Post: #1

I've been trying to make a ranking of the best cities to pick up women based on the travel section . Taking into account cost of living, obesity, breast size, internet connection, logistics, etc.

At first I tried to read all the top posts in the section, but I realized it is taking me to long to parse all that information and put it all together. So I built a small site where everyone can send their ratings.

I worked on this for a few days, hope it could be helpful to someone.

I added a few clubs and bars I found in the threat of Ho Chi Minh:

https://pickupok.com/Vietnam/Ho%20Chi%20Minh%20City

If you don't find the city you are at, I will added manually.
Any feature request is welcome. I hope you don't find this spammy

   

Post: #2

(03-03-2018 03:15 PM)Altium Wrote:  I've been trying to make a ranking of the best cities to pick up women based on the travel section . Taking into account cost of living, obesity, breast size, internet connection, logistics, etc.

At first I tried to read all the top posts in the section, but I realized it is taking me to long to parse all that information and put it all together. So I built a small site where everyone can send their ratings.

I worked on this for a few days, hope it could be helpful to someone.

I added a few clubs and bars I found in the threat of Ho Chi Minh:

https://pickupok.com/Vietnam/Ho%20Chi%20Minh%20City

If you don't find the city you are at, I will added manually.
Any feature request is welcome. I hope you don't find this spammy

Interesting indeed, but, some figures are way off: like, Obesity ranked red-flag at 7 in Buenos Aires? Really? But, please, do keep working on this data-gathering project, it has potential.

Post: #3

Breast as a category but not butts?

Post: #4

Good work Altium.I can only scroll down to Budapest.Cant see anything below Budapest.Is that where it ends? Thank you for the time spent.I have been to Lima countless times.May be time for Colombia.

Post: #5

Good idea, you also need an ass-ometer

Post: #6

Great idea! This has lots of potential.

Post: #7

Thanks for the feedback!
I will add the ass metric for sure. I added only 30 cities, I don't have an automated system to do it. I've done it manually.
I will weight differently the obesity, so it doesn't look that drastic in some countries.
It looks like people is not submitting their ratings, I guess I will search for more data and unpload it myself.

Post: #8

Las Vegas should be added to this list.

Post: #9

HOnestly feels like numbers pulled out of someones head who barely or hasnt visited the places and just wants to make a website

Post: #10

(03-04-2018 11:10 AM)SLSlayer Wrote:  Las Vegas should be added to this list.

it's already there since the beginning:

https://pickupok.com/USA/Las%20Vegas

(03-04-2018 11:20 AM)Beirut Wrote:  HOnestly feels like numbers pulled out of someones head who barely or hasnt visited the places and just wants to make a website

I know it could look like that, but the ratings that are not editable are extracted from these sources:

Breast:
http://www.averageheight.co/breast-cup-size-by-country

Obesity:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co...ite_note-3

Life quality:
https://developers.teleport.org/api/gett...quality_ua

The whole idea is to crowdsource the other ratings to make it closer to reality.

Post: #11

A budget of $800/month in Kiev ?!? that's a joke - even without accommodation.

With this budget, "nightlife" would mean "have 3 beers" and "good dinner" some cat vareniki or shashlik with house vinegar (ooops sorry, wine) by the glass at a cheap venue.

Good luck with the top-tier ladies with a budget of 22 €/day lol.

Post: #12

A chart is probably going to be a pretty poor way to compare the female prospects of a city. Just take Buenos Aires for example, where very few young women are chubby but your chart has it rated as high obesity. The nightlife might be a 9 or 10 in BsAs on objective measures but it's super inefficient for gaming. Buenos Aires has quality almost as good as EE but the higher quality gets stupid amounts of attention and is jaded and super flaky. Ultimately you just have to do the research because stats even for some pretty objective measures can be very deceiving.

You should have an asterik on Colombian breast size since all of the fake tetas are throwing the numbers off. I guess budget is all relative, but there's no way you could live comfortably in the best parts of these cities for those amounts.

Post: #13

DELETE

Post: #14

(03-04-2018 01:02 PM)Count Pierre Wrote:  A budget of $800/month in Kiev ?!? that's a joke - even without accommodation.

With this budget, "nightlife" would mean "have 3 beers" and "good dinner" some cat vareniki or shashlik with house vinegar (ooops sorry, wine) by the glass at a cheap venue.

Good luck with the top-tier ladies with a budget of 22 €/day lol.

The cost calculation comes from here:
https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/in...rrency=USD

I do "A single person monthly costs: 365.42$" + "Apartment (1 bedroom) in City Centre 453.90$"
I will add some extra for nightclubs and restaurants. Can I ask how much are your expenses there? I could make it editable too.

(03-04-2018 01:06 PM)jcardial Wrote:  A chart is probably going to be a pretty poor way to compare the female prospects of a city. Just take Buenos Aires for example, where very few young women are chubby but your chart has it rated as high obesity. The nightlife might be a 9 or 10 in BsAs on objective measures but it's super inefficient for gaming. Buenos Aires has quality almost as good as EE but the higher quality gets stupid amounts of attention and is jaded and super flaky. Ultimately you just have to do the research because stats even for some pretty objective measures can be very deceiving.

You should have an asterik on Colombian breast size since all of the fake tetas are throwing the numbers off. I guess budget is all relative, but there's no way you could live comfortably in the best parts of these cities for those amounts.

The club ratings are editable, if you think they are off just make your contribution with the value it should be. The ranking is game oriented.

I want to add more options for game and girls for each country. For example dancing game, dinner game, day game, night game, flakiness, etc

I don't know why Argentina is rated so high, the data is actually from the World Health Organisation. Female prevalence of obesity there is 27.3%, as high as UK with a 26.9%.

Post: #15

(03-04-2018 01:59 PM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

(03-03-2018 05:56 PM)NordicTom Wrote:  Breast as a category but not butts?

Scrap the whole thing, it's useless without butt information.

It's already there!!

Post: #16

(03-04-2018 02:04 PM)Altium Wrote:  

(03-04-2018 01:59 PM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

(03-03-2018 05:56 PM)NordicTom Wrote:  Breast as a category but not butts?

Scrap the whole thing, it's useless without butt information.

It's already there!!

Just took a look after finishing the thread! Excellent work, Altium!

Post: #17

Great idea and execution, Altium. I think the goal of a website like this is to essentially take dynamic, unstructured, subjective information and convert it into static, structured, objective information. This requires heavy curation, otherwise the website eventually falls into disrepair. To succeed, there needs to be incentive for the users to do the curation, such as building a reputation for themselves, and extremely clear rules on how they are to do the curation. Examples of websites that have successfully followed this model are Stack Overflow, Quora, and even this forum.

Also, I think subjective metrics would be more useful than some of these objective ones, in most cases. For example, instead of comparing the marginal difference in breast size between countries, it would be more useful to have curated pictures of normal girls from each country. Also, information such as good for white guys, good for black guys, good for dark-haired guys, etc. would be helpful. Finally, a simple breakdown of good for night game, good for day game, good for online game would be useful. Think of how you can simplify the metrics as much as possible. You will have to simplify in order to scale the curation.

Post: #18

I agree with Lampwick, this is a great idea but execution will be very difficult.

You should have a custom feature that can exclude certain traits. For example, I don't really care about the bar and club rank but thin and breast size are very important. I would also consider a culture rank or foreigner acceptance rank. In addition, the cost is pretty meaningless and should probably be broken down further to things like rent, food/drink cost, and transportation cost.

It is a good start Altium and if you get this right it will be an awesome site. Hopefully you take our suggestions as constructive criticism and us not hating on your idea.

Post: #19

Thanks! this was nicely done

Post: #20

(03-04-2018 11:20 AM)Beirut Wrote:  HOnestly feels like numbers pulled out of someones head who barely or hasnt visited the places and just wants to make a website

Bit like you, barely visited a place but posted a datasheet

Post: #21

This is actually a decent idea. Though some of the categories you can't vote on..

Post: #22

I agree on all rankings except for logistics. Depending on the budget your logistics could be perfect or terrible in any given town.
If you would say logistics at a certain budget that would make more sense. But a good idea in general.