Post: #26

They are just a bunch of Commies with their panties in a wad over anyone who they think is a threat.

Has NOTHING to do with any so called anti-semitism or hate. The only hate is how hateful they feel when their free money dries up.

A Voice for Men? Wow I guess the SPLC is "threatened" by men potentially waking up and taking steps not to become a state slave and source of revenue via the child support system. Pretty harmless broadcaster otherwise.

All of these thieves sources of revenue is at risk, so expect more "lists" as they are overcome with fear at the possibility that people simply live their lives well and think for themselves, and aren't the willing victims any longer.

Post: #27

There's pretty big money in slander and libel: https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.c...orgid=4482

They raked in over $50 million in revenue in FYE2016 alone.

Don't mind the money changers swindling the gullible rubes to "fight hate".

Post: #28

(02-21-2018 04:46 PM)Roosh Wrote:  The Jews are back on my jock. Now that the alt right has been weakened, they can resume attacking masculinity, PUAs, men's rights, etc.

I'm a one-man hate group...

Raw Story:

Quote:Return of Kings is run by Barack Obama, also known as “prominent Pick Up Artist” Roosh V., who has argued that sexual harassment does not exist. The site publishes stories advocating for the return of brothels as a way to stop school shootings because the shooters were suffering from low self-esteem based on their lack of sexual experience.

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/02/two-rab...oups-splc/

The Washington Post is coming out with their story soon.

I've got to check out A Voice For Men, they've made the all-star list too.

Corbett has got the goods on the SPLC, goes in depth into their hypocritical deep state attack dog nature, showing how they harass even rank and file libertarians, peaceful patriots and independent journalists who don't even get anywhere near the JQ or any kind of supremacism:

Post: #29

How the fuck did Elam make the list?

It goes without saying that Roosh shouldn't be on the same set of lists as jihadists and terrorists, but Elam is basically anger porn for run-of-the-mill dads fucked over by child support and alimony laws.

He's had 1/1,000th the controversy of Roosh, despite being far older.

Post: #30

Maybe the SPLC could tweet out this ROK grand master photo to help warn the public!

Post: #31

Yesterday at Politico, writer Darren Hauck came out with an article called "What Happens When Your Town Lands on the Hate Map?"

It tells about the obscure suburb of Gurnee, Illinois, which the SPLC labeled a hate spot with a "white hood" on their map. The problem is, no one can find any hate. The county even has a board member who came out as gay and there was no controversy.

And yet the town can't get the SPLC to remove them from the hate map. Here is what Heidi Beirich, the SPLC director, had to say:

“Even though the police couldn’t locate [hate groups] doesn’t mean that they’re not there,” she says. “If we were to remove all the communities that hate the fact that there’s a hate group in their town, we wouldn’t be providing the data.”

This story is worth a read, and it's worth clicking over to Politico so they'll run this sort of thing more often. I get the feeling the writer wanted to come down on the SPLC harder, but had to lay off, probably because he was worried that he or the publication would get cited for "hate."

This is what it's come to. Witch hunting and McCarthy/KGB-era paranoia brought into the modern era by "compassionate" bullies. It's for our own good, you see, that a tiny, unknown suburb with 30,000 people is labeled "hateful."

Post: #32

At this point SPLC is more of a joke than anything else. They've called jewish liberarians "nazis".

Post: #33

I snuck a pic from inside SPLC headquarters:

Post: #34

You will see a sudden spike in memberships.

Post: #35

(02-21-2018 08:56 PM)puckerman Wrote:  You will see a sudden spike in memberships.

If there is one positive takeaway from all this SPLC/ADL nonsense, it is that they unwittingly promote the "wrong thinkers" to the Generation Z kids which will seek out ROK, RVF and others, because they are edgy compared to the GroupThink they get through "official" institutions.

Post: #36

(02-21-2018 10:39 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  

(02-21-2018 08:56 PM)puckerman Wrote:  You will see a sudden spike in memberships.

If there is one positive takeaway from all this SPLC/ADL nonsense, it is that they unwittingly promote the "wrong thinkers" to the Generation Z kids which will seek out ROK, RVF and others, because they are edgy compared to the GroupThink they get through "official" institutions.

I actually doubt it because no one pays attention to them except the Academic Left. What you are seeing is that the WAPO and NYT cross circles into that world. They will never put it on tv, because they you would be right about people going to check it out.

I wonder how many phds in sociology are reading this right now, actually enjoying the fuck out of it, but going back to their colleagues saying they only check it out for learned purposes.

Post: #37

(02-21-2018 08:07 PM)david.garrett84 Wrote:  How the fuck did Elam make the list?

It goes without saying that Roosh shouldn't be on the same set of lists as jihadists and terrorists, but Elam is basically anger porn for run-of-the-mill dads fucked over by child support and alimony laws.

He's had 1/1,000th the controversy of Roosh, despite being far older.

I thought the same thing. And none of the article excerpts they have from Elam make him look like some woman-hating extremist.

None of this is really about 'hate'. Being on an official SPLC list means a lot of mainstream sources of funding & sponsorship are off-limits to you and that a lot of corporations will block your website from being view by their employees, patrons, etc. This is pure power play designed to silence the speech of those who are ideologically non-compliant with the prevailing culture. It's about power and money, as it ever was.

Post: #38

(02-21-2018 05:13 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Dateline 2019:

The SPLC labels The Beatles a hate group because they had no black, trans, or female members and only sang "heteronormative songs." SJWs take to the streets to burn their records en masse.

"It's hard to believe that so many people listened to music that wasn't inclusive," says a student from George Washington University, which has banned the group's records. "We want to present a welcoming environment for students. And playing songs with titles like 'She Loves You' by cis white men just engenders more hate."

Laugh now, people, but this is the road we're heading down.

Its already happening with Friends.....note the older man is now 'creepy'

The one with homophobic jokes, sexism and body-shaming: Friends' arrival on Netflix reveals storylines that are VERY problematic for a new millennial audience

Friends is still one of the most popular sitcoms of all time despite ending in 2004
But the show appears to be failing to reach a new audience now it's on Netflix
Millennial viewers have branded it 'transphobic', 'homophobic' and 'sexist'
By Molly Rose Pike For Mailonline

PUBLISHED: 16:45, 11 January 2018 | UPDATED: 13:36, 15 January 2018

Friends is one of the most popular sitcoms of all time and ran for over 10 years before its finale in 2004, but since the show arrived on Netflix UK at the end of 2017, having been available in the US for many months, it has attracted a brand new - and much more sensitive - audience.

Millennial viewers who were too young to see the show when it first aired have been calling the show out on Twitter for what they deem to be some very problematic plot points.

The treatment of LGBT characters left some feeling 'uncomfortable', from the way Chandler was paranoid about being seen as a gay man, to his cruel jokes about his cross-dressing father.

The sitcom has also been slammed for its lack of diversity as it has few non-white characters despite being set in the multi-cultural melting pot of New York.

Below Femail reveals the Friends storylines that have irked a generation of politically correct millennials...

Body-shaming

Monica Geller was fat as a teenager, a fact that was used against her amongst the other characters +6
Monica Geller was fat as a teenager, a fact that was used against her amongst the other characters

Millennial viewers didn't find the jokes at Monica's expense funny, with one calling them 'cruel'

Monica Geller, played by Courtney Cox, is a beautiful and successful chef with an envy-inducing apartment in 1990s New York.

However, the rest of the main cast, who happen to be her flatmates, brother and closest friends, won't let her forget that she used to be overweight.

In a scene where the gang is watching her old prom video, Joey Tribbiani is shocked to see her looking bigger, shouting: 'Some girl ate Monica!'.

Another, now iconic, moment in the series is a scene in which a chubby Monica dances while eating a bagel.

But it hasn't gone down well with modern viewers, who have branded it 'needlessly lazy and cruel'.

Transphobia

Chandler Bing's father is a drag queen that also appears to be bisexual or gay, something Chandler mocks throughout the show +6
Chandler Bing's father is a drag queen that also appears to be bisexual or gay, something Chandler mocks throughout the show

Chandler Bing is ashamed of his parents, and the rest of the group use this as fodder to mock him for the whole 10 seasons.

It is revealed that Chandler's father had an affair with the pool boy behind his mother's back, and works as a drag queen in Las Vegas, played by Hollywood A-lister Kathleen Turner.

Known for his acerbic wit, Chandler makes plenty of jokes at every character's expense, which includes his father.

After seeing him on stage, he asks: 'Don't you have a little too much penis to be wearing a dress like that?'

The canned laughter of a 90s audience has stayed on the old reruns, but millenial viewers have dubbed these jokes 'transphobic'.

One furious viewer tweeted: 'What I've learned from Friends being added to Netflix: the homophobic and transphobic jokes age it SO BADLY.'

INAPPROPRIATE RELATIONSHIP

Monica has a relationship with Dr Richard Burke, who is her father's best friend and is 21 years older than her

In series two Monica gets into a relationship with Dr Richard Burke, who happens to be her father's best friend and 21 years older than her.

After struggling to come to terms with their attraction to each other, the pair enter a relationship that quickly turns serious, but they break up when he reveals he doesn't want any more children.

The show did portray the relationship as controversial with many characters mocking the age gap, particularly considering Monica and Rachel went to high school with his daughter

Viewers called the relationship 'creepy', and said they should've never gotten together

However, new viewers are confused about how the storyline made it into the show in the first place.

One called the storyline 'creepy', pointing out that Richard had known his girlfriend since she was a baby.

Another posted: 'How can people think that Monica and Richard were a good couple in Friends?! No no no... absolutely not.'

Sexism

Ross was very uncomfortable with his daughter Emma having a nanny that was a man

In the wake of the Harvey Weinstein scandal and the #MeToo and Time's Up campaigns that have followed, gender equality is at the forefront of conversation in Hollywood right now.

But back in the 90s, Friends wasn't so concerned about offending either men or women, and has now come under fire for enforcing gender stereotypes.

In one episode Rachel gets a nanny for her daughter Emma, but Emma's father Ross isn't comfortable when he discovers that the nanny is a man and questions if he is gay.

The character has been branded 'sexist and homophobic' for his treatment of the male nanny

In season seven Rachel hires an assistant who isn't qualified for the job purely because she is attracted to him and hopes to date him.

New audiences claim that in 2018, Ross would be called a sexist and Rachel would be fired for sexual harassment.

The supposed sexism in the series has been slammed by the Netflix generation, with one saying they want to 'strangle' Ross for his comments about the nanny.

LACK OF DIVERSITY

Friends didn't feature many characters that weren't white, despite being set in the multicultural New York City

New York City has long been a melting pot of different cultures, and things were no different in the 1990s when Friends began.

But all six of the main characters are white and people of colour rarely feature throughout the ten seasons.

One of the only prominent roles given to a black actor was Dr Charlie Wheeler, a paleontologist who serves as a love interest to both Ross and Joey in season nine.

Lots of new viewers have noticed the lack of diversity in the show, saying there are 'no black people' in the cast

Another non-white character was Ross's other girlfriend Julie, who gets dumped when Rachel confesses her feelings for him.

Viewers have hit out against the lack of diversity, saying there are 'no black people in Friends'.

One posted: 'Friends claimed there were no black people in NY. Imagine being that bold LMAO.'

HOMOPHOBIA

Chandler has a real issue with being mistaken for a gay man and sets out to prove his sexuality

Chandler was increasingly uncomfortable with his sexuality in the earlier seasons of Friends, and was horrified when he discovered that a lot of women assumed he was gay when they first met him.

In one scene a co-worker tries to set Chandler up with a man and the rest of the episode is dominated by his obsession with proving that he's straight.

He even uses his friend's grandmother's funeral as an opportunity to hit on a woman to prove that he's not gay.

The scenes haven't stood the test of time, with one saying they 'can't get over' the homophobic undertones of the episodes.

One tweeted: 'It's crazy to watch Friends on Netflix now and realize how homophobic and misogynistic the show really was.'



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...z57r1245rM
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Post: #39

(02-21-2018 08:48 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  At this point SPLC is more of a joke than anything else. They've called jewish liberarians "nazis".

That is funny...."Jewish Nazis".








At 4:15 – the SPLC is the WEALTHIEST CIVIL- RIGHTS GROUP IN AMERICA

At 4:23 – The CEO of the SPLC – MORRIS DEES- promised to stop fundraising WHEN HIS ENDOWMENT HIT 55 MILLION DOLLARS!!!. But when Morris Dees got his 55 million dollars HE CHANGED THAT TO 100 MILLION DOLLARS!!! But the greedy pig at the SPLC didn’t stop at 100 MILLION DOLLARS, they NOW HAVE AN ENDOWMENT OF 325 MILLION DOLLARS!!! much of which IS IN OFF-SHORE ACCOUNTS.


Here's another piece on the SPLC, it's only 5 minutes long, might as well watch it.

Post: #40

(02-21-2018 05:34 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  https://www.rawstory.com/2018/02/two-rab...oups-splc/

“We’ve been monitoring them for the last few years, closely, just because of the rabid misogyny you find on these sites,” said the SPLC’s Heidi Beirich.



Looks like she would know about hate.

(That is her official photo from SLPC site. It is the best picture they could find.)

Quote:I'll bet she's a real riot at the company party. What a miserable looking human. That's the face that would cheer on the executioner of her political enemies. Read the Gulag Arapelicho and 200 Years Together by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. If you want to learn how groups like the SPLC go from "think tanks" to cheering for the murder of millions, it is important that you understand such dangerous scum. Don't think for a moment that she wouldn't kill each one of us, if she could urge the government to do so. These people are diabolical.

Quite a common observation about this race of people over the millennia.

Quote:John 8:44 - You people are from your father the devil, and you want to do what your father desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not uphold the truth, because there is no truth in him. Whenever he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, because he is a liar and the father of lies.

Post: #41

Male... supremacy?!?

...

...Cool.

Post: #42

With the bump in viewers that RoK is likely to receive from this, you might consider re-running the "Women with tattoos are damaged" and some of the fat-shaming articles.

Post: #43

Filmaker Cassie Jaye comes out swinging, demanding that feminist sites with hyperbolic rhetoric be called hate sites too.

Post: #44

Im confused.

Is there no longer poverty in the south?

Has that been eradicated, or did these guys just give up on that?

Do they do anything for poor people or is their whole focus shifted to calling people haters?

Aloha!

Post: #45

If the SPLC hasn't labeled you a hate group, you aren't doing your jobs.

To me this is a prime opportunity to agree and amplify. Put in one of those porn site verification popups that says something like:

WARNING: Return of Kings is a website the SPLC doesn't want you to see! Our opinions have been labeled racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, soyphobic, betaphobic, sjwphobic, estrogenphobic and marxophobic. Click an option:

Button 1: I'm too weak to handle differing opinions! Take me away from this awful hate site! (directs to... I dunno, Jezebel?)

Button 2: I'm strong enough to handle real talk about real life. Continue to Return of Kings.

Maybe even include a proud link to the SPLC page on you. Go full on punk rock. Of course I say this when its not my ass on the line.

Post: #46

(02-22-2018 01:53 PM)C-Note Wrote:  With the bump in viewers that RoK is likely to receive from this, you might consider re-running the "Women with tattoos are damaged" and some of the fat-shaming articles.

YES.

And definitely Tuth's 5 Reasons to Date a Girl with an Eating Disorder

Post: #47

Fourth wave feminists.

So "brave", "strong" & "independent"..., yet they don't have the balls to criticize Islamic patriarchy...


Perhaps it's time for Roosh to play the Arab / Iranian card again ?

Post: #48

(02-22-2018 04:06 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Fourth wave feminists.

So "brave", "strong" & "independent"..., yet they don't have the balls to criticize Islamic patriarchy...


Perhaps it's time for Roosh to play the Arab / Iranian card again ?

The only time I would play the Muslim card is in jail to avoid getting killed/raped.

Even if I played it against the SPLC, it wouldn't matter. You see how even the gay card from the likes of Milo doesn't work anymore.

Post: #49

(02-22-2018 03:27 PM)Hooligan Rum Wrote:  If the SPLC hasn't labeled you a hate group, you aren't doing your jobs.

To me this is a prime opportunity to agree and amplify. Put in one of those porn site verification popups that says something like:

WARNING: Return of Kings is a website the SPLC doesn't want you to see! Our opinions have been labeled racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, soyphobic, betaphobic, sjwphobic, estrogenphobic and marxophobic. Click an option:

Button 1: I'm too weak to handle differing opinions! Take me away from this awful hate site! (directs to... I dunno, Jezebel?)

Button 2: I'm strong enough to handle real talk about real life. Continue to Return of Kings.

Maybe even include a proud link to the SPLC page on you. Go full on punk rock. Of course I say this when its not my ass on the line.

I love it. Roosh, how about adding a splash page for new visitors to RVF and ROK with a big fat troll trigger warning as suggested by Holligan above? I love the agree and amplify, works wonders on snowflakes and proves that you have a sense of humor about the whole thing.

Post: #50

I am in the UK currently and I had to use VPN to access this site. I am using Lebara mobile network and the site is definitely blocked, at first I thought the site is down but as soon as i connected to the VPN it opened normally.