Post: #26

WB them all. Just differs on how much alcohol it will take before they look good. Even the Asian 1 looks like a work of art (...Salvador Dali) so I can get the novelty notch/bravery badge.

Post: #27

(06-18-2018 09:33 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  Ratings are such a waste of time: It's either: A.) WB or B.) WNB. The rest is autism and personal taste.

Hmm...so you'd bang the same type of girl on a drunken horny night as the girl you'd marry or have a long term relationship with? At least have four categories:

1. Would never touch
2. Would fuck, if especially horny or with no other options available
3. Would fuck then and again, but would probably not have kids with or post to social media/introduce to your family
4. Would marry/knock up/proudly show off

1 = 1 - 4
2 = 5
3 = 6-7
4 = 8+

This is an example. Obviously everyone has their own taste and decides what a "5" or an "8" is to them.

Post: #28

(06-19-2018 05:18 AM)kinjutsu Wrote:  My Asian 9.999 (Korean) Pleas tell me how Lucy Liu is better than this girl. I'll wait.



I'm not even into Latina's but Isabella Rodrigez is a damn fine solid 9.

That Asian girl to me is a 6 (did you even look at her yellow teeth?) and your latina is a 7. I'm sure they are popular girls in their respective countries on social media (or wherever you found them). Just goes to show that taste in women differs quite a bit and a universal rating scale with individual women representing a specific number on it can never exist. It's like saying a contemporary Italian couch is a "10" and an old baroque style English sofa is a "6". Well, I am sure there are people who prefer the classic style to the modern, and they'd disagree strongly with that rating. Hence, let's stop all this now because your efforts turning this into a science will forever be futile. There are universal beauty standards, sure, but they can never be that specific.

Post: #29

Quote: Obviously everyone has their own taste and decides what a "5" or an "8" is to them.

Well that's just ridiculous. The only reason this is even up for debate is because we judge based on lousy photos on the internet, some of which capture weird moments, poses, or makeup that might obscure the exact hotness of any given girl, and leads to undeserved debate on the subject.

Check out an actual girl in real life as she walks by you, and 99/100 guys will come up with the exact right rating identically.

No man has ever thought a 5 was an 8 or vice versa without being mentally deranged or a god damned liar.

Post: #30

(06-22-2018 04:45 PM)christpuncher Wrote:  Well that's just ridiculous. The only reason this is even up for debate is because we judge based on lousy photos on the internet, some of which capture weird moments, poses, or makeup that might obscure the exact hotness of any given girl, and leads to undeserved debate on the subject.

Check out an actual girl in real life as she walks by you, and 99/100 guys will come up with the exact right rating identically.

No man has ever thought a 5 was an 8 or vice versa without being mentally deranged or a god damned liar.

I don't agree with you at all. I have a good friend of mine and we have completely different tastes in women. He likes tall and dark skinned women while I prefer shorter/medium height and light skinned ones. He also prefer more masculine features (like strong jaw line) while I prefer more feminine features. An "8" to him might not be a "5" to me, but probably closer to a "6".

Post: #31

Having a "type" or taste almost always means:
"The last three 6s that I banged all had *blank* quality, so I guess that's my type now and I can call them 7s or 8s."

Post: #32

(06-22-2018 05:09 PM)christpuncher Wrote:  Having a "type" or taste almost always means:
"The last three 6s that I banged all had *blank* quality, so I guess that's my type now and I can call them 7s or 8s."

If you say so, lol.

Here are two random girls I found that I would rank very highly (maybe 9 or 10s):





Here is Emma Watson who millions of people claim to be a "10":



Do they look the same to you? To me the first two are 9/10s and the third one is a 7. And yes I have seen Emma Watson in films etc, so I know she's not my type.

Post: #33

Apparently this one is also a "10" and is seen as one of the most beautiful women in the world according to various websites:



I don't generally like black women. So how can she ever be a 10 to me?

Post: #34

Quote: An "8" to him might not be a "5" to me, but probably closer to a "6".

Either he's a liar or you're a racist...

Race, height, masculine/feminine face preferences can only count for a 1/2 point difference at the very most. Anything more and there is some social/cultural influence that is making you say things that you know aren't true or has pushed you past a healthy place and into derangement.

Post: #35

^ those seem like fine ratings you've given Jay. I'd say 8.5 (careful on those shoulders though), 8.5, 6.5, 8.

Clearly nobody thinks Emma Watson is a 10 that isn't lying.

So you'd be more satisfied to bang Emma than the black girl, because you generally don't like black girls? I'm guessing not... And like I said there can be slighty different score from racial preferences, but not profound ones.

Post: #36

(06-22-2018 05:26 PM)christpuncher Wrote:  

Quote: An "8" to him might not be a "5" to me, but probably closer to a "6".

Either he's a liar or you're a racist...

Race, height, masculine/feminine face preferences can only count for a 1/2 point difference at the very most. Anything more and there is some social/cultural influence that is making you say things that you know aren't true or has pushed you past a healthy place and into derangement.

Fair enough. Maybe you're right, maybe not. I will have to ponder on this for a while.

What I do know however, is that I've gone out with a friend or two plenty of times and looked on groups of girls. I would ask "which one do you like the most?" and they won't always pick the same one I would've picked. Maybe that just means I (and everybody else) have pre-conceived notions about people you look at. But how could you ever completely remove those from the equation? We are humans and not computers. Don't you think things like hormone levels will affect the types of women you believe are the sexiest?

Post: #37

(06-22-2018 05:34 PM)christpuncher Wrote:  ^ those seem like fine ratings you've given Jay. I'd say 8.5 (careful on those shoulders though), 8.5, 6.5, 8.

Clearly nobody thinks Emma Watson is a 10 that isn't lying.

So you'd be more satisfied to bang Emma than the black girl, because you generally don't like black girls? I'm guessing not... And like I said there can be slighty different score from racial preferences, but not profound ones.

I would bang the black girl before I'd bang Emma Watson. And I agree with your score of 8/10 on her. I'm pretty sure some guy is gonna come on here (sooner or later) and claim Emma Watson to be a 10 though.

Post: #38

Quote:What I do know however, is that I've gone out with a friend or two plenty of times and looked on groups of girls. I would ask "which one do you like the most?" and they won't always pick the same one I would've picked. Maybe that just means I (and everybody else) have pre-conceived notions about people you look at. But how could you ever completely remove those from the equation? We are humans and not computers. Don't you think things like hormone levels will affect the types of women you believe are the sexiest?

That's probably because some of them were overweight, short haired, had big/small tits, wore some unusual fashion... And you've all been either loved or spurned by those certain syle of women in a previous relationship, so you improperly declare a desire or dislike for it now in an attempt to feel better or jocky for social position.

Hey I get it, I've done it I'm sure. Deep down though every man knows a women's hotness is nearly perfectly objective, and your status as a man from whether you can readily lay a 7.5 or only a 6.5 is perfectly clear.

Fatness is a whole other weird issue that fucks with the rating scale immensely, and I'm not sure what to make of it.

Post: #39

(06-22-2018 05:58 PM)christpuncher Wrote:  

Quote:What I do know however, is that I've gone out with a friend or two plenty of times and looked on groups of girls. I would ask "which one do you like the most?" and they won't always pick the same one I would've picked. Maybe that just means I (and everybody else) have pre-conceived notions about people you look at. But how could you ever completely remove those from the equation? We are humans and not computers. Don't you think things like hormone levels will affect the types of women you believe are the sexiest?

That's probably because some of them were overweight, short haired, had big/small tits, wore some unusual fashion... And you've all been either loved or spurned by those certain syle of women in a previous relationship, so you improperly declare a desire or dislike for it now in an attempt to feel better or jocky for social position.

Hey I get it, I've done it I'm sure. Deep down though every man knows a women's hotness is nearly perfectly objective, and your status as a man from whether you can readily lay a 7.5 or only a 6.5 is perfectly clear.

Fatness is a whole other weird issue that fucks with the rating scale immensely, and I'm not sure what to make of it.

You made some good points, and I will change my point of view because of it.

It is entirely correct that there are universal, objective standards. However, I do not know what difference it actually makes in real life. If two girls are objectively 8s but you prefer one over the other for subjective reasons, then you'd still be disappointed if you ended up with your non-favorite of the two. And you can't use this scale to change the way you interact with them either, because that would presuppose that the women saw themselves exactly the same way as they are objectively.

Post: #40

Rating scale isn't objective. Its just as close as we can get as a technology to form theories.

Post: #41

Anyone not agree this is a 10?

Post: #42

What guys don't understand about the rating scale is that it works only in aggregate - 100-1000 men who have some good experience with women (so large portions of men must be excluded because if you are too thirsty, too unattractive, too inexperienced, then your opinion is shit).

And then it works out - a 7 is one that is rated by most as a 7 while some will give her 8,9,10,6 and even 5.





Emma Watson is the cute innocent-looking one who is now into feminism after all that dick-sucking of paper-Alphas. There is something very appealing to ravage a girl that looks as if birds help her dress in the morning.

Post: #43

(06-23-2018 02:34 AM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  



Anyone not agree this is a 10?

I'd rate her an 8, maybe 8.5. Tits too small for ever being a 10 and jawline too strong. Also I don't like her skin that much, looks like one of those where you can see the veins popping everywhere (without Photoshop filters). Her hands are unattractive and vein-y. Her nose is also pointing a bit too much upwards and is slightly too large in general. Eyebrows are also not perfect, they are too thin close to the nose. Her hairline seems to be thinning a little at the top as well. Not perfection.

Post: #44

(06-20-2018 01:17 AM)Delta Wrote:  This chart lost all credibility the second I saw his Asian "4".

I thought the exact same thing.

Post: #45

If you’re not a good looking guy you can’t tell the difference between a 7 and a 9. To most guys all good looking girls look similar, and most will settle for one close to their level of attractiveness.

It’s only when you start being prettier yourself than a lot of girls than you can truly see which are the 9s and 10s.

Post: #46

Scale:
WB
Borderline WB (a "5")
WNB

Post: #47

I agree there is no such thing as a 10, because I don't think perfection really exists, except for maybe in photoshopped pictures.

So this girl is not a 10, and I would say 9s have exceptionally beautiful faces, which she does not have so she can't be a 9 either.

Most would rate her an 8, but I say she's a 7 because although she has a great body her arms are manly and disgusting. She really should switch her routine from fitness girl to model girl gym routine. I know the androgynous look is becoming more popular, so my opinion isn't shared by everyone here. She's obviously still extremely fuckable.