Post: #101

Post: #102

(01-15-2019 12:22 AM)Kona Wrote:  My girlfriend shaves her pussy with a mach 3.

Aloha!

My girlfriend shaves her pussy at mach 3

Post: #103

The thing about the globalists is that they don't live what they preach:



Gilette's owner's girlfriend.

Comment by Rollo was of course deleted:



Even Twatter is a nightmare for them:

They already deleted thousands of comments and hundreds of thousands of downvotes, but it's still negative.

Post: #104

(01-15-2019 02:11 AM)Avoy Wrote:  

(01-15-2019 12:07 AM)metalfan20 Wrote:  Unfortunately Btaun is owned by P&G. If you use electric make the switch to Remington when it comes time to replace it.

Funny. I didn't know. Kind of hard to escape this web.



ZeroHedge - These 11 Companies Control Everything You Buy

I am based in Europe so it is maybe easier for me to buy local hand-made products. You pay more, but fuck the big corps. You should be able to find (online) shaving products from NYC.

Post: #105

(01-14-2019 10:25 PM)Papi Rico Wrote:  

(01-14-2019 01:52 PM)KeepMovingForward Wrote:  At 1:03 they even demonize cold approaching. Narrator bleats "act the right way" as a man notices a hot girl passing by, follows his masculine instinct and makes to approach, only to be stopped by his "friend" who stiff arms him and chastises him: "not cool, not cool."

1:03 was perhaps the most relevant moment. Many guys focused on the racial undertones in play, but I was more troubled by the fact that the guy prevented from approaching was well above average in terms of looks and shape. They didn't cast some scrawny, acne-ridden incel. The dude legit looks like someone we could roll with.

The message is clear and unequivocal: we don't care how smooth you are, how good-looking you are, or where you do it. Cold approaching is categorically reprehensible.

I fear we'll soon see US cities rolling out blanket bans on all forms of interaction with strangers in public areas. And when you deprive men with testosterone of a fundamental pleasure, like owning a gun, expressing his opinion, or chatting up an attractive female, things can only end one way.

That dude was a 6'4 +, built like a rugby player, and looked like what every woman describes on her Tinder wish list-That faggot Black dude was also tall and attractive-I am sure women don't want to talk to them....newsflash-those are the only men women see, and that is why they were cast in a commercial made by a woman. Short ugly men with no game should have been cast in that role-keep it real.

Post: #106

(01-15-2019 08:55 AM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  

(01-14-2019 10:25 PM)Papi Rico Wrote:  

(01-14-2019 01:52 PM)KeepMovingForward Wrote:  At 1:03 they even demonize cold approaching. Narrator bleats "act the right way" as a man notices a hot girl passing by, follows his masculine instinct and makes to approach, only to be stopped by his "friend" who stiff arms him and chastises him: "not cool, not cool."

1:03 was perhaps the most relevant moment. Many guys focused on the racial undertones in play, but I was more troubled by the fact that the guy prevented from approaching was well above average in terms of looks and shape. They didn't cast some scrawny, acne-ridden incel. The dude legit looks like someone we could roll with.

The message is clear and unequivocal: we don't care how smooth you are, how good-looking you are, or where you do it. Cold approaching is categorically reprehensible.

I fear we'll soon see US cities rolling out blanket bans on all forms of interaction with strangers in public areas. And when you deprive men with testosterone of a fundamental pleasure, like owning a gun, expressing his opinion, or chatting up an attractive female, things can only end one way.

That dude was a 6'4 +, built like a rugby player, and looked like what every woman describes on her Tinder wish list-That faggot Black dude was also tall and attractive-I am sure women don't want to talk to them....newsflash-those are the only men women see, and that is why they were cast in a commercial made by a woman. Short ugly men with no game should have been cast in that role-keep it real.

We here of course know the reality of things - even if you banned cold-approaching. The good-looking guy with Game who still does this would get all the feminazi pussies wet even more. Even in fucking Saudi Arabia the shitlords are throwing phones at girls and then meeting up in secret - all with lives at risk. Basic human biology of desiring buff masculine men cannot be stamped out. The feminists will keep on writing articles how they can't stop fucking misogynists.

Also note how the TV spot while praising more black men, they also promoted the soft effeminate black guy. Though the first take was of course of a good-looking strong black man followed by an ugly boomer cuck. Most of the "nu-males" were cucks or looked like that. The plan of the progressives is not to make the blacks into new masculine shitlords - while they put them in a better light, they prefer for blacks to turn into effeminate soy-boys too - even if that works even less than their other idiotic ideas.

Meanwhile commercials in Eastern Europe:



The writing says:

"She already knows what she will have in her mouth soon."

Though the nonsense spreads out everywhere of course.

Post: #107

@OP Thanks for sharing this clip and @Avoy for linking to zh.

I'm already avoiding many of these brands as good as possible and now gilette will join the list
(I was using Remington anyway, they are far cheaper in the long run).

Post: #108

(01-14-2019 06:16 PM)Spectrumwalker Wrote:  Theres a part in this ad where they cut away to a tv that shows some girls gone wild pool party with some chick grinding on a guy and clearly enjoying it.

So it's ok for women to act like toxic whores.

The daughters watching today will be the sluts of tomorrow.

Waiting for the Tampex version: "The Best a Woman Can Get"

Teaching girls how not to be whores.

I mean, it's only fair. If a shaving company is going to teach men how to be men, then a tampon company should teach a lady how to be a lady...right?!

Social programming shouldn't be so damn gender biased!

Post: #109

< You are forgetting yourself bucko!

Women are perfect the way they are. They are an oppressed class of humans and only need to believe in themselves in order to become fantastic engineers, scientists and even attain mal upper-body strength. There is no need for guidelines to female behavior. Everything they do is perfect - whether it's doing porn, fucking 1000 men for empowerment - unless of course it's voting for Trump, then they are traitors!

Post: #110

When I last checked it last night I think it had 179K dislikes. Now the video has over 300K dislikes.

How long before SJWs claim it's just russian bots?

Post: #111

(01-15-2019 06:35 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

(01-15-2019 02:58 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

(01-15-2019 02:11 AM)Avoy Wrote:  

(01-15-2019 12:07 AM)metalfan20 Wrote:  Unfortunately Btaun is owned by P&G. If you use electric make the switch to Remington when it comes time to replace it.

Funny. I didn't know. Kind of hard to escape this web.



ZeroHedge - These 11 Companies Control Everything You Buy

A few people control these companies and much of the Fortune 500. You can't escape the spider's web through boycotts.

While you cannot escape the globalist matrix, the companies or local brands should get punished. Managers will lose jobs over this if the turnover tanks. All the other brands are owned by the globalists, but the managers who attempt to be the most woke still are going to get punished first. Even their masters will simply fire them as other globalist families pick up their market share.

A boycott is sweet and delicious - Star Wars is getting clobbered and people at Disney already have lost their jobs, the same with Dice and Battlefield V, the same will be happening at Gilette - no matter whether that Indian minion spouts feminazi drivel.

Remember Pepsi going all woke? It cost them hundreds of millions for sure if not more. Coca Cola did not mind picking up their share and low-tier Pepsi employees certainly got fired.

Get woke, Go broke baby!

Post: #112

Bawdy is on FIRE!

Post: #113

I wanna see the Rotherham UK version, where a white British man spots a vulnerable 12 year old girl and moves to aproach her, before his virtuous Pakistani friend stops him with the words "Dude, not cool."

Post: #114

^That's a nice strategy by Bawdy Barber

Post: #115

Peter Lloyd is all over this shit.

Post: #116

My dad, who is conservative but doesn't follow this stuff that closely on a day to day basis (and has also been out of the country for the last 2 weeks), texted me out of the blue this morning to say he'll never buy another Gillette product.

Post: #117

(01-15-2019 11:31 AM)debeguiled Wrote:  Peter Lloyd is all over this shit.

LOL he called feminist SheHadist

100k dislikes just got removed....YouTube mafia in the house!!

Post: #118

The female director of the ad has been repeatedly accused of PEDOPHILIA.

Quote:"Ironic that this ad campaign was directed by Australian director Kim Gehrig, who has been accused of sexuaI abuse by 2 men & 5 women when they were minors. Her victim's videos exposing Ms. Gehrig for being a predator have been on Youtube for a number of years - 1 dating back to 2010. Yet this paedophiIe is trying to smear the vast majority of men as predators & abusers? Gilltette, did you even do a cursory background check on Ms. Gehrig's Somesuch & Co. firm before hiring her to direct this campaign? Explain why your company's associated with a predator who's actions lead to the suicide of one of her victims in 2016!!"

http://boards.4chan.org/pol//thread/1998...kim-gehrig

”OMG, YOU DINOSAURS! BELIEVE VICTIMS!”

Post: #119

Don't switch to Harry's, they are another anti-male company.

If you are a wet shaver then it's best to buy a safety razor and natural shave soap.

Post: #120

(01-15-2019 12:07 PM)david.garrett84 Wrote:  The female director of the ad has been repeatedly accused of PEDOPHILIA.

Quote:"Ironic that this ad campaign was directed by Australian director Kim Gehrig, who has been accused of sexuaI abuse by 2 men & 5 women when they were minors. Her victim's videos exposing Ms. Gehrig for being a predator have been on Youtube for a number of years - 1 dating back to 2010. Yet this paedophiIe is trying to smear the vast majority of men as predators & abusers? Gilltette, did you even do a cursory background check on Ms. Gehrig's Somesuch & Co. firm before hiring her to direct this campaign? Explain why your company's associated with a predator who's actions lead to the suicide of one of her victims in 2016!!"

http://boards.4chan.org/pol//thread/1998...kim-gehrig

”OMG, YOU DINOSAURS! BELIEVE VICTIMS!”

^^I can't find anything to back up these claims other this quote being shared^^

Here is another video she made last year.... I think she has a problem with the white men




Fucking weirdo she is... she directed this as well

Post: #121

Would be cool if the execs at Gillette checked out this Twitter thread.

Post: #122

In a proper society vigilantes would cause pain and suffering to anyone pushing out degenerate/sacreligious/blasphemous material like. Instead there is a little show on ITV where a bunch of women stick it to the men, and a few dislikes on YT. I guess disliking videos on YT and being argued at by a bunch of women on TV is what constitutes a defense of Virtue/Religion/Culture/Masculinity these days.

I mean, the Production Company who made this is right here in London, in a little backstreet in HAckney, I could go there tomorrow and let them know this is not acceptable, but somehow I feel the Manosphere is more about Virtue Signaling online than taking real actions and real risk.

Being talked down to by Women on TV, when they tell you what Masculinity is supposed to be, and then getting excited cos a YT vid got some dislikes is pretty beta/cuck in my opinion, and is probably what the Liberal/Media/Gillete wanted anyway.

"Hey, look at these MEN in our society, we can take the piss out of them in ads, on TV, and they think they won cos they gave a few dislikes to a YT video"

The response to the ad so far is as much a part of the problem as the ad, just ask yourself is there anything Masculine in the response here.

Post: #123

(01-14-2019 09:09 PM)Mage Wrote:  

(01-14-2019 12:20 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  

(01-14-2019 12:16 PM)Mortay Wrote:  

(01-14-2019 12:12 PM)questor70 Wrote:  Holy SHIT do I hate being preached to from a commercial. What kind of world do we live in? Leave this sort of sermonizing for church.

Ya it was hard to believe this was real when I first saw it. However, the public seems to not be accepting this crap as tons of comments say they will not be buying their razors anymore.

Won't matter. Gillette is owned by Proctor & Gamble and good luck boycotting every brand they own:

Brands owned by P&G

Baking soda can substitute 90% of products from this brand list.

I already have banned products from these P&G kocksuckers (and other korporate kocksuckers like them) from my humble abode.

Post: #124

The 1:03 guy getting c-blocked is enrageing. I can’t imagine anyone I know CBing me like that. Gillette go to Hell!

Post: #125

(01-15-2019 12:53 PM)mzp1 Wrote:  In a proper society vigilantes would cause pain and suffering to anyone pushing out degenerate/sacreligious/blasphemous material like. Instead there is a little show on ITV where a bunch of women stick it to the men, and a few dislikes on YT. I guess disliking videos on YT and being argued at by a bunch of women on TV is what constitutes a defense of Virtue/Religion/Culture/Masculinity these days.

I mean, the Production Company who made this is right here in London, in a little backstreet in HAckney, I could go there tomorrow and let them know this is not acceptable, but somehow I feel the Manosphere is more about Virtue Signaling online than taking real actions and real risk.

Being talked down to by Women on TV, when they tell you what Masculinity is supposed to be, and then getting excited cos a YT vid got some dislikes is pretty beta/cuck in my opinion, and is probably what the Liberal/Media/Gillete wanted anyway.

"Hey, look at these MEN in our society, we can take the piss out of them in ads, on TV, and they think they won cos they gave a few dislikes to a YT video"

The response to the ad so far is as much a part of the problem as the ad, just ask yourself is there anything Masculine in the response here.