Post: #151

(04-28-2019 06:13 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  Carl is stepping it up. His videos were all lackluster but now he is moving on to being a full-time shitlord. He has his formula down and the media and politicians keep taking the bait. They never learn, just rinse lather repeat. Either Carl is forcibly retired by UKIP or he wins.

Completely agree, he's shitlording himself into office.

Or, to explain myself better, if I were a betting man, much like with Trump in 2016, I think the odds are 1 to 3 for the win, not 1 to 50 like the media thinks. Betting on Sargon is smart.

Post: #152

I have an £10 bet on UKIP. If they somehow win, I'll get £3220

A month is a long time in politics.

Post: #153

Sargon is boring but you have to admit he is holding his frame well.

Post: #154

I tend to disagree. He is “holding frame well” but it doesn’t come off as confident and dominant the way it does when Trump does it. It comes off like he’s a try hard and is probably going to be perceived that way by the majority of “normies” who aren’t part of internet culture.

Post: #155

The Daily Mail did a hit piece on him, where they included this "sickening" quote:

Quote: ‘I can be quoted as saying you can f*** young boys. It’s actually not as controversial as you think. Depends on the child, doesn’t it? The ancient Greeks were pederasts. It was considered to be normal. It was mentoring.’

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6967747/amp/Now-Ukip-candidate-said-wouldnt-rape-Labour-MP-says-OK-sexually-abuse-boys.html


Pretty damning right? Who knew that Sargon openly supported the sexual abuse of young boys?

Actually, that single quote is four different quotes taken from three different podcasts, stitched together to give the appearance of a single quote, and completely out of context.





Absolutely shameless.

I see no difference between the article and this Simpsons clip, which was supposed to be a purposefully over the top exaggeration of media lies:

Post: #156

Sargon will be continued to be attacked by the media since they don't control him, haven't vetted and greenlit him. He is nationalist with old-school civic nationalist views but clearly opposed Islamic immigration and has made numerous videos that not all cultures are equal. The globalists don't control him and as others have said:

"Sargon is akin to a Youtube-4Chan-shitlord running for office! He legitimizes all of 4chan as real opposition!"

That is the last thing they want. They attack guys like PewDiPie for the same reasons - simply because they don't control him and even a somewhat left-leaning but sane PewDiPie must be torn down, because he could turn on them with his massive audience. Benjamin is of the same bent - he is no sellout even if he tries his best to distance himself from those evil ethno-nationalists. Still - he is correctly viewed by the establishment as not reliable - he could easily amend his views one day and say: "Fuck - it - it's Britain for the Brits - I was slightly wrong in the past." The indicator of their servants is either to be a useful idiot who swallows all their lies as well as updates or someone who knows the correct opposition knowing how far he can go and be still accepted at the table. He is trying to go a Jordan Peterson route, but I am not so sure whether he has enough backing from above.

Post: #157

His main source of income is out. They come for the moneey first.

Revenge for runing for office. Mr Metokur warned Sargon that they might ban him fully if he runs for office.

Post: #158

Kudos for putting himself into the grinder and he isn't half getting a lot of shit from the scum media here, especially over those rape comments he made. Oh the horror of no context! Fucking yellow journalism.

The country will not vote for guys like him on major platforms. The Brexit party is going to take a good number of votes followed by Labour and Lib Dems. The Tories are going to be annhilated. UKIP is being sidelined.

Post: #159

He's single handedly destroying UKIP, through his own arrogance and mediocre intelligence. Thinking he could 'Trump it out'. No, Trump is a fabulously wealthy, charasmatic leader of men, Sargon is a chubby, bearded twat that looks like he should be working in a Car Phone Warehouse.

Post: #160

UKIP has been barely a party of one single issue that was dominated by Nigel Farage. And he left before Brexit could even happen.

Sargon has nothing to destroy anyway.

As for Trump - it's standard Neocon program with him.

Post: #161

(05-11-2019 05:42 PM)Elmore Wrote:  He's single handedly destroying UKIP, through his own arrogance and mediocre intelligence. Thinking he could 'Trump it out'. No, Trump is a fabulously wealthy, charasmatic leader of men, Sargon is a chubby, bearded twat that looks like he should be working in a Car Phone Warehouse.

Piss off. He's doing more for his beliefs than you, and most people on here. Trump is a zionist shill and a complete let down.

Post: #162

(05-12-2019 12:10 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  UKIP has been barely a party of one single issue that was dominated by Nigel Farage. And he left before Brexit could even happen.

Sargon has nothing to destroy anyway.

As for Trump - it's standard Neocon program with him.

The Brexit party and Nigel are 1 trick ponies too! However the likes of Nigel are completely ignorant of the demograph and voting bloc issues the country is now seeing across the board.

Real shit is coming down the line this half century.

Post: #163

< Back when Brexit happened I was decried as a nay-sayer that it would not happen. And now it's pretty clear - the immigration will continue with or without Brexit and the penalties for the EU leave are so steep, that a second vote might be coming. It's not that the UK could not live well without the EU, just some minor trade deals - no it's that they tank the UK as punishment.

The same with Trump. I did not expect him to win, but obviously he was a good safety valve for the people thinking that something would change. And to a certain extent it did, but it became more or less the normal Neocon program of good economics coupled with wars and no change to the immigration policy.

So what has really changed with Brexit or Trump when the US as well as the UK will become minority-Anglo/White in a few short years anyway. I don't know the stats from the UK, but the ones from Germany are terrible - in 2100 Germany will be 20% native German, 50% Muslim, rest - who cares - also with a huge population boom of 130 mio. AND THE UK HAS HIGHER NON-EU IMMIGRATION NUMBERS THAN GERMANY!!!! They had some 400.000 non Euros coming in 2018 and not much less in 2017.

Brexit wasn't planned for sure, they wanted it to be the final vote. But they will likely vote again or tank the economy, then vote again.

Sargon is at least attempting something, but he is mostly a 4-chan-aware normie with no background in the real power structure behind the scenes. His view of history is likely something of "it just happened", he does not know anything about the issue of usury and the decades of planning it took to get even to this stage. Cudos to him, because he might tank his internet career for his beliefs.

Post: #164

The one good thing about Sargon being deplatformed is it shows no amount of punching right and saying "leftists are the real racists" will protect you (so don't do it.)

Post: #165

(05-12-2019 07:54 AM)Teedub Wrote:  

(05-11-2019 05:42 PM)Elmore Wrote:  He's single handedly destroying UKIP, through his own arrogance and mediocre intelligence. Thinking he could 'Trump it out'. No, Trump is a fabulously wealthy, charasmatic leader of men, Sargon is a chubby, bearded twat that looks like he should be working in a Car Phone Warehouse.

Piss off. He's doing more for his beliefs than you, and most people on here. Trump is a zionist shill and a complete let down.

First point, why so salty. Second, i'm no Trump fanboy, but he won power, thus depriving it of the fucking Satan that is the Clintons. He's no hero, but for that alone we can be grateful. Sargon will achieve nothing.

The Right in the UK are a fucking disaster, so fractured, so much controlled opposition. Ukip, For Britain, Brexit Party, even Tommy ffs. How splintered can it get. Too many egos, too many careerists, and Sargon's one of them, and not a very good one either.

For the record the best them IMHO is For Britain. At least Anne Marie is talking about White people having a homeland, and openly rejecting any notions of White Guilt. UKIP, Sargon, Dankula, Tommy and Farage are a bunch of Civic Nationalist cuckholds.

Post: #166

The civnat cucks are on the chopping block too which is a huge mistake for the globalists because now they're nothing but a stepping stone to ethno-nationalism. If civic nationalism doesn't allow for ethnic Britons to negotiate specifically for the continuation of their culture and indeed their ethnicity itself then it's a waste of time.

Fortunately the globalists are angling towards sending people to the gulags for merely being white and flying the national flag so Tommy Robinson might rally people to civic nationalism but the globalists will push them all further to enthnic nationalism.

Personally I don't think there's any sized pile of skulls that's too high a price to pay to ensure that in 100 years Britannia is still inhabited by ethnic Britons, that Ireland is still inhabited by ethnic Irish, etc etc.

If I were a warlord faced with a Germany where only a thousand ethnic Germans remained I would purge a hundred milllion foreigners to rightfully give the land back to my ancestors. I'd give the invaders the option to decamp and piss off first. I'm nice like that. But if they pushed the issue they'd all get the sword. So it was for the Moors once. That's why I'm not all that worried about muslims "outbreeding" Germans, French, etc. It doesn't take many European natives to drive out invaders regardless of whether they're first, second or tenth generation.

Post: #167

I'm not salty. I'm just sick and tired of people on the internet saying what they'd do differently, or that people like Sargon or Tommy etc aren't doing precisely what they'd like them to do. It's really irritating.

Edit: I 100% agree with you about the splintering, that is also really irritating. That UKIP are so down in the polls is saddening. I might have been too brazen with my "piss off" phrase, so I apologise for that, but I've been in this IRL for many years and it's just so frustrating.

Post: #168

(05-13-2019 09:44 AM)Elmore Wrote:  

(05-12-2019 07:54 AM)Teedub Wrote:  

(05-11-2019 05:42 PM)Elmore Wrote:  He's single handedly destroying UKIP, through his own arrogance and mediocre intelligence. Thinking he could 'Trump it out'. No, Trump is a fabulously wealthy, charasmatic leader of men, Sargon is a chubby, bearded twat that looks like he should be working in a Car Phone Warehouse.

Piss off. He's doing more for his beliefs than you, and most people on here. Trump is a zionist shill and a complete let down.

First point, why so salty. Second, i'm no Trump fanboy, but he won power, thus depriving it of the fucking Satan that is the Clintons. He's no hero, but for that alone we can be grateful. Sargon will achieve nothing.

Trump has done things 180 degrees from what he planned to do on major issues. No wars started yet but his admin is full of globalists the Bush era would be proud of.

Sargon is making the mistake of appealing to logic with no big backers behind him. He can be dismissed as some guy and those with real backers, aka lobbyists will do as they've always done, seize power and abuse the system.

The existing power structure does not favour men coming in from nowhere and taking big crowds onto his side. Look at Enoch Powell and how easily they brushed him aside and he was in a completely different era and a different man.

Post: #169

So apparently I've been pulled into Sargon's mess, had to write a piece rebutting the false claims about me. Here's the relevant portion regarding Sargon:

Quote:I wonder why you never bothered to contact me about Sargon, the main focus of your video; he and I aren’t exactly on good terms. I’ve been watching the recent events surrounding him with mild amusement. For those of you who don’t know, The Daily Mail published a piece where they took four different quotes from Sargon, pasted them together out of context, and used it to imply that he supported pedophilia. I find this amusing because this is the same thing he did to me back in 2015. Back when Phil Mason published that attack video, Sargon – who’d been my friend and ally for some time – pulled a complete 180, publically denouncing me and calling me a liar, purely for the sake of ingratiating himself with the angry chemist. Live by the sword, die by the sword, Sargon. Don’t complain about your enemies using slander to gain a petty advantage over you, when you’ve done the same thing to others.

Sargon’s a midwit who spends too much time on 4chan. He has all the political integrity of a weather vane. He has no principles which inform his ideas, nor does he have principles which guide his behaviour. His political stance boils down to “I wish I was 20 years old again, I liked living in that world.” You really should have reached out to me, Porsalin, instead of assuming you knew where I stood.

Post: #170

He killed it

Post: #171

What an absolute shitshow - I love it! For the record, I got sick of S'rg'n some time ago, but I will be voting for the smug buffoon. Too funny not to.

Post: #172

(05-17-2019 05:31 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  



He killed it

Yes, he did. And it's amazing how at the start she basically announced that she'd already talked policy with other UKIP people, but this was going to be a hit piece.

Post: #173

(05-17-2019 05:31 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  



He killed it

The only good thing about Sargon is that he is fighting for what he believes even if he tried to punch as much right as possible.

But ultimately he had no idea of how far he was going and given the fact that there are thousands or tens of thousands of footage, then it was clear that he must have said a few things which were not PC.

I would personally go into the rape stats themselves, but the feminists and normal women all assume that they are far worse than it seems. When I told one that the real rape stats from Western women being raped by Western men are less than 1 in 2000, then she wanted to attack me physically. The morons truly believe this 1 in 4 story because they heard some odd story about a girl getting fucked a bit harder than she agreed to or one who had a bad one-night-stand experience. The real rapes are seldom shared. For the countries that publish them like Norway then it's a disaster - 99%+ of rapes by strangers are done by Muslims or Africans.

But I guess that citing those stats would tank Sargon's chances even more.

Post: #174

I don't think he 'killed it', he was her intellectual superior and when watching (as we do) with the facts he was certainly in the right. However, the average normie will still come away thinking of him as "that internet rape joke guy". Killing it is what Jordan Peterson did to Cathy Newman where normies came away absolutely convinced that the media lies, repeatedly and couldn't understand what was so "evil and alt right" about the interviewee and it showed up the media witch hunt for the hysterical smear campaign it was. I wish Sargon all the best.

Post: #175

Why are feminists and the like obsessed with rape? It's the moral panic that refuses to die. How many of us has met a woman (outside of dating crazy chicks from POF) who ever complained about being raped? We are to believe 1 in 4 women are being pawed and molested by men on a daily basis; yet no woman in my family or female in my social circle has ever mentioned this having happened to them.

Is it some kind of dystopian fantasy?

I'm sick of hearing about the subject. It's amplification in the culture is not proportional to the amount of actual rape (real rape, not regret sex) happening today in the west.

P.S. the line of questioning is retarded. If we are no longer allowed to joke about rape then what other crimes are we no longer allowed to joke about? Genocide? Holocausts? Murder? Incest? Child molestation? How about we round up every comedian who has ever made a joke about one of these subjects and try to unperson them too.

All we'd have left would be Amy Schumer.