Post: #151

Here's a thought that occurred to me:

Her rant a tacit admission of something that she would decry as heresy were it ever uttered by one of those terrible alt-right types. Namely, that de-balling white males is a BAD thing because they're no longer able or willing to stand up for their society.

Also note AC's R/K theory is in full effect. She attempts to use shaming language because she knows thats what would work on her.

Post: #152

This case reminds of a case about 8-10 years ago where someone had some child, a girl of course, pretend to be "lost" in a shopping mall in order to "test" the response of bystanders. I don't remember if this was in the U.S. or the U.K. (I think it was in the U.K. as well). I remember the news article that resulted in it blasting bystanders, particularly men, for not helping this child. The article actually cited the fear of legal liability, specifically the possibility of being accused of being a child molester, as a major reason given by many men interviewed as for their reluctance to involve themselves in this. In typical fashion, the writer of the article brushed off such concerns as "unwarranted" and "unjustified" in the case of a lost little girl.

I think this was also in the U.K. because most guys in the U.S. would at least take the girl to the Mall security or customer service will little legal liability. In the U.K., they are more likely to be suspected as pedo.

I do remember this being discussed in the "manosphere" blogs of the time. I also remember commenting on it by saying that when society insists on generating what I called "synthetic" risks to intervention, then such intervention is unlikely to occur. Incentives matter. I used the term synthetic risk to mean those risks of legal liability that are synthetically manufactured by feminists and other leftists, as opposed to natural risks such as the possibility of drowning if you dive into a fast flowing river to save the little girl who fell in.

Guys will endure natural risk to save someone because its something we do. Its part of the constitution of being a guy. However, societies that manufacture synthetic risk, for the purposes of political expediency, that threaten and punish people for trying to do the right thing deserve whatever consequences that results from such policies.

Post: #153

There was actually a case a few years back in the uk where a small girl/baby got in to the street and died (run over i guess). It actually transpired in the inquest that a white van man had seen her, but didn't dare help for fear of being branded a pedo.

Post: #154

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/33...-help.html

Post: #155

(06-06-2018 08:28 PM)Investment Bro Wrote:  I'm going to get attacked for this, but honestly? If you saw someone, who was initially just minding their business getting attacked, man or woman, would you just stand there?
Who gives a shit if she's a female CEO or not? There's a such thing as human decency, and even if the favor is not returned, if you're witnessing an assault you do something about it. The woman in this case is right. If the man was mentally deranged, he needs to be locked up. He can't control himself. The people who shied away? They were in full control of their actions and chose to do nothing. This is the society we've devolved to.
How are we supposed to return the west to the way things are supposed to be if we can't stand up for an innocent person being assaulted? That's pretty sad.

This viewpoint actually pisses me off.

If I am obligated to risk my life for some stupid bitch on a subway... then she must be obligated to provide me something in return. What exactly is this fucking bitch obligated to do for the men she wants protection from? Nothing.

The social contract of 200 years ago is gone. These are not "our women". We have no obligation to protect them. In Arab countries they have a strong sense of "our women"... and those women are required to submit to the authority of the men around them. That includes regulations on who they date and their sexuality among many other things. This is a traditional gender contract where men are supposed to step up and risk their lives for women.

Women in the west do not want that contract. They do not want to submit to the authority of men. Therefore they are not entitled to the protection of men at random. They must instead rely upon the power of the state, because that is the authority to which they submit.

Post: #156

(06-10-2018 12:46 AM)EndsExpect Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 08:28 PM)Investment Bro Wrote:  I'm going to get attacked for this, but honestly? If you saw someone, who was initially just minding their business getting attacked, man or woman, would you just stand there?
Who gives a shit if she's a female CEO or not? There's a such thing as human decency, and even if the favor is not returned, if you're witnessing an assault you do something about it. The woman in this case is right. If the man was mentally deranged, he needs to be locked up. He can't control himself. The people who shied away? They were in full control of their actions and chose to do nothing. This is the society we've devolved to.
How are we supposed to return the west to the way things are supposed to be if we can't stand up for an innocent person being assaulted? That's pretty sad.

This viewpoint actually pisses me off.

If I am obligated to risk my life for some stupid bitch on a subway... then she must be obligated to provide me something in return. What exactly is this fucking bitch obligated to do for the men she wants protection from? Nothing.

The social contract of 200 years ago is gone. These are not "our women". We have no obligation to protect them. In Arab countries they have a strong sense of "our women"... and those women are required to submit to the authority of the men around them. That includes regulations on who they date and their sexuality among many other things. This is a traditional gender contract where men are supposed to step up and risk their lives for women.

Women in the west do not want that contract. They do not want to submit to the authority of men. Therefore they are not entitled to the protection of men at random. They must instead rely upon the power of the state, because that is the authority to which they submit.

Agree 100%. That said I would probably intervene if it was a young girl/boy or elderly person of either sex. A middle aged white woman? Hell no. I have a family myself to take care of, not about to risk it all for some washed up fashion CEO. I know most men have the inclination to step in and defend when we perceive a weaker party is being attacked. However we must remember our predisposition for such is what has lead us to the situation we find ourselves in. I don't think the predisposition itself is the problem, rather, our discernment of when acting upon it needs work. Choose your battles, don't charge blindly into battle like the knights of old so to speak. We need to be smarter, learn to dance around the ridiculous laws we're chained to. That would be a start.

Post: #157

(06-10-2018 12:46 AM)EndsExpect Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 08:28 PM)Investment Bro Wrote:  I'm going to get attacked for this, but honestly? If you saw someone, who was initially just minding their business getting attacked, man or woman, would you just stand there?
Who gives a shit if she's a female CEO or not? There's a such thing as human decency, and even if the favor is not returned, if you're witnessing an assault you do something about it. The woman in this case is right. If the man was mentally deranged, he needs to be locked up. He can't control himself. The people who shied away? They were in full control of their actions and chose to do nothing. This is the society we've devolved to.
How are we supposed to return the west to the way things are supposed to be if we can't stand up for an innocent person being assaulted? That's pretty sad.

This viewpoint actually pisses me off.

If I am obligated to risk my life for some stupid bitch on a subway... then she must be obligated to provide me something in return. What exactly is this fucking bitch obligated to do for the men she wants protection from? Nothing.

The social contract of 200 years ago is gone. These are not "our women". We have no obligation to protect them. In Arab countries they have a strong sense of "our women"... and those women are required to submit to the authority of the men around them. That includes regulations on who they date and their sexuality among many other things. This is a traditional gender contract where men are supposed to step up and risk their lives for women.

Women in the west do not want that contract. They do not want to submit to the authority of men. Therefore they are not entitled to the protection of men at random. They must instead rely upon the power of the state, because that is the authority to which they submit.

I have no problem with going out of my way to help someone on the subway and getting nothing back in return. What I have a real problem with is doing the same and then being arrested and charged with a crime because some prosecutor thinks that I may have used too much force, or I didn't allow enough time for the assailant to stop and leave, or some other Monday morning quarterbacking from some DA asshole who, even though was not on site to witness actually what happen, still thinks he can make the better call than myself. This is what pisses me off about this whole thing. Then there is the added possibility that the damsel in distress herself also decides to accuse me of racism or some such thing and actually helps the prosecutor in this case.

The dimensions of this go far beyond not just getting anything in return from the damsel in distress.

Post: #158

Related and presented without comment:

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-44431582

"BBC Radio 4's Eddie Mair reveals 'shame' over assault

BBC Radio 4 presenter Eddie Mair has revealed how he was attacked by a gang on a bus in London.

Mr Mair said he was too ashamed to report the incident, which happened in December, to police.

The 52-year-old was left with bruising to his head after being struck by one of a group of three youths riding bikes.

Writing in the Sunday Times, he said: "I felt I may have been in some way responsible for what happened."

Mr Mair, who presents the PM programme, expressed sympathy for comedian Michael McIntryre, who was robbed by two men on a moped who smashed his car windows.

His own attack took place as he was returning home from dinner with friends in London.

A gang of youths circled him on their bikes as he walked to a bus stop, with one lifting his front wheel close to the presenter's face.
Told no one

Mr Mair said he tried to film their intimidating behaviour, but their faces were hidden by their hoodies.

As he went to buy a bus ticket, one of them struck him on the side of the head, leaving a large bruise above his right ear.

"I told no one, least of all the police. Not my family or friends. Not work colleagues. I felt shame. I felt I may have been in some way responsible for what happened," he said, adding that he wondered if his video recording had goaded them.

A woman on the bus urged him to report the crime to prevent similar assaults but Mr Mair said he resisted.

"For weeks, every time the local paper reported an assault, I believed that I had contributed to it. More shame," he said.

He eventually reported the assault before he left for a trip to South America, but officers were unable to identify the attackers from his video.

Police told him that reporting the crime earlier may have helped, because CCTV imagery would have been available for up to a month.

Mr Mair, who observed ironically that being affected by crime made him "on trend" for once, also had his bag stolen in a mugging in South America."

Post: #159

Do not read too much into white men in urban centres with that type of shame ^. They are just hopeless.

Post: #160

(06-10-2018 12:28 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  Writing in the Sunday Times, he said: "I felt I may have been in some way responsible for what happened."

Just not in the way you think you are.

Post: #161

(06-10-2018 01:47 AM)LionHound Wrote:  

(06-10-2018 12:46 AM)EndsExpect Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 08:28 PM)Investment Bro Wrote:  I'm going to get attacked for this, but honestly? If you saw someone, who was initially just minding their business getting attacked, man or woman, would you just stand there?
Who gives a shit if she's a female CEO or not? There's a such thing as human decency, and even if the favor is not returned, if you're witnessing an assault you do something about it. The woman in this case is right. If the man was mentally deranged, he needs to be locked up. He can't control himself. The people who shied away? They were in full control of their actions and chose to do nothing. This is the society we've devolved to.
How are we supposed to return the west to the way things are supposed to be if we can't stand up for an innocent person being assaulted? That's pretty sad.

This viewpoint actually pisses me off.

If I am obligated to risk my life for some stupid bitch on a subway... then she must be obligated to provide me something in return. What exactly is this fucking bitch obligated to do for the men she wants protection from? Nothing.

The social contract of 200 years ago is gone. These are not "our women". We have no obligation to protect them. In Arab countries they have a strong sense of "our women"... and those women are required to submit to the authority of the men around them. That includes regulations on who they date and their sexuality among many other things. This is a traditional gender contract where men are supposed to step up and risk their lives for women.

Women in the west do not want that contract. They do not want to submit to the authority of men. Therefore they are not entitled to the protection of men at random. They must instead rely upon the power of the state, because that is the authority to which they submit.

Agree 100%. That said I would probably intervene if it was a young girl/boy or elderly person of either sex. A middle aged white woman? Hell no. I have a family myself to take care of, not about to risk it all for some washed up fashion CEO. I know most men have the inclination to step in and defend when we perceive a weaker party is being attacked. However we must remember our predisposition for such is what has lead us to the situation we find ourselves in. I don't think the predisposition itself is the problem, rather, our discernment of when acting upon it needs work. Choose your battles, don't charge blindly into battle like the knights of old so to speak. We need to be smarter, learn to dance around the ridiculous laws we're chained to. That would be a start.

Easy to say, but when a lot of situations are time critical, your instinct or your brain will act first.

Post: #162

Cases like this sort of cut to the heart of modern social justice.

Women like this have egos writing checks their characters can't cash.

They are pretending to be more spiritually evolved than they are.

She is perfectly happy to reach out her hands to any and all refugees because she is secure in the belief that it won't affect her in a negative way and that all problems will be attended to by someone else.

This is the heart of the virtue signal.

Her cry that the men should have rescued her is the moral version of tapping out, even if she doesn't know it.

I want a new borderless, cultureless world where all are welcome.

Bad thing happens.

Men please save me.

Post: #163

The BBC stooge above is lying that he did not see their faces exactly - if they had been Neonazis, then he would have blasted it out 24/7 for the next couple of weeks.

As for anyone thinking that the Arab countries care about "their women", then it depends - here an Egyptian PSA:





It's far more clannish as soon as you turn Muslim - women are constantly raped and harassed there. Of course if someone had started targeting Arab girls for pimping in the UK, then they would have quickly organized with the respective guys being murdered in the streets.

Ah well.... it's all going to shit anyway. Funny that cities like London will be a nice view into the future for other countries. And keep in mind that London is wealthy and will remain wealthy - the low-IQ bastards will just want to rise up in the ranks of money:





It's good that I don't live in the West anymore. I swear that I would get in trouble with the law there defending myself and beating up one of those blessed enrichers too much. The worst part of it is that sometimes the moped gangs use acid - they want your phone or wallet and throw simply acid into the face of some stranger - blinded or disfigured for life. This is London now and this will be the future of Europe. It will be just another low-trust shitty society where Whites have to travel to China or Japan get a breather from the mass crime wave and rape-fest that has been unleashed on them.

Post: #164

(06-10-2018 02:19 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  As for anyone thinking that the Arab countries care about "their women", then it depends - here an Egyptian PSA:





It's far more clannish as soon as you turn Muslim - women are constantly raped and harassed there. Of course if someone had started targeting Arab girls for pimping in the UK, then they would have quickly organized with the respective guys being murdered in the streets.

Let's take a brief moment to talk about the difference between men and women when it comes to morals. A large percentage of men... not all... but a large percentage have a strong set of internal morals. Even sociopathic guys often have internal moral lines that they will not cross.

Women for the most part completely lack an internal moral compass. If left to their own devices their morality is whatever benefits them at that moment. In order for women to have any morals or values at all... they generally must be forced onto them by the culture at large. I can't prove this, but I believe that most women would be Ok with legal murder as long as it benefited them at the time, and would not lose attraction for the killer.

What Arab guys are doing is physically enforcing morals on women who childishly challenge the authority of male elders. The stuff in this video only happens to women who dont follow social morays.

Post: #165

(06-10-2018 03:07 PM)EndsExpect Wrote:  What Arab guys are doing is physically enforcing morals on women who childishly challenge the authority of male elders. The stuff in this video only happens to women who dont follow social morays.

In your fucking dream. I listened to interviews with Egyptian women (one Canada born, but lived in Egypt for years) and they said that even if they took upon wearing a Niqab, then men would grab their asses.

This thought that a Hijabi or Niqabi won't get harassed is liberal perception of Muslim morals. Men have an innate ability to see a young woman or a slim vs a fat woman even if she wears a trash bag and covers her hair.

I have heard from multiple women that they had daily ass-grabs and more even if they just walked down the street or used public transport. The only thing that helps is if you are very old, very fat or have a male escort around you.

Fuck Islamic morals - all countries are massive sausage fests there and in the past this was alleviated by constant wars, rapes of infidels and slave girls. And they miss that, so they pounce on any woman out there.

Post: #166

(06-06-2018 08:28 PM)Investment Bro Wrote:  I'm going to get attacked for this, but honestly? If you saw someone, who was initially just minding their business getting attacked, man or woman, would you just stand there?

That's pretty sad.

No. Id get the fuck out of the way, move train cars, get off at the next stop.

Being a hero gets you killed. Or seriously injured. Its everyone's responsibility not to put themselves in that position to begin with.

You wanna be a hero, captain knight on a shining horse, and get injured and or killed because of it? Be my guest. why not don a costume, and run around your town saving Women CEOs from big bad Arab men? go on! do it tough guy!

But really though. . .do you think shaming someone for ...not doing that is going to work? no.

In fact, im going to NOT do what you want me to do even more. Who gives a shit about you? "It's sad"

It's Sad? Well, go cry me a fucking river. At least Ill be injury free/hospital visit/bill free/alive/able to go to work and work towards my life goals.

Post: #167

You could tangle with some scum and get disfigured for life:

https://nypost.com/2018/06/10/man-bites-...rawl-cops/

Post: #168

(06-06-2018 10:28 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I suppose it's not to anyone's benefit to simply go back and forth over why intervening in a situation like this is a bad idea. It's more helpful to explain the why in detail. This forum typically approaches the nature of women in relation to sexual manipulation one way or another, but there are other facets of their ingrained behavior where it's important to understand the nature of women so you don't get blindsided with bad outcomes for "nice" behavior.

What I'm going to go into here is stuff that a lot of guys understand on a basic level yet without having an appreciation for the nuts and bolts level of how it works.

My experience in this field is drawn mostly as a guard who had to deal routinely with issues of domestic violence and female mental health issues in health care settings. This has been complimented by the mentorship in these issues of the older guards who I foolishly dismissed as fossils until I was proven wrong often enough to accept reality.

I'll open with the big premise.

Women do not do "gratitude" except where it's a convenient entry to gain the continued patronage of someone they're sexually interested in.

This is not limited to saving them from a violent encounter. We are generally painfully aware here that an ugly man who changes a flat tire for a woman and a handsome man who does likewise will receive two vastly different responses. The handsome man will be showered with praise and offers of future rendezvous while the ugly man will have to suffer the woman standing silently and awkwardly to one side as she fidgets, desperate for the horrible ordeal to disappear in her rear view mirror.

For most women in any stage of fertility there is no such thing as gratitude. Only an opening to gain sexual access to a suitable set of genetics.

The second part of this equation is arguably more cruel.

Women are biologically driven shut out men they owe an obligation to when that man is not considered to be sexually suitable. Worse, they will actively seek to harm that man's social standing in order to "get rid of him" rather than suffer his continued proximity under the burden of a debt they don't wish to recognize.

Hear me, young pups, as I tell the tale of two guards. One as ugly as sin, the other an Adonissian vision of male charm. Several damsels found themselves under duress. A vicious, drunk cad was attacking their booth at their place of work. The ugly guard arrived first on scene and bore the lion's share of the peril in restraining the attacker. The gorgeous guard arrived second and merely provided support to finalise the matter.

Who got the credit from all these women? You guessed it. But worse. The women soon began to find agreement that the ugly guard who had long since been accepted as benign in his patrols suddenly took on an aura of creepiness, such that a request was made to management that the creepy guard should be left to patrol outside while the gorgeous guard patrol the booths.

That, gentlemen, is how female gratitude manifests itself.

Moving on.

When faced with a violent encounter a woman's first reaction is to secure her survival. "White middle class men, save me!"

What most men don't understand is that the very second survival has been secured, a woman will instantly mentally re-arrange the event to preserve her tribal alignments.

Did that go by you too quickly? Again.

The very second survival has been secured, a woman will instantly mentally re-arrange the event to preserve her tribal alignments.

This is why police will save a woman from being stabbed by her deranged husband and she will provide a report mere minutes later that the police busted in and assaulted him for no reason. Not only will she says this but she will believe it down to her core.

You can bet on it again and again and again and you will not be disappointed. If a woman has to choose between telling the truth and protecting "her tribe" (even if that's loosely defined as progressives-plus their human pets) then she will lie until the end of time to protect her tribe. She does this effortlessly because her tribe is intrinsically linked to her ego. It's a survival mechanism that ensures she places her own children above everyone else's, even if her "child" is a 6 foot "unwell asian man".

These are not principles on female modus operandi. They are iron laws.

Respect these laws and account for them or suffer the consequences.

p.s. If you wonder now what the difference is between white-knighting in the 50's and white knighting today then the million dollar question is this.

Does the woman I'm trying to save consider me to be part of her tribe or a factional enemy?

This would make a lot of sense from an evolutionary point of view. Having low value males to whom they owe some social debt would be a reproductive risk to a woman. The man may decide that he is entitled to be repaid with sex or more likely, other higher value men would comply with a code of honor which would prevent them from pursuing said woman, i.e. I like Cindy but Mike fought off that bear that almost killed her the other day so he should get a first right to her.

I wonder to what extent this is responsible for the cases of male feminists being thrown under the bus with sexual assault allegations. It would seem to be a perfect example of low value men that might feel they are owed something setting off this instinctive reaction.

Post: #169

Looking through the posts in this thread it seems to me that where the poster lives understandably influences their opinion of whether or not they would do something in this situation.

If a poster lives in the U.K. or in a city big enough to have a subway they stay the fuck out of this. I understand this reaction as they seem to be in a culture that punishes defending oneself or others.

I am lucky enough to live in a place where you are allowed to defend yourself or others so my gut reaction is different.

Everyone here is allowed to conceal carry with no permit. The dodgy fuckers don't know if Grandma has a gun in her purse, but they do know she will not be in trouble if they try to attack her and she keeps shooting until they stop. There is still plenty of crime but it is almost always the same young idiots shooting each other over a bag of weed or it is vehicle theft.

Post: #170

Don't confuse Londonistan with the rest of Britain. If you started attacking women in say a small middle income town you would be confronted in micro seconds.

The England of the shires is completely different to London.

I dropped my bank card at the super market and it was with the information desk before i went back from the car to look for it. England is still largely a high trust society away from certain urban areas.

Post: #171

(06-09-2018 09:36 AM)Easy_C Wrote:  Here's a thought that occurred to me:

Her rant a tacit admission of something that she would decry as heresy were it ever uttered by one of those terrible alt-right types. Namely, that de-balling white males is a BAD thing because they're no longer able or willing to stand up for their society.

Also note AC's R/K theory is in full effect. She attempts to use shaming language because she knows thats what would work on her.

Is it really neuturing men or are the men just adapting to survive their new environment? Social media, the internet and the 24/7 news cycle have really put a dent in the male thought process these days with the amount of horror stories flying around.

Can you blame an animal for adapting to its circumstances?

Post: #172

(07-04-2018 11:19 AM)deerhunter Wrote:  Looking through the posts in this thread it seems to me that where the poster lives understandably influences their opinion of whether or not they would do something in this situation.

If a poster lives in the U.K. or in a city big enough to have a subway they stay the fuck out of this. I understand this reaction as they seem to be in a culture that punishes defending oneself or others.

I am lucky enough to live in a place where you are allowed to defend yourself or others so my gut reaction is different.

Everyone here is allowed to conceal carry with no permit. The dodgy fuckers don't know if Grandma has a gun in her purse, but they do know she will not be in trouble if they try to attack her and she keeps shooting until they stop. There is still plenty of crime but it is almost always the same young idiots shooting each other over a bag of weed or it is vehicle theft.

The wise man does not let his own living situation influence his behavior in an enriched city like London. Chinese tourist pamphlets already have massive warnings out for London and Paris. In London that guy could pull a knife or a bottle of acid on you - and then you are truly fucked especially with acid.

Acid attacks in London happen 1.5 times daily.

I live in an area where most men would move against such a crazy guy - the crazy Middle Eastern looking man would actually stick out like a sore thumb and would be clobbered by multiple men.

But that does not mean that what is good behavior in one place is advisable behavior in another place where you can be left blind and disfigured when dealing with London's enrichment. That woman was part of the brainwashed masses who wants this vibrant diversity - let her enjoy it now.

Post: #173

(07-04-2018 01:14 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

(07-04-2018 11:19 AM)deerhunter Wrote:  Looking through the posts in this thread it seems to me that where the poster lives understandably influences their opinion of whether or not they would do something in this situation.

If a poster lives in the U.K. or in a city big enough to have a subway they stay the fuck out of this. I understand this reaction as they seem to be in a culture that punishes defending oneself or others.

I am lucky enough to live in a place where you are allowed to defend yourself or others so my gut reaction is different.

Everyone here is allowed to conceal carry with no permit. The dodgy fuckers don't know if Grandma has a gun in her purse, but they do know she will not be in trouble if they try to attack her and she keeps shooting until they stop. There is still plenty of crime but it is almost always the same young idiots shooting each other over a bag of weed or it is vehicle theft.

The wise man does not let his own living situation influence his behavior in an enriched city like London. Chinese tourist pamphlets already have massive warnings out for London and Paris. In London that guy could pull a knife or a bottle of acid on you - and then you are truly fucked especially with acid.

Acid attacks in London happen 1.5 times daily.

I live in an area where most men would move against such a crazy guy - the crazy Middle Eastern looking man would actually stick out like a sore thumb and would be clobbered by multiple men.

But that does not mean that what is good behavior in one place is advisable behavior in another place where you can be left blind and disfigured when dealing with London's enrichment. That woman was part of the brainwashed masses who wants this vibrant diversity - let her enjoy it now.

If you live in a place where acid attacks happen 1.5 times daily (on top of a shit load of other violent crime and various ethnic conflict) then it's time to fucking move. It's a big planet and no job or opportunity is worth taking that risk.

Guys, you have to start thinking long term, not with your ego or your pride, or perhaps fall prey to wishful thinking. The bus on cleaning up the West and reversing life to prior conditions has left the station a long time ago and it won't ever come back. Now it's just a question of how to wind things down before Whites turn into a small minority and the respective nations slowly devolve into 3rd world shitholes. Some places (London, Paris, Marseilles, etc.) are ahead of the curve, others are limping behind. In the end however they will all be taken over, it's just a matter of time. Just search online about what's happening in Nantes, France right now. Once known as a thriving port city and the home of the Château des Ducs de Bretagne it is now enjoying violent riots by middle Eastern gangs bent on destroying not only the city but the rest of France.

But exponential change only truly makes itself felt when it's way way too late to reverse its causes. And the demographic hammer that is about to slam nations like Germany, France, Britain, Holland, and many others will feel like it came out of nowhere, although anyone with two braincells to rub together should have seen it coming a long time ago. Maybe back in the 1980s or 1990s we may have stood a chance, but now in 2018 the name of the game is to relocate your ass to a community that is willing and capable of defending itself against the coming onslaught. For Europeans this most likely means Eastern Europe (except Russia I think) and for Americans this most likely means the U.S. North West (based on demographic maps - cough cough).

It'll ALL be about ethnicity going forward, just as Zelcorpion has put it here just recently. Stick to your own and form networks of brothers you can rely on when and not if the shit hits the fan.

Post: #174

(07-04-2018 03:36 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(07-04-2018 01:14 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  

(07-04-2018 11:19 AM)deerhunter Wrote:  Looking through the posts in this thread it seems to me that where the poster lives understandably influences their opinion of whether or not they would do something in this situation.

If a poster lives in the U.K. or in a city big enough to have a subway they stay the fuck out of this. I understand this reaction as they seem to be in a culture that punishes defending oneself or others.

I am lucky enough to live in a place where you are allowed to defend yourself or others so my gut reaction is different.

Everyone here is allowed to conceal carry with no permit. The dodgy fuckers don't know if Grandma has a gun in her purse, but they do know she will not be in trouble if they try to attack her and she keeps shooting until they stop. There is still plenty of crime but it is almost always the same young idiots shooting each other over a bag of weed or it is vehicle theft.

The wise man does not let his own living situation influence his behavior in an enriched city like London. Chinese tourist pamphlets already have massive warnings out for London and Paris. In London that guy could pull a knife or a bottle of acid on you - and then you are truly fucked especially with acid.

Acid attacks in London happen 1.5 times daily.

I live in an area where most men would move against such a crazy guy - the crazy Middle Eastern looking man would actually stick out like a sore thumb and would be clobbered by multiple men.

But that does not mean that what is good behavior in one place is advisable behavior in another place where you can be left blind and disfigured when dealing with London's enrichment. That woman was part of the brainwashed masses who wants this vibrant diversity - let her enjoy it now.

If you live in a place where acid attacks happen 1.5 times daily (on top of a shit load of other violent crime and various ethnic conflict) then it's time to fucking move. It's a big planet and no job or opportunity is worth taking that risk.

Guys, you have to start thinking long term, not with your ego or your pride, or perhaps fall prey to wishful thinking. The bus on cleaning up the West and reversing life to prior conditions has left the station a long time ago and it won't ever come back. Now it's just a question of how to wind things down before Whites turn into a small minority and the respective nations slowly devolve into 3rd world shitholes. Some places (London, Paris, Marseilles, etc.) are ahead of the curve, others are limping behind. In the end however they will all be taken over, it's just a matter of time. Just search online about what's happening in Nantes, France right now. Once known as a thriving port city and the home of the Château des Ducs de Bretagne it is now enjoying violent riots by middle Eastern gangs bent on destroying not only the city but the rest of France.

But exponential change only truly makes itself felt when it's way way too late to reverse its causes. And the demographic hammer that is about to slam nations like Germany, France, Britain, Holland, and many others will feel like it came out of nowhere, although anyone with two braincells to rub together should have seen it coming a long time ago. Maybe back in the 1980s or 1990s we may have stood a chance, but now in 2018 the name of the game is to relocate your ass to a community that is willing and capable of defending itself against the coming onslaught. For Europeans this most likely means Eastern Europe (except Russia I think) and for Americans this most likely means the U.S. North West (based on demographic maps - cough cough).

It'll ALL be about ethnicity going forward, just as Zelcorpion has put it here just recently. Stick to your own and form networks of brothers you can rely on when and not if the shit hits the fan.

I love how here on a PUA forum it's cool to suggest whites should basically prep for war against darker races, but when I suggest the women of those races are less desirable than white women and that this creates a real world imbalance that in turn creates tension and social problems, I get shouted down as a racist loser.

Post: #175

Unreported: how her panties were soaked when this "six foot" tall invader negged her with extreme prejudice.

Undereported: her outrage when the white men declined the invitation to enter into a tacit "let's you and he fight" over her barren cunt.