What is this crap with Laura Ingraham apologizing over mocking David Hogg's grades? What is there to apologize for? She caved at the very first assault from Soros goons, and now they're going to use that weakness to finish her off. Haven't "conservatives" learned their lesson after 518957151 witch-hunts witnessed over the last decade?

Breitbart Wrote:Laura Ingraham Apologizes as Advertisers Flee, David Hogg Says ‘Not Enough’

Fox News Host Laura Ingraham shared a public apology Thursday to Parkland school student David Hogg after multiple companies announced they were pulling their ads from her show, the Ingraham Angle. The apology, however, was “not enough” for Hogg, who called for the advertiser boycott Wednesday after Ingraham teased him about getting rejected from several colleges.

It beggars belief that the host of one of the supposedly most-watched shows in USA could be this cucked. If a peak career achievement can't provide you with a sense of power and self-determination, then what do you need?

(03-30-2018 08:27 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  What is this crap with Laura Ingraham apologizing over mocking David Hogg's grades? What is there to apologize for? She caved at the very first assault from Soros goons, and now they're going to use that weakness to finish her off. Haven't "conservatives" learned their lesson after 518957151 witch-hunts witnessed over the last decade?

Breitbart Wrote:Laura Ingraham Apologizes as Advertisers Flee, David Hogg Says ‘Not Enough’

Fox News Host Laura Ingraham shared a public apology Thursday to Parkland school student David Hogg after multiple companies announced they were pulling their ads from her show, the Ingraham Angle. The apology, however, was “not enough” for Hogg, who called for the advertiser boycott Wednesday after Ingraham teased him about getting rejected from several colleges.

It beggars belief that the host of one of the supposedly most-watched shows in USA could be this cucked. If a peak career achievement can't provide you with a sense of power and self-determination, then what do you need?

All modern media runs on ads especially cable TV. We lived in a highly polarized society, so the threat of a boycott is really damaging.

(03-29-2018 08:32 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Hate to be a spoilsport here, but since the forum bans photos and discussions of underage girls, I think we need to either apply that rule to underage boys as well or get rid of the rule altogether.

I'm uncomfortable with mocking underage high school kids on this forum. It's difficult enough for adults to handle being in the public eye.

And I'm no legal expert, but I assume there could be some ramifications to this since you can take anyone to court these days.

Finally, applying one standard to teen girls and another to teen boys reeks of White Knighting -- the same criticism many of us level at the mainstream media, the schools, the churches, etc.

You can't be serious.

These lil' faggots want to make themselves the headliners of the anti-liberty set and you want to declare them out of bounds?

That would be a nice way to validate the Left's strategy. "We're going to push our politics using the political equivalent of child soldiers and if you shoot back you're a baby-killer!"

They want to swim in the deep end? So be it. They are all fair game. True enough we should keep away from talking about WB/WNB for the chicks but in political terms these little pricks needs to be destroyed like any other commie piece of shit.

Ingraham is a business woman and a potential political candidate.

Also - what underage?

Those kids are 18, and even if they were 16, so what?

When the 16yo Red Guards in China proceeded to ostracize and sometime kill so-called Imperialist intellectuals like doctors, then they lost their childhood protection status. The same goes for Muslim teen rapists.

And as I said - those kids are 18 at least - some seem to be older. Fuck them.

I will put a serial murdering 12yo also away for life - I don't give a shit.

Part of me would like to remain free to joke about what a meltdown-in-the-making this kid is, but I think DOBA makes a fair point. (A lot of this will just be me explaining what I've been feeling to myself, so bear with me.)

Hogg is a dumb, overemotional teenager, but 17-year-old Canopus wasn't much more well-adjusted. You are very easy to make fun of at that age, no matter your political leanings. At 17, I'd probably be just as irritating if I were being pushed this hard by a callous, predatory 24/7 media cycle that encouraged me to blare my every thought through a global megaphone. While he's (sadly) probably plugged into this machine for life in some capacity or another, there's a non-zero chance that 27-year-old David Hogg is going to cringe at a lot of what he's saying and doing - or rather, what he's probably being coached to say and do.

I'm annoyed that Hogg's every peevish outburst gets treated by so many people as some miraculous, unanswerable political revelation, as if surviving a trauma somehow makes you a fucking policy expert, and then there's outcry when anybody criticizes what he says ("How dare you! He's just a kid!"), no matter how obviously stupid the statement. But apart from a couple of his tweets, I've noticed it's not Hogg himself that's using that defense so much as it's his supporters and all the pundits, activists, and celebrities who want to score Virtue Points off white-knighting for a teenager after (to make use of Leonard's metaphor) strapping him up with a vest full of talking-point bombs and hurling him headlong at everyone they want to cow, control, and destroy.

Those people are the real problem here. Because they aren't just annoying brats. They're, for the most part, grown adults who aren't ever going to be embarrassed or ashamed of what they're doing with the Parkland kids. They know exactly what they're doing. They choose to do it. I'm sure many of them enjoy doing it.

They've been there for every atrocity the FBI "mysteriously" fails to prevent. They'll be there for the next one. When the Parkland kids are a depleted resource and of no more use, they'll go for some other, sexier angle. And then they'll start the whole miserable dance all over again, just with a different set of pearls to clutch and pawns to shuffle on the gameboard.

I've got nothing personal against Hogg or Gonzalez. But with the people making profit and pressing for political advantage off them and the pile of dead kids none of them can actually name? You bet your ass it's fucking personal.

He's very likely 18, a high school senior, also he's an activist.

The left wants to emotionaly black mail and guilt trip you for criticizing what a kid says ("HOW DARE YOU!").

FUCK YOU.

If you open your mouth in public, especially on TV and threaten to remove the rights of actual adults - then you have no protection.

NONE.

I do not give a single fuck, this kid should know freedom of speech WORKS BOTH WAYS.

You're allowed to rationally rebuff, rebuke, and criticize someone who talks about the rights of citizens.

Guys please stop calling him a kid. 18 is a grown ass man in the context of politics. Isn't he 19? Regardless, politics is a a hot ass kitchen. Don't jump into it, if you cannot handle the heat.

He's anywhere from 20-27.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6gux99

Not a fan of Ben Shapiro (fast talking Israel shill), but see if you notice anything when he and David Hogg are pictured side to side.

Does this mean celebs like Justin Bieber are off limits as well? Or does it only pertain to the anointed useful idiots?

Source:





Time: 5:48

(03-30-2018 09:43 AM)Dragan Wrote:  All modern media runs on ads especially cable TV. We lived in a highly polarized society, so the threat of a boycott is really damaging.

Yes it does, but indulging the threat doesn't stop the boycott; in fact, it makes it worse. These people and corporations are not boycotting you because they're genuinely offended, they're doing it because they irrationally hate you and want you dead.

Giving in to their demands will only ensure your demise. You don't negotiate with terrorists.

A random person on the street can be excused for not being aware of this, but an experienced conservative political analyst like Laura Ingraham cannot.

Conclusion: CUCKED

(03-30-2018 10:21 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(03-29-2018 08:32 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

Hate to be a spoilsport here, but since the forum bans photos and discussions of underage girls, I think we need to either apply that rule to underage boys as well or get rid of the rule altogether.

I'm uncomfortable with mocking underage high school kids on this forum. It's difficult enough for adults to handle being in the public eye.

And I'm no legal expert, but I assume there could be some ramifications to this since you can take anyone to court these days.

Finally, applying one standard to teen girls and another to teen boys reeks of White Knighting -- the same criticism many of us level at the mainstream media, the schools, the churches, etc.

This isn't a discussion about gaming underage girls. Its more akin to discussing a toddler being weaponized with a live hand grenade in its diaper by adult handlers.

That said attacking the kids personally is IMO intellectually beneath the RVF..or should be.

But I have to admit these particular young adults make it hard to resist doing so. Plus some of the stuff is funny as fuck

^THIS. Plus, Hoggy woggy made himself a public figure and seems to relish in his new status, so fair game. The fact he's bragging about his twitter followers means he's not exactly a shrinking violet with no understanding of the realities of social media.

Much to his chagrin, he's out done by a short bald brown dyke, his classmate, who has about double the number of twitter followers. I wonder if either of them realizes how many of them are fake/bots?

On the shooter - I saw this. What a complete basket case of a kid. No info on the natural father but he and the natural mom are presumably out there somewhere. I think the theories of fetal alcohol syndrome are well founded. Whoever the mom is, she seems like a real loser.

Quote:By the time he was 3, he was diagnosed with developmental delays. By the time he was 6, he'd suffered the trauma of witnessing his father's death. By the time he was 16, he was preoccupied with wars, death and killing, school records reveal. And he never made it to 20 in the outside world.

Lynda and Roger Cruz knew their new son had challenges, but neither lived to see what he was capable of.

His adopted dad died of a heart attack at 67; adopted mom sued the doctors and got some cash out of it, then she croaked a year or two ago of pneumonia at 61, flipping out Cruz even more. But he was probably damaged from birth.

Quote:One day before her 49th birthday, Lynda Cruz’s adopted son was born, on Sept. 24, 1998. She and Roger Cruz had married late in life. He was 61 and had four kids from a previous marriage.

A close family friend and former neighbor, who asked that her name not be published, told the South Florida Sun Sentinel that the couple arranged the private adoption through an attorney. They insisted the birth mother pass drug tests and visit the doctor. The baby’s father was unknown, the friend said.

Less than a year later, the same woman got pregnant again. The baby had a different father. Lynda and Roger adopted that boy, Zachary, as well. Their family was complete.

Couldn't keep her damned legs closed the first time; I guess old habits are hard to break. Dumb slut cranked out another one with a different guy. Whatever the hell she was doing while pregnant it couldn't have been healthy.

And yet the media asks - "What's wrong with boys?" as if women are not part of the picture.

Fuck that. These kids have forced their way into the spotlight. They get paid when the cameras turn on. We didn’t hesitate to criticize Justin Bieber when he was under 18 and fucking up. At least Bieber worked for his celebrity status. These assholes just showed and forced their way in front of the cameras.

The complete ignorance, yet they really think they should be listened to.

(03-30-2018 05:12 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  The complete ignorance, yet they really think they should be listened to.

You definitely do not need to do all that to buy an AR 15

Depends on the State you live in. But it's something similar for a tax stamp.

1st off, Laura Ingram should have doubled down and not apologize for her statement. I take that as a negative against her!
Second off, when is this 20-something crisis actor going to get it through his thick skull that his gimmick is wearing thin and noone buys what he is selling!

All you need to know is he has a Punchable face irregardless of political standing. Thats gonna make a lot of people not like you right there.

If it wouldn't ruin my career prospects id totally go full child political soldier for the opposing stance. Just for the opportunity to coax this punk in a charity boxing match for fun.
Im sure plenty of others at his highschool would advocate for the more rational side but of course they picked the leftist retards. No (2018) intelligent right leaning person would would go full ape shit and win this political war because of how it would negatively effect their future.

It's only just occurred to me that the fanatical drive against AR15s in particular is odd.

In generic political terms the gun grabbers would be far better off screaming against something unAmerican like an AK47 which is the perennial gun of the terrorist worldwide, and Russian to boot.

Speculating on the why is pretty easy.

As usual for the mindless mobs and the billionaire globalists this has less to do with achieving an outcome on gun control and more to do with fostering/expressing extremist hostility between the Communist Corporate Gynocracy and the Redblooded Libertarian Patriarchy.

I've expressed this elsewhere some time ago but imagine a large cutout of a man, now separate him up into puzzle pieces. On each of those pieces you put a picture of something that makes that man. Cliches perhaps, but for an American in the end you will have a "Mid Westerner" or "Californian" or a "New Yorker" and it will all be pretty obvious at a glance what each man is made up of in a cultural sense.

Well the globalist overlords realised when Communism collapsed that it wasn't effective to simply kill off everyone who had a single piece of the human puzzle that they didn't like. There would be nobody left, or in any case you'd have to kill off so many people that the rest would develop an "anti-communist" piece of the puzzle as part of their inherent culture.

So now what they do is they attack the pieces of the puzzle individually. No need to kill a million men. Kill a million gun pieces of a million puzzles instead. Kill the "F100 truck" puzzle with heavy handed environmental regulations. Kill the "rodeo" part of the puzzle with animal cruelty laws. Kill the "holy cross" part of the puzzle by screaming endlessly about separation of church and state. Eventually you kill the culture without killing the man, leaving millions of soul-less husks with nothing of value left to defend.

And that's why they scream about AR15s instead of AK47s. Precisely because the AR15 is a symbol of American liberty.