Post: #226

(02-06-2015 08:52 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

It's too bad people have started helping her carry this shit, she probably would have given up by now otherwise. It would have wrecked her back lifting it like an idiot with her obviously inadequate upper body strength.

Post: #227

(02-06-2015 06:25 PM)Seamus Wrote:  On the negative side, a fourth accuser just stepped forward, and it's a "a male Columbia student who identifies as queer and black" (http://tinyurl.com/pfs3v97)

This story just took a weird turn.

I thought it was already weird. You mean weirder. Much weirder. And I have a funny feeling this isn't the end. Fortunately, I'm more than weird enough to handle it.

Question: Is it possible that feminists, leftists, and SJWs will self destruct in their own weirdness?

Second question: Do gay black males (bottoms, that is) suffer from the same lack of desirability as black women? Enquiring minds want to know. It puts "Black Like Me" in a whole new light.

It's actually a serious question. The first members of the leftists were feminist women. Generally they were low SMV: the bottom of the female ranks. The second members were the omega males: effeminate, hoping to curry favor with the females. Who else are the low ranking members of society? Not hetero black men; everyone knows women love chocolate. Gay black men? How about gay Indians?

Post: #228

(02-06-2015 08:52 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

God she's pathetic.

I would have followed her around with tape-on wheel balancing weights and stuck them on when she wasn't looking.

Post: #229

(02-06-2015 03:06 PM)Renzy Wrote:  “everyone should be very, very cautious in accepting a man’s claim that he has been wrongly accused of abuse or violence” and that one indication of an abuser is that he will “act persuasive and logical.”

Didn't you know? Protesting innocence is the surest sign of guilt!

But if you said I DINDU NUFFIN they'll believe you.

Post: #230

(02-06-2015 09:00 PM)Texas_Tryhard Wrote:  

She's trying to look like Jesus. Not working.

Post: #231

This chick is invited to the presidential State of the Union speech.

Quote:Tonight Emma Sulkowicz, who drew international attention when she vowed to carry a mattress in protest after Columbia University failed to expel her alleged rapist, is attending the president's State of the Union address with New York senator Kirsten Gillibrand. Paul Nungesser, the man Sulkowicz accused of sexual assault, has largely remained silent, but today he spoke out, saying he was "dismayed and disappointed" to learn that Sulkowicz was invited to the event. "I am shocked to learn that Senator Gillibrand is actively supporting Ms. Sulkowicz’s defamation campaign against me by providing her with a public forum in which to broadcast her grave allegation. By doing so, Senator Gillibrand is participating in a harassment campaign against someone who, for good reason, has been found innocent by all investigating bodies," Nungesser told Daily Intelligencer.

Nungesser maintains that he is innocent and says that is why he has never been disciplined or charged. "Sulkowicz’s accusation is untrue and unfounded: I have never sexually assaulted anyone. This is why Columbia University after seven months of detailed investigation in November 2013 found me to be not responsible." He claims that the NYPD decided not to bring charges after Sulkowicz filed a police report in May 2014. "I voluntarily let myself be interviewed by DA chief of Sex Crimes at SVU in New York City, in August 2014," he said. "Shortly after this interview, the DA’s office informed me that they decided not to pursue the case further."

Sulkowicz told Daily Intelligencer previously that she decided not to pursue the criminal case any further. Neither Sulkowicz nor Senator Gillibrand’s office returned immediate requests for comment.

Post: #232

(03-03-2015 05:59 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  Neither Sulkowicz nor Senator Gillibrand’s office returned immediate requests for comment.

I bet.

The clowns have outstayed their welcome. It really is time for this fucking circus to end.

Post: #233

(03-03-2015 05:59 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  This chick is invited to the presidential State of the Union speech.

Quote:Tonight Emma Sulkowicz, who drew international attention when she vowed to carry a mattress in protest after Columbia University failed to expel her alleged rapist, is attending the president's State of the Union address with New York senator Kirsten Gillibrand. Paul Nungesser, the man Sulkowicz accused of sexual assault, has largely remained silent, but today he spoke out, saying he was "dismayed and disappointed" to learn that Sulkowicz was invited to the event. "I am shocked to learn that Senator Gillibrand is actively supporting Ms. Sulkowicz’s defamation campaign against me by providing her with a public forum in which to broadcast her grave allegation. By doing so, Senator Gillibrand is participating in a harassment campaign against someone who, for good reason, has been found innocent by all investigating bodies," Nungesser told Daily Intelligencer.

Nungesser maintains that he is innocent and says that is why he has never been disciplined or charged. "Sulkowicz’s accusation is untrue and unfounded: I have never sexually assaulted anyone. This is why Columbia University after seven months of detailed investigation in November 2013 found me to be not responsible." He claims that the NYPD decided not to bring charges after Sulkowicz filed a police report in May 2014. "I voluntarily let myself be interviewed by DA chief of Sex Crimes at SVU in New York City, in August 2014," he said. "Shortly after this interview, the DA’s office informed me that they decided not to pursue the case further."

Sulkowicz told Daily Intelligencer previously that she decided not to pursue the criminal case any further. Neither Sulkowicz nor Senator Gillibrand’s office returned immediate requests for comment.

I believe Sulkowicz has been careful never to actually say Nungesser's name in public, because she is probably aware that that would immediately open her to a successful defamation suit.

Post: #234

(03-04-2015 02:56 AM)Carlos100 Wrote:  

(03-03-2015 05:59 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  This chick is invited to the presidential State of the Union speech.

Quote:Tonight Emma Sulkowicz, who drew international attention when she vowed to carry a mattress in protest after Columbia University failed to expel her alleged rapist, is attending the president's State of the Union address with New York senator Kirsten Gillibrand. Paul Nungesser, the man Sulkowicz accused of sexual assault, has largely remained silent, but today he spoke out, saying he was "dismayed and disappointed" to learn that Sulkowicz was invited to the event. "I am shocked to learn that Senator Gillibrand is actively supporting Ms. Sulkowicz’s defamation campaign against me by providing her with a public forum in which to broadcast her grave allegation. By doing so, Senator Gillibrand is participating in a harassment campaign against someone who, for good reason, has been found innocent by all investigating bodies," Nungesser told Daily Intelligencer.

Nungesser maintains that he is innocent and says that is why he has never been disciplined or charged. "Sulkowicz’s accusation is untrue and unfounded: I have never sexually assaulted anyone. This is why Columbia University after seven months of detailed investigation in November 2013 found me to be not responsible." He claims that the NYPD decided not to bring charges after Sulkowicz filed a police report in May 2014. "I voluntarily let myself be interviewed by DA chief of Sex Crimes at SVU in New York City, in August 2014," he said. "Shortly after this interview, the DA’s office informed me that they decided not to pursue the case further."

Sulkowicz told Daily Intelligencer previously that she decided not to pursue the criminal case any further. Neither Sulkowicz nor Senator Gillibrand’s office returned immediate requests for comment.

I believe Sulkowicz has been careful never to actually say Nungesser's name in public, because she is probably aware that that would immediately open her to a successful defamation suit.

We can only hope that she slips at some point and he fucking nails her in court. What an awful woman.

Post: #235

Emma looking great with the fresh neon blue hair dye job . Herself and the "guerrilla girls" making a statement on rape mattresses.

Would have loved to be a fly on the wall in this obviously stimulating discussion on Feminism. I'm sure the Gorilla mask girls had some good input on the lecture.

edit- fixed pic link

Post: #236

^ It's interesting how popular Crayola-coloured hair dyes are getting. I'm seeing many women around my town lately sporting stupid colouration, all of them old enough to know better. This used to be a 15-24 kind of instinct, but now it's the domain of obese forty-somethings, which is why this chick's picture now makes her look like she's in her forties to me.

It's telling they're choosing unnatural colours to display their difference. They're setting themselves apart from humanity by going for the lifeless, natural-highlight-free, dead-looking hair. Given that hair is one of the most apparent sign of health and life in a person - women add highlights to heighten the appearance of life and health - they're embracing the deliberate repulsive quality of the Uncanny Valley: I am walking death. I'm a cancer survivor in a spirit-lifting wig.

Yeah, I know it's only hair dye - I'm not shocked that they walked into a chemist and picked up a bottle of mass-produced hair dye and think it's some kind of rebellious statement when it's as tediously-suburban an act as can exist - but interested in why do they choose the colours they do. Their presentation says a lot about their mindset. Even the people joking about it have touched on some kind of underlying instinct.

You've probably seen the Aposematism picture by now, but notice how these girls seem to be sending signals that they're not fit for breeding?









Sarkeesian seems far too old to be affecting this look, but it matches her emotionally-immature, tantrum-like nature. Admittedly, there was probably some kind of mercenary Mirroring behind her decision, so as to extract more VictimBux.



I'm not a woman, I'm not a girl, I'm a Lifeless Thing. Specifically, a child's toy.



There's a pre-sexual toddler instinct at play here, which is why university safe spaces now resemble pre-schools. Ever noticed how a toddler colours a page without understanding of observable boundaries and patterns of nature?



Bang these toddler-women at your peril.

EDIT: It also appeals to toddler-men. Anime is really presenting women as Toys.

Post: #237

(04-15-2015 03:06 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ^ It's interesting how popular Crayola-coloured hair dyes are getting. I'm seeing many women around my town lately sporting stupid colouration, all of them old enough to know better. This used to be a 15-24 kind of instinct, but now it's the domain of obese forty-somethings, which is why this chick's picture now makes her look like she's in her forties to me.

It's telling they're choosing unnatural colours to display their difference. They're setting themselves apart from humanity by going for the lifeless, natural-highlight-free, dead-looking hair. Given that hair is one of the most apparent sign of health and life in a person, they're embracing the deliberate repulsive quality of the Uncanny Valley: I am walking death. I'm a cancer survivor in a spirit-lifting wig.

Yeah, I know it's only hair dye - I'm not shocked that they walked into a chemist and picked up a bottle of mass-produced hair dye and think it's some kind of rebellious statement when it's as tediously-suburban an act as can exist - but interested in why do they choose the colours they do. Their presentation says a lot about their mindset. Even the people joking about it have touched on some kind of underlying instinct.

You've probably seen the Aposematism picture by now, but notice how these girls seem to be sending signals that they're not fit for breeding?

Would Bang these two ^^

Post: #238

And that's about all I'd do.



Back on topic, am I the only one who thinks that ms. Emma looks like a spindly daddy long-legs spider?

Post: #239

^

1. False rape accusation because she's not emotionally-mature enough to deal with Adult Sexuality.

2. Untouchable Cartoon character.

Post: #240

My PTSD is triggered every day this bitch is still out there unpunished.

Post: #241

So glad to know my senator invited this attention whore to what, in modern times, should be a very exclusive event for the best and brightest.

I think my state may just have the two worst senators in the nation - Schumer the war hawk, champion of the Israel lobby and unsustainable immigration. He's actually going to be the next Democratic leader in the senate. Better hope they don't get their majority back anytime soon.

Then you have Gillibrand, the champion of hysterical feminism.

I challenge anyone living in the US to beat that combination of "representatives."

(04-15-2015 03:06 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ^ It's interesting how popular Crayola-coloured hair dyes are getting. I'm seeing many women around my town lately sporting stupid colouration, all of them old enough to know better. This used to be a 15-24 kind of instinct, but now it's the domain of obese forty-somethings, which is why this chick's picture now makes her look like she's in her forties to me.

I'm seeing this more and more. Just today I saw around 7 or so girls with oddly-colored hair, if I had to make an estimate.

Last summer, there were less of them.

Post: #242

I would expect that the hard-core feminists on her campus have invited her to some socials, gotten her drunk, and done their best to convert her into a dedicated carpet-muncher. If so, that might explain the hair color change.

Post: #243

(04-15-2015 06:02 PM)Libertas Wrote:  I'm seeing this more and more. Just today I saw around 7 or so girls with oddly-colored hair, if I had to make an estimate.

Last summer, there were less of them.

Walked a block to get a coffee and saw three of them. I followed a teenage one in the requisite SJW Problem Glasses waddling ahead of me on the way back.

I could sum her up with 3 D's:

Dumpy - obese body, clothes were both too big or too loose for her. She looked like someone had laded out a serving of mashed potato and brought it to life.

Depressed - hair was greasy and unwashed and looked corpselike, stared downwards, slumped shoulders. She walked like Charlie Brown.

Disconnected - I-Phone in her hand, Beats headphones on her dirty hair, to shut out the visual and aural world around her. Almost got flattened by a car when she stepped out onto the street.

No wonder they cling to the fantasy of a Judgment-Free Utopia. I can't figure out why they believe anyone would want to follow them.

Post: #244

Paul Nungesser is suing the bejesus out of Columbia:

Quote:Columbia sued by student accused of rape by mattress-toting undergrad
Reuters

APR. 23, 2015, 8:11 PM 67

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A Columbia University student who officials cleared of rape allegations has filed a lawsuit claiming the school allowed his accuser to harass and defame him by permitting her to carry a mattress on her back on its New York campus as a protest.

Paul Nungesser, a graduating senior at the prestigious Ivy League school, was accused by Emma Sulkowicz of raping her in August 2012. She complained to school officials, but they later cleared Nungesser. He maintains the sex was consensual.

In protest, Sulkowicz began carrying a mattress with her at all times on campus in what she said was an artistic statement entitled “Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight)." The performance piece earned the visual arts student national headlines and an award from the National Organization for Women.

In his lawsuit, filed on Thursday, Nungesser argues he was a victim of harassment and defamation and that the university allowed him to suffer in a hostile educational environment, according to a statement from his attorney, Andrew Miltenberg.

Seeking a jury trial in U.S. District Court in Manhattan and unspecified monetary damages, the lawsuit names Columbia, President Lee Bollinger, its board of trustees and Jon Kessler, a visual arts professor, as defendants.

The lawsuit said Nungesser was effectively denied equal access to Columbia’s resources and opportunities, undermining and detracting from his educational experience.

He suffered "damages to his physical well-being, emotional and psychological damages, damages to reputation, past and future economic losses, educational and athletic activities, and loss of future career prospects," his attorney's statement said.

A spokesman said Columbia had no comment. Sulkowicz could not immediately be reached for comment.

Sulkowicz filed a police report in May 2014 but according to local media did not pursue a criminal case.

She has said that the sex she had with Nungesser was consensual at the onset but turned violent.

Post: #245

Here is the complaint. Let's dig into this:

https://kcjohnson.files.wordpress.com/20...plaint.pdf

Post: #246

I guess he was waiting until he had finished his senior year? so long as theres no chance they won't let him graduate now, good for him.

Post: #247

from the complaint:

Quote:16. While they were still freshmen and before any physical relationship had begun, Emma broached the topic of anal sex with Paul by private Facehook messenger as follows:


Emma: fuck me in the butt

Holy shit. Read the complaint. Emma is a total slut and bat shit crazy. She was fucking everyone and enjoyed taking it up the ass. LOL

Post: #248

Here's the crux:

Quote:Emma’s Efforts For Affection From Paul Go Unreciprocated

30. As is evident from Emma’s Facebook messages to Paul during the summer prior to their sophomore year, Emma’s yearning for Paul had become very intense. Emma repeatedly messaged Paul throughout that summer that she loved and missed him. She was quick to inquire whether he was in love with the woman he was seeing abroad.

31. Thereafter, she continued pursuing him, reiterating that she loved him. However, when Paul did not reciprocate these intense feelings, and instead showed interest in dating other women, Emma became viciously angry.

When you like a guy but he doesn't reciprocate, leverage rape hysteria to make his life a living hell as an act of revenge.

Post: #249

(04-23-2015 09:45 PM)Dusty Wrote:  from the complaint:

Quote:16. While they were still freshmen and before any physical relationship had begun, Emma broached the topic of anal sex with Paul by private Facehook messenger as follows:


Emma: fuck me in the butt

Holy shit. Read the complaint. Emma is a total slut and bat shit crazy. She was fucking everyone and enjoyed taking it up the ass. LOL

Wow. Am I missing something? Sooooo... just because she was a "slut", we're supposed to conclude that she was not assaulted by this predator? Again, wow.

I've got news for you pal: if consent is not affirmatively and continuously maintained, it's rape. Simple as that. Whether or not Ms. Sulkowicz discussed anal sex in private communications with Mr. Nungesser, whether she had engaged in anal sex with him or others on other occasions, indeed whether she had earlier consented to anal sex on the night in question -- all of these are entirely irrelevant. As soon as consent is withdrawn by Ms. Sulkowicz -- and it can withdrawn at any moment by mere lack of affirmation -- he must cease and desist at once from any sexual activity that was no longer being affirmatively consented to, or else he is a rapist to be dealt with accordingly.

I am sick and tired of the victim blaming I'm seeing here. What about the idea of "consent" don't you understand, asshole?

Post: #250

^^