Post: #1

https://womenintheworld.com/2018/11/30/d...SCdH4xeabc

Quote:A growing wave of sex-positive feminists are working to usher in what they describe as a “pleasure revolution” in which women’s sexuality is embraced, rather than stigmatized, by both individuals and society at large. According to advocates of the movement, such as author and feminist Stephanie Theobold, the pleasure revolution is “about women asserting their own pleasure,” just as the #MeToo movement was about the problem of “men imposing their pleasure on women.” But for Reba Maybury, a 27-year-old political science professor and professional dominatrix, the larger problem is a historical power imbalance that she’s now working to correct in a unique fashion.

A socialist of mixed-race background, Maybury, who also goes by the name Mistress Rebecca, says that she had “always been fascinated by sex and notions of shame around sexuality,” particularly in regard to fetishes.

“I find it ridiculous how secretive people are about fetishes, because everybody has them. Some are just more extreme than others. For most people fetishes are quite subtle and sensitive,” she explains.

For many of her clientele, who are almost exclusively white right-wing men because she finds herself unable “to be even fictionally cruel to any other type of man,” that fetish is serving a powerful woman. Maybury derives her pleasure comes from forcing those men to see the contradiction between their love of powerful women and their support for political parties that actively work to limit women’s rights and empowerment. In her book, Dining with Humpty Dumpty, she detailed conversations with a man she said exhibited the “disgusting contradiction” of claiming to be both “a ‘female supremacist’ and a Tory.’”

“A lot of the book is about how people use political issues as a sexual fantasy and how that’s problematic,” Marbury explained in an interview with Centre Pompadour. “In the book, I decide to think about the power dynamic that exists between a dominatrix and her submissive. If he wants to really make me happy, which he says he does, what could possibly make me more happy than turning him into a socialist?”

Hoes in politiks

Post: #2

The sexual humiliation, cucking, etc., of conservative white men is absolutely vital to the globalist agenda. They aren't even hiding it anymore.

Post: #3

Because nothing screams 'reliable narrator' like a Female Author or a Feminist or a Socialist or a Whore.

She's a guaranteed four-pack of falsity, hypocritically engaging in Capitalism to sell her stupid book.

Post: #4

(12-01-2018 11:50 PM)CaptainChardonnay Wrote:  “In the book, I decide to think about the power dynamic that exists between a dominatrix and her submissive. If he wants to really make me happy, which he says he does, what could possibly make me more happy than turning him into a socialist?”

That reads like Chanboard trolling or an Onion article. But I guess it's real because it's in England, but it's hard to distinguish between parody and real life nowadays.

Post: #5

The story behind the story: "Gee, my dominatrix business is failing. What to do? I know! Sell the media an article feeding into their hatred of 'right wing men' to get free publicity!"

My opinion from seeing her photo: This woman isn't changing anything but the refrigerator, which went from full to empty.

Post: #6

(12-02-2018 12:21 AM)Thot Leader Wrote:  The sexual humiliation, cucking, etc., of conservative white men is absolutely vital to the globalist agenda. They aren't even hiding it anymore.

Her so called "Right-wing Clients'' are secret cucks. She only facilitates their coming out as open soyboys.

Only Men with a secret desire to be dominated by women like her would make up her clientele.

Post: #7

Girl from article





Bleach

Post: #8

I always laugh when women think they’re socialists by virtue signalling fairness, equality of opportunity, inclusivity and wealth redistribution.

Yet they ensure that lower class men are EXCLUDED from the sexual market place by destroying the one man - one woman arrangement of state sponsored monogamy by willingly sharing upper class men like the concubines of old.

Upper class women see these women as ‘cheap’ because they undercut the price that upper class men need to pay. It’s really cut throat capitalism.

A socialist SMP would be enforced by the church to ensure every man who wants to be a father finds a wife of his station in life.

Post: #9

(12-02-2018 03:19 AM)N°6 Wrote:  A socialist SMP would be enforced by the church to ensure every man who wants to be a father finds a wife of his station in life.

In the Soviet Union for example, if you were a KGB agent, single and stationed abroad, the state would provide a wife for you.
Of course she would be of sufficient ideological pedigree, a party member and a patriot.
You might have never met each other before.
The state would strongly suggest to her that it's a good idea to marry you.
The state would strongly suggest to you that it's a good idea to marry her.
The state would also strongly expect the two of you to do your duty and make some children as soon as possible.

Reason being that an agent who has a wife and children back home is far less likely to switch sides and defect.


It's also clear that in true socialism, the state will definitely pay attention to a highly productive party member and working class hero complaining that he can't find a wife.
Some woman will have to do her patriotic duty, no matter how boring, ugly or autistic that guy is.

Post: #10

(12-02-2018 03:10 AM)godfather dust Wrote:  Girl from article

...

Bleach

Not enough bleach.

Post: #11

Jesus, No. That is one ugly broad.

Post: #12

(12-02-2018 03:10 AM)godfather dust Wrote:  Girl from article

Bleach

Dude, in the future when you post a photo of a fat typist troll, limit yourself to one photo and then have the bleach immediately after. I don't want to have to scroll through multiple photos of the uggo to get to the bleach.

Post: #13

I thought from the title this was going to be about Megan Bobonick.

Post: #14

Alright, I've got an offer for this "dominatrix".

Let's have a one-on-one, no-holds-barred, can't-call-the-cops test of dominance and see who can actually "force" anybody to do anything.

I guarantee you, one of us is getting fucked up the ass with their head in the toilet, and it's not me.

Post: #15

The only thing she could forcefully do to me is force me to lose my lunch by having to look at her fat face.

Post: #16

(12-02-2018 10:51 AM)Jetset Wrote:  Alright, I've got an offer for this "dominatrix".

Let's have a one-on-one, no-holds-barred, can't-call-the-cops test of dominance and see who can actually "force" anybody to do anything.

I guarantee you, one of us is getting fucked up the ass with their head in the toilet, and it's not me.

Be careful, she might try and marry you after that.