Post: #201

44

Post: #202

44

Post: #203

43

Post: #204

43

Post: #205

42

Post: #206

43

Post: #207

41

Post: #208

48

Post: #209

(01-18-2012 02:12 PM)tenderman100 Wrote:  45

(02-05-2012 11:59 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  

(02-04-2012 11:02 PM)WesternCancer Wrote:  

(02-04-2012 04:24 PM)tenderman100 Wrote:  44

NO WAY.

Oh, it's possible, believe me. Makeup, 15 years of yoga, eating salads, breast work.

Meanwhile, look closely under the eyes. See the dark shadows?

I love chics who keep good shape via yoga. I'd kinda STR/LTR w this older mama for learning & one on the checklist - Woman 10 years older

Post: #210

45

Post: #211

44

Post: #212

47

Post: #213

Not a 40 something...she's 50

Post: #214

(02-05-2012 11:59 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  Oh, it's possible, believe me. Makeup, 15 years of yoga, eating salads, breast work.
Meanwhile, look closely under the eyes. See the dark shadows?

She is not 44. This is demonstrable by examining female signs of aging.

Her face is still heart-shaped. As a woman ages, her jaw gets square. Even women with millions, like Jennifer Anniston, can't prevent this. Even the "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills," who are kept animals that do nothing other than invest in their appearance, can't prevent the manjaw.

As a woman ages (and this is why I can't be with old women), her skin loses moisture. This is especially true of white women. In that woman depicted, her skin is practically morning dew.

She is tan, but her decollete is supple and moist. Unless she used a fake tan.

She does not have any loss of facial fat.

She doesn't have tricep arm fat.

I could go on.

That girl is not in her 40's.

Post: #215

(02-05-2012 07:34 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  She is not 44. This is demonstrable by examining female signs of aging.

Her face is still heart-shaped. As a woman ages, her jaw gets square. Even women with millions, like Jennifer Anniston, can't prevent this. Even the "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills," who are kept animals that do nothing other than invest in their appearance, can't prevent the manjaw.

As a woman ages (and this is why I can't be with old women), her skin loses moisture. This is especially true of white women. In that woman depicted, her skin is practically morning dew.

She is tan, but her decollete is supple and moist. Unless she used a fake tan.

She does not have any loss of facial fat.

She doesn't have tricep arm fat.

I could go on.

That girl is not in her 40's.

Maybe she is, maybe she isn't. I think some of your criteria are useless though -- you can workout to keep your triceps lean, you can, as you note, use a fake tan.

And trust me, you can get that "dewey" look with very good makeup, especially if the photos are not high quality, high def.

In the end, though, she says she's 44. Do women lie? Of course they do. Some women though are inclined to blurt out the truth.

But why 44? Why not, if she is really is in her, say, mid 20s, say 34 instead? Or 36? If she's after the 50+ sugar daddy, he'd still go for her, yes?

Or maybe it's a simple matter of her have typed in 1968 in her birthday field, instead of 1978.

Post: #216

45

Post: #217

41

Post: #218

48

Post: #219

42

Post: #220

41

Post: #221

44

Post: #222

41

Post: #223

(02-06-2012 11:59 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  In the end, though, she says she's 44. Do women lie? Of course they do. Some women though are inclined to blurt out the truth.

But why 44? Why not, if she is really is in her, say, mid 20s, say 34 instead? Or 36? If she's after the 50+ sugar daddy, he'd still go for her, yes?

Or maybe it's a simple matter of her have typed in 1968 in her birthday field, instead of 1978.

What if women are capitalizing on this whole cougar obsession and actually lying upwards about their ages instead of down? Imagine if you saw a 20 year old who said she was late 30's...your first thought would be "goddamn, this chick has aged very well" It actually makes her appear to be more appealing genetically if she looks like she's 20 in her late 30's. I wouldn't put it past some of these nutjobs

Post: #224

(02-06-2012 04:11 PM)Jackhammer Wrote:  

(02-06-2012 11:59 AM)tenderman100 Wrote:  In the end, though, she says she's 44. Do women lie? Of course they do. Some women though are inclined to blurt out the truth.

But why 44? Why not, if she is really is in her, say, mid 20s, say 34 instead? Or 36? If she's after the 50+ sugar daddy, he'd still go for her, yes?

Or maybe it's a simple matter of her have typed in 1968 in her birthday field, instead of 1978.

What if women are capitalizing on this whole cougar obsession and actually lying upwards about their ages instead of down? Imagine if you saw a 20 year old who said she was late 30's...your first thought would be "goddamn, this chick has aged very well" It actually makes her appear to be more appealing genetically if she looks like she's 20 in her late 30's. I wouldn't put it past some of these nutjobs

Hah, there's a thought. I doubt that delusional cougar behaviour has gone THAT far. On a visceral level women know that young is better. It's usually when they get older themselves that the hamster wheel goes a-spinning.

Post: #225

44