaved, respectful Montreal girl.

By what I've seen, he'd have a better chance of going in there riding a unicorn.

Plenty of cute, feminine girls in Montreal as long as you avoid certain areas overflowing with white-knights, radical feminists and other associated groups.

It's times like these that we need G here to set the record straight. I've never been to Montreal, so I don't know.

Crescent St. in my opinion had less of these than St. Laurent - but I was only there for two weekends.

Post: #111

AWALT

Post: #112

Is that the standard for how pretty actresses have to be in Montreal?

Post: #113

(08-10-2015 07:12 PM)CactusCat589 Wrote:  Is that the standard for how pretty actresses have to be in Montreal?

She's alright though. Just incredibly damaged and in need to identify with something.

Post: #114

Hi Roosh,

You were barely able to keep your cool. Fortunately, you did. The right of self defense in Canada has been a dead letter now for over 30 years. As hard as it was, walking away was the best option. So, don't get mad, get even. And consider getting bodyguards next time, or travel with a large enough group so you'll be protected if you are attacked by a mob.

Years ago, a very senior Canadian Crown Prosecutor told be that if I ever defend myself in Canada to not get caught or I will get charged regardless of the circumstances. Also, under the Canadian Criminal Code, the definition of a "weapon" is anything used to harm others. So if I hit someone with a banana peel in anger, I have used a "weapon".

Good luck, and I hope the Crown presses charges against that insane, violent, divorced from reality, female nutter.

Post: #115

Why do all of these nuts have nudes?

Post: #116

(08-10-2015 06:49 PM)DannyAlberta Wrote:  

(08-10-2015 06:42 PM)Roosh Wrote:  The police are pursuing the case.



http://www.journaldemontreal.com/2015/08...s-en-cours

My French is way out of practice, but they seem to be saying they are investigating Roosh as well for posts prior to his arrival.

Quote:Ce que plusieurs ignorent, c’est qu’une deuxième plainte a récemment été déposée contre Roosh V pour des propos qu’il aurait écrits sur son blogue les 1er et 2 août. Ces propos, jugés «inquiétants» par les autorités montréalaises, ont été signalés aux policiers par «certaines personnes».

Les publications auraient été mises en ligne quelques jours avant l’arrivée du blogueur à Montréal, le 4 août.

Give me a break. Words on the internet are not a fucking crime you libtards. Assault is though...

I think I found video of the officer that got assigned all of the roosh related complaints. "Hey Mcnulty, read all of these twitter, facebook and blog posts and see if there is anything criminal in them. Have fun!"

Post: #117

(08-10-2015 07:07 PM)Avarence Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 09:02 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:59 PM)Porfirio Rubirosa Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:58 PM)WanderingMan Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:20 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  It would send an even bigger message if he went to that bar with a quality, well behaved, respectful Montreal girl.

By what I've seen, he'd have a better chance of going in there riding a unicorn.

Plenty of cute, feminine girls in Montreal as long as you avoid certain areas overflowing with white-knights, radical feminists and other associated groups.

It's times like these that we need G here to set the record straight. I've never been to Montreal, so I don't know.

Crescent St. in my opinion had less of these than St. Laurent - but I was only there for two weekends.

Crescent St is waste. Full of tourists who don't know any better.

Post: #118

(08-10-2015 07:26 PM)pdwalker Wrote:  Hi Roosh,

You were barely able to keep your cool. Fortunately, you did. The right of self defense in Canada has been a dead letter now for over 30 years. As hard as it was, walking away was the best option. So, don't get mad, get even. And consider getting bodyguards next time, or travel with a large enough group so you'll be protected if you are attacked by a mob.

Years ago, a very senior Canadian Crown Prosecutor told be that if I ever defend myself in Canada to not get caught or I will get charged regardless of the circumstances. Also, under the Canadian Criminal Code, the definition of a "weapon" is anything used to harm others. So if I hit someone with a banana peel in anger, I have used a "weapon".

Good luck, and I hope the Crown presses charges against that insane, violent, divorced from reality, female nutter.

Self Defence in Canada

Quote:CBC News: Someone has just stolen something that belongs to you and is running down the street. Can you chase and tackle them to get your stuff back?

"You're allowed to try and get your belongings back," Nichols says, but under Section 38 of the criminal code, "you can't strike or cause bodily harm to the person that's stealing your stuff."

Holy shit. I never thought I'd be so proud to be an American.

Post: #119

(08-10-2015 06:32 PM)Game_Started Wrote:  What the fuck is this garbage?

It's a metaphor for all guys with the wrong game are creepy losers except for the player that calibrates correctly and comes with correct game and he gets to bang her. In other words...she's just another ordinary delusional chick

Post: #120

How is this dialog any different than what Roosh has said???

Girl 1: I just don't understand why you didn't stop him
Girl 2 It was just a moment. Just bodies. You know that feeling?
Girl 1: No, but I hear it happens.
Girl 2: I think he felt it too.

Post: #121

(08-10-2015 07:29 PM)kbell Wrote:  Why do all of these nuts have nudes?

So that we can objectify their rig of course

Post: #122

(Today 01:14 AM) Durbo [0]
(Today 01:01 AM)Natural Born Gyalist Wrote:
I cant see this publicity as being anything but beneficial to Roosh's business enterprises. After all I am a paid member who only heard about Roosh because of the whole "guy advocates rape" media scrum. As my name implies, I have never had problems getting women to sleep with me and I have a notch and flag count that would make 99% of men jealous. I was curious about the whole thing and now I am here, so I can say for myself that I would not be a member here if it were not for the "bad" publicity given to Roosh. This incident will undoubtedly boost book sales and membership.

I have been a follower of ROK and the manosphere for just over a year now. But because of what was happening in Montreal, I registered on this forum. I bought a Lifetime Gold membership.

BTW, anyone thinking of joining should just buy a Lifetime Gold membership. Don't be cheap - its just $21.
PM Quote
---

Good idea.

Time to put my money where my mouth is.

Post: #123

(08-10-2015 07:26 PM)pdwalker Wrote:  Hi Roosh,

You were barely able to keep your cool. Fortunately, you did. The right of self defense in Canada has been a dead letter now for over 30 years. As hard as it was, walking away was the best option. So, don't get mad, get even. And consider getting bodyguards next time, or travel with a large enough group so you'll be protected if you are attacked by a mob.

Years ago, a very senior Canadian Crown Prosecutor told be that if I ever defend myself in Canada to not get caught or I will get charged regardless of the circumstances. Also, under the Canadian Criminal Code, the definition of a "weapon" is anything used to harm others. So if I hit someone with a banana peel in anger, I have used a "weapon".

Good luck, and I hope the Crown presses charges against that insane, violent, divorced from reality, female nutter.

Bullshit, please explain this article and this and this. I guess your very senior Canadian Crown Prosecutor didn't tell you about the Lucky Moose Law eh?

Post: #124

Double post

Post: #125

(08-10-2015 07:44 PM)TornadoByProxy Wrote:  How is this dialog any different than what Roosh has said???

Girl 1: I just don't understand why you didn't stop him
Girl 2 (Justyna Bania): It was just a moment. Just bodies. You know that feeling?
Girl 1: No, but I hear it happens.
Girl 2: I think he felt it too.

Woman talks about sex= empowerment

Man talks about sex = lasciviousness

Edit: It's called hypocrisy