Post: #1

From Dailymail (UK). Name: Karina Irby. (29 years old). From 54 kg to 64 kg.

Article








'Trolls will comment that I'm now "fat" BUT in reality I'm a happy, healthy lady,' she continued.

'I was pretty unhealthy in my first photo. Not eating right and not taking care of my body.

'Yes I've gained weight, both fat and muscle but I'm now training four times a week and eating for my body. It’s crazy what eating and weights can do.'

In June last year the designer posted a three-way photo that further illustrates her transformation, showing how her body has significantly changed in five years.







So you are telling me that by becoming fatter, a woman can actually gain MORE followers and thirsty admirers?



Which one do you prefer? 54 kg or 64 kg?

Post: #2

I like big butts and I cannot lie

A girl who has wide hips with the waist slimmer then the hips and still has a flat stomach is damn near always a WB from me dog.

Post: #3

I don't know how to explain this other than men watching too much porn and turning into gluttons for punishment.

Post: #4

She put the weight in the right places. I'm going with 64 kg.

Post: #5

On paper I like the slimmer girl, but really I like the 64 kg version of her better.

As R Kelly said:

My minds telling me noooo...but my body... my bodyyyyyss telling me yessss

Post: #6

She adapted to the times. I WB both.

Thick girls are in and with the very blurry line between fat and thick, all girls have a chance to be considered “beautiful”. That’s why these women are so insecure nowadays!

Post: #7

Yeah, no.

I would destroy this girl the way she is now.

I've always liked big asses. And a big ass isn't possible if all a girl has are stick thin legs.

She absolutely should not add any more weight, but she's in that sweet spot for me now. Reminds me of Demi Rose



That pic of her in the gym with her stomach and arms speaks volumes for me.

Post: #8

Something seems off. I have never seen a girl gain weight like that.

Her face, boobs and waist have remained the same and all the weight gained has gone to her ass?? She is the one who's trolling. I think she used fat injections.

Also, that's too fat of an ass. Its a novelty to fuck these kind of butts sometimes but after the first few times, they start looking ugly when you are doing them doggy. And if its a fake ass then it feels and looks even more ugly.

Post: #9

She put on 10 kg in all the right places while still maintaining a flat stomach. And she lifts.

Post: #10

(11-06-2018 09:09 AM)bk19xsa Wrote:  Something seems off. I have never seen a girl gain weight like that.

Her face, boobs and waist have remained the same and all the weight gained has gone to her ass?? She is the one who's trolling. I think she used fat injections.

Also, that's too fat of an ass. Its a novelty to fuck these kind of butts sometimes but after the first few times, they start looking ugly when you are doing them doggy. And if its a fake ass then it feels and looks even more ugly.

That's what I was thinking. Looks fake like Kim Kardashian or that other pop star bitch (Nicki Minaj?). For my tastes I'd like a happy medium between the two versions.

Post: #11

I would have sex with every version of this girl.

Post: #12

if those photos aren't doctored she has godly hip and ass genetics. I do not blame her for gaining the weight to accentuate them--even if she went over board. dudes love huge asses and dudes are thirsty.

Post: #13

White women are conforming to black tastes in general.

Post: #14

How about 5 kilos and call it a day?

Women being stick thin is legitimately a health problem, but that ass is in the fast-lane to Disasterville.

Post: #15

Prefer 54kg to my taste. Bizarre though, it looks like 9 out of 10kg went straight to her arse

Most attractive waist to hip ratio is reputedly 0.7. In her 'fatter' pic the ratio is probably much lower and seems out of proportion. I never got the big booty thing, I don't wanna fuck a cartoon.

Post: #16

Early version for me but she's on a path to fatsville anyway.

The pic in the middle of the 3 shot collage is her best point, for mine.

Post: #17

Im really surprised at the love the "after" version is getting in this thread. I think she's disgusting now

The fat acceptance movement over the last thirty years has obviously worked.

I weep for the future of non fattie girls everywhere

Post: #18

Call me old fashioned but I'm talking the 54kg version. Having those skinny legs wrapped around my neck? Uhh yes, please.

The 64 kg version is just a transitional stage. She's about 3 Big Mac's away from falling down that Ham Planet hole. And all the validation she's getting from her IG with her new look will make her descent even faster.

Once they go down that hole, well, we all know they rarely get out.

Post: #19

Her ass got a little too big, notice the beginnings of cellulite setting in. Would like to see her pics at 59kg (the center one in the gold thong looks about right).

Anyway it doesn't matter - even at 54kg she had thick, rather than bony, ankles. This is a key indicator of her genetics being predisposed for dramatic weight gain later in life (usually triggered by pregnancy/child birth).

Would Bang but Would Not stick around

Post: #20

54kg

Post: #21

Her ass is fake in my opinion,but I would still have sex with her-it would take 3 months for me to get tired of her and her shit if those photos are accurate.

EDIT: After reading the article she is 18 in her skinniest photo and 28 in the thicker photos. I want the 18 year old skinny white woman not the 28 year old thick girl. I always choose the girl with less miles and 10 years is a lot of miles.

Post: #22

I'm not sold that her ass isnt fake. I spend alot of time in gyms with white women who do heavy leg days, and their asses have better shapes than that.

**Atlanta Man beat me to it, he knows his white women . **

Post: #23

As long has she has no health problems, she can keep her ass. By the looks of her thighs, she does lift, so there a good amount of muscle on on those legs. Which is good thing for her long term as she learned how to keep herself in good health.

Post: #24

Its a taste thing gents.

There is a similar divide in the ass lounge thread between those who like 'Thick girls' and those who like svelte girls.

Thank god for all the men on here who like the 64kg version. We compete for totally different shapes of women.

To me the 54kg version doesn't take good care of herself (I like a ballet dancer's ass or Ariana Grande's general tone and ass) -she just looks skinny and lazy, the 64 kg version looks absolutely disgusting to me and I couldn't fuck that on a my worst possible coke, booze, codeine, PCP, viagra, ketamine fuelled bender.

I would rather fuck a potato multiple times before I fucked her 64kg Ham Beast version.

But that's just me.

Even if we accept and celebrate a difference in taste.. In 2003 a survey of British girls said that they all aspired to J Lo's ass above all.

Problem for me at the time was that not a single teen or early 20's girl I knew back then did any real exercise that affected let alone changed their body shape or were even really that healthy.

They were just fat bitches or skinny, flat assed bitches that worked in shit retail jobs at the weekend.

'Course they loved J-Lo .. what better future than sitting around on their phones stuffing their oversized guts whilst men worshipped their blubbery thighs.

Good luck to the 64 kg fans but I'm not sure that this increasingly popular body look is a healthy sign for the West (or for the rest who will inevitably follow the West in the future..)

Post: #25

Well I suppose if I had to choose between an equally pretty fatter girl or a skinny girl, it would then come down to her personality.



Hahahaha, kidding, I'd go with the skinny girl every time.