Post: #1

A Youtube channel did a sort of game show where seven people have to pick only one to receive money. Not a single character in the show is likable, and both of the men are gay. They are really annoying, the type of SJW that we often criticize.

The game immediately becomes one of identity victimhood (the gay white guy gets voted off first), and the whitest woman in the group with the red bandana declared herself "Hispanic". It was mildly entertaining to watch them "eat their own" for a relative small amount of money. This will quickly become the future of America.

Post: #2

Those people look like trash, but WB white Latina

Post: #3

I knew the least ugly woman would receive it for some reason. Scrolled to end of the video and wasn't surprised. Too annoying to watch it all.

If there was a contest like that here and you'd see some "eat their own" too. Even worse haha.

Post: #4

1:35 Reparations for what, bitch? I thought you just said you were an immigrant here. "Working on issues of climate change" but needs $1000 for new tires... that must be some fancy bicycle you fucking turd.

Triggered. Can't make it past 2:30.

Post: #5

Ya, I'm not even going to try to watch that. I know I'm not strong enough.

Post: #6

(04-26-2018 07:09 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  Those people look like trash, but WB white Latina

She's like 300 pounds, man.

The thirst is real...

Post: #7

This is a complete rip off from the 2015 film Circle that can be watched on Netflix, especially when they started talking about race and being eliminated,

Except in the movie, they drop dead.

Post: #8

(04-26-2018 08:01 PM)Suits Wrote:  Ya, I'm not even going to try to watch that. I know I'm not strong enough.

Smart move, it's twenty minutes you'll never get back. The whole thing sucked. I'm not surprised the white dude got voted off immediately.

(04-26-2018 07:38 PM)Salvadore Wrote:  I knew the least ugly woman would receive it for some reason. Scrolled to end of the video and wasn't surprised. Too annoying to watch it all.

If there was a contest like that here and you'd see some "eat their own" too. Even worse haha.

I would hope to have had the presence of mind to tell her to make a grand on the stripper pole.

(04-26-2018 07:09 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  Those people look like trash, but WB white Latina

I hope you don't mean the 400 pound white whale who declared herself latina. Ilah is the hot hispanic looking female - she got voted off quick even though she had a child and was a fulltime student. Unbelievable. I don't know or care the name of the whale.

Post: #9

Comments on the video are hilarious(and showing the soy-ification of society):

Quote:This video makes me so angry, woow

Quote:ilah deserved the money the most god im sad and pissed off. love you ilah i hope better things await such a sweet, kind person like you in the future

Quote:I already hate Hodan after what she said at 14:40

Quote:Wow can’t believe how angry this made me

Quote:Welp. This made me hate Shakera and Hodan and Kris even more. Jesus you guys are horrendous

Quote:The last three people should literally kill them selves . They just used their race to justify their shitty lives and they pinned they’re life issues on white people even though they have nothing to do with it. They are the kind of people who make the world a shitty place. Also they were being blatantly racist to the white people and Ilah.

Quote:What a horrible hate-filled person Hodan is

Quote:After watching this video and reading the comments I genuinely feel exhausted.

Quote:This video lowkey pissed me off lol.

How soft do you have to be for a silly video to trigger so much emotion in you?

On a side note it warms my heart that people are calling out black racism. I'm not sure if they did before...

Post: #10

If you want to watch people voting themselves out, with only one person receiving 1 million$ and the second one 100000$, then watch Survivor, on CBS.

Way funnier, and way more cutthroat, while being entertaining.

Post: #11

Red dress at 8:39



She's also the most pleasant of the bunch

Though that's not saying much

Post: #12

(04-26-2018 08:38 PM)LINUX Wrote:  This is a complete rip off from the 2015 film Circle that can be watched on Netflix, especially when they started talking about race and being eliminated,

Except in the movie, they drop dead.

That was an excellent movie with an ending I did not anticipate.

G

Post: #13

(04-26-2018 09:04 PM)The Catalyst Wrote:  How soft do you have to be for a silly video to trigger so much emotion in you?

... and to have such a lack of dignity that you'd publicly-reveal your dysfunctional psychology for just $1000.

Are SJW's that bad with their money? I discovered yesterday that the young fella who I'd been helping out around Christmas and that I taught to budget has been saving $150 a fortnight on a fortnightly-income of $430 for the last three months, so when his electricity and gas bills finally came, he still had $600 to spare. I fully-expected that'd I'd be having to kick in for it, but he said he really-liked what I'd said about it always being good to be able to access a few grand in an emergency and he wants to get that security net in place first, and THEN save for things he wants from there. (His Dad had a habit of pawning everything they owned whenever he had a bill to pay).

He's seventeen and living-independently. What's their excuse?

Post: #14

This is obviously staged at least to some degree and is basically a propaganda to guide people who is to be considered the biggest victim and thus entitled to biggest privileges - and I mean real privileges - like free taxpayer money.

Everyone's identity is just reduced to race, sex and orientation. These people have no personality at all.

The only white male gets voted off first obviously. Also he was the least gay of the two, the other "man" was constantly mentioning how he has husband. So I am not sure if the first guy to get voted off was really gay or just a soyboy, but anyway he was a white male so obviously he had to leave first. The guy only came up with a problem with a broken windshield - so I think this moment was staged and meant to show that you know - white people don't have any real problems in life, they are so privileged. So that is first message - white men - don't even bother to get any sympathy in this new society we are building.

After that all three white women get voted off starting with the only attractive one and then both fatties. So we get a moment when all four white people sit in the voted off corner and we have the three brown people left . Again the message is clear - white people - don't even bother. Every single brown person is above you and more privileged to tax payer money then you are. But if you want to increase your chances among yourselves, then become fat and unattractive. Still it won't help you at all against people of color.

Now we have a brown normal woman remaining, a brown muslim woman remaining and a brown gay man remaining. Everybody knows that the remaining male has no chance, gay or not. So I assume the Muslim woman should be the most privileged. But apparently they decided to pull a more devious stunt here and show the supposed "altruistic" nature of the muslims, with the muslim woman being the one who votes for someone else and that is obviously the other woman, not the man. So messages here: 1)women should support each other against men; 2)Muslims are altruistic and good people; 3)If you are a man - don't even bother, even if you are gay; 4)All power and money should be given to brown women.


How could and should this have been properly handled in a normal society - the contestants should themselves come up with a game to determine a winner, something like guessing riddles or whatever and scoring points. So that the winner is based on ability and some merit, not disability and being a useless parasite.

Post: #15

People compete like this for $1000? That's £720...have these jackasses developed such bad soy latte addictions that they need to do this for so little money?

It's like the producers had a meeting where the main question was "What's the least amount of money we can spend to hold the Oppression Olympics?"

Post: #16

(04-27-2018 01:49 AM)Matsufubu Wrote:  People compete like this for $1000? That's £720...have these jackasses developed such bad soy latte addictions that they need to do this for so little money?

It's like the producers had a meeting where the main question was "What's the least amount of money we can spend to hold the Oppression Olympics?"

You are too priviliged - you don't understand their plight. They don't have as many opportunities to earn 1000 bucks as you.

Btw, assuming it was not all staged, it is really intresting if that winner really walked off with the money or did she share or at least bought pizza to all the other contestants, like a decent human being would? My bet is that she bought it that she really did deserve to win and gave them nothing.

If I would have won I would give 100$ to everyone else, but obviously that is why I would never win - I don't view myself as a victim strongly enough.

Post: #17

Although the show was most likely scripted, you'd think that in a functioning group they'd just split the money evenly and call it a day.

Take any seven guys out here in the sticks and it would play out like this. The alpha would say "even split?" One or two at most would argue the point. At that point the alpha would say to the other 4 guys "five way split?"

And that would be all she wrote.

Post: #18

(04-27-2018 04:30 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Although the show was most likely scripted, you'd think that in a functioning group they'd just split the money evenly and call it a day.

Take any seven guys out here in the sticks and it would play out like this. The alpha would say "even split?" One or two at most would argue the point. At that point the alpha would say to the other 4 guys "five way split?"

As far as I know with professional gameshows/reality TV it's against the rules to split the money, otherwise (virtually)everyone would do it in every situation like this.

Whether this is also true here I wouldn't know.

Post: #19

(04-26-2018 11:32 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(04-26-2018 09:04 PM)The Catalyst Wrote:  How soft do you have to be for a silly video to trigger so much emotion in you?

... and to have such a lack of dignity that you'd publicly-reveal your dysfunctional psychology for just $1000.

Are SJW's that bad with their money? I discovered yesterday that the young fella who I'd been helping out around Christmas and that I taught to budget has been saving $150 a fortnight on a fortnightly-income of $430 for the last three months, so when his electricity and gas bills finally came, he still had $600 to spare. I fully-expected that'd I'd be having to kick in for it, but he said he really-liked what I'd said about it always being good to be able to access a few grand in an emergency and he wants to get that security net in place first, and THEN save for things he wants from there. (His Dad had a habit of pawning everything they owned whenever he had a bill to pay).

He's seventeen and living-independently. What's their excuse?

I spent a fortnight once with some chavs. I was quite chuffed with the experience. We had a cracking time. In the morning, we had a big fry-up.

But when the land lady caught one of the birds in her starkers, she threw a wobbly. Afterwards, we had a larf about it all. Now excuse me while I piss off back to the Wigan Casino -- they're a friendly lot, through and through. One of the lads lent me a tenner last week.

Post: #20

That's a preview of what Hell will be like for these people.

Post: #21

(04-27-2018 04:30 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Although the show was most likely scripted, you'd think that in a functioning group they'd just split the money evenly and call it a day.

Take any seven guys out here in the sticks and it would play out like this. The alpha would say "even split?" One or two at most would argue the point. At that point the alpha would say to the other 4 guys "five way split?"

And that would be all she wrote.

Or pick straws, roll the dice and have one guy take it. Beers are on him.

Does not surprise me how this went - oppression olympics all the way. The black Muslim woman only did not get it because she essentially gave it away to the second "most oppressed" group - the black woman.

Even more brutal are some of the current psychological tests run at colleges. I read some experiments where they ask a bunch of SJWs, whether they would rather kill one black man vs 1000 white women and children. And most pick the 1000 white women and children.

Rest assured - the last time this kind of rampant oppressor hatred was stoked - it ended in pure genocide.

Post: #22

(04-26-2018 07:01 PM)Roosh Wrote:  A Youtube channel did a sort of game show where seven people have to pick only one to receive money. Not a single character in the show is likable, and both of the men are gay. They are really annoying, the type of SJW that we often criticize.

The game immediately becomes one of identity victimhood (the gay white guy gets voted off first), and the whitest woman in the group with the red bandana declared herself "Hispanic". It was mildly entertaining to watch them "eat their own" for a relative small amount of money. This will quickly become the future of America.

Meh this has already existed for 18 years on American television. Survivor and Big Brother are basically this concept, voting each other out and rely on social and strategic game for 1 to be left standing and win either $1 million or $500,000. The main difference here seems to be it's for a lot less money and they're all SJWs instead of only a % of them.

Post: #23

(04-27-2018 04:20 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(04-27-2018 04:30 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Although the show was most likely scripted, you'd think that in a functioning group they'd just split the money evenly and call it a day.

Take any seven guys out here in the sticks and it would play out like this. The alpha would say "even split?" One or two at most would argue the point. At that point the alpha would say to the other 4 guys "five way split?"

And that would be all she wrote.

Or pick straws, roll the dice and have one guy take it. Beers are on him.

Does not surprise me how this went - oppression olympics all the way. The black Muslim woman only did not get it because she essentially gave it away to the second "most oppressed" group - the black woman.

Even more brutal are some of the current psychological tests run at colleges. I read some experiments where they ask a bunch of SJWs, whether they would rather kill one black man vs 1000 white women and children. And most pick the 1000 white women and children.

Rest assured - the last time this kind of rampant oppressor hatred was stoked - it ended in pure genocide.

Do you have links or sources for the bolded section, Zel?

Post: #24

(04-27-2018 05:18 PM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  

(04-27-2018 04:20 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(04-27-2018 04:30 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Although the show was most likely scripted, you'd think that in a functioning group they'd just split the money evenly and call it a day.

Take any seven guys out here in the sticks and it would play out like this. The alpha would say "even split?" One or two at most would argue the point. At that point the alpha would say to the other 4 guys "five way split?"

And that would be all she wrote.

Or pick straws, roll the dice and have one guy take it. Beers are on him.

Does not surprise me how this went - oppression olympics all the way. The black Muslim woman only did not get it because she essentially gave it away to the second "most oppressed" group - the black woman.

Even more brutal are some of the current psychological tests run at colleges. I read some experiments where they ask a bunch of SJWs, whether they would rather kill one black man vs 1000 white women and children. And most pick the 1000 white women and children.

Rest assured - the last time this kind of rampant oppressor hatred was stoked - it ended in pure genocide.

Do you have links or sources for the bolded section, Zel?

I saw this in some other test - cannot find it now, but the Harvard one is bad enough:

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/Study?tid=-1

Here you are conditioned to associate bad words with European Americans and good words with African Americans.

There is a ton of crap in those tests - and the funny part is that the tests actually have the reverse effect since the bias is hardly missed by any sane individual. They later reverse the association fields and test how quickly you react to it - if you do it slower or faster, then that is supposed to be proof of your racism.

Post: #25

Not joking here.

I took the Harvard one, and it turns out I have an implicit bias against white men with guns.