Post: #1076

This is not to say I don't like you or that I have any major beef with you, but I gotta point this out:

(03-06-2019 06:02 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  Erm... Aneroid buddy, I was being sarcastic.

I included you because with all your intelligence you were falling into the bickering and nonsense instead of just finding the video and improving the discourse.

Generally you're a far more insightful poster on other topics, the other guys I included not as much.

(03-06-2019 08:51 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  I've already improved the quality of the thread!
We've moved from posting bargain basement memes (Go back a few pages to see that cringeworthy Ben Garrison comic) and "haha look at the dumb socialist woman, women and socialists are so dumb" to a general recognition that;
1.) AOC is supremely good at her job.
2.) AOC and her backers are deliberately aping Trump's tactics from the 2016 election to great effect.
3.) Posting dumb memes and "dunking" on her only furthers her cause.

I'd say I've done more to improve the quality of this thread than any thread I've participated in since I first opened my account. It honestly feels like I've really made a difference.

No, you haven't. If anything, you've contributed to the detriment of the thread more than bringing the quality of posting up.

Your contributions in the past to the Trump thread have been far better than to this one. Irony indeed.

Post: #1077

Meh, it's a forum thread, not a term paper. There are limits to the amount of research I'm willing to go do.

But you're a good guy, so I'll take that under advisement.

Post: #1078

Quote:McCarthy was a great patriot and a solid conservative, don't rely on the trotskyite narrative that we've been stuck with like that book you've read about him.

McCarthy was a piece of shit. Mccarthy calling someone a communist in the 1950s is the equivalent of a SJW calling someone a racist today. It really is that simple

Calling someone a great conservative in the 1950s is the same as calling someone a great social justice warrior today. At some point in the 1960s with the Great society, the Democrats and Republicans essentially switched sides and agendas.

Post: #1079

Interesting video.

Pretty much what most of us were thinking - but it unravels it with more names and organizations.

Post: #1080

Its the Justice Democrats behind her, right? There will be more to come.

Post: #1081

Still waiting on those bazongas.

Post: #1082

This thread could stand to gain from more analysis about the forces that help enable an AOC. A number of posters have already done this so far.

This week: AOC’s mother is not a fan of the massive taxes her daughter wants to bring in (above and beyond Andrew Cuomo’s current efforts in NY): https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/4334...ocs-mother

If Ted Cruz’s dad came out against the border wall, any typist with a keyboard would have been writing articles juxtaposing the “compassionate”, “rational” older Cruz with his “heartless”, “silly” son.

The muted/non-manipulated/close to non-existent coverage of AOC’s mother reminds me of the father of Kamala Harris recently being livid at her portrayal of Jamaicans as weed-smoking sit-abouts. Had this been a Republican talking about another race, particularly a minority, all hell would have broken loose amongst the newspapers, non-cable news shows, and any non-Fox news network.

In fact, calling to attention AOC’s mother’s opposition to these kinds of taxes would have further emphasized how her daughter is talking out of her arse and owes her logic-less policies to a life lived without struggle or a proper dose of reality. So, a woman who actually lived in the sort of society AOC wants to create versus her own progeny, whose allure to her supporters is making videos inspired by cultural Marxist professors from her kitchen, frequently when wearing her pyjamas. Go figure.

The media is devoted to minimizing or plain ignoring the private family/personal disputes/differences of Leftists, whilst accentuating anything said/purported to be about candidates right of center.

Post: #1083

Interdasting.
Either he's upset someone else is getting all the attention. Or perhaps its indicative of a distinct divide in the DNC behind the scenes? :

Scarborough Calls on Media to Pump the Brakes on AOC Coverage — ‘Keep Everything in Perspective’

Monday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” host Joe Scarborough called for members of the media to back off of obsessing over freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who he said is the media’s “latest fad.”
Scarborough, a former Republican congressman, recalled his time as a congressman, saying the press would “seize” on whatever “stupid” thing the freshmen would say, which he advised is now going on with Ocasio-Cortez, who he noted only got 15,000 votes to get elected.
“AOC, I think she won her primary, which was basically her election,” said Scarborough. “She got 15,000 votes. She won by 3,500 votes. She got 15,000 votes. Hillary Clinton got what, 63, 64, 65 million votes? I think the press needs to keep everything in perspective.”
He continued, “I know they like to chase the latest fad, but they’ve done it with the Republicans for years, focusing on stupid comments by backbenchers. I think they probably need to keep this in better perspective.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/03/...rspective/

Post: #1084

Whenever you mention Joe Scarborough, you must always mention Lori Klausutis.

Post: #1085

Got into this thread late so I wanna know, would you bang?

Post: #1086

Has porn made a AOC parody yet. Asking for a friend

Post: #1087

(03-11-2019 11:17 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Interdasting.
Either he's upset someone else is getting all the attention. Or perhaps its indicative of a distinct divide in the DNC behind the scenes? :

Scarborough Calls on Media to Pump the Brakes on AOC Coverage — ‘Keep Everything in Perspective’

Monday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” host Joe Scarborough called for members of the media to back off of obsessing over freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who he said is the media’s “latest fad.”
Scarborough, a former Republican congressman, recalled his time as a congressman, saying the press would “seize” on whatever “stupid” thing the freshmen would say, which he advised is now going on with Ocasio-Cortez, who he noted only got 15,000 votes to get elected.
“AOC, I think she won her primary, which was basically her election,” said Scarborough. “She got 15,000 votes. She won by 3,500 votes. She got 15,000 votes. Hillary Clinton got what, 63, 64, 65 million votes? I think the press needs to keep everything in perspective.”
He continued, “I know they like to chase the latest fad, but they’ve done it with the Republicans for years, focusing on stupid comments by backbenchers. I think they probably need to keep this in better perspective.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/03/...rspective/

He makes a fair point. But it shows how awesome she is.

Post: #1088

(03-12-2019 08:06 AM)Pride male Wrote:  Got into this thread late so I wanna know, would you bang?

This is the politics section not the objectify women section. Get outta here with that sexist bullshit.

Post: #1089

All jokes aside, we all know that's not unrelated.

I'm repeating myself here but not being ugly is a huge distinguishing factor for her and a big part of why the Soy crowd loves her.

Post: #1090

Post: #1091

Still no tit pics?

Post: #1092

(03-13-2019 08:47 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  All jokes aside, we all know that's not unrelated.

I'm repeating myself here but not being ugly is a huge distinguishing factor for her and a big part of why the Soy crowd loves her.

If she was tending bar or dancing at a local club, a college girl or working a normal job, of course you'd bang her.

As a congresswoman, you'd bang her but only if she's properly tied up.

Post: #1093

(03-15-2019 10:06 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  If she was tending bar or dancing at a local club, a college girl or working a normal job, of course you'd bang her.

As a congresswoman, you'd bang her but only if she's properly tied up.

Then again...
Would any of us want George Soros sloppy seconds...?

Post: #1094

Gallup: Ocasio-Cortez Is Losing Favor With America

Democrats may be in love with their fresh-faced democratic socialist from New York, but overall, America is souring over Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez by quite a bit.
According to Gallup, a new survey showed that while more people than ever know who Ocasio-Cortez is, they’re not liking what they discover:

Quote:Two months into her new job on Capitol Hill, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has become a much more recognizable figure to Americans. Half of U.S. adults were unfamiliar with or had no opinion of her in September after her seismic primary win over the summer, but that figure has shrunk to 29% today. But the increased visibility has not improved her overall standing with Americans. Whereas the public had mixed views of Ocasio-Cortez in September, her image now tilts slightly negative, with 31% viewing her favorably and 41% unfavorably.

Gallup reported that since September unfavorable rating has climbed 15 percentage points. Meanwhile here favorability rating has climbed as well, but only by seven points, and namely a result of Democrat approval according to Gallup:

Quote:Despite some increase in her favorable ratings, Ocasio-Cortez’s unfavorable ratings grew at a greater pace since September among most groups. The congresswoman is viewed negatively by most Republicans, of whom 73% have an unfavorable view of her — up from 52% in September. Only 5% of Republicans view Ocasio-Cortez favorably — resulting in a net favorable rating of -68 among this party group. The fact that Republicans are more likely to have an opinion of her than Democrats helps explain her overall net-negative rating.

https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2...r-america/


She may always have favour among the Useful Idiot crowd.
Yet she'll need the support of the more mercurial center if she ever wants a bigger seat at the table.
Or if she wants to move from the kiddies table to the adults table as the case may be.

Post: #1095

Quote:Only 5% of Republicans view Ocasio-Cortez favorably

Translation: 5% of Republicans are taking psychedelic drugs.

Post: #1096

(03-16-2019 05:17 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

Quote:Only 5% of Republicans view Ocasio-Cortez favorably

Translation: 5% of Republicans are taking psychedelic drugs.

Or perhaps a reverse psychology type thing, if they deem her to be more harmful to the DNC than most.

Post: #1097

AOC is just more imperial blowback for the shortsighted and ill-conceived action of annexing Puerto Rico.

Post: #1098

(03-15-2019 09:20 AM)Ski pro Wrote:  Still no tit pics?

This is the only reason I ever pop into this thread. I think though if they were out there they would have spread by now on 4chan and beyond. And now that she's an all important member of congress I doubt she'd risk taking some now.

Here's her at SXSW a couple of weeks ago:

   

Post: #1099

I really wish she'd put a paper bag on her head and stop wearing a bra.

Post: #1100

Hmmm.
That low & no kids...?