Post: #301

(09-10-2018 03:27 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  I think that the European laws governing Ashkenazim back in the day that confined them to merchants and moneychanger roles instead of ensuring that they stuck to blue collar work like in Eastern Europe where they had a much wider range or roles. Really selected for this duplicity.

What better way of selecting for verbal gymnastics than confining Ashkenazim to those professions and ensuing only the best merchants and moneychangers are able to have children.

Its a problem that Europeans have exacerbated or create if it wasn't a problem before

Exactly - I talked with some older people in EE a while back and they said that Jews were either very rich (merchants, real estate holders, bankers) or poorish (very low-tier craftsmen). This is replicated in Israel as well with a rather predatory system.

Western Europe only made things worse by keeping them away from the trades - many would have become so as they did in EE.

And of course - it was the bankers lending to countries and European royalty that really hoisted families like the Rothschild to the highest ranks. Again - it was lack of awareness and lack of wisdom that doomed the West - even if the final strokes of Western obliteration are just being enacted on the low-down.

The same goes about the practices and powers uf usury - just banning it or giving it to Jewish people (because they are dirty) was just dumb as rocks.

Awareness and clear sight is a much better weapon than idiotic mindless hatred.

When you think about it - this meme from Curb your enthusiasm is not without basis in the low-trust Israeli mentality:



It's just a healthy skepticism that prevents you from being taken advantage of. They are just 3% - just don't let them. You can still go for a drink together.

Post: #302

(09-10-2018 03:27 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  Its a problem that Europeans have exacerbated or create if it wasn't a problem before

The jews were merchants already under the Roman empire. This is because jews already occupied the same land that the Phoenicians did and probably have some overlap with them.

Post: #303

< Ay, but strangely enough the reason for the killing of Caesar and the subsequent decline of Rome was something practiced by the Roman plutocracy - usury. Caesar wanted to issue a currency without usury. And it was usury that forced Rome to constantly conquer and ultimately collapse under the weight with a useless usury upper-class. All of them were non-Jews, so this is not new in history.

Post: #304

How badly were jews treated by Europeans? They make it seem like they were constant pogroms and life in the ghettoes was dreadful. In which case they may see their anti white crusade as revenge.

Post: #305

^^Excellent question. The standard narrative being that jews were persecuted and chased throughout their entire history. You know how every nation /ethnic group has a collective consciousness of their history? In the case of the Jews, they seriously belive that they've never done anything slightly wrong and that everyone else was just jelly and chased them away because they were too successful.

There is a very good book about this called Jewish History Jewish Religion by Israel Shahak. He argued that Jewish persecution has been vastly exaggerated. In fact., jews often lead far better lives that the average peasant in Europe. In Russia in particular, which is the one country jews always have an axe to grind with, they held especially privileged status, even before 1917, and obviously long after.

Post: #306

(09-10-2018 04:23 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(09-10-2018 03:27 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  Its a problem that Europeans have exacerbated or create if it wasn't a problem before

The jews were merchants already under the Roman empire. This is because jews already occupied the same land that the Phoenicians did and probably have some overlap with them.

Every nation has merchants. The Ashkenazim weren't able to be anything but merchants and moneychangers/Bankers in Europe.

Post: #307

If you look especially into the history of the pogroms in EE and Russia, you find two things.

One was the strange occurence that some were even wanted by Western Jewry as they wanted them to move to the holy land.

And second you had mostly a rather peaceful coexistence until some banking Jews started to confiscate large parts of the properties of the landed gentries - obviously due to usury-lending. When that happened and the issue became widespread and existential the landlords stoked the Jewish hatred and did some massacres for sure. Though those were relatively limited since millions more continued to live in those regions. The gentile hatred was rather stoked by Talmudic lore than much of anything else.

Actually usury was the main reason why the English king cast out the Jews in the middle ages. Back in medieval economy that kind of compound interest without regulation quickly concentrated so much land in their hands within a very short period, that the king found it easier to cast them out then to try and control it all.

Obviously now usury is permeating every country in the world, but at least it is more regulated and transparent. And no one feels dirty anymore for charging interest out of religious reasons - not even the Muslims even if they do it the roundabout way.

The most funny article I read was one where an Israeli anti-usury monetary reform group got their day to talk about it in the Israeli Knesset - attempting to abolish usury money creation in Israel. Got nowhere of course.....

Post: #308

(09-01-2018 09:11 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

(09-01-2018 09:06 PM)Sgt Donger Wrote:  ^
How does ratoj9 have 28 reputation points when he has only done 20 posts?

Looks like he's met a lot of members in person, that seems to help.

i.e. providing real value

Post: #309

(06-06-2018 08:13 PM)Super_Fire Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 06:34 PM)YoungBlade Wrote:  Hey, you agreed that Christianity is a diverse, multicultural religion.

Don't get butthurt because your hamster got shot dead.

Shit dude, you're right. We're a bunch of cucks, worshipping a Jewish dude while railing against the Jews. I mean, yeah, the Jews have a big problem with Catholicism/Christianity and don't give a shit about paganism, but still.

We should follow the religion of our ancestors, no matter how lacking in philosophy, metaphysics, and actual textual foundation that religion is.

I wasn't going to reply until you said "textual foundation."

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is the oldest existing piece of the New Testament:



Rylands Library P52, a fragment of the eighteenth chapter of the Gospel of John. Paleographers date it to no earlier than 100 CE, possibly as late as 175 CE.

THIS is what you expect people to believe is the inspired word of God? A credit card-sized scrap of papyrus found in a garbage pile in Oxyrhynchus? God can inspire the gospel writers....but not preserve the writing? Ridiculous, asinine, and that's not even taking into consideration the thirty-plus year period of oral transmission of the stories about Jesus, before they were written down in another country in another language by people who never knew Jesus. Copying books by hand is difficult and content-distorting enough by itself (particularly in the case of the New Testament, where the greatest variability in manuscripts is in the earliest period of copying); oral transmission is far, far worse.

There was a Jesus....but for anyone to believe we have an accurate record of anything about him, other than his baptism by John and crucifixion, is foolish.

Post: #310

(06-07-2018 07:56 PM)Super_Fire Wrote:  

(06-07-2018 06:01 AM)YoungBlade Wrote:  Wait, I thought pagans were the ones who provided the philosophy and metaphysics in multicultural Christianity? Or were they just backwards savages while the Hebrews brought civilization to them with their wonderful religion?

Greek metaphysics and philosophy are not a religion. Nobody follows Greek religion now, probably not even yourself. And with good reason, pantheism holds societies back, and is full of immoral gods.

What you're attacking is a strawman, and you know it. "Multicultural Christianity"? You of all people should know "agree and amplify" when you see it.

You're not going to de-Christianize the board, YoungBlade. You'll simply have to accept that the foundations of the West are both Christian and pagan.

The Greek who pray to Zeus

Post: #311

(09-10-2018 07:36 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  Every nation has merchants. The Ashkenazim weren't able to be anything but merchants and moneychangers/Bankers in Europe.

Why where they in Europe in the first place?

They shouldn't be.

Post: #312

(09-10-2018 03:35 AM)godfather dust Wrote:  

(09-09-2018 10:52 PM)Longshanks Wrote:  https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda...st-denial/

This is incredible. Unz.com is one the best sites on the net.

Damn... Read this, hour long article.

Off topic (and not terribly serious)... What if Hitler was the world's leading Rabbi... Putting Christians to death by the millions, claiming they were Jews to replace Christianity as the religion of the west with crypto Judaism and holocaust worship.

The chutzpah!

Post: #313

(09-04-2018 02:37 PM)Pride male Wrote:  I was reading Rockwells White Power. He writes that the Bible is actually a blue print for Jewish domination. I dont believe the bible is history, but it is fascinating how Abraham, Isaac, Joseph, Daniel, Esther and Josephus manage to outfox the Gentile rulers and become prominent in governing over the goyim.

You don't say.




http://library.flawlesslogic.com/eckart_1.htm

Post: #314

delete

Post: #315

The eternal victim claimants say they were oh so badly treated in Europe. In reality they were making predatory loans and kidnapping babies for blood sacrifice. They have been schemers wherever they have gone and this is noted throughout history.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Bloody-Satanic-...riel+toaff

Post: #316

< I read about that book.

The funny part was that it created an outrage in Israel, but not because it has been published as a book - that is not even contested. It created an outrage, because it was published in English - the goys must not know.

Post: #317

Brand new BBC TV show about British Jews:

We are British Jews

Quote:In a two-part series, eight British Jews with a broad range of opinions, beliefs and practices, go on a journey to explore what it means to be Jewish in Britain today and examine some of the most pressing questions and challenges facing the Jewish community at home and
in Israel.

In the first episode, the group meet in Manchester, home to the UK's largest Jewish community outside of London. After getting to know each other, and discovering their differences, they explore what antisemitism looks and feels like in modern Britain and reflect on how perceptions of Israel affect them here at home. They meet the owner of a local restaurant which has been attacked a number of times in recent years and talk to a Labour MP who has been the focus of abuse online. The group go on to meet with Jewish students, where they hear how they have needed security when they have held Israel events on campus.

The group then travel to Israel, the country many of the group call their homeland. Starting their journey on a Kibbutz, a communal farm, they get some stark reminders of the realities of life in the Jewish State and meet a young American woman who has volunteered to serve in the Israeli Defense Forces.

Post: #318

At least the Russians and Spanish went down fighting the Bolsheviks. America and Britain were taken without a shot being fired.

Post: #319

^The Anglo-Saxon is much more susceptible to Jewish influence without any resistance. Not sure why though.

Post: #320

Because of Protestantism. Orthodox Christianity is generally much more resilient against subversion.

Post: #321

Ron Unz continues his excellent "American Pravda" series of essays, this time writing about the 9/11 and the involvement of Mossad. I only quoted the conluding paragraphs but I advise reading the whole thing.

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-...-theories/

Quote:...
Although my growing suspicions about the 9/11 attacks stretch back a decade or more, my serious investigation of the topic is quite recent, so I am certainly a newcomer to the field. But sometimes an outsider can notice things that may escape the attention of those who have spent so many years deeply immersed in a given topic.

From my perspective, it seems that a huge fraction of the 9/11 Truth community spends far too much of its time absorbed in the particular details of the attacks, debating the precise method by which the World Trade Center towers in New York were brought down or what actually struck the Pentagon. But these sorts of issues seem of little ultimate significance.

I would argue that the only important aspect of these technical issues is whether the overall evidence is sufficiently strong to establish the falsehood of the official 9/11 narrative and also demonstrate that the attacks must have been the work of a highly sophisticated organization with access to advanced military technology rather than rag-tag band of 19 Arabs armed with box-cutters. Beyond that, none of those details matter.

In that regard, I believe that the volume of factual material collected by determined researchers over the last seventeen years has easily met that requirement, perhaps even ten or twenty times over. For example, even agreeing upon a single particular item such as the clear presence of nano-thermite, a military-grade explosive compound, would immediately satisfy those two criteria. So I see little point in endless debates over whether nano-thermite was used, or nano-thermite plus something else, or just something else entirely. And such complex technical debates may serve to obscure the larger picture, while confusing and intimidating any casually-interested outlookers, thereby being quite counter-productive to the overall goals of the 9/11 Truth movement.

Once we have concluded that the culprits were part of a highly-sophisticated organization, we can then focus on the Who and the Why, which surely would be of greater importance than the particular details of the How. Yet currently all the endless debate over the How tends to crowd out the Who and the Why, and I wonder whether this unfortunate situation might even be intentional.

Perhaps one reason is that once sincere 9/11 Truthers do focus on those more important questions, the vast weight of the evidence clearly points in a single direction, implicating Israel and its Mossad intelligence service, with the case being overwhelmingly strong in motive, means, and opportunity. And leveling accusations of blame at Israel and its domestic collaborators for the greatest attack ever launched against America on our own soil entails enormous social and political risks.

But such difficulties must be weighed against the reality of three thousand American civilian lives and the subsequent seventeen years of our multi-trillion-dollar wars, which have produced tens of thousands of dead or wounded American servicemen and the death or displacement of many millions of innocent Middle Easterners.

The members of the 9/11 Truth movement must therefore ask themselves whether or not “Truth” is indeed the central goal of their efforts.

Post: #322

It was nice knowing you guys. Kona gets my weed eater. I know he will appreciate it when I am no longer there to use it. That will be my only legacy.

Post: #323

What's with the hatred of specifically whites. Is it their capabilities or are they still pissed about Jesus?

Post: #324

(09-19-2018 12:11 PM)loremipsum Wrote:  What's with the hatred of specifically whites. Is it their capabilities or are they still pissed about Jesus?

Yea white people bend over backwards to accommodate your every silly little whim... Seems us whites (barring some exceptions) are the most pliant cattle/goyim. The group least likely to reject their claims as ridiculous neurotic bullshit.

I guess they just don't need us anymore.

Post: #325

(09-19-2018 12:11 PM)loremipsum Wrote:  What's with the hatred of specifically whites. Is it their capabilities or are they still pissed about Jesus?

Biggest threat to their power