Post: #76

(12-03-2018 03:16 PM)Jetset Wrote:  

(12-03-2018 02:59 PM)TIOT12 Wrote:  Yeah, he does seem socially awkward but I feel we are missing some details that Neil can't say without making himself look worse. For example, did he get some previous IOIs that the girl is now denying? There is some reason why Neil thought he had a chance here and wonder if this is a case of the assistant simply getting cold feet as Neil's social awkwardness became apparent?

One obvious explanation for him not noticing her reply story about sexual harassment would be if he actually had blue-pilled nice guy chump intentions and thought she was the awkward one for bringing it up.

It's entirely possible that he was trying to treat her as a professional equal and a guest in his home, and that he made some remark about stress and hobbies which she blew out of proportion, because in her mind, it's impossible that a man was not trying to bang her.

I've said shit before that was interpreted by PC types as being about race, gender, disability, etc., when I had absolutely no intentions of the kind. I can see him dumbly thinking he's made a special connection as a mentor and being pleased with himself while she's neurotically convincing herself she's about to get raped.

I'll second this. I follow a strict "Don't shit where you eat" policy, and I can appreciate a woman's friendship, even if she's attractive.

Unlike Tyson (I hope) I make sure to screen for latent feminism/snowflakeism; and I hope that I have enough Game to recognize when a woman's working on a sexual level - when they're leveraging their sexuality to either collect some Beta Orbiters, and/or manipulate the Alpha Boss into giving them a promotion. Failing to play into their dynamic (as either Chad or Beta Bux) outrages them as much as a stripper whom you're ignoring in lieu of your delicious steak sandwich (you really think I came here for the tits, honey? Thousands of tits are just a click away on my phone, it's finding a good steak sandwich that peaks my interest). They feel slighted, or something, that you're neither worshipping at their feet nor gaming them into multiple orgasms. The audacity of treating them like a human being sends them into a tizzy.

So I'm friendly with women in the workplace, I even become outside friends with some of them, but I make sure to avoid the drama queens. I get the sense that Tyson tried to friend up a drama queen, and now he's reaping the whirlwind for his charity.

Post: #77

In a weird turn, Tyson's accuser from the 1980s apparently crashed a NOVA event in 2010 to publicly accuse Tyson during a Q&A session.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/nei...916faed7f8

Quote:“I’m here in honor of all the people that you raped, assaulted, harassed, violated, denied,” she said, “and for the lives that you affected and for the lives of their parents and their friends and everyone that was involved when you were a TA in grad school at UT Austin in 1984 ― including myself.”

This incident is confirmed, and she claims she told UT professors about her allegations in 2007 while seeking reference letters to re-enter graduate school.

It's also revealed that BuzzFeed picked up the story first but broke it off after she couldn't produce those emails.

Meanwhile, another excerpt from her blog:

http://newday.tchiya.com/bluelotusspeaks

Quote:In summary, I was molested in my KemeTones© Cosmic Sound Healing Booth. Copper Pyramid and all.

Needless to say, this interrupted my flow, and over the course of the next 3 months, more weird assaults, threats, and/or violations took place on one level or another. I managed to get on with my life, until…..

This March, when I was sexualized by an Elder whom I trusted, in my own home. Yes, I was violated in my own home. Again. This event took me only one week to recover enough to speak up and take action. I got over my fear of “ruining” another man’s life by standing up for my own. I got over my fear of making someone angry by standing in my truth. Powerful lessons, nevertheless, took me out of the scene for a moment. This has been followed recently by very strange chain of events that has left me completely baffled by the male species.

It seems that June 7th is "Tchiya Amet Day", by "official proclamation of the mayor of Austin".

Post: #78

^^^I can't even read that flyer, it's written by a retard.

Post: #79

https://tchiya.wordpress.com/2014/08/08/...ns-update/

Quote:Less than 2 months after Tchiya Amet Day, End the Silence, End the Violence, (June 7 2014), 2 days before my 53rd birthday, 2 days before the end of my Chiron Return, (August 5, 2014), at around 4pm pst, I was sexually molested/assaulted in broad daylight, in front of my boyfriend, in our booth at Reggae on the River 2014. Fortunatly, it only took me 3 days to file a police report as opposed to 30 years....When he returned a few hours later, he walked right past my boyfriend who was seated in front of merchandise , right behind me, and proceeded to place one hand on my left breast while other hand headed into my vagina. I raised my hands up, said WHOA and stepped back. I froze for what seemed an eternity. Hands still raised, mouth dropped wide open, eyes bulging. heart pounding. When I was about to tell him to leave, still seated, my boyfriend calmly began to speak with him. This shocked me even more, and traumatized, turned to go work on next client. Kept silent, not wanting to make waves or embarrass boyfriend.

Next day, a friend told me that I need to speak with the boyfriend about what happened. We did, and this led to us breaking up.

I think I know why he dumped her.

Post: #80

I said it before and it bears repeating: That bitch is certified nuts and completely unreliable as an accuser. It is only a matter of time before she accuses one of her magic crystals of sexual assault.

Post: #81

(12-05-2018 02:40 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  I said it before and it bears repeating: That bitch is certified nuts and completely unreliable as an accuser.

What is it about her that tipped you off?

Post: #82

Well, what a fucking surprise. The bullshit clickbait leftist media has posted an article claiming there is a fourth accuser.

To deprive these cocksucking clickbait rags which are tearing our civilization apart of any revenue, here is a link to the archive.is version of this Buzzfeed article: http://archive.is/EudU8

To save you a click, I will quote the hightlights:

Quote:Nobody Believed Neil deGrasse Tyson's First Accuser. Now There Are Three More.

Flag for bad logic!
   

A rape and a dinner with a co-worker with possible sexual innuendo are two very different things. Unless, of course, you are an ugly bitter feminist (the kinds of bitches who read articles like this one).

Quote:Now a fourth woman has told BuzzFeed News her experience of sexual harassment from Tyson. In January 2010, she recalled, she joined her then-boyfriend at a holiday party for employees of the American Museum of Natural History. Tyson, its most famous employee, drunkenly approached her, she said, making sexual jokes and propositioning her to join him alone in his office. In a 2014 email shared with BuzzFeed News, she described the incident to her own employer in order to shoot down a proposed collaboration with Tyson.

A proposition for sex, even if done (and I don't believe this fourth anonymous woman), is not the same as rape.

Quote:For years, Amet [the nutcase claiming to have been raped by Tyson] had been trying to make the world listen to her account of a powerful man who had once assaulted her and derailed her life. Mainstream publications, including BuzzFeed News, were unable to adequately corroborate the events from so long ago, and did not publish her allegations.

The reason why you can not corroborate the accusations is because they are bullshit.

(I skimmed the next part, quite frankly, I don't give a shit about this lying bitch's life.)

Quote:Amet, meanwhile, denies that she ever slept with him outside of the time of the alleged rape. “I do not remember any time being intimate,” she said. “That is simply not true.”

Of course this slut is going to pretend she never had even consensual sex with Tyson. She will not be the first slut who denies the sex one it becomes public knowledge, and she will not be the last one either.

Quote:She was upset about how the allegations against Tyson — including a rape claim — were being written off by many as an example of the #MeToo movement going too far.

Well, touch shit. Reasonable people -- read, not ugly bitter harpies who read crap like Jezebel and Buzzfeed -- think conflating a false rape accusation from a mentally unstable women with possible innuendo (which, since she was probably drunk, is remembered poorly) is character assassination.

The article then includes the photo of Tyson looking for a Pluto tattoo on that ugly hag's arm. Here's a clue, lady: You're an ugly hag. Tyson had no sexual interest in you whatsoever, and you're just wishing he did.

The Ashley Watson stuff has already been discussed in this thread; I don't think Tyson was making a genuine pass at her and I think she is making up in her mind something that just wasn't there. All I will say about Watson is that, if she weren't so crazy (making a false accusation is a sign of mental and emotional instability), I would bang her.

Post: #83

So uh, dude gets drunk and tries to bang women. I'm not seeing any abuse of power or forced penetration here. If I ever hold a public position I am fucked. I get drunk and try/do bang girls like 50% of my life.

Is using your celebrity to bang girls bad now?

@jetsets article

"Standing in my truth", literally everything she says she be immediately discarded if someone can't get it together long enough to even just pretend like they know that truth is singular and self evident, not one person possesses it nor can influence it. When someone says "my truth" they are so arrogant they think they can bend an objective fact around their will by simply speaking it into existence.

Post: #84

Citing "anonymous sources" should be fucking banned in journalism, period.

(12-05-2018 01:47 PM)kaotic Wrote:  ^^^I can't even read that flyer, it's written by a retard.

not just written by a retard, but designed by a literally retarded person passing themselves off as a "graphic designer". It's fucking VISUALLY offensive.
–USING SEMI-SCRIPT ALL CAPS FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN A MAXIMUM OF THREE INITIALS
–unneeded shit crammed in between the "relevant" stuff with smaller typesize
–that "book" font with the weirdly-shaped old-style numbers
I am not a graphic designer by any means either, but that thing is a fucking scalding mess.

Post: #85

Don't forget it's it's using (5?) fonts? What the fuck? I've seen better shit done by 3rd graders in Microsoft Word 2003.

Also "womb clearings" haha what? Birth? Douching? Neck yaself

Post: #86

(12-06-2018 03:02 PM)Eugenics Wrote:  So uh, dude gets drunk and tries to bang women. I'm not seeing any abuse of power or forced penetration here. If I ever hold a public position I am fucked. I get drunk and try/do bang girls like 50% of my life.

Is using your celebrity to bang girls bad now?

@jetsets article

"Standing in my truth", literally everything she says she be immediately discarded if someone can't get it together long enough to even just pretend like they know that truth is singular and self evident, not one person possesses it nor can influence it. When someone says "my truth" they are so arrogant they think they can bend an objective fact around their will by simply speaking it into existence.

Taking this a step farther, how many married couples met in a bar when a guy was half-drunk and flirting? How many met at frat parties that way? Or even high school parties?

#metoo has now come to encompass anything a woman doesn't like. People aren't going to take this seriously anymore.

Post: #87

The Brad Pitts and DiCaprios of the world never get metooed. Just the Weinstein and Bill Cosbys.

Post: #88

(12-06-2018 03:09 PM)Eugenics Wrote:  Don't forget it's it's using (5?) fonts? What the fuck? I've seen better shit done by 3rd graders in Microsoft Word 2003.

Also "womb clearings" haha what? Birth? Douching? Neck yaself

New PC word for abortion?

Post: #89

Of course there will be holes in his story

I can’t remember detail for detail of what exactly happened when I banged a girl this last November let alone back when I was in college

Post: #90

(12-06-2018 04:30 PM)Pride male Wrote:  The Brad Pitts and DiCaprios of the world never get metooed. Just the Weinstein and Bill Cosbys.

Leo is in another relationship with a smoking-hot young model. It's unlikely, but I wouldn't be surprised if some spurned lover from his past #LookAtMeToo'd him. No man is immune.

Post: #91

Given his political views, I bet Neil supported the whole metoo movement when it started. If I'm correct, then no sympathy given. I'm not going to side with either of the women either, but in no way would I side with Tyson if he was supporting this ruckus all along.

Post: #92

(12-06-2018 03:02 PM)Eugenics Wrote:  So uh, dude gets drunk and tries to bang women. I'm not seeing any abuse of power or forced penetration here. If I ever hold a public position I am fucked. I get drunk and try/do bang girls like 50% of my life.

Is using your celebrity to bang girls bad now?

100% agreed.

People need to quit with the "position of power" bullshit.

Abusing a position of power would be something like using force or blackmail, where physical, financial or psychological leverage is used to fuck someone over, in a negative way.

Post: #93

(12-07-2018 08:45 PM)JackinMelbourne Wrote:  

(12-06-2018 03:02 PM)Eugenics Wrote:  So uh, dude gets drunk and tries to bang women. I'm not seeing any abuse of power or forced penetration here. If I ever hold a public position I am fucked. I get drunk and try/do bang girls like 50% of my life.

Is using your celebrity to bang girls bad now?

100% agreed.

People need to quit with the "position of power" bullshit.

Abusing a position of power would be something like using force or blackmail, where physical, financial or psychological leverage is used to fuck someone over, in a negative way.

The "position of power" idea -- which originated in the 1980s -- is also bullshit because those positions are temporary.

If feminists really wanted to ban "power imbalances," they would ban permanent things that connote imbalances of power. These would include things like white men dating black women or men who are very large dating tiny women.

I mean this seriously. Physical power is way more intimidating than a mere job. You can get fired from the job the next day, but if you're 6'5" you can't wake up 5'2" the next day.

And as for race, perhaps we should seriously look into why all inter-racial dating isn't banned, because no matter what the mix, there's sure to be an imbalance of power (be it physical, financial or intellectual). If we can get feminists to ban this, we'll come full circle!

Post: #94

(12-07-2018 09:13 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(12-07-2018 08:45 PM)JackinMelbourne Wrote:  

(12-06-2018 03:02 PM)Eugenics Wrote:  So uh, dude gets drunk and tries to bang women. I'm not seeing any abuse of power or forced penetration here. If I ever hold a public position I am fucked. I get drunk and try/do bang girls like 50% of my life.

Is using your celebrity to bang girls bad now?

100% agreed.

People need to quit with the "position of power" bullshit.

Abusing a position of power would be something like using force or blackmail, where physical, financial or psychological leverage is used to fuck someone over, in a negative way.

The "position of power" idea -- which originated in the 1980s -- is also bullshit because those positions are temporary.

If feminists really wanted to ban "power imbalances," they would ban permanent things that connote imbalances of power. These would include things like white men dating black women or men who are very large dating tiny women.

I mean this seriously. Physical power is way more intimidating than a mere job. You can get fired from the job the next day, but if you're 6'5" you can't wake up 5'2" the next day.

And as for race, perhaps we should seriously look into why all inter-racial dating isn't banned, because no matter what the mix, there's sure to be an imbalance of power (be it physical, financial or intellectual). If we can get feminists to ban this, we'll come full circle!

I don't agree with you on this. Power differences are all down to the individuals involved, and not to broad categories.

I have known 16 year olds working in ice cream shops who flat out dominated their bosses with their moods and expectations.

I have known 7 footers who wouldn't hurt a fly, and middle schoolers who would push you in front of a train just to see what happens.

That's where feminists are wrong: Their broad, sweeping, mostly disingenuous generalizations are a crock of shit.

They are just playing dumb, and pretending that people are about as complex as a box of rocks.

Women have tons of power, and they always have, because they will do what it takes to get what they want, whereas men have moral standards and will stop short of their goals if it conflicts with their values.

So much of social power comes from manipulating other people, their emotions, their fears, their guilt, their shame, and women are the experts at this, at figuring out what buttons to push and then pushing them until they get what they want, and then the pain stops, for now.

Why the hell else do the passive aggressives, the narcissists, the borderlines, and the sociopaths always seem to win?

It is so funny how feminism started out by saying men should be more sensitive to emotions and social realities, just like women are, and now women pretend they have no idea that, for example, women can lie, women can use guilt trips and shame, and a strong willed woman can walk all over a kind, decent, and introspective man.

Jesus Christ. How many time have I seen some woman dominate a situation and then play the scared little girl immediately after, and everyone falls for it.

It has nothing to do with color, or size, or sex, or job title. It is only about who actually has the power in that time and at that place.

The rest is self serving bullshit.

Post: #95

(12-06-2018 04:30 PM)Pride male Wrote:  The Brad Pitts and DiCaprios of the world never get metooed. Just the Weinstein and Bill Cosbys.

I beg to differ, as Donald Trump was falsely accused, also:
/thread-70784.html - Cristiano Ronaldo accused by Vegas thot
/thread-43606.html - Johnny Depp viciously betrayed by Hollywood wifey
/thread-70670.html - 13 year old kid falsely accused because girls thought he was "racist"

You don't have to be famous, rich or powerful(or even adult apparently) to be metooed.

Any evil bitch that wants to fuck you up can easily cheat the judicial system and/or the media to get you fucked up with no repercussions
In a sane society anyone you got beef with would have to pay thugs to kill you, or at least make up an elaborated story to set you up, but it would require much more work and imply a serious risk. If the police found holes in the story or traced back the hitmen the person could spend decades to life in jail

These metoo# thots?
Just make any shit up and grab popcorn
Tell me when one of them has suffered anything more than being laughed at on the internet. Seriously, there must be like two or three of them?

Fucking ridiculous

Post: #96

(12-06-2018 10:37 PM)Uprising Wrote:  Given his political views, I bet Neil supported the whole metoo movement when it started. If I'm correct, then no sympathy given. I'm not going to side with either of the women either, but in no way would I side with Tyson if he was supporting this ruckus all along.

My point precisely. If you don't have enough wisdom (something majorly lacking among modern people) that all of the progressive madness is connected to this, and by promoting it, you were all along setting yourself up, you are hopeless.

Like with Cosby, it's all bullshit, but they had their reward, and now the Devil wants his due.

Post: #97

(12-06-2018 03:05 PM)moneyshot Wrote:  Citing "anonymous sources" should be fucking banned in journalism, period.

(12-05-2018 01:47 PM)kaotic Wrote:  ^^^I can't even read that flyer, it's written by a retard.

not just written by a retard, but designed by a literally retarded person passing themselves off as a "graphic designer". It's fucking VISUALLY offensive.
–USING SEMI-SCRIPT ALL CAPS FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN A MAXIMUM OF THREE INITIALS
–unneeded shit crammed in between the "relevant" stuff with smaller typesize
–that "book" font with the weirdly-shaped old-style numbers
I am not a graphic designer by any means either, but that thing is a fucking scalding mess.

She could have paid me to get something ten times better and I'm barely an amateur.
Of course, I'd only communicate with her through secure anonymous channels and probably set up a burner bank account