Post: #51

Youtube statistics:

Video..................................................................# of views

Crazy chick shooting cat.......................................1,000,000,000,000

ISIS killing Ethiopian Christians............................. 0
in Libya

Post: #52

the reason why it's fucked up is because a cat is completely defenseless against a human. There's a reason why many serial killers start off with animal cruelty. It's a sign of psychologiCal disturbance. If I see a feral cat my first thought isn't " let me go grab my bow and arrow". Some of you guys just have it in for cats. Live and let live.

Post: #53

1. As a trained vet, she should have been able to look at the cat and know immediately that it was not feral. I'd bet that it approached within 10'-20' of her which is something feral cats don't do, and it explains why she got the head shot.
2. So she killed a neighbors cat and bragged about it on Facebook, going so far as to show it off. She's a vet BTW. This is an affront to everything her profession stands for. I bet her motivation was to impress some hayseed redneck who gave her 'gina tingles.

She'll probably face a stiff reprimand from the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners. This is a violation of their ethical guidelines, and in the medical field, medical professionals are held to a higher standard. And when she does get reprimanded, that shit will follow her for the duration of her career, even if she leaves the state, even if she changes her name.

The majority of people aren't going to take their pets to be cared for by someone who posts this kind of shit on the internet. And most employers aren't going to want to bother with someone who brings this kind of job related baggage with them.

She fucked herself pretty good, and rightfully so.

Post: #54

I find the cultural phenomena more interesting than one cat page. I mean, the accepted practice now is for everyone to have a facebook page and put all kinds of stupid stuff on it to draw attention to themselves. So why does she have to justify her stupid stuff just because she is political incorrect? Isn't drawing attention to oneself justification enough? Who are the judges who decide which person's facebook page will get likes and which will destroy the owner's life? And what about all those hamster videos on Youtube with those hamsters performing stupid tricks and going in circles on their hamster wheels. What about cruelty to hamsters? Is making a hamster dizzy acceptable in society now? Who decides? And has anyone noticed that facebook pages are starting to make the national news?

Post: #55

What's noteworthy is that she's a veterinarian who has done something in rather poor taste, that also happens to be a direct contradiction to her professional code of ethics. It's also noteworthy that her level of arrogance regarding the matter is off the charts.

Post: #56

All this bird-killing nonsense about cats is truly idiotic.

I tell you who kills trillions of birds:

It's the government with entire programs of killing billions of birds every year for some inane "environmental" or agricultural reason.
http://worldtruth.tv/usda-admits-extermi...-and-bees/
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/...nloads.htm
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wildlife_damag...lac031.pdf
I can remember about Stalin doing that on a grand scale killing trillions of birds in order to protect the crops only to result in an explosion of the insect population. But I am sure that pesticides are killing way more small birds than all of the above measures.

Also what kills billions of birds - among those big ones are the stupid ineffective windmills (15.000 of those already inactive) - all of those exist because they are subsidized by the taxpayer via higher energy bills.



Stray dogs cannot run loose of course, because they band together and start hunting and killing - and they very quickly are hunting men as well as Australian examples have shown - those things are not comparable to cats.

And yes - feral cats should be caught and neutered - then released - they catch plenty of animals like rodents which are actually destructive to the agricultural process - there is a reason why cats have been employed deliberately by agricultural societies for millennia now. I wonder if we have forgotten about those things in our society who is obsessed about killing and spray-killing everything.

One of the first psychopathic signs is the killing and torturing of small animals / pets. There are reputed to be sects out there who "harden" their kids by taking in pets and then forcing the kids to kill those pets. It truly creates wonderful human beings out of them.

I am sorry to disappoint you, but we humans are not natural meat eaters. Of course similarly to the gorilla we will kill and hunt and eat meat, but these are not natural feral abilities or even tastes that we observe in our young that indicate that looking at a bunny or cow we want to kill and eat it. Yes - cats are such creatures and had we evolved from those, then I am sure you would see 5 year old girls killing small rabbits from time to time with their bare hands. Humans need to learn that animal-killing part and most of us don't enjoy it for a good reason. You don't see children naturally jump at bunnies and kittens in order to eat them. Those that do enjoy killing for nothing other than amusement are walking down a dark path.

Now I don't consider everyone a psychopath for doing it, because a lot of it is customary and there is the survival aspect (also I don't want to be a hypocrite for eating meat, but not killing it personally) - still that scene where a VETERINARIAN kills an obvious house cat for fun and then posts pics of her "prey" on social media for giggles is truly staggering in it's mindlessness and stupidity. It does not even matter if she tortures and eats cats in her basement, how on earth could a vet believe that it is a good idea to do so in public and be proud of it?

Post: #57

She should have her DVM license revoked over this. If feral animals are a problem they can be trapped and euthanized humanely. This is just another ridiculous attempt at attention whoring, and she should be held accountable publicly for her poor choices/actions.

Post: #58

You guys pointing out the 'damages' that feral cats do and saying she did the right thing, you realize this cat wasn't feral right? This was somebody's pet. To do this at all shows some deep psychological issues, but to then post it on social media with a huge smile? Insane.

Post: #59

Also I would not overstress the importance of anti-pet articles coming out from the MSM or the government, because I read long-term plans by the UN Agenda 21 (now changed name into sustainability or another greenie term) that they prefer humans to not have any pets at all - no dogs, no cats, no nothing.
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/10/humane...agenda-21/

In addition they don't want you to eat meat anyway, so no hunting either (meat can be replaced by high-quality organic vegan or vegetarian diet, but you won't get that either on the cheap).

They are probably going to do this the same way as with the planned travel restrictions - simply by raising the costs necessary to have animals. Plus there will be the additional propaganda. Personally I think that animals like dogs and cats do something worthwhile for us humans - they make us more human and loving. You may not believe me, but I think that the world would look a lot darker if we all had no empathy and could kill a dog without batting an eyelash. All the crazy cat-ladies would be even more demented without their cats.

Post: #60

Wait, the cat wasn't feral? So she shot her neighbors pet cat in the head with an arrow? Then posted the photo on Facebook?

What a sick cunt lol.

If it is a pet cat isn't that a felony? A guy in my home town got a fairly lengthy prison sentence for poisoning his neighbors dogs. Shooting your neighbors pet cat in the fucking face with a bow and arrow must fall under the same law?

Post: #61

   

Post: #62

Well said Rio Nomad, that cat was a pet and not "feral". As a vet she should have known from "Tigers" appearance that he was someone's cared for pet and therefore not a legitimate target.

I hope the cat died quickly.

Post: #63

Posting it on social media was dumb, but we used to do this all the time as kids.

Neighbors dogs, cats, etc. They start fights with your own animals, bite you, kill small animals, property damage etc. We'd just start off with bb guns and move up to bow and arrows or 22s if the animals didn't get the message. That, and tweakers would always let their dogs roam. Pulled a rottie who was fang deep in my dog's neck off, then shot it.

This is just how rural America works. Property rights are deeply ingrained, and people are just used to handling their own business.

Post: #64

A true mark of a sociopath - killing something and grinning from ear to ear.

In fact hunting generally is pretty pathetic. Dudes blasting an animal with a rifle from hundreds of meters away, solely for the purpose of 'fun'. Unless you are doing it for food or safety, you are either doing it to prove something, or doing it to satisfy your depraved instinct to kill things for the sake of it. This includes bull fighting. Unless there is a fair chance of the animal killing you, its pathetic. If you're doing it to prove something, lets see you kill a lion with a kukri, or an elephant with a spear. And none of that 'good shot' nonsense, that applies equally to a paper target or a clay pigeon.

Post: #65

In a civilized society there are reasonable laws protecting animals, but having too much sentiments for animals can be a sign of a degenerate society. What about the lady with the "I break for animals" bumper sticker? That means she is potentially willing to create a hazard and kill people if an animal darts out in front of her car. She could even be more dangerous than a crazy lady with an bow and arrow. And why don't we neuter and release rats? Animal rights activism is another crazy wing of SJW.

Post: #66

(04-20-2015 08:33 AM)Sherman Wrote:  In a civilized society there are reasonable laws protecting animals, but having too much sentiments for animals can be a sign of a degenerate society. What about the lady with the "I break for animals" bumper sticker? That means she is potentially willing to create a hazard and kill people if an animal darts out in front of her car. She could even be more dangerous than a crazy lady with an bow and arrow. And why don't we neuter and release rats? Animal rights activism is another crazy wing of SJW.

You're exactly right. To me, hardcore animal lovers who value their pets as much or more than human life are strange. You shouldn't mistreat them, but you should also never forget that they're nothing more than property (or tools in the case of hunting dogs and service animals).

People get too emotionally invested in their animals and I don't think it's mentally healthy. Chicks these days use them as baby stand-ins and guys sometimes use them as women or friend stand-ins. Although that's weird behavior, the worst thing is that they often let them behave badly because they're so invested in them. It reminds me of the crappy parents who let little Johnny terrorize other kids and believe he can do no wrong because he's their kid.

If people kept their property on their property this kind of shit wouldn't happen. Even though the girl is a moronic dumb fuck attention whore, the cat's negligent owner (also a woman judging from the videos of the cat) apparently didn't care enough about it to keep it in the house or figure out a way to keep it on her land. If this girl's going to face charges, the owner should at least be fined.

Post: #67

I am pretty sure she was referring to hunting in the following quote, but her old blog from 2011 should make for some draaaaama.

Quote:Current interests: Living my days to the fullest, finding the meaning of happiness, killing things or trying to kill things (animals, a full glass of whiskey, hangovers, etc),

http://wyogirl-kristenlindsey.blogspot.com/

She's a horse chick to boot, nothing more for me to see here.

Post: #68

(04-20-2015 10:47 AM)IvanDrago Wrote:  Her old blog from 2011 should make for some draaaaama.

Quote:Current interests: Living my days to the fullest, finding the meaning of happiness, killing things or trying to kill things (animals, a full glass of whiskey, hangovers, etc),

http://wyogirl-kristenlindsey.blogspot.com/

She's a horse chick, nothing more for me to see here, I'm out.

She likes her dog.

Post: #69

Apparently the pussy pass is not as powerful as the proverbial pussy.

Post: #70

If the blog is hers, then she was raised in a rural environment as a hunter. She could actually be a traditional woman. It use to be not unusual for a hillbilly girl to be able to cook and kill a possum. She would brag about it as a way of advertising herself to a wider range of potential husbands. She hasn't learned yet how to attract an urban hipster, who would be horrified by her possum stew. Maybe she needs PUA training.

Post: #71

Now I'm scared about letting my cat roam in the garden...

Post: #72

(04-20-2015 09:21 AM)TheWastelander Wrote:  

(04-20-2015 08:33 AM)Sherman Wrote:  In a civilized society there are reasonable laws protecting animals, but having too much sentiments for animals can be a sign of a degenerate society. What about the lady with the "I break for animals" bumper sticker? That means she is potentially willing to create a hazard and kill people if an animal darts out in front of her car. She could even be more dangerous than a crazy lady with an bow and arrow. And why don't we neuter and release rats? Animal rights activism is another crazy wing of SJW.

You're exactly right. To me, hardcore animal lovers who value their pets as much or more than human life are strange. You shouldn't mistreat them, but you should also never forget that they're nothing more than property (or tools in the case of hunting dogs and service animals).

People get too emotionally invested in their animals and I don't think it's mentally healthy. Chicks these days use them as baby stand-ins and guys sometimes use them as women or friend stand-ins. Although that's weird behavior, the worst thing is that they often let them behave badly because they're so invested in them. It reminds me of the crappy parents who let little Johnny terrorize other kids and believe he can do no wrong because he's their kid.

If people kept their property on their property this kind of shit wouldn't happen. Even though the girl is a moronic dumb fuck attention whore, the cat's negligent owner (also a woman judging from the videos of the cat) apparently didn't care enough about it to keep it in the house or figure out a way to keep it on her land. If this girl's going to face charges, the owner should at least be fined.

I just have to laugh at this. Did you ever grow up on a farm with cats? I did, damn things run around all the time, there is no way you can keep one on your property if it wants to get out. You don't want them to be in your house the entire time because that limits their hunting range for varmint and makes the house dirtier. The most you can do is have set feeding times for them so that they come back at night and can be locked in the house.

Unless the cat was somehow damaging her property the this isn't the cat owner's fault except for the fact that he/she didn't put a collar on the cat. The bow happy chick just wanted something to shoot.

Post: #73

(04-20-2015 05:29 AM)RioNomad Wrote:  Wait, the cat wasn't feral? So she shot her neighbors pet cat in the head with an arrow? Then posted the photo on Facebook?

What a sick cunt lol.

If it is a pet cat isn't that a felony? A guy in my home town got a fairly lengthy prison sentence for poisoning his neighbors dogs. Shooting your neighbors pet cat in the fucking face with a bow and arrow must fall under the same law?

Exactly. "Animal cruelty" is the name of the charge. I know a girl in my city who was charged with misdemeanor animal cruelty for forgetting to bring her dog inside during the night in winter, and the dog froze to death.

My question on this incident is: how does she know whether the cat is "feral" or not? Just because it looks scraggly and unwashed?

I've never heard of the common housecat being a "threat" to any homeowner or livestock that would justify shooting it.

Post: #74

(04-20-2015 01:47 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

(04-20-2015 05:29 AM)RioNomad Wrote:  Wait, the cat wasn't feral? So she shot her neighbors pet cat in the head with an arrow? Then posted the photo on Facebook?

What a sick cunt lol.

If it is a pet cat isn't that a felony? A guy in my home town got a fairly lengthy prison sentence for poisoning his neighbors dogs. Shooting your neighbors pet cat in the fucking face with a bow and arrow must fall under the same law?

Exactly. "Animal cruelty" is the name of the charge. I know a girl in my city who was charged with misdemeanor animal cruelty for forgetting to bring her dog inside during the night in winter, and the dog froze to death.

My question on this incident is: how does she know whether the cat is "feral" or not? Just because it looks scraggly and unwashed?

I've never heard of the common housecat being a "threat" to any homeowner or livestock that would justify shooting it.

Generally yes, you can tell by the look of the cat. Also they tend tend to have a standoffish attitude or even run away at the sight of man.

Post: #75

They also squint their eyes like they are tired and generally look pitiful.