Post: #1

Have you guys heard anything about this?

Last I checked the cast included the entire cast from the first one, less Rourke, and this time Schwarzenegger and Bruce Willis actually have parts. Also, Van Damme and Chuck Norris are supposed to be in it.

And to add a bit more substance to this post: Stallone is a beast! I mean, I know he probably uses HGH like a fat kid in a candy factory, but still - fucking massive dude.

Post: #2

As cheesy as this flick will be I'm going to love it.

I saw the first movie together with my best friend after consuming half a kilo of grilled red meat and a six pack each. Those are the kind of moments women will never be able to give you.

Post: #3

Meh. First one wasn't even a "good bad movie"--it was just bad. I liked the basic idea, though; maybe they can pull it around with a sequel.

Post: #4

Yes, it is being shot now in Bulgaria. Schwarzenegger, Bruce Willis, Van Damme, Chuck Norris, Jason Statham, and I think Sly Stallone is the producer and director.
These boys are running around partying in Sofia and the tabloids are following them - funniest story I ready was that Van Damme bet his $15k watch on an arm-wrestling match with a local thug and lost it, then didn't want to give the watch so he got his ass kicked (don't know if true or not).

Post: #5

this is easily gonna be the manliest film of 2012

Post: #6

(11-25-2011 04:18 AM)K-man Wrote:  Yes, it is being shot now in Bulgaria. Schwarzenegger, Bruce Willis, Van Damme, Chuck Norris, Jason Statham, and I think Sly Stallone is the producer and director.
These boys are running around partying in Sofia and the tabloids are following them - funniest story I ready was that Van Damme bet his $15k watch on an arm-wrestling match with a local thug and lost it, then didn't want to give the watch so he got his ass kicked (don't know if true or not).

Stallone isn't directing it.

Post: #7

Stallone has never been better than he was in "Rambo" (2008). Just purely on body count and dudes getting graphically chopped up by machine gun fire, and sheer brutality, it dwarfs anything else he's done.

Post: #8

(11-25-2011 08:55 PM)Timoteo Wrote:  Stallone has never been better than he was in "Rambo" (2008). Just purely on body count and dudes getting graphically chopped up by machine gun fire, and sheer brutality, it dwarfs anything else he's done.

that movie was good! i bought it on blu ray as soon as it came out. Expendables was horrible though.

Post: #9

(11-25-2011 08:55 PM)Timoteo Wrote:  Stallone has never been better than he was in "Rambo" (2008). Just purely on body count and dudes getting graphically chopped up by machine gun fire, and sheer brutality, it dwarfs anything else he's done.

I'd have to disagree, Stallone's best performance was Rocky and then Rambo.

Post: #10

(11-28-2011 06:56 PM)bengalltigerr Wrote:  

(11-25-2011 08:55 PM)Timoteo Wrote:  Stallone has never been better than he was in "Rambo" (2008). Just purely on body count and dudes getting graphically chopped up by machine gun fire, and sheer brutality, it dwarfs anything else he's done.

I'd have to disagree, Stallone's best performance was Rocky and then Rambo.

If you want to get into a debate about Stallone's "acting," I might rank his performance in "Cop Land" above his performance in "Rocky." I thought "Rambo" topped all for graphic violence and action.

Post: #11

Sure Rambo is the most violent. I haven't watched Cop Land, so I don't know if it was his best performance.

Post: #12

Can we have an honorable mention for cliffhanger?

Post: #13

(11-28-2011 10:29 PM)Alpha Wrote:  Can we have an honorable mention for cliffhanger?

how about Get Carter ?