Post: #22601

She's the girl-next-door type, which has an especially strong appeal to some guys.

Yet to others she's a plain-Jane. I think "5" is a bit low. There's nothing about her that's below average. Particularly in this day and age.

Post: #22602

Aren't the prettiest girls those that look good without needing makeup?

Post: #22603

(06-17-2017 12:58 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 08:16 PM)kosko Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 01:42 PM)Cation Wrote:  

She is roughed up here with barley any make up but you can see good foundation for looks. The trick is learning how to spot these types of girls in everyday life, lots of girls look like that as they don't put in much effort but you dress them up and they look like Gal.

Most "5"s are at their peak when you see them out, Gal in her natural state looks very average but lurking is a hot slut when dolled up.

I'd be happy if my girl looked like that chilling at home, most girls are strait up homely and busted with no makeup on.

Also keep in mind that she is 32 and a good 10 years past her peak - plus 2 kids. So essentially she is one of the hottest MILFs around.

Reality has hit me. I'm officially "old", I'm 25.

A decade ago I would consider girls 27 or 32+ "MILFs" or "cougars". Now they're just "bitches my age or a few years older then me". It's like I'm not even attracted to them that much anymore...unless they are stunners or have $$$.

Post: #22604

(06-17-2017 09:47 AM)El_Gostro Wrote:  Aren't the prettiest girls those that look good without needing makeup?

If they need make up to be attractive, they aren't attractive.

Of course, if that were mandatory, girls from Russia and Ukraine wouldn't hold a candle to girls from other parts of the world that just look good naturally.

Post: #22605

nvm wrong post

Post: #22606

< Gotta say Suits - if that was the only pic of Gal Gadot I would at best give her a 7. But that is a rather lousy pic and also she is 32 already.

That is the best pic the media could find of her without makeup. I know 25yo girls who look like shit compared to her:



I think that part of her appeal is frankly her presence and femininity and she does look much better with makeup.



But clearly there are much hotter women out there:

Post: #22607

(06-17-2017 03:24 AM)Veloce Wrote:  Tonight I had a girl over, Mexican chick from Minnesota that I met in a bar. I'd give her a solid 8. Face is 7.5 body is 8.5. You could do your taxes on her abs yet she's got nice plump natural tits and ass. One of those very fortunate latinas.

This was our 3rd time hanging out, just makeout sessions so far, won't give up the bang. I teased her all night and was escalating physically, but she eventually put up a red light I couldn't get past. We'd kiss but not for very long, and she would take in a lot of physical touching before pulling herself back.

I got pretty frustrated and called her out on it. "You've got strange body language. Like you're interested, but guarded. What's the matter, you got a boyfriend?"

And she proceeded to tell me he's not exactly a boyfriend, but a boy toy that she's loyal to, some guy she "fucks around" with and is basically a fuck buddy.

I got pretty grossed out by this blatant display of sluttiness and pushed the conversation toward her leaving my place. I smoked some weed and put on my favorite album of the moment. And had the following thought:

Not one of these chicks have the foresight or intelligence or perspective to realize that their sluttiness is their greatest handicap. I mean at least be discreet. Tell me you're in a weird mood or on your period or some other bullshit. I just couldn't believe her bold faced honesty, but I guess I should be thankful for that. Maybe I'll wind up fucking this girl, maybe not. She's got another 10 years like this before settling down with some beta loser that she's miserable with. I'm no prince charming, but what if I was? These hoes complain all day on social media about not being able to find a quality guy but in the meantime they're content with meaningless sex to occupy their romantic life. It's a goddamn race to the bottom and really bums me out sometimes. Also, I'm high.

This. They'll either behave this way or find a boyfriend only to cheat anyway.

Post: #22608

I have three groups of friends right now. I almost have a triple life.

1. Remaining normies from before I left the country and got red-pilled (this is by far the smallest group and I tell them the truth about practically nothing - they're friendly acquaintances at best)
2. Alt-right aligned friends (many I knew before I left, many I met after returning, and they'd have my back in a firefight)
3. Traditionalist Catholics (a lot of quality women, but the males tend to be so obsessively fixated on religion I don't know how good they'd be as friends yet)

Groups 2 and 3 can intersect just fine - there'd probably be awkwardness, though, so I want to keep them separate. Nobody from Group 1 knows anything about 2 and 3 and just wonder why I disappear for extended periods of time.

I don't like that I have to do it, and it's exhausting...but that's the Current Year for ya.

Post: #22609

(06-17-2017 03:42 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Girl who is hung up over some more Alpha man who treats her as a side piece while she holds out and hopes that he will turn around and make her THE ONE.

She may fuck just that one guy.

Actually one of the strategies of how women can pin down an Alpha is to stay faithful to him even before he becomes exclusive with her. Of course her going out with you and making out would break that rule and she has shown her slut cards out in the open. You could likely bang her later, because that guy is not going to settle with her and there are millions of those girls who hold out over this idiotic thought of "it's complicated", "fuckbuddy" etc. The reality is that they fuck a guy who fucks dozens and hope to become THE ONE. They waste their time.

See here's what's funny to me. Hypothetically, what if I "out-alpha" (god that's gay) whatever dude she's banging and her spreading her legs for me is her next hypergamous step. She royally fucked up by laying her slut cards in the open because now, there's 100% no way I could ever take her seriously. At least if she was coy and conniving like the rest of her gender and lied to me, tried to play the good girl, I might give her a shot at an exclusive relationship. And I would have an exclusive relationship with a girl at this point, if it was the right girl, but it seems like none of them want it, which is crazy. Women control the sex, men control the commitment. Women are giving up the sex and don't care about our side of the bargaining table. They really are fucking dumb.

Anyway like I said about this girl, "interested, but guarded". I think she's qualifying me for the next bang. She texts me out of nowhere, sends me more texts than I send her, sent me a text last night with plenty of emojis, "Thank you sooo much for tonight, so much fun." I'm gonna go for it since I get a shot at girls this hot maybe 1-2 a year. I'll probably wind up banging her for a few months and treating her like shit which she'll love.

Post: #22610

(06-17-2017 12:09 PM)Veloce Wrote:  

(06-17-2017 03:42 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Girl who is hung up over some more Alpha man who treats her as a side piece while she holds out and hopes that he will turn around and make her THE ONE.

She may fuck just that one guy.

Actually one of the strategies of how women can pin down an Alpha is to stay faithful to him even before he becomes exclusive with her. Of course her going out with you and making out would break that rule and she has shown her slut cards out in the open. You could likely bang her later, because that guy is not going to settle with her and there are millions of those girls who hold out over this idiotic thought of "it's complicated", "fuckbuddy" etc. The reality is that they fuck a guy who fucks dozens and hope to become THE ONE. They waste their time.

See here's what's funny to me. Hypothetically, what if I "out-alpha" (god that's gay) whatever dude she's banging and her spreading her legs for me is her next hypergamous step. She royally fucked up by laying her slut cards in the open because now, there's 100% no way I could ever take her seriously. At least if she was coy and conniving like the rest of her gender and lied to me, tried to play the good girl, I might give her a shot at an exclusive relationship. And I would have an exclusive relationship with a girl at this point, if it was the right girl, but it seems like none of them want it, which is crazy. Women control the sex, men control the commitment. Women are giving up the sex and don't care about our side of the bargaining table. They really are fucking dumb.

Anyway like I said about this girl, "interested, but guarded". I think she's qualifying me for the next bang. She texts me out of nowhere, sends me more texts than I send her, sent me a text last night with plenty of emojis, "Thank you sooo much for tonight, so much fun." I'm gonna go for it since I get a shot at girls this hot maybe 1-2 a year. I'll probably wind up banging her for a few months and treating her like shit which she'll love.

Women have solid instincts of shying away from the slut perception, but the entire media, feminism and society tells them the lies of equality of genders, women being able to be "studs" as well, partying and having sex being alright.

Women don't even realize the difference between a slut and a stud. If you tell her that you fuck other hot girls, she finds you more attractive. She probably thought that her sexual market value would rise in your book.

Even better if a broad bangs a celeb and tells you about it as a proof of something.

Society tells women now that men should even accept "open" relationships while it is 100 times easier for women to get sex on the side than for men.

Also - yes - you can likely out-Alpha that guy. He only has the after-sex-conversion advantage. Maybe you will be the "complicated fuckbuddy" in a few months while she goes out with another guy.

Post: #22611

(06-15-2017 05:03 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(06-15-2017 11:47 AM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  

(06-15-2017 10:23 AM)All or Nothing Wrote:  

(06-14-2017 11:22 AM)kosko Wrote:  If mental giants were truly the leaders of the world then we would all be slaves to Engineers. IF anything Engineers are salves to society, not the other way around, Kim Kardashian with high levels of Social IQ has more power than some smart as hell Engineer who works for Bell Labs.

Folks who are socially retarded will never be able to figure that out. This is why a person whom has zero talent or smarts but simply is great at managing and move/shift people can rise up just as fast, if not quicker, than someone who has high level of talents and smarts.

Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos are both mental giants and they are at the top of the food chain as far as wealth goes (not power per se).

There is a difference between being an engineer and being a leader. I would agree with you, engineers are workhorses for big businesses just like the blue collar guy is. Still, an engineer with leadership ability can do very well for himself.

The social skill thing is at its core the sales type vs the engineering type. It exists on a spectrum obviously, but that was how I broke it down at work. In every business, there will be the people persons who go out and sell and then there are the guys who keep there head down and do the background work.

There are a lot of high value jobs that are still just servants operating at a higher level. Airline pilots are just glorified bus drivers. Doctors are really just high skilled body servants, having to deal with your nasty, filthy ailments. Engineers are just glorified construction workers.

The only people with true power are high ranking military leaders, politicians (especially in an executive role, rather than legislative), and high ranking businessmen. These people have actual power, and everybody else are just serving people in these roles.

I should put a not sure if serious image here too but I feel responding to this is a waste of time. So lets take a very influential and energetic leader in the form of Julius Caesar or Genghis Khan.

Where would these leaders be without their siege engineers? Fucking nowhere thats where.

Where would society be without adequate sewers? Shit out of luck, thats where.

Where would we be with just the power of leadership, aka the religious leaders? Well look at the dark ages or better yet, Islamic countries. hell even they understand shit in the streets needs to be handled properly.

And engineers are just 1 of many cogs in a machine that needs them, like leaders but you are having an absolute laugh if you believe that BS you just laid out.

Leaders are fucking nobodies without power and who gives them that power? A community, a nation, a religion. If your enemy has a better or bigger stick than you, you're toast.

If all the doctors, engineers and scientists gave up and offed themselves the world would end - literally.

I agree that combat engineers and sewer workers provide valuable services to the people that employ, command, or rule them, but I don't really think that means they are powerful like the people they serve.

Post: #22612

(06-16-2017 07:16 PM)Suits Wrote:  ^^^She's barely a 5.

Suits often says he mostly bangs 5's. Now we know what he means!

Post: #22613

I think most people, both men and women, have a warped view of what a woman looks like naturally. As TLoz wrote, most women look "homely" naturaly, more cute than sexy, more submissive than seductive. This is what women naturally look like. A pet annoyance of mine is how western women use makeup to completely hide their femininity. There's a trannyish quality to modern makeup which hides the homeliness and submissiviness.

Allow me to illustrate:

Kim Kardashian pre-celebrity:



Kim Kardashian post-celebrity:



I admit I don't do much in transvetites except learn enough to avoid them, yet I wouldn't feel completely shocked if someone said "its a trap" on the second picture.

Another example, Megan Fox, 19:



Megan Fox now:



Some of it is aging, but mostly it isn't, the made up Hollywood is angular and sharp, the natural look is round and soft.

That's why I like girls in more traditional countries who use less makeup and use it more to show sexual excitedness (blush).

Post: #22614

Mindblown in above post

Post: #22615

(06-16-2017 12:52 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

I get the feeling you don't know what NEET means.

Post: #22616

Pakistan arrests man for driving pet lion through Karachi streets

Quote:Police in Pakistan have arrested a man who took his pet lion for a night-time drive through the streets of the bustling southern port city of Karachi after video of the incident went viral on social media, police said on Thursday.

Keeping wild cats as pets is not uncommon in Pakistan, where wealthy businessmen have been known to operate private zoos and sometimes parade the animals for the public.

The brief clip shows a docile lion lounging in the back of a pick-up truck, restrained by a leash and collar, as curious onlookers walk past in the city of about 20 million people.

Businessman Saqlain Javed was arrested on Wednesday but later freed on bail.

"The man was driving around with his lion near a local market and it was a matter of endangering public life and property," senior police superintendent Muqadas Haider told Reuters.

Javed has a license to run a personal zoo and raise lion cubs, Haider added, but is not allowed to transport the animal on city streets.

The lion has been returned to its home as police consult the wildlife department on further action.

Javed was not immediately available for comment. Police said he claimed to be taking the animal home after a visit to a vet.
Also In Entertainment News

"We have a security detail monitoring the property to make sure the lion is not removed," Haided added.

In 2015, a pet lioness gave birth to five cubs in the central city of Multan, media said at the time.

Post: #22617

(06-16-2017 01:42 PM)Cation Wrote:  

Again, this is not a pic of a "Plain Jane" or a "girl next door". It's a pic of a serious world beauty who remains a serious beauty in her early 30s (indeed in some ways she looks better than she did when she was younger).

Like I said, a serious beauty is never merely cute, pretty, or hot. There is always a certain severity in the looks of a beautiful girl or woman. When she is captured like this -- with no makeup, her hair up, straight ahead without any angle -- the severity can seem like a kind of plainness. But this is really an optical illusion.

Almost any real "girl next door" is actually full of obvious imperfections, asymmetries, and impurities; these are overlooked in an overall blur of freshness and femininity. In a beauty like GG, there are no imperfections and there is no blur; instead there is a symmetry and a clarity of every feature, a precision of bone and an evenness of skin. The overall effect is waterish, and this spring water essence of a hard beauty is what can sometimes be mistaken for a completely different sort of plainness.

It's interesting to think of the sexual status of a serious beauty like this; there is so much good bone in the structure that it can seem forbidding to the normal male eye, something to be admired rather than desired. But what the beauties have is just enough flesh on the bone, and when the eye finds the relief that it was seeking, that meat on the ass and the breast, that shapeliness of mouth, it is incited in the most savage way possible. In the end -- of course -- the greatest beauties are also of the very greatest sexual value, but like many things about them this is not always easy to see and understand from the first glance.

Post: #22618

(06-17-2017 03:00 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  I think most people, both men and women, have a warped view of what a woman looks like naturally.

Most younger girl's idea of a 'Hot 9' looks like a Drag Queen to my older eyes.

The celebrities who pass down their style to the general mass of women are dressed and styled by gay men, who have a deep and disgusted hatred of women and femininity. They dress women to highlight angularity in both their body and facial features, which is attractive in masculinity, not the chubby and soft natural roundness of submissive femininity. The hack their hair short to make them look more their favourite object of their desire: teenage boys. Makeup is used to the female features harsher, and to highlight cruelty and bitchiness.

When I hear a girl saying she wants to look 'Fierce', I assume she means like some Gay Man's viciously-exaggerated fantasy of his overbearing, dominating mother figure, which explains why they love trashy, loudmouthed women who age hideously, (Madonna, Kathy Griffin, Bette Midler) and often end up destroying themselves.

We get it guys: you want to see 'Mommy' crash and burn.

A couple of years back I discussed the gradual 'deadification' of the women in Playboy since the 60's. I just put this down to the difference between the women being styled by women and photographed by heterosexual men, (look sweet, soft and submissive), to now being styled by and photographed by gay men, (look cruel, angular and dominating).

I suggest guys not base your relationship expectations and / or jack-off fantasies around Obvious Gay Mommy Issues.

Realistically, any Nighttime 9 is just a Morning 6 anyway. Hell, you can watch her drop a notch or two as you fuck: the mascara runs, the makeup smears, her eyes water and her nose starts dripping from over-enthusiastically giving head, the hair falls out of place, and you become slightly-disgusted as you realise that she's that into you enough to have no apparent limits to her willing-debasement in an effort to please you.

Post: #22619

(06-17-2017 12:16 PM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote:  I agree that combat engineers and sewer workers provide valuable services to the people that employ, command, or rule them, but I don't really think that means they are powerful like the people they serve.

Never said they were powerful, they are neccesary.

But power is subjective. Tell Trump to design a Skyscraper or bridge and he will use his experience of dealing with engineers and architects to get somewhere but he won't know the details where you need to calculate stuff even on a grand scale, let alone the minute details.

Those big buildings aren't just reliant on steel and concrete holding it up. Tell some engineer who likes to get balls deep in software programmes to run a country and he will fold like paper.


Edit: Wonder Sloot wants some of Kirks length, not Supercucks.

Post: #22620

I don't want this to be true, yet it probably is...

Post: #22621

(06-17-2017 04:48 PM)cascadecombo Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:52 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

I get the feeling you don't know what NEET means.

Calm down Ragie Wagie.

Tick Tock Tick Tock.

Another day, Another dollar.

Post: #22622

(06-17-2017 08:26 AM)Suits Wrote:  If that's a hottie, then I've been banging nothing but 9's here in China.

But of course you have...

It's because of ridiculous posts as these that I only occasionally go into any game or female beauty related threads, it always seems like I'm the only one not banging 9s and 10s like it's supposed to be normal daily occurence and very attractive or even gorgeous girls are considered average or plain. The pointy elbows syndrome is strong with you Suits.

Post: #22623

So a couple weeks ago I had a ONS with this chick from a bar. Her body was nothing special and kind of weird actually...like boxy, but she had a really hot face. Very exotic...1/2 latina, 1/2 native american it turns out.

We hit it off in the bar and she tells me she's a lesbian, so we're talking about girls all night long and I'm offering my usual abusive and misogynistic views on women which she finds absolutely hilarious. We get drunk and I swear she's giving me IOIs so I go for it and we're making out. Switch venues, escalate, take her home and bang. She claims I'm the first guy she's been with. I highly doubt it. Crazy ass bitches these days.

Regardless, she fucked like she was inexperienced, she's early 20s, and the puss was pretty great. Tight and wet, just as it should be. But the sex itself was average and her body was nothing to write home about. Plus the crazy factor seems really high with this one and I don't feel like coming home to a couple of dead cats.

But last night it dawned on me that if this girl really does bang mostly chicks, there might be high potential for threesomes. In addition to the "crazy/hot" chart, I think someone needs to come up with a "crazy/potential threesome" chart. I guess it would look about the same...

Just texted her to come over tonight.

Post: #22624

(06-18-2017 10:48 AM)Teutatis Wrote:  

(06-17-2017 08:26 AM)Suits Wrote:  If that's a hottie, then I've been banging nothing but 9's here in China.

But of course you have...

It's because of ridiculous posts as these that I only occasionally go into any game or female beauty related threads, it always seems like I'm the only one not banging 9s and 10s like it's supposed to be normal daily occurence and very attractive or even gorgeous girls are considered average or plain. The pointy elbows syndrome is strong with you Suits.

You obviously haven't read many of my posts.

Post: #22625

(06-18-2017 12:24 PM)Veloce Wrote:  But last night it dawned on me that if this girl really does bang mostly chicks, there might be high potential for threesomes. In addition to the "crazy/hot" chart, I think someone needs to come up with a "crazy/potential threesome" chart. I guess it would look about the same...

I found it easier if you're friends first, just treat her like a good ol buddy wingman, then she'll definitely help you out with threesomes.