Post: #26

I think this is a great new sport and I'm going to full endorse opening season on cat hunting starting with indoor cats first. If things go well then maybe in a couple years well let the ladies take it to the streets.

Post: #27

I don't let my cats outside, but if one of them got out and some cunt shot it with an arrow I'd strangle her with the bowstring.

More importantly, WNB. Women prancing around pretending to do masculine things is unattractive.

Post: #28

It would be satisfying to go on a hunt for people like this while they're out on a "hunt."

Post: #29

Feral cats really do slaughter everything they can get their paws on. Scientists did research on that once by monitoring housecats and other cats. They kill a lot.

Even if you take all those things into consideration this bitch definitely has sociopathic tendencies though. She can't even figure out why people would be angry at her with this and seems to believe she would get away scott free. That demonstrates a serious lack of social empathy right there.

Remember that video that one serial killer guy made vacuum sealing kittens to death? People went absolutely nuts over that and for good reason. People who kill animals for absolutely no reason aside from legit hunting tend to be crazy.

Post: #30

(04-19-2015 05:17 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  Feral cats really do slaughter everything they can get their paws on. Scientists did research on that once by monitoring housecats and other cats. They kill a lot.

Even if you take all those things into consideration this bitch definitely has sociopathic tendencies though. She can't even figure out why people would be angry at her with this and seems to believe she would get away scott free. That demonstrates a serious lack of social empathy right there.

Remember that video that one serial killer guy made vacuum sealing kittens to death? People went absolutely nuts over that and for good reason. People who kill animals for absolutely no reason aside from legit hunting tend to be crazy.

Agreed, feral cats can be a problem in some places. Some parts of rural WI are infested with wild cats, wildlife and forestry workers will shoot them if they see them on public land.

2. If the cat was the pet of someone, it needs collar so people know its not wild.

3. Something is wrong with this chick, she doesn't 'get it' as in no one wants to see you holding up a dead cat with an arrow through its head.

Post: #31

(04-19-2015 05:17 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  Feral cats really do slaughter everything they can get their paws on. Scientists did research on that once by monitoring housecats and other cats. They kill a lot.

The key words are "get their paws on". Cats are a mutherfucker when it comes to killing baby rabbits, baby birds, moles, and mice. But let another animal their size or even another cat come into the yard and they head for the hills like screaming bitches.

Post: #32

Relevant video. One of my favorite WKUK skits :

Post: #33

(04-19-2015 05:30 PM)aSimpNamedBrokeback Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 05:17 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  Feral cats really do slaughter everything they can get their paws on. Scientists did research on that once by monitoring housecats and other cats. They kill a lot.

The key words are "get their paws on". Cats are a mutherfucker when it comes to killing baby rabbits, baby birds, moles, and mice. But let another animal their size or even another cat come into the yard and they head for the hills like screaming bitches.

Same thing with sharks or any other predators. They usually have similar behavior. They are opportunistic killers by default. There's a natural reason for that because predators are meant to cull the weak or keep the prey population in check. Certain smaller animals will be more ferocious but only because they actually have the physical ability to take down much larger animals. A badger is a good example, don't fuck with badgers in the wild.

Post: #34

(04-19-2015 05:41 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 05:30 PM)aSimpNamedBrokeback Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 05:17 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  Feral cats really do slaughter everything they can get their paws on. Scientists did research on that once by monitoring housecats and other cats. They kill a lot.

The key words are "get their paws on". Cats are a mutherfucker when it comes to killing baby rabbits, baby birds, moles, and mice. But let another animal their size or even another cat come into the yard and they head for the hills like screaming bitches.

Same thing with sharks or any other predators. They usually have similar behavior. They are opportunistic killers by default. There's a natural reason for that because predators are meant to cull the weak or keep the prey population in check. Certain smaller animals will be more ferocious but only because they actually have the physical ability to take down much larger animals. A badger is a good example, don't fuck with badgers in the wild.

What are you talking about? Cats badgers and sharks all do a different job. I've watched sharks swim right by me in clean water and struggle to get over a sandbar I. An outgoing tide to get to where the other fish or whatever is ready to feed so they can play pac-man every night while my guests are freaking out because sharks are swimming at us. They don't give a fuck about us they want to play PAC-man and gobble up all those stupid sea trout up and that's all.

Cats though.. Nasty mfers. I do like to preserve wild cats like lions etc and all North American wildcats but rouge style cats like red tabby goes wild here?

Post: #35

^ I did that on my phone obviously English is my 5th language.

Post: #36

(04-19-2015 06:38 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  What are you talking about? Cats badgers and sharks all do a different job. I've watched sharks swim right by me in clean water and struggle to get over a sandbar I. An outgoing tide to get to where the other fish or whatever is ready to feed so they can play pac-man every night while my guests are freaking out because sharks are swimming at us. They don't give a fuck about us they want to play PAC-man and gobble up all those stupid sea trout up and that's all.

I think you are missing my point here i'm saying that all these animals are opportunistic killers. Sharks will go after typical easy prey and weak animals but avoid humans for a lot of reasons. Humans don't fall into the "weak" or "prey" animal category for sharks..ie. it's not a good opportunity kill for them. That's why most shark attacks are test bites when they mistake humans for something else. In scuba they avoid divers mainly because of bubbles and we're weird as fuck to them. However if you're bleeding, bobbing on the surface stranded somewhere in the middle of the pacific.. it's a different story. Then certain blue water sharks will certainly home in on that. Read about WW2 and the Tiger and Blue Shark feast in the pacific during that time.

Cats are similar because they are also predators and don't go after non opportunity prey. They may defensively scratch but obviously not try and kill something that can kill them as well.

Badgers and other polecats (wolverines) are nasty as hell too..while not strictly predators they can hunt and own most larger animals. I think even coyotes don't try and go solo on them.

Post: #37

(04-19-2015 04:14 PM)scotian Wrote:  ^I don't have a problem with people going to Africa to hunt wild animals with rifles if the hunt is legal and regulated, they pay large hunting fees and part of the money is used for animal conservation, it is a big industry and the local economies benefit from the tourist dollars. As far as I know, lions aren't endangered over there and if the animal was to die of natural causes, it likely would be by breaking its leg in the wild and dying of exposure or getting ripped apart by a pack of hyenas, a bullet to the head from a rifle is a much better way to die. Hopefully the meat was fed to other animals or donated to people who eat lions as I believe that no part of a dead animal should go to waste.

I have no problems killing animals for food but I really think hunting for thrills is a sick practice. For the life of me I cannot understand people who take pleasure in killing majestic, exotic animals just for kicks. I don't know why this even has a level respectability. That's right up there with pyromania to me in senseless destruction for it's own sake.

Hell at least with bull fighting I can see how it's somewhat of an art where there is risk to the bullfighter and it's interesting to watch. But hunting from safety on a safari is bullshit.

Post: #38

(04-19-2015 07:02 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  I have no problems killing animals for food but I really think hunting for thrills is a sick practice. For the life of me I cannot understand people who take pleasure in killing majestic, exotic animals just for kicks. I don't know why this even has a level respectability. That's right up there with pyromania to me in senseless destruction for it's own sake.

It depends, some hunting is necessary to control wild animal population. Just look at the out of control wild boar in some states. Even if people don't hunt them for food it's still necessary to kill them.

There are animals that kill for fun too. Dolphins have been observed ripping the fins off a sunfish and watching it slowly flail around and die.

Not saying that's right but it is what it is.

Post: #39

(04-19-2015 07:02 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 04:14 PM)scotian Wrote:  ^I don't have a problem with people going to Africa to hunt wild animals with rifles if the hunt is legal and regulated, they pay large hunting fees and part of the money is used for animal conservation, it is a big industry and the local economies benefit from the tourist dollars. As far as I know, lions aren't endangered over there and if the animal was to die of natural causes, it likely would be by breaking its leg in the wild and dying of exposure or getting ripped apart by a pack of hyenas, a bullet to the head from a rifle is a much better way to die. Hopefully the meat was fed to other animals or donated to people who eat lions as I believe that no part of a dead animal should go to waste.

I have no problems killing animals for food but I really think hunting for thrills is a sick practice. For the life of me I cannot understand people who take pleasure in killing majestic, exotic animals just for kicks. I don't know why this even has a level respectability. That's right up there with pyromania to me in senseless destruction for it's own sake.

Hell at least with bull fighting I can see how it's somewhat of an art where there is risk to the bullfighter and it's interesting to watch. But hunting from safety on a safari is bullshit.

Post: #40

(04-19-2015 03:04 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:  The owner shouldn't have let the cat wander off their property. If you can't control your pets, this could happen to them. Cats are an invasive species and kill all sorts of native wildlife because irresponsible owners think it's cute to let them roam free.

In rural areas it's not uncommon for cats or dogs wandering onto other people's property to get blasted if the landowner doesn't know who they belong to.

I live in a county where there's a decent sized city and patches of rural land that's never been developed. There was a big furor down here a few years ago when a rancher shot two dogs a retard let loose in his cow pasture. Don't let your animals fuck with other people's property.

If they are farm cats then of course they are going to roam free. Our cats had free range of the property and neighboring areas during the day but we would lock them up at night. Our cats had collars on them however.

I think the key question is weather or not the cat she shot was in any way damaging her property. For example one of the feral dogs we shot would come onto our property and drive off native animals with his hunting. He would also end up causing our farm dog to run off and hunt with him. We buried him out in the jungle one day.

If she just shot the cat for no particular reason simply because it was on and off her property at times and was something that would twitch when it got hit, then she should be ashamed of herself.

Post: #41

(04-19-2015 07:00 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 06:38 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  What are you talking about? Cats badgers and sharks all do a different job. I've watched sharks swim right by me in clean water and struggle to get over a sandbar I. An outgoing tide to get to where the other fish or whatever is ready to feed so they can play pac-man every night while my guests are freaking out because sharks are swimming at us. They don't give a fuck about us they want to play PAC-man and gobble up all those stupid sea trout up and that's all.

I think you are missing my point here i'm saying that all these animals are opportunistic killers. Sharks will go after typical easy prey and weak animals but avoid humans for a lot of reasons. Humans don't fall into the "weak" or "prey" animal category for sharks..ie. it's not a good opportunity kill for them. That's why most shark attacks are test bites when they mistake humans for something else. In scuba they avoid divers mainly because of bubbles and we're weird as fuck to them. However if you're bleeding, bobbing on the surface stranded somewhere in the middle of the pacific.. it's a different story. Then certain blue water sharks will certainly home in on that. Read about WW2 and the Tiger and Blue Shark feast in the pacific during that time.

Cats are similar because they are also predators and don't go after non opportunity prey. They may defensively scratch but obviously not try and kill something that can kill them as well.

Badgers and other polecats (wolverines) are nasty as hell too..while not strictly predators they can hunt and own most larger animals. I think even coyotes don't try and go solo on them.

Before I engage this can you tell me if you see this in your normal day and do you live in a climate full of these guys?

Post: #42

I only hunt two types of game: 'dear' hearts and 'bare' asses.

Post: #43

(04-19-2015 07:46 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 07:00 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 06:38 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  What are you talking about? Cats badgers and sharks all do a different job. I've watched sharks swim right by me in clean water and struggle to get over a sandbar I. An outgoing tide to get to where the other fish or whatever is ready to feed so they can play pac-man every night while my guests are freaking out because sharks are swimming at us. They don't give a fuck about us they want to play PAC-man and gobble up all those stupid sea trout up and that's all.

I think you are missing my point here i'm saying that all these animals are opportunistic killers. Sharks will go after typical easy prey and weak animals but avoid humans for a lot of reasons. Humans don't fall into the "weak" or "prey" animal category for sharks..ie. it's not a good opportunity kill for them. That's why most shark attacks are test bites when they mistake humans for something else. In scuba they avoid divers mainly because of bubbles and we're weird as fuck to them. However if you're bleeding, bobbing on the surface stranded somewhere in the middle of the pacific.. it's a different story. Then certain blue water sharks will certainly home in on that. Read about WW2 and the Tiger and Blue Shark feast in the pacific during that time.

Cats are similar because they are also predators and don't go after non opportunity prey. They may defensively scratch but obviously not try and kill something that can kill them as well.

Badgers and other polecats (wolverines) are nasty as hell too..while not strictly predators they can hunt and own most larger animals. I think even coyotes don't try and go solo on them.

Before I engage this can you tell me if you see this in your normal day and do you live in a climate full of these guys?

With regards to sharks. Definitely, yes. I've been up close with hammerheads, bull sharks, loads of different reef sharks, etc.. not in shallow water though.

Post: #44

A woman her size would need a bow with a very low draw weight that couldn't hit shit except at close range. I would bet good money the cat was shot at point blank range.

This type of thing happened off and on in my neighborhood growing up. It was kept quiet though. No one called a town meeting to attention whore about it. This is some next level sociopathy here. A sane person would know this could be career ending.

Post: #45

(04-19-2015 05:30 PM)aSimpNamedBrokeback Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 05:17 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  Feral cats really do slaughter everything they can get their paws on. Scientists did research on that once by monitoring housecats and other cats. They kill a lot.

The key words are "get their paws on". Cats are a mutherfucker when it comes to killing baby rabbits, baby birds, moles, and mice. But let another animal their size or even another cat come into the yard and they head for the hills like screaming bitches.

Don't be so sure. In Australia, feral cats can bring down prey up to 4 kg (nearly 9 pounds) and have been recorded on camera doing so: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn27...ammal.html

Albeit part of it is the adaptation that a true feral cat undergoes. Within a few generations they tend to grow larger and stronger than their domesticated cousins, mainly due to survival of the fittest.

Post: #46

cats eat at home from the food their spinster feeders provide them and then go out and kill all kinds of birds and baby game animals. fuck cats. In Germany a licensed hunter is obligated by law to kill a free ranging cat if he encounters it. Germans have this one right.
This ladies mistake was being so unaware of the pc culture that she actually posted a picture of an arrowed cat. that was incredibly stupid. The sjws will get her as we have already seen.
Amazing how much the urban guys here hate on hunting.

Post: #47

(04-19-2015 08:13 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 07:46 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 07:00 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 06:38 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  What are you talking about? Cats badgers and sharks all do a different job. I've watched sharks swim right by me in clean water and struggle to get over a sandbar I. An outgoing tide to get to where the other fish or whatever is ready to feed so they can play pac-man every night while my guests are freaking out because sharks are swimming at us. They don't give a fuck about us they want to play PAC-man and gobble up all those stupid sea trout up and that's all.

I think you are missing my point here i'm saying that all these animals are opportunistic killers. Sharks will go after typical easy prey and weak animals but avoid humans for a lot of reasons. Humans don't fall into the "weak" or "prey" animal category for sharks..ie. it's not a good opportunity kill for them. That's why most shark attacks are test bites when they mistake humans for something else. In scuba they avoid divers mainly because of bubbles and we're weird as fuck to them. However if you're bleeding, bobbing on the surface stranded somewhere in the middle of the pacific.. it's a different story. Then certain blue water sharks will certainly home in on that. Read about WW2 and the Tiger and Blue Shark feast in the pacific during that time.

Cats are similar because they are also predators and don't go after non opportunity prey. They may defensively scratch but obviously not try and kill something that can kill them as well.

Badgers and other polecats (wolverines) are nasty as hell too..while not strictly predators they can hunt and own most larger animals. I think even coyotes don't try and go solo on them.

Before I engage this can you tell me if you see this in your normal day and do you live in a climate full of these guys?

With regards to sharks. Definitely, yes. I've been up close with hammerheads, bull sharks, loads of different reef sharks, etc.. not in shallow water though.

How so? Tell me is it a controlled environment?

Post: #48

(04-19-2015 09:01 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 08:13 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 07:46 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 07:00 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

(04-19-2015 06:38 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  What are you talking about? Cats badgers and sharks all do a different job. I've watched sharks swim right by me in clean water and struggle to get over a sandbar I. An outgoing tide to get to where the other fish or whatever is ready to feed so they can play pac-man every night while my guests are freaking out because sharks are swimming at us. They don't give a fuck about us they want to play PAC-man and gobble up all those stupid sea trout up and that's all.

I think you are missing my point here i'm saying that all these animals are opportunistic killers. Sharks will go after typical easy prey and weak animals but avoid humans for a lot of reasons. Humans don't fall into the "weak" or "prey" animal category for sharks..ie. it's not a good opportunity kill for them. That's why most shark attacks are test bites when they mistake humans for something else. In scuba they avoid divers mainly because of bubbles and we're weird as fuck to them. However if you're bleeding, bobbing on the surface stranded somewhere in the middle of the pacific.. it's a different story. Then certain blue water sharks will certainly home in on that. Read about WW2 and the Tiger and Blue Shark feast in the pacific during that time.

Cats are similar because they are also predators and don't go after non opportunity prey. They may defensively scratch but obviously not try and kill something that can kill them as well.

Badgers and other polecats (wolverines) are nasty as hell too..while not strictly predators they can hunt and own most larger animals. I think even coyotes don't try and go solo on them.

Before I engage this can you tell me if you see this in your normal day and do you live in a climate full of these guys?

With regards to sharks. Definitely, yes. I've been up close with hammerheads, bull sharks, loads of different reef sharks, etc.. not in shallow water though.

How so? Tell me is it a controlled environment?

Nope, it's not a caged environment if that's what you are asking nor is it sharks attracted by chum bait. It's all from diving in their natural habitat.

Post: #49

The key thing that nobody mentioned in regard to feral cats is that they become an issue when their population blows up and you get a colony. All this bitch had to do was trap the cat and take it to a free or low cost spay/neuter program, then she could have released it back. In Texas there are plenty of these programs whose aim is to cut down feral cat populations, one of the cats ears is clipped so that you can recognize that the animal is fixed. I don't see her posing by 12 dead cats so I'm assuming that this was just a lone cat that lived near her. Feral cats eat mostly rodents with the occasional bird thrown in but one cat is not going to decimate a population.

Post: #50

New york times arcticle by natalie angier, jan 29, 2013. Don't know how to inbed. Article claims cats both domestic and feral kill a median of 2.4 billion birds and 12.3 billion mammals per year in the united states. Remember these cats get supplemental food from all the cat ladies so they always have the energy and desire to hunt, even when a wild animal would take a pass. Texas girl was doing the right thing, in the wrong society when she went online.