Post: #26

First they read comics, next they are reading the Torah! Oy vey!

Not a great way to end a hard day. I loved Marvel growing up. I saw him in person at a comicon but didn't want to wait forever to get an autograph. He and Lou Farrignou went out to sign a wheelchair bound boy photo or memorabilia, which I thought was a nice gesture.

Post: #27

It's amazing to watch.

One dude drops triple parenthesis and everyone else turns it into a Jewthread.

#NotAllJews

I know jack all about Leebs but my Hitler genes are not getting agitated here. Maybe this thread can get bach on trach.

Post: #28

Let's all sing along, guys:

Post: #29

(11-12-2018 07:19 PM)Mr. D Wrote:  And of course...





R.I.P. Stan, at least you won’t have to witness the shitshow.

Spiderman will be a ladyboy next year now that Stan is dead. He was the only reason why Disney had to scrap that idea.

Post: #30

RIP Stan Lee. You'll be missed.

Post: #31

RIP Stan! Thank you for the stories!

95, a nice age! And seeing a lot of your creations coming to the silver screen must've been a nice experience.

Post: #32

He had a great life, made a big contribution and seemed like a fun guy. RIP.

Post: #33

RIP Stan The Man. It was a blessing that he lived long enough to see his creations become huge silver screen successes.

Post: #34

On a different note.
Not a bad time for Stan Lee to go out.
The comics have already lost the plot with political correctness, but the films have just about held on without going overboard.

Aside from "Infinity War 2", with the next film being Captain Marvel, I suspect it will go down hill for the MCU with PC nonsense from there on.

As I say. Not a bad time to go out.

Post: #35

Also; the obligatory meme :

Post: #36

From the age of 7 I'd buy a Spider-Man comic at the newsagents each week then cross the road and wait for the bus to take me to school. I'd sit and absorb every word and picture on the way (often missing my stop). Then once I'd read it cover to cover, I'd spend a week trying to copy all the artwork until the next issue came out.

That exquisite thrill of seeing a new Spider-Man front cover each week just waiting on the news-stand all pristine and shiny, ready for me to buy is a feeling I can still recall now, nearly 40 years later.

Reading these comics was such a great escape for me and I'm indebted for all the joy and education they gave me. Comics are a great educational tool for young boys; my vocabulary and understanding of science came on leaps and bounds due to Stan Lee and his artists.

Anyone who's read my repeated attacks on the way the Marvel movies and comics are going, may be surprised, but I'll always be grateful for what Stan gave me.

Post: #37

(11-12-2018 10:14 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  It's amazing to watch.

One dude drops triple parenthesis and everyone else turns it into a Jewthread.

#NotAllJews

I know jack all about Leebs but my Hitler genes are not getting agitated here. Maybe this thread can get bach on trach.

Now why would you go ahead and say something like that?

Perhaps because of (((Leonard D Neubache)))?

Hmmmm?

Post: #38

(11-12-2018 06:48 PM)Dirtyblueshirt Wrote:  Iron Man had a serious struggle with alcoholism in the comics. He definitely had some low points, even losing his company once due to his drinking. That was his flaw, although it was not really used in the Marvel movies. Obviously the studio avoided this aspect so they could still market the character to children, keeping him more funny and less dark.

Tony Stark's alcoholism didn't come until the mid to late 70s, many years after the Stan Lee origin, I think it was David Michelinie that introduced the "Demon In a Bottle" storyline. The Heart problem was his original "flaw" Stan gave him, then alcoholism was added a decade or more after.

"A wealthy American business magnate, playboy, and ingenious scientist, Anthony Edward "Tony" Stark suffers a severe chest injury during a kidnapping. When his captors attempt to force him to build a weapon of mass destruction, he instead creates a powered suit of armor to save his life and escape captivity. Later, Stark develops his suit, adding weapons and other technological devices he designed through his company, Stark Industries. He uses the suit and successive versions to protect the world as Iron Man. Although at first concealing his true identity, Stark eventually declared that he was, in fact, Iron Man in a public announcement.

Initially, Iron Man was a vehicle for Stan Lee to explore Cold War themes, particularly the role of American technology and industry in the fight against communism.[1] Subsequent re-imaginings of Iron Man have transitioned from Cold War motifs to contemporary matters of the time"


Tales Of Suspense #39
"Cover pencils by Jack Kirby, inks by Don Heck. First appearance of Iron Man in "Iron Man Is Born!", script by Stan Lee (plot) and Larry Lieber (script), art by Don Heck; Playboy industrialist and weapons designer Tony Stark is injured in Vietnam and captured by communists; While pretending to build a weapon for his captors he builds a suit of battle armor to keep his injured heart beating and uses it to escape and beat the communist commander."

" I think I gave myself a dare. It was the height of the Cold War. The readers, the young readers, if there was one thing they hated, it was war, it was the military....So I got a hero who represented that to the hundredth degree. He was a weapons manufacturer, he was providing weapons for the Army, he was rich, he was an industrialist....I thought it would be fun to take the kind of character that nobody would like, none of our readers would like, and shove him down their throats and make them like him....And he became very popular." - Stan Lee

He set out to make the new character a wealthy, glamorous ladies' man, but one with a secret that would plague and torment him as well.[8] Writer Gerry Conway said, "Here you have this character, who on the outside is invulnerable, I mean, just can't be touched, but inside is a wounded figure. Stan made it very much an in-your-face wound, you know, his heart was broken, you know, literally broken. But there's a metaphor going on there. And that's, I think, what made that character interesting." Lee based this playboy's looks and personality on Howard Hughes,[9] explaining, "Howard Hughes was one of the most colorful men of our time. He was an inventor, an adventurer, a multi-billionaire, a ladies' man and finally a nutcase."[10] "Without being crazy, he was Howard Hughes," Lee said.[7] "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Man

EXCELSIOR!

Post: #39

Post: #40

The man was a legend in his own right. RIP Stan the man.

Post: #41

He died on the same day as my cat. :/

Post: #42

Post: #43

Meh. Can they stop making these shit liberal comic book movies now.

As for ((())) there are certain people that will play all sorts of games attempting to ridicule and baffoon the use of ((())) because it has been so exposing and damaging.

Post: #44

Why do jews even bother giving their kids last names, they always change them?

Post: #45

(11-13-2018 07:14 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Why do jews even bother giving their kids last names, they always change them?

They change their (((names))) to hide their real origins, and true numbers among the population...but their real identity creeps out anyway in their behaviours, the type of jobs they take, and the kind of things they produce.


See here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto-Judaism

Post: #46

God not everybody is about DA JOOOOOS.......









































But its mainly the DA JOOOS.

Jesus god bless these openings from the 90's, the guitar and the riffing in this Spiderman theme, so full of winning. Aside from Spiderman I've never liked the Marvel live action films, but the cartoons were incredible from this era, peerless in fact. They weren't comedies. X-Men live action was never done right aside from First Class. Rogue completely lost her long locks and feminity. They look like kids.









This one is haunting to this day:





Jesus, this one:

Post: #47

(11-13-2018 10:44 AM)JakeDormer Wrote:  The man was a legend in his own right. RIP Stan the man.

There was a great TV show by director Jon Favreau called "Party of 5". It was basically about all the super cool dinners and lunches you have the genuinely brilliant and creative superstars in Hollywood. He said "If only I could film this stuff, it would be the best thing ever". My favorite one was Stan Lee, Rob Zombie, and a bunch of other famous people just shooting the shit, and the vast respect everyone from every field gave Stan Lee. This was from guys you would be surprised even knew his name, and they were all deeply interested in his ideas and outlook.

Post: #48

(11-13-2018 08:52 PM)DarkTriad Wrote:  

(11-13-2018 10:44 AM)JakeDormer Wrote:  The man was a legend in his own right. RIP Stan the man.

There was a great TV show by director Jon Favreau called "Party of 5". It was basically about all the super cool dinners and lunches you have the genuinely brilliant and creative superstars in Hollywood. He said "If only I could film this stuff, it would be the best thing ever". My favorite one was Stan Lee, Rob Zombie, and a bunch of other famous people just shooting the shit, and the vast respect everyone from every field gave Stan Lee. This was from guys you would be surprised even knew his name, and they were all deeply interested in his ideas and outlook.

Is this the one? It has Mark Hamill and JJ Abrams talking about Star Wars (which is funny in retrospect in that they will be working in the future together ), Stan Lee at the same table in the mid 00s. I give Abrams abuse in the Star Wars thread, but he seems a decent enough man to talk to in person.

Post: #49

Stan Lee was no SJW - from 2015:

Stan Lee: Spider-Man should stay white and straight

Quote:After a new set of leaked Sony emails revealed a restrictive set of rules for Spider-Man’s on-screen persona, the character’s creator, Stan Lee, has spoken out in support of the controversial stipulations.

The rule that says Peter Parker, Spidey’s alter ego, should always be white doesn’t bother Lee, according to an interview he gave to entertainment site Newsarama.

“I wouldn’t mind, if Peter Parker had originally been black, a Latino, an Indian or anything else, that he stay that way,” he said. “But we originally made him white. I don’t see any reason to change that.”

Lee is also in agreement with the requirement that Parker’s sexuality should remain as originally written, but is open to the idea of other homosexual comic book characters.

“I think the world has a place for gay superheroes, certainly,” he said. “But again, I don’t see any reason to change the sexual proclivities of a character once they’ve already been established. I have no problem with creating new, homosexual superheroes.”

Lee was also keen to point out that his remarks had nothing to do with bigotry, but rather with staying true to his work.

“It has nothing to do with being anti-gay, or anti-black, or anti-Latino, or anything like that,” he said. “Latino characters should stay Latino. The Black Panther should certainly not be Swiss. I just see no reason to change that which has already been established when it’s so easy to add new characters. I say create new characters the way you want to. Hell, I’ll do it myself.”

His comments follow news that Miles Morales, a mixed-race iteration of Spider-Man, will be replacing Peter Parker in the comics.

The latest Spider-Man reboot is still in the process of casting its lead, with The Impossible star Tom Holland rumoured to be the frontrunner.

Post: #50

https://www.dailywire.com/news/38311/sjw...ly-zanotti

On cue, SJWs pile on Stan Lee

"all stan lee did was steal ideas from dc to create his own characters. he was racist, sexist, a homophobe and he also assaulted a woman. y’all can be thankful he created your favorite characters but stop acting as if he was an incredible person who did something extraordinary

— alicia is a whole new level of fake woke (@valkyriescarol) November 12, 2018"