Post: #1

Has anyone ever experienced meeting an SJW girl, not holding back against her ideological onslaughts and have it ending up with her telling you how much they want to be dominated? Or something to that affect.

Post: #2

I think this should be in the Game section, but alas, I can't say I have. I've made a staunch neoliberal German male friend change his mind on feminism and islam, but that was using facts and statistics. Since girls operate primarily on feelings, it's more difficult—and it's a waste of time. You can bring them round through your actions and by using humour though, and only once they know you properly.

Edit - I see it's been moved. And as for bringing them round, I'm only talking from personal experience in regards to female acquaintances' opinions, not sex.

Post: #3

Very often.
I’m a Dom and the best subs for BDSM (at least in the Western world) are left wing women.
They crave being dominated.

Post: #4

Stay away from these women.

This is the only absolute I have with women. Single moms, fatties, busted chicks, hookers, I would suggest staying away from all of those as well, but it's ultimately up to you if you want to make that risk and or lose self-respect. Social justice warriors aka feminists are the women that do not deserve a single cock at all until they completely change their views. They should be shunned like lepers and driven out of existence through non-reproduction, and suicide from social exclusion.

These are the women that will ruin your life. The false rape accusers, etc.

Stay away.

Post: #5

the good thing is you learn a lot about patriarchy and caribbean spiritual dance therapy

Post: #6

(01-29-2018 02:09 PM)gework Wrote:  Has anyone ever experienced meeting an SJW girl, not holding back against her ideological onslaughts and have it ending up with her telling you how much they want to be dominated? Or something to that affect.

It's important to understand the reason women become SJW. There are True Believers and Followers. The True Believer types feel persecuted by something, are either low SMV or feel low SMV. A huge part of their belief system is hinged on anger at not being able to get attractive males. In my experience many of these women are into being dominated.

- As a side note a lot of these true believer women are black, especially the hot ones!. I've had some experiences with these ladies that push the borders of what I'm willing to do. It's really weird to have a woman that is a BLM activist enjoy being dominated, but it's near creepy to find her asking you for raceplay bullshit.

Followers are a different pathology. These girls are usually from upper middle class and wealthy families. They have an intense need for moral exculpation and an intense desire to go with the flow. I think these tend to be just normal women in terms of domination enjoyment... which means they run the gamut. They are involved in the SJW movement not because they actually believe in the bullshit much, they just want to prove themselves "righteous" and expunge the guilt of being the most privileged humans in the universe, without actually giving up any of that privilege.

Post: #7

Nice analysis EndsExpect. My experience is a bit different though. The wealthy ones are very aggressive and bitter because of the conflict they are in. The Black activists (I actually met only one) are more simple and in tune with themselves because less in situation of cognitive dissonance. But I agree she was very extreme.

Post: #8

(01-29-2018 03:03 PM)Montrose Wrote:  Nice analysis EndsExpect. My experience is a bit different though. The wealthy ones are very aggressive and bitter because of the conflict they are in. The Black activists (I actually met only one) are more simple and in tune with themselves because less in situation of cognitive dissonance. But I agree she was very extreme.

If you are a wealthy leftist woman, you are faced with a moral quandary. You feel guilty for being rich, but you feel oppressed because you are a woman. How do you alleviate that guilt while keeping your victimhood status? You join a group that advocates for less fortunate people. This should relieve a lot of the bitterness and anger. I can't say that this group enjoys being dominated any more than the next.

In regards to black women activists... I got into this social circle for a while back in 2014... and the level of kink involved here is more than I think most guys can take. They are obsessed with the ghosts of history more than virtually any other group. I believe this is why they are so easy for me to get and dominate, while they throw insane barriers at the black men around them. Men are supposed to be the leaders of your family, your tribe, your nation. Women expect you do go to war for them and either come back on your shield or with it. It's deeply ingrained in the female psyche. When your group of men are histories greatest failures... a woman naturally will shit test these guys harder. On the flip side women love conquerors, and men who are successful.

For example, If Russia goes to war with Turkey and crushes them. Turkish women will actively seek out Russian men for at minimum a generation.

Post: #9

(01-29-2018 02:50 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  Stay away from these women... Stay away.

I agree this is just from a position of curiosity.

(01-29-2018 02:59 PM)EndsExpect Wrote:  It's important to understand the reason women become SJW.

Nice analysis. I've written something in the same vein here.

The hierarchy of social justice-types between vague, acolyte and grand poobah is something I've also noticed. Over the last two years, since fairly firmly leaving the reservation I've been making quite a lot of politically risque comments and of the girls in my orbit who generally fit into the bracket of vague left thinking these tend to be met with aroused giggling. I think these types of girls can be turned around quite easily with the correct cues; and if you're in The West it's pretty much your only option.

Then with acolytes, I think that your non-PC comments are just going to get you booted straight off, even though they desire you, they can't bring themselves to admit that as it conflicts too much with their politics, which is a balancing mechanism to offset their unfulfilled desires and sense of self. If you were going to rehabilitate such a girl, it's going to be an arduous drip-drip effort that wouldn't be worth your time if you are a higher SMV male.

Then with the high priestesses of social justice, it's probably about as fruitful as trying to rehabilitate a psychopath.

Since biological gender emerged 1 billion years ago, the overwhelming trend has been for males to be the dominant force in society and relationships. That's a billion years that has given females a genetically driven desire for something like:



And not:


[Unsuccessfully Coping with the Natural Beauty of Infidelity]

Historically if you were a woman who displayed competitive and aggressive traits, this would have diminished your chances of having children and so genes that predicate such people diminish. We've been engaged in ingraining gender roles and desires in our genes for as long as it's been possible.

Girls who are in touch with their desire to have a leader husband might look something like this:



Those girls that suppress their desire to fulfill their ingrained desires, still have them, but their suppression causes them to seek them in a dysfunctional way (which is always the expression of suppression). So a girl who has a natural desire for a strong man who is good in bed, end up contorting that desire through suppression and end up telling random guys they want to be hate fucked like human garbage + choked while being called a whore and then walk out the room and say, "I'm not your bitch, by the way."

In the case of SJWs they tend to have very specifically shunned functional marriage and I've heard a lot of them go on about how when they were growing up they were daddy's little girl who dreamed about their prince, or Tarzan, or Hercules. And when they find out such pinnacles of masculinity are not just lining up for them, well ...



I find that when intelligent people can't get what they think they should have, they are liable to socialise their personal pathology into a social pathology, which is what social justice is. I'm also under the impression that social justice, particularly radical feminism are socialised shit tests. Are we going to sit by and applaud becoming a cucked society or are we going to step up, take control and lead? Any ideas on this?

Post: #10

Social justice is destroying society. Social Justice endgame is a segregated society where each category hates the others for imaginary wrongs, and where efficiency is sacrificed to political correctness. Hence a ‘cucked society’ is not stable. At some point, either reason will prevail and Social Justice will be discredited for several generations (optimistic scenario) or we have anarchy and civil war and shithole near you (pessimistic scenario, unless we win the Civil War). Or China conquers the world.

Post: #11

The kinkiest, most depraved and submissive women I've ever been with were all SJW (or at least SJW-lite) during the day. I stopped trying to argue and change them a long time ago.

Post: #12

(01-29-2018 04:16 PM)gework Wrote:  I agree this is just from a position of curiosity.
Nice analysis. I've written something in the same vein
The hierarchy of social justice-types between vague, acolyte and grand poobah is something I've also noticed. Over the last two years, since fairly firmly leaving the reservation I've been making quite a lot of politically risque comments and of the girls in my orbit who generally fit into the bracket of vague left thinking these tend to be met with aroused giggling. I think these types of girls can be turned around quite easily with the correct cues; and if you're in The West it's pretty much your only option.
Then with acolytes, I think that your non-PC comments are just going to get you booted straight off, even though they desire you, they can't bring themselves to admit that as it conflicts too much with their politics, which is a balancing mechanism to offset their unfulfilled desires and sense of self. If you were going to rehabilitate such a girl, it's going to be an arduous drip-drip effort that wouldn't be worth your time if you are a higher SMV male.
Then with the high priestesses of social justice, it's probably about as fruitful as trying to rehabilitate a psychopath.
Since biological gender emerged 1 billion years ago, the overwhelming trend has been for males to be the dominant force in society and relationships. That's a billion years that has given females a genetically driven desire for something like:
Historically if you were a woman who displayed competitive and aggressive traits, this would have diminished your chances of having children and so genes that predicate such people diminish. We've been engaged in ingraining gender roles and desires in our genes for as long as it's been possible.
Girls who are in touch with their desire to have a leader husband might look something like this:
Those girls that suppress their desire to fulfill their ingrained desires, still have them, but their suppression causes them to seek them in a dysfunctional way (which is always the expression of suppression). So a girl who has a natural desire for a strong man who is good in bed, end up contorting that desire through suppression and end up telling random guys they want to be hate fucked like human garbage + choked while being called a whore and then walk out the room and say, "I'm not your bitch, by the way."
In the case of SJWs they tend to have very specifically shunned functional marriage and I've heard a lot of them go on about how when they were growing up they were daddy's little girl who dreamed about their prince, or Tarzan, or Hercules. And when they find out such pinnacles of masculinity are not just lining up for them, well ...
I find that when intelligent people can't get what they think they should have, they are liable to socialise their personal pathology into a social pathology, which is what social justice is. I'm also under the impression that social justice, particularly radical feminism are socialised shit tests. Are we going to sit by and applaud becoming a cucked society or are we going to step up, take control and lead? Any ideas on this?

A couple points worth discussing.

You make a bit of an allusion to Social Justice being a religious thing with Acolytes and Priests. I think you are correct in this belief. Social Justice is a Functional Religion. People who have an actual Religion cannot be fully SJW... even Muslims. They will follow along for the ride, but do not take on many of the core beliefs. The basic premise is that if humans set up an all powerful government and you put the correct people in charge (smart and empathetic above all things), that person can fiddle with the nobs and levers of government to produce heaven on earth. It will punish the wicked and reward the faithful.

The vast majority of minorities involved in SJW bullshit are not true believers. They have their faith in other things, they just believe that they can benefit from SJW nob fiddling. The true believers in my experience are the thought leaders who exist primarily in academia, and the secular white people who are the priests of the movement.

So, here is my advice. If you meet a liberal SJW woman and she passes a boner test. Don't be afraid to try and fuck her. They are a lot of effort to become wife material... and tend to be very stupid so don't waste your time in that direction.

The only caveat to that is if the SJW is Asian or Black. Those girls can be VERY worth the effort.

(01-29-2018 04:43 PM)Montrose Wrote:  Social justice is destroying society. Social Justice endgame is a segregated society where each category hates the others for imaginary wrongs, and where efficiency is sacrificed to political correctness. Hence a ‘cucked society’ is not stable. At some point, either reason will prevail and Social Justice will be discredited for several generations (optimistic scenario) or we have anarchy and civil war and shithole near you (pessimistic scenario, unless we win the Civil War). Or China conquers the world.

I believe the endgame is North Korea 2.0 with some dipshit like Obama as "Our Dear Leader". It's all about putting themselves on top. History teaches that unless we fight them militarily... they will win.

Post: #13

Sort of depends on the SJW...

There are basically three types...

1. The crazy, screaming blue haired, tattooed pierced ones that go to marches. What they "want" is a polyamorous relationship with tattoo artists, bartenders, painters, and a "main" beta male they can drag around to all their stupid shit. They are usually in therapy and on medication. They talk about being in therapy a lot.

2. The liberal identifying white girl who writes Facebook posts about how much she hates Trump. She's probably a nurse or a school teacher who grew up in a normal house. These girls are actually easy to bang by engaging them, and they'll eve be compelled to your traditional right wing views. I have a MAGA hat in my room and an AR-15 hanging up straight up Dan B style. At first they'll usually pretend to be mad or disgusted, then they'll want to explore the discussion. Sometimes they'll disqualify you, but it's usually because the interest is low and it's a good excuse.

3. Your fake service industry SJW. She usually bartends, has some tattoos and a nose ring. She'll bitch about Trump, maybe wear a pussy hat, but not really care all that much when it comes down to it. They usually fuck other service industry men (who tend to be ambivalent), but can be had. At the end of the day, if they like you, they'll basically just roll their eyes at your antics. If you try and have a political discussion they'll basically say "this is boring, what concert is playing this weekend?" It's more about fitting in than actually knowing anything about politics.

Post: #14

Yes, not all of them are fat. But the downside is they don't shave their armpits. And you'll have to hold back from disagreeing with her about 50 times over the course of a date (examples include how funny Trevor Noah is, or her support for the trannies)

Verdict: get in and get out like a thief in the night.

Post: #15

Just about all of them.

Post: #16

Agreed.

I managed a dreadlocked majorly pierced and tattooed girl for the 5 minutes that she actually managed to hold down a job with us, goes around the SJW destinations of the world now as an acoustic guitar political 'protest singer'.

After we both left the job I asked her out for drinks. She said she refused to come out with me to a high end 'bread head' establishment and definitely wouldn't 'wear a fu q ing cocktail dress'.

I said off the cuff I don't know about you but I always wear a cocktail dress to these places... and if I have to then you have to .

Turned into a dare where she would make an effort and dress up and also have to buy all the drinks if I would drag up.
A mutual friend told me afterwards she went and got a wax, plucked etc. etc. and went round her friends houses to borrow perfume, heels and a dress.

I went to a department store and told the girls there that I had to drag up for a stag weekend and didn't know what brands were good so they did my face for free.
I wore a cheap dress, wig and trainers. We went to this swanky joint, I emailed them ahead (difficult to get in) to say that I was on the town council's LGBT rights group and I was concerned that trannies like me were being refused entry to clubs like theirs.
She looked good when she turned up, all scrubbed up, sheer stockings, heels, black dress, had her dreads up in a bun. We got the red carpet treatment. She still had a smelly, manky woven purse crammed full of drug money but never mind she bought all our cocktails with it.

Went back to her caravan in the guts of a disused building. When I saw the washing facilities that they all used I couldn't bring myself to go down on her but a quality quality blowjob.

Turns out surprise surprise that she had an ex-military staunch authoritarian father. She told me she tended to avoid big or sporty mainstream looking guys but she said when I made a joke about wearing a dress then it all seemed less threatening and shed decided to go for it.
All that riding mountain bikes to dealers houses and carrying heavy protest signs had left her with a tight little body. I like to think that I spanked her harder than her dad ever would have.
Was jamming her tight little figure in between her mismatched unwashed cushions while she was yelling 'phuq me daddy, phuq me!" she seemed majorly into it and yet majorly embarrassed at the same time.

Inside every SJW is a submissive in my view.

It was a pretty fun one off.

I still follow her on social media saving whales and protesting the man - the wrong side of collecting too many tattoos and piercings now - when she could have pulled hard on the controls and levelled off as a 6 going forward.

Instead she looks horrific now. Saddens me to see what an ideology can do to someones looks.

Post: #17

Delete duplicate.

Post: #18

I assume we are just talking about bangable SJW.

In which case I would advise be more patient and dont take them seriously, ESPECIALLY if they are young.

Been playing around with some 18s and they dont have any world view at all. They are simply regurgitate what they hear and see around themselves.

They have never been with a man with a strong conviction and confident in his beliefs, you would be amaze at how quickly they shift their views to please you.

Make The World Great Again one young bitch at a time.

Post: #19

Great thread.

Good things happen when you go past page 1.

Post: #20

I haven't, but the closest to noticing that phenomenon was when I brought up the James Damore memo in a class I was taking. A girl who sat near me who said she "had issues" with it started giving me much more intense eye contact (staring contests) during our conversations after that. It was weird. She had really bad breath though, so I got never attempted to pursue anything.

Based on that limited experience I believe there is something to it, under the right circumstances.

It probably requires younger girls. I was dating someone in their early 30's and she actually dumped me after political disagreements.

Post: #21

(02-18-2018 02:34 PM)RexImperator Wrote:  I haven't, but the closest to noticing that phenomenon was when I brought up the James Damore memo in a class I was taking. A girl who sat near me who said she "had issues" with it started giving me much more intense eye contact (staring contests) during our conversations after that. It was weird. She had really bad breath though, so I got never attempted to pursue anything.

Based on that limited experience I believe there is something to it, under the right circumstances.

It probably requires younger girls. I was dating someone in their early 30's and she actually dumped me after political disagreements.

She did you the favor. She is a woman in her 30's with the mental development of a teenager.

Post: #22

Not really.