Post: #51

Australian ethno-nationalist sounds sorta funny with Australia being a mixture of a shitload of different ethnicities... yes, you guys get a lot of lebs, indians and what not lately but you also get many italians, croats, serbs, russians, romanians, white brits, christian arabs... White Australia is far from over

Post: #52

Our problem is that we have no ancestral claim to the land nor primary founding stock of any particular breed of European. "White" may be our designated target group by the elites but it doesn't make for a cohesive response unit. I love this country as much as the next guy but we're about as homogeneous in our mentality as the future EU armed forces will be, which is to say barely at best.

If China vanished from the face of the earth then I would be more hopeful but the reality is that the top 10% of China is something like 6 times our entire population they're all looking to build and feather some safe-haven nests outside of their nation. Meanwhile like all Western nations we're mortgaging the house to fund our progressive drug addictions while the Chinese are eagerly buying up those assets hand over fist. Our gutless politicians will sell the entire nation to the Chinese to keep the music playing for as long as possible. They already turn a blind eye to the flaunting of our intranational house buying laws because it keeps house prices up and keeps the banks and the boomers happy, and as is the case in the West 99% of people are so blue-pilled they think that if you give a million Chinese an Australian passport then in five minutes flat they'll all be dinky-di bonza Aussies committed to a fair squeeze of the sauce bottle.

A collapse of China and/or the US might save our demographics but as I said before, anything other than a drastic dislocation of the slow slide into irrelevance will ensure that China simply props up our lifestyle while slowly colonizing our entire nation, and we're simply too lazy as a peoples to stop it. At least the muslim invaders were confronting enough to get our blood up from time to time. The Chinese will just smile politely until eventually you look around and can't see another white dude in the crowd.

Post: #53

(02-09-2019 01:53 AM)Rorogue Wrote:  @Going Strong

I am a huge tennis fan, and Kyrgios' confusion with his mixed race identity has caused huge problems for him.

That picture you posted is from an epic match he played with Federer around 2 years ago. He nearly beat Federer that night, but was booed for playing well by the idiot crowd in Miami.

Since then he has been disillusioned and withdrawn from the game.

He will never be seen as a European Greek, only a dark brown/black guy. Yet he probably expects to be treated like a European because or his name.

His only chance of getting back into tennis and succeeding would be to adopt a full on Serena, militant pro brown/black attitude: "I'm going to be hated anyway, let's disappoint these cra***rs"

That is the decision most mixed race men reach, when they realize the won't be treated like their white parent, by whites

I partially agree with your post and respect your knowledge on tennis matters. I saw this Kyrgios-Federer game, too. But I think you are making the grave mistake that Kyrgios himself is making : you mistake hostility from the public because of nonchalance and extreme risks, with hostility due to racism.

Nobody dislikes Kyrgios because he is tanned. People often dislike him because he abandons fight in many games, and is nonchalant. By the way, Monfils told that Kyrgios said to him that he, too, Kyrgios is victim of anti-Black racism, and Monfils laughed. For nobody mistakes Kyrgios with an African migrant, so racism is only into Kyrgios' head!

So my point, once again is: light-skin young people like Kyrgios, should not obsess about racism. Nobody in the modern world is racist against them.

By the way, most people on the thread have not seen the picture of this (OP's) woman, well I have and she is very beautiful, totally looking like a gorgeous Italian chick, just with a dark tan but Italian features. That is why I am thinking that nobody in our modern world will be racist against her children, as they will probably look very "cute" and just a bit tanned, like Kyrgios. No problem, except maybe with some hardcore racist people who are almost disappearing worldwide.

To end with Kyrgios again, I think he should do the contrary of what you advise, he should go the opposite way of alt-Left activist Serena, who's trying to meddle for the worse in everything from US to British politics. Kyrgios should calm down, never think again about his race or supposed racism, and be happy. Then he will win Grand Slam events, as he is super gifted and powerful (much more gifted than De Minaur, but De Minaur, himself multi-citizenship dude, has a lot of mental fortitude)

One last thing: OP, if you stay with this beautiful woman, be sure she never reads or finds out about this thread .
Ah, and you might ponder Off The Reservation's post: please, be sure that this woman is not attracted to your money, and that she really loves you.

Post: #54

(02-09-2019 09:25 AM)Rorogue Wrote:  you will think that you are in Istanbul, Mexico City, Mumbai, Kabul, Tehran, Islamabad, Marrakesh, Algiers

Or Melbourne.

Post: #55

Maybe consider how bad the dating market in australia is... many on the forum have posted about it. If you're australian and a half decent bloke, you could probably slay in the US. Try the more conservative parts of the country. Aussie men are seen as alpha, athletic, and exotic in the US by women.

Best of luck, can't give you any other advise. The situation is something you have to figure out for yourself.

Post: #56

These are only my own thoughts but I would advise sticking with the Mauritian woman.

My Reasoning

Family > Tribe > Cultural Community > Nation > Race

Frankly, your "race" is not a conscious entity, which means it doesn't care about you. And what is the point of serving it if you have to be utterly miserable for the rest of your life to do so? When I say that your race does not care about you, I mean that an individual can only really feel connected with up to 150-250 other people at any given time. This is called "Dunbar's Number" and a race it does not make. Beyond that number, everything is really just theoretical. Anyone beyond that number is someone that you may not feel anything bad for but you do not know them, they do not know you, and, when push comes to shove and a choice must be made, both of you will most likely look out for whoever is in your respective personal webs before you look out for each other.

In this way, your tribe matters much more than your race because your tribe will have far more in common with you in terms of mutual loyalty, shared goals, common core values, and so on than any random person from the other side of the continent or planet whom you have never met and disagree on nearly everything with but just happen to share a certain number of genes with.

Further, being from the American Deep South myself, I can tell you that inbreeding becomes inevitable at a certain point when you set out to separate people in order to preserve genetic purity whether or not those people actually share similar views or values. Inbreeding, as we can also see with the British Pakistani population, is very undesirable and it becomes only more so with each successive generation that practices it. Fact is that, when you reduce your population and genetic diversity enough, you eventually run out of non-relatives to bang and reproduce with. At that point, things start getting very weird very fast. The fact that smart men of the past like Einstein and Darwin married their own first cousins as recently as the 1940s and 1950s does not make it a smart thing to do and, while you may succeed in preserving some positive genetic traits like big hands and blue eyes, you will also be rolling the dice with whatever nightmare genes you and your wife happen to have both inherited from your great great grandfather back in the old country.

This is why a cell phone app was invented in Iceland called "Bump" which allows you to bump phones with another person you are considering getting physical with to find out whether or not you are related and, if so, how closely. Family records have been very meticulously kept by the government in Iceland for centuries and that is how the app figures this out. Iceland also has historically had almost no immigration from outside since the island was first settled and the whole country has a smaller population than the city of New Orleans. Suffice it to say, they tend to not be very "diverse" genetically speaking.

As an Australian, you may find it interesting to know that, long ago in the distant mists of history, Aboriginals once nearly went extinct because they did not have enough genetic diversity to produce viable offspring and were eventually saved by the arrival of other people from elsewhere whom they could breed with. The first arrivals to Australia from Europe would not have known that though as, by the time they got there, all of the people who had arrived before them had already assimilated themselves into one or more of the various tribes and clans.

So, if you really want to join a team and be loyal to it, I would recommend throwing your loyalty behind the Mauritian woman (because she seems like she could be a good wife and mother and her family and home culture are probably good to join if they produced her) instead of behind a bunch of random jerkoffs in Seattle or some other futureless place you are never going to even visit or have anything to do with just because you share a common ancestor from centuries ago that neither of you ever met or know anything about and who may or may not have been someone that you would both want to beat the crap out of if you did know them. Just be sure that she is a woman who wants to join your tribe and throw her loyalty behind you as well.

Being of different races does not automatically mean that you are or must be of different tribes. You can look at the Newari people of Nepal for an example of this. Some look Indian, others look Burmese, and still others are so mixed that you don't really know but they wear the same traditional clothes and have more in common with each other than any of them have with any other people group that they may or may not look more similar in physical appearance to. Another example would be the people of Cabo Verde for whom the same holds true.

These women are all Newari (indicated by their dress), meaning they are from the same tribe/"ethnic group." Genetically mixed but culturally homogenous.




*Another thing to consider is that, as Heuristics mentioned above, you are unlikely to do better than her as long as you remain in Australia.

Post: #57

Another thing to ponder is the fact that you seeing yourself as a member of a greater whole does not necessarily mean that the majority of the other more "pure" members of that greater whole see you as one of them. I, for example, know that I cannot simply join Dutch or Italian society because my ancestors came from there (my grandmother, in fact, is still a Dutch citizen and never naturalized in the US). Those societies will not throw open their gates and give me a passport solely because we have common ancestors. I know because I've contacted Immigration and asked. I'm just a foreigner to the governments of those countries, in the same category as people from Peru, Cambodia, and the Solomon Islands.

I also have people of other races in my family who I am intrinsically more bound to than other white people from the same country and, if those two should ever come into conflict, it is obvious which side I would take. Most of my friends are of other races as well but, because we grew up together, worked together, and have rapport and shared views, I have more in common with them than I do with other white people from some other part of the US I've never been to who are probably soy milk-drinking feminists or something. If those two groups ever came into conflict for some reason, it is again obvious which side I would be inclined to take.

Going further, I would say that I culturally identify more with a number of people who are not white far more than I do with nearly every white person in Sweden or Belgium. For one, other Americans who are not white but who I know have the same passport as me and will be allowed only 3 months in the Schengen Zone, just like me. That is, of course, not to say that there are not plenty of non-white Americans that I would not be glad to push into the ocean along with the white soy milk-drinking feminists from Seattle.

I have nothing at all against Sweden or Belgium and wish everyone there the best but those countries are weird. I don't speak their language, I don't share the majority view in their societies on many if not most very important issues, and I know that I will never be part of either of their societies (though I am happy to visit and support them in securing their own sovereignty) because I don't really have a desire to be, I know I'll never move there to try to join them and assimilate into their identity group, and, if either or both of them started conquering the world for some reason, I would be inclined to join with the Ethiopians and Vietnamese in resisting them because their food sucks, most of them probably don't believe in any kind of god, and I don't want to have to file my taxes in Swedish or be brought before a female judge in a hate speech court for saying that the Belgian Health Minister should be someone who isn't morbidly obese.

I would have an easier time assimilating into an Amharic Tewahedo community where I know I share certain core values and beliefs with the people than I would in a feminist and atheistic Swedish commmunity. If, for some reason, I got banished from my family, country, and every other relational web that I'm in but could choose to enter another cultural community and the choice was between Amharic Tewahedo or whatever smoldering godless ruin remains of what might have once been called Swedish culture, I would start learning Amharic and not lose any sleep over my decision.

I also don't buy into the whole "sacred land" thing. I understand why people do and I don't think they are dumb or anything. I just tend to think that the people make the land sacred and not the other way around. The Hungarians did that with Hungary and the Guyanese did it with their country. People who came from somewhere else made their new land a proper home by constructing their civilization on it based on what is important to them. The Amish/Mennonites are another example of this. They have communities all over the Americas from Pennsylvania to Paraguay but they remain distinct and, though their ancestors came from northwestern Europe, they would not fit in there now and probably would not regard that land as any more sacred that the land that they farm and earn their livelihood from.

I'm rambling not though and all of this is, again, just my thoughts.

Family > Tribe > Cultural Community > Nation > Race

Post: #58

@Waqqle
you make some excellent points
.+1 rating

Post: #59

As I've noted elsewhere, I believe ties to the soil kick in somewhere around fifth generation when no living relative was born somewhere else. Genetic acclimatisation to the area is also a factor. Bizarrely something so clinical as relative oxygen levels, humidity and even geo-magnetic factors could play into this concept but most westerners move so often these days that they aren't really aware that their ties to the land are a missing part of their life's puzzle.

Moving from Idaho to Arizona is the same in this sense as moving from Idaho to Mexico.

Post: #60

^
It's an interesting idea and it is definitely true that all of our various ancestors were geographically isolated from each other for all of human history until very recently and adapted over tens of thousands of years to very specific environments because almost none of them ever went more than a few dozen miles at most from wherever they were born and almost invariably bred with someone who was not genetically very different from themselves. Even Buddha and Jesus, as world famous as they are, never ventured more than a couple hundred miles from the places of their birth in their own lifetimes (unless you subscribe to the theory that Jesus survived his crucifixion and, afterward, trekked to Kashmir and became a monk there, died around age 80 and was buried at Roza Bal).

Climate definitely has some interesting effects on people. White people will find that they have their own peculiar difficulties living in a place on the Equator (as I have) due to sunburn and skin cancer because their ancestors were not adapted to that sort of environment. As I understand, skin cancer from the sun is a major problem in Oz and New Zealand.

Same deal with lowland people from a place like Paraguay who move to a highland place like El Alto in Bolivia and need a week or two to adjust to the altitude or even move up the mountains gradually to avoid getting altitude sickness. I heard once that many ethnic Tibetans have a gene that makes their blood cells able to hold and transport oxygen more efficiently so they can more easily live at high altitudes.

It gets more interesting when you start factoring in things like diseases that are endemic to a certain area that natives barely notice but that new arrivals might have great difficulty with. Europeans learned that from their early explorations into Central Africa as the Amazon tribes learned it from them.

I do tend to see these as mostly or entirely things which can be dealt with and/or overcome and difficulties which come with corresponding benefits. For example, I have to stay in the shade more in Colombia than I might in a frigid and overcast place like Holland but the upside is that I don't have to bundle up as much to avoid freezing to death.

There is a pretty easy adaptation to all of these things, at least in my case, with the exception of diseases for which there are no vaccines. That would be the factor which concerns me most personally. I can adapt to altitude, stay in the shade, and adjust to humidity and I would probably stop noticing those things once they become my new normal. This was the case when I came back to Atlanta after having lived non-stop (without leaving) in the Philippines for two years at one point. I became comfortable in the Philippines and found Atlanta to be unbearably cold and dry (until I re-adapted to it). I still hate how dry my skin gets without lotion and how cracked my lips get without lip balm in Atlanta and actually have found myself preferring humid tropical climate zones for these (I am less bothered by needing to find shade than by needing to buy and use lotion and lip balm regularly) and other reasons despite the fact that my ancestors obviously did not get geographically isolated and evolve in humid tropical places.

Most of those things I have found myself able to adapt to within a couple of weeks to a month but I can't rapidly develop an immunity to malaria or SARS. If anything were to greatly concern me, it would be pathogens that I don't have immunity to. Perhaps, if I were to marry a woman whose ancestors were from that place and who had immunity or resistance herself, my children would inherit both her immunities and mine. Of course, that would not necessarily help me with the pathogens and not living in a place where such pathogens come from is not necessarily a guarantee that I will never be exposed to them anyway by someone traveling from one of those regions, an insect or rodent in a cargo hold, or something else as we learned with the Ebola and Bird Flu scares of this past decade.

Another thing I think about is the fact that our own genes and DNA are not necessarily constant throughout our own individual lives. Our cells are constantly reproducing and dying just as we are on the species level. Different parts of your body have different types of cells which are replaced at different rates but I think I heard that, around every 7 years, you are, biologically speaking, basically a similar but entirely new organism as you no longer have any of the cells that you had prior and none of the cells you have are completely identical to the ones that gave birth to them (at the very least, they have shorter telomeres or something). This gets freakier when certain genes and cells start mutating as they reproduce and replace themselves in response to whatever kind of environment you are in and/or whatever kind of lifestyle you have. For example, being obese quite literally alters your DNA so that any children you have are more likely to develop diabetes and other problems even if they themselves make different life choices than you did (one reason why I would not be against unhealthy "foods" being heavily controlled and obesity being shamed and/or penalized somehow).

Even the development of cancer is essentially a gene mutation that occurs within a person's own lifetime when some of his cells decide that they would like to outlive him instead of the other way around. Cancer, in a way, is sort of like a cellular version of feminism - one cell or small group of cells poisoning other cells and living it up completely selfishly at the cost of making the body uninhabitable (clinically dead or dying) for any and all future cells that might be born in the coming generation(s).

Climate, environment, and their impact on human evolution are, collectively, definitely an interesting subject to wonder about and I would not fault any white Danish person for wanting to stay in Denmark because they consider cloud cover more important than warmth or a black Malawian for preferring to stay in Malawi because the cold dry air in Austria gives him nosebleeds and makes him ashy. I can't rightly fault anyone for having a personal preference when it comes to climate.

Post: #61

As a condemner of ethno-phyletism (as is the true christian church) and promoter of free association, I find that the real issue that people who claim to be "ethno nationalist," such as the OP, should be discerning and understanding what they're really focusing on and saying. If you are an ethnic superiority guy you are just misled. That doesn't mean that certain races have more advanced traits in various areas, of course they do, this is obvious to a non-scientific layman even. But what you should be describing is just particular characteristics (physical, let's say) or cultural importance over all other options. Being honest about racial differences is one thing, saying that some entity that's really hard to define is superior over all is completely different (and silly). This is obviously a long conversation, but I would say the most important question is how you live your life, how you think your family will fit in to the "local" community, and being honest with yourself about how you will question, accept, or deal with the challenges that may arise.

After you have contemplated, prayed, or meditated on these things, then you can appropriately make your decision. As others have said, there are costs and benefits to all decisions, that much is always true and universal. Having awareness of them is the key between a thoughtful person who can plan or endure, as opposed to the man who chooses (eventual suffering) without even thinking, or without any meaning. The latter is a camp we all must be careful not to slip into.

Post: #62

As other posters have mentioned, basically ALL white women in the west are unfit for marriage by age 25. The only decent white women I see married off and having children (sadly only 1-2) met their husband in high school or college. So as red pilled white men 25-40, who prefer to have children that look like us, what are we supposed to do? You have eastern european women who are more feminine but also ruthless and come from a completely different culture.

Hypothetically, is the situation different if the woman is half white AND half asian/hispanic/middle eastern? Then you’re children will be 75% white. And most likely possess more of you’re european traits than your wife’s. I have thought about this a lot, which is why for wife hunting in the future I may consider HAPAs and high caste Latinas/Brazilians.

Post: #63

(02-09-2019 06:39 AM)Belgrano Wrote:  

Elizabeth Warren would have to cram 8 more people into her heritage photograph. If she's lucky there might be some old daguerreotype plates lying around.

Oh, and WB the Quadroon.

Post: #64

I wonder how many other white nationalists just totally drop their whole commitment the second some hot piece of brown ass comes along.

You gotta stick to your principles. You just cracked.

Aloha!

Post: #65

@Westcoast99: You could also consider becoming Mormon. I am not being sarcastic. I mean you could seriously consider that as an option.

Post: #66

Waqqle- Just can’t do it for religious reasons.

This thread does not surprise me at all considering how masculine western women are.

Post: #67

(02-08-2019 09:25 PM)quaker13 Wrote:  My childhood bestfriend is currently a white nationalist. He doesn't have a hateful bone in his body(besides not liking jews), but is preoccupied with seeing the white race sustain itself and flourish.

It's so telling that the least disturbing thing you all find in this thread is the continous opprobrium against Jews.

You really like to think you're so trendy eh, carrying on an, ancient age-old grudge. How original, how blindingly ingenious. Quelle surprise, or shall I let the gravity of that sink into your tender flesh.

Post: #68

(02-10-2019 06:23 PM)JWLZG Wrote:  

(02-08-2019 09:25 PM)quaker13 Wrote:  My childhood bestfriend is currently a white nationalist. He doesn't have a hateful bone in his body(besides not liking jews), but is preoccupied with seeing the white race sustain itself and flourish.

It's so telling that the least disturbing thing you all find in this thread is the continous opprobrium against Jews.

You really like to think you're so trendy eh, carrying on an, ancient age-old grudge. How original, how blindingly ingenious. Quelle surprise, or shall I let the gravity of that sink into your tender flesh.

We saved them from the Nazis and spent 50 years protecting them from anti-semitism while pouring money into THEIR ETHNOSTATE, and they still hate us.

They spent that 50 years hollowing out our societies and openly bragging amongst themselves about it.

"carrying on an ancient grudge"



Bet you'd never have the balls to accuse a Jew of that.

Post: #69

To the OP:

I admire the fact that you're being honest, to share your story with the forum.

But since we're being red pill here, then here's the truth:

--> If you create a mixed race family you are being racist against your own ethnicity. This is especially cowardly especially considering that whites are a global minority and being genocided at a rapid rate. You will be disrespecting your native European culture and spitting on the grave of your ancestors.

I'm all for having casual relations with beautiful women all around the world of all colours, and I'm all for tasting all the flavours of icecream. But in terms of choosing a baby mama and procreating with people of different constitutions that is completely unnatural and contributing to the evil agenda of ((( them ))).

Remember that all the "non-whites" on the thread that are calling you racist are actually projecting their own racism, and they would never support race-mixing if their own native people were being genocided.

Post: #70

This discussion reminded me of an old post from Stormfront:



EDIT: for some reason the image is not loading, here's the link: https://imgur.com/a/N2Gnsv6

You can find the original thread and post, it's from 2009. Ten years ago. Has it gotten better? I don't believe so.

A lot of guys in that thread were calling him a race traitor, but can they really blame him? Is race the most important thing? I don't believe so.

If the choice is between an entitled, dumb, fat white bitch and a gentle, smart, nice girl from another race, is it really a choice? I have seen this play out so many times, with others and myself. We don't have that many east Asians here, but I have known several white guys dating nice, feminine and submissive black women, after breaking up with naggy, overweight and 'independent' white women. These black women, in turn, exclusively date white men.They refuse to date the men their own race because, in general, they are uneducated thugs and these women want to escape the 'ghetto'.

Before I got married, I had a couple of black or half-black chicks who almost got to me. Sweet, feminine, beautiful women who were not entitled, naggy, dumb or crass. It wasn't easy to break it off just because they were of a different race.

And of course I never told them why, that I could not bring myself to have mixed children. I got extremely lucky afterward by finding a nice girl of my own race to marry, but I could have easily not found it. Lots of guys are not so lucky - there just aren't a lot of them out there anymore.

People here mentioned white genocide, but it's not genocide. It's suicide - and you cannot change this trend. Race mixing is only one part of this. In a sane, orderly society you wouldn't have that much race mixing. The larger numbers of race mixing that we see are just another symptom of the general disease. And ethnic homogeneity will not magically solve it all.

Do not sacrifice yourself in an altar to the false god of race.

If you think you can have a lasting, loving and fruitful marriage with this woman, and if she is all you say she is, you should do it. Race is important, and your kids will have some identity issues - but, there are many more important things than race.

Post: #71

Sometimes life just happens. If your GF is into you for you, and not the the money or the 'privilege/status' (common in 3rd world countries) then go for it. Good women are becoming scarcer and scarcer, or so I have been informed.
At a certain stage (age) you need to focus on your happiness. Whether it is "Happy Wife - Happy Life" or "No Wife - Happy Life"!

Post: #72

Thanks for everybody's responses, they are helpful. Even the guys who called me a racist, because you verified my thinking that any mixed race kids I may have would have to battle with these insecurities. Also don't be stupid, I don't hate mixed race people (or think they are 'wrong'), or hate any people for that matter because of their colour or think anyone is better than anyone else or any other bullshit like that. We all have our pros and cons - stop thinking what the TV tells you to about white people and wake up.

I just don't like the massive increase in tension, unassimilated population, traffic, car jackings, armed robberies, home invasions and not recognising what country I'm in when I go into the city - it's been a very dramatic change here, we're just never had that here before in Australia (obviously we did have some crime, but not this violent and not to this extent, when I grew up we used to leave our car and front door unlocked). I also work in IT and so I'm at the coalface of this demographic change, the dominate languages in my lunchroom are Chinese, Hindi and Tagalog.

There's been a few questions raised so I'll add some more detail.

I'll start by saying I genuinely wish success, happiness and prosperity to all people of the world. I have an abundance mindset and believe this is possible. Just as I dislike my own country transforming in this way I also wouldn't want it to happen to other countries. Whether it's a mass immigration of say Polish people into Kenya to the point of displacing or changing their culture, Indonesians into East Timor, Americans into Mexico or any other replacement/mass demographic change that causes turmoil (the post WW2 borders we currently have today - I'd rather not have a WW3 to redraw them again).

So when I see posts from a former Black nationalist I feel a sense of respect and kinship, just as I wish the best for Europeans, he would for his people and I respect him for that. Quaker13 your post was really helpful. Coincidentally, Irish slave blood flows through my veins (which, according to (((Google))) is just a 'myth'), albeit a more distant connection in my timeline.

As a side, my best mate at work is Vietnamese Australian, and he told me in confidence that "'no offence', but if I was with an Aussie women, I wouldn't have kids with her". I don't hold that against him, it's OK with me if he thinks that, and it's OK with me if others don't care about it.

Speaking of Ireland, the same BS is happening there and they're projected to be a minority in the not to distant future as well. White British are a minority in London, Manchester and Birmingham as well, so so much for 'go back to your European homeland', this coordinated agenda is happening everywhere and you'd be a fool not to be concerned if this was happening to you as well whatever your background.

Maybe it's just be the contrarian in me pushing back against this - my way of saying 'fuck you' to the globalists.


More about me and my Game

• While I'm nearly 41, I consider myself good looking, hit the gym regularly, try to eat right and have been good with my skincare regimen. I easily pass for 30-35 and lay girls in their 20's.
• My game is strong (ex-PUA coach), although has been pretty rusty lately and like everyone I have my moments of doubt, dry spells, laziness and weakness.
• In essence what I'm saying is I'm moderately confident I can find an equally quality European girl if I sack up and put in the effort (not a 9.5, but I'd be happy with an 8). In fact, I only recently stopped seeing a very hot 25yo Russian. Good looking girl but her personality / pleasantness just didn't compare to the Mauritian girl. I'd rate the Russian an easy 9, so yeah, I strike it lucky from time to time (luck being a function of the hard work I put in).
• I *suck* on the dating apps (am not a chad).
  

Having said that, can I do this consistently? And for how long? Of course this is limited. I've probably passed my peak in looks (although dominance/confidence is still increasing), it's getting hard to stay trim (currently a few kgs overweight) and my hair is starting to thin - so yeah, point taken, I have left it late and it's downhill from here. I personally find 33 and over just too old / jaded and so I am against the clock for those 25-30 year old 8's.

I mention the Rh- blood thing because of a natural phenonmen - if an Rh+ man impregnates an Rh- woman, the womens immune system antibodies can attack the red blood cells of the baby and they can be born with jaundice. In severe cases the baby may need a transfusion when born (essentially, 'back in the day', this child would die). Given Rh- people are only around 15% of the world (mostly Europe), there is a part of me that wonders if this is natures way of telling me I'm meant to be with an Rh- wife (or is it just some outdated biology thing). And before someone says it, I don't think it's a 'superior' blood type, just a different one (FWIW there are all kinds of conspiracies out there about Rh- being 'royal' blood or 'alien' blood).

The other thing that got me thinking is how the NWO/elite obsess over 'bloodlines'. Makes me wonder if there is some importance to it (something more than we currently understand).

In Summary

I'm still reading through and contemplating what people have written. Although, I can't fuck around much longer with this as I got the second attempt at 'so, we've been together for x long now, and...' question. I managed to fob it off but I won't be able to for long (well really, I don't feel good about not addressing it if it is a concern for her).

In general the 'personal happiness' argument makes sense, and I'm really happy with her. Maybe I can make my decision less stressful by just committing to another 6 months and seeing where that takes us.

As far as other European girls go, I do have an ex who is top shelf, 9.5 in looks (back when she was 21, still looking great now at 31). I de-flowered her and she only has 1 other notch, in many ways the perfect trad hot to settle down with. Tall, perfect skin, brunette with green eyes, happy gene, pleasant. Her parents are still together (although both dole bludgers / live off welfare). Only reason we broke up last time was because I wanted to play the field more (whilst she was trying to lock me down hardcore), and I found her a bit boring. People change a lot between 21 and 31 though, so maybe worth re-visiting. She's still single and still has a very strong bond towards me.

I do have a handful of other near-misses worth touching base with again if I wanted to do that.

Obviously there is also an ocean out there, although I will agree with the general sentiment, only few white girls post 25 are mother material and I'd have my work cut out for me trying to score a new one.

Post: #73

Very high standards, OP.

Show me a >7.5 white girl and I'll show you a girl with princess syndrome.

Meanwhile, the 31 year old? Even if you get her pregnant today you're looking at [email protected], [email protected]/4 and [email protected]/36 and that's an extremely best case scenario which is still in the danger zone for abnormalities and serious damage with long/infinite recovery times.

Guys never want to hear it, but you're better off with a tight-bodied younger girl even if you have to suffer a plain face, and there's a LOT of reasons for that.

You may want to consider what you're really willing to sacrifice to have those white kids to a suitable mother. I suppose if you did no-fap for a month and still couldn't get it up for a 6 then the psychological damage of the cunt carousel is already done, but honestly all women get old and childbirth is a bitch on their bodies. That's just a fact of life. In ten years time you're going to give less than a single fuck whether she was a 7 or an 8 or a 9 when you married her, and the 30 year old 7 is going to be shitting over the 40 year old 8 because things go downhill fast at that point anyway. What going to matter most is that you have a wife who's healthy, has the energy to raise your healthy kids and who isn't a socially damaged cunt.

tldr: Age(lower) before beauty.

Post: #74

OP you've got oneitis for an African girl. You are the prize, not the bird. Even though you've left it kind of late (41 is pretty old to be getting serious tbh) you should realise how many great options there are out there. Those who say there's no good white women out there obviously haven't traveled the world enough.

Also don't split hairs about how beautiful your (potential) future wife is. All 8s become 7s, all 7s become 6s. As Leonard says - age is more important, also intelligence.

Get on a plane to Eastern Europe. Stay a few months. Take your pick. Plenty of feminine wife-quality women over there. It's not rocket science.

P.S. for the record I'm also white and currently with an African honey (for over 2 years now). Before that it was an Afro-Brazilian. I would only procreate with someone outside of my own background, because I'm not racist against my own tribe.

Post: #75

tldr: Age(lower) before beauty.
[/quote]

Listen to this advice and listen well. I am 43, I am also looking for a woman to bear my children. Race bullshit aside-You are too old to be fucking around. You want a white woman-Go to the Former Soviet Union and the satellite states, pick a woman, bring her to Australia and get her pregnant-(I am against marriage because it disincentives women, having a child allows her to stay in country). Shield your assets in various trust instruments. Give her no incentive to stray or rape you in the family court.

No Offence , but you are old, I say this because I am old. If you were 27 I would give you a different playbook but now your main goal is on and expedited timetable-Use you nationality,The fact you are Caucasian, Passport and income and go get what you want.

On a personal note-Try to be with someone who gives you more happiness than sadness and in the FSU target teenagers(18-19)-remember they mature faster over there due to the harsh circumstances.