Post: #26

Well, your fake Profil is bad as fuck. I made one that looked like this model-gangster mugshot that people talked about some time ago. I had around 75 matches after 3 days in a 400k city. Girls on Tinder prefer interesting looking guys over some good pictures taken.
Your fake profil guy looks good but people forget that many men now are doing professional photos. Its something a girls sees 20 times a day. Also your Bio is bad.

PS: Stop comparing Tinder in Asia to europe. White men is +5 smv in some shithole. Ofc you get matches lol.

Post: #27

(01-04-2018 01:20 AM)Naughty By Nature Wrote:  LOL at Putin Closes.

I don't do online game, except for a rare few times in the past.

I also rarely do night game.

I DO do day game.

Cost: $0.00.

Don't hate just because you lack the confidence to approach women in the flesh, bud. Get on my level, son.

I try to deal with my insecurity issues by making anonymous Internet posts about how my game is better than another guy's game.

Get on my level, son.

Post: #28

OP the fact that you would do this fake account means (in that moment) you were PATHETIC.

You proved nothing, except that male hamster - ism is alive and well and that anyone can come up with any excuse for their failures. If you don't like tinder or whatever app do something better. Works for some guys not for you and your fakes, move on. (Happens to work well for some guys using a real profile, go figure, must be a great mystery.)

Your male models look like fags or metrosexuals at best. The time you spent doing this you could have been test driving a new Mustang and flirting with the receptionist at the dealer. But no, you spent that time looking for pics of GUYS...

Post: #29

Why not both? Swipe right when you're sitting on the train or waiting in line. Approach when you see some hotties. Stop making shit into binaries, my bros. If you gotta pick one or the other, pick the best one. Otherwise, do both and, more importantly, make it fit your lifestyle. If you're actually doing something with your life and got 4 hours to spare cruising around a mall then I don't' know what to tell you.

Post: #30

We all know daygame is hard and the excuses fly because of it. The quality however, is miles better than anything even a model can get online.

If you've got a great deep voice, are tall, have body language game, and are a smooth talker, you shouldn't even consider online game. Perhaps in the winter if you live up north, because things do slow down considerably, but daygame is still awesome if you have a notable personality; even in polar conditions.

If you're shy it may not be the best option and that's fine, but be honest with yourself; you don't do it because it's hard; not because Tinder is better.

Post: #31

Your 'revolutionary' experiment has been done before, OP.

Tinder Male Model experiment









As the original Tinder 'scientist' GermanLifter would say: Get on my level, SON.

Post: #32

(01-04-2018 12:24 AM)Naughty By Nature Wrote:  I maxed out the limit of right swipes in a 12 hour span which was 100. It's now been 19 hours since then and I have received *DRUM ROLL* 2 matches. 2!!! 2 women out of 100 have swiped right on this male model account, further proof that online dating is the LEAST effective way to meet women, unless you're interested in DUMPSTER DIVING.

Not that you haven't been eviscerated enough, but getting two likes out of 100 swipes is above average. A man of average attractiveness is liked by one out of every 115 women.

Not to mention you only waited 19 hours before making this trainwreck of a thread. If you wait a week, I guarantee you'd see 4-5 more of those girls you liked swipe you back. That's just how the algorithm works. Swiping right on a girl doesn't mean she sees you in her stack - it might take weeks for you to show up as she swipes through all the other guys, but eventually you will.

Oh, and the fact that you conveniently ignored that your fake profiles has 3+ girls that swiped him first.

Post: #33

This deserves a call out.

(01-04-2018 01:20 AM)Naughty By Nature Wrote:  Don't hate just because you lack the confidence to approach women in the flesh, bud. Get on my level, son.

That's rich coming from the guy who had a MGTOW meltdown about LA and approaching women. Who keeps using the the buzzword "Los Mangeles" "Man Diego" and bitches about approaching in general.

Quote:I think we can all agree that online dating is a veritable cesspool of trannies, catfish, prostitutes, bots, and women who look nothing like their pics.

Quote:TripleG, damn, is DC that bad? That sucks, man. Sounds like Los Mangeles aka The LAnd of Snakes. I met several dudes that either quit or started doing P4P, lol. Major gender imbalance.

Quote:As someone who has lived in both Los Mangeles aka The LAnd of Snakes and Chicago, I feel uniquely qualified to weigh in on this.

Quote:Los Mangeles is a cultural and logistical dumpster fire. It is complete garbage. Half your day is spent in traffic, the other half is spent dealing with fake, slimy people, and the entirety is spent being flaked on by the most entitled, flaky women in North America.

Quote:I, too, am not understanding Pituco’s “follower” mentality of LA > Chicago because, well, other people around the world say so. That’s mindless groupthink. Katy Perry must be more talented than Andrea Bocelli because, well, other people say so, amirite?

Quote:Vegas is terrible for daygame, outside of Saturdays at the Fashion Show mall. Nightgame is legit but expect for about 1/3 of the women you approach in Vegas to be prostitution whores.

Quote:Lol, those pictures of Nashville are epic. Literally the exact opposite of Los Mangeles, Man Diego, and Man Francisco in the ratios department.

Quote:It’s mind blowing to me how Dallas, despite being a major city and the 4th biggest metro in America, is completely drab and dead.

Houston is also a very sprawling city with a serious lack of foot traffic and bustle. Brutally hot and humid too.

I would hate to live in either of those cities as a dude dedicated to daygame. Having to game at the mall seriously sucks.

Quote:I wouldn't recommend online dating for older guys or younger guys.

It's a cesspool of trannies, catfish, bots, prostitutes, crazy women, and women who look significantly worse than their photos (this is the most common issue).

There's also the fact you're sitting in your room staring at a screen. You're not connecting with anyone, you're not building any confidence, and you're not getting outside your comfort zone.

Online dating makes you WORSE with women.

Bitching about San Diego:

Quote:/thread-1826-...pid1662640

Quote:What's even more hilarious is you're telling guys to "sack up" and hit up girls in person which I haven't seen you post much in the approach log thread, or any bangs in the I Just Had Sex thread.

Even more moronic is the fact you only waited 19 hours , anyone and everyone whose used tinder KNOWS it takes a few days for you to start accruing matches.

Your bio is straight retarded.

Apparently you haven't read the Tinder App thread and [email protected] is right this shit has been done before with great results.

But here you are bitching once again instead of giving any advice, just like a jaded female would.

EVERYONE KNOWS you shouldn't be running straight dating apps - that you should be doing both if you can and can manage your time.

What have you done in Atlanta since you've been there? How many girls have you approached? How many have have you been on dates with ? How many have you banged?

I means seriously Jesus Christ - write a data sheet already instead of complaining all the time.

The only mark ass trick here is your hamster nigga !

Post: #34

Naughty, I agree with most of what you said. But this wasn't a conclusive experiment. And if guys want to use "internet game" and spam girls with copy and paste messages, then let them do it. There will be less girls being approached in real life.

Post: #35

Kaotic after 6 cups of coffee and checking today's posts.

Post: #36

(01-04-2018 10:09 AM)xxx Wrote:  We all know daygame is hard and the excuses fly because of it. The quality however, is miles better than anything even a model can get online.

If you've got a great deep voice, are tall, have body language game, and are a smooth talker, you shouldn't even consider online game. ... not because Tinder is better.

Online != tinder. DUCY?

Post: #37

(01-04-2018 01:07 PM)zoom Wrote:  Naughty, I agree with what you said. But this wasn't a conclusive experiment. And if guys want to use "internet game" and spam girls with copy and paste messages, then let them do it. There will be less girls being approached in real life.

What's hilarious is people think it's copy pasta all day long.

Besides the literal "let's fuck" line there's more to it. (the element is correct with this)

We all understand it takes skill to hit up a woman on an approach, to ignore approach anxiety, to open a woman the right way, close, etc.

You still text girls you approach in person or meet online (this takes a certain level of skill/game)

You still go on dates with girls you approached in person or meet online (takes the same amount of skill/game)

You still close, beat LMR, and bang girls you approach or meet online (takes the ever more than the last amount of skill/game)

You still spin plates, expand their sexual fantasies, get in a relationship, and maintain frame with girls you approach or meet online (still takes the same amount of skill/game)

To dismiss and discount and say "oh it doesn't take game to fuck girls from online bro" is absolutely hilarious.

You still need to bring your A game - and I would argue you need MORE because she's got a bagfull of dicks on her dating apps on standby and you need to beat those odds.

Shit I haven't even started talking about the SA thread which are dime pieces all day. (quality has gone down tho)

Yes there are downsides - girls being tricky with their age, pics, etc.

But if you can't filter out those females or find out if she's legit or not - well then I feel bad for you - it's easily manageable (searchable).

The beauty of approaching is what you see is what you get - however she could still be that dirty little hoe that's getting dick online.

The convenience for dudes who do online is because they lead busy lives, want ease of access with pussy without the sunken time investment.

Some guys absolutely kill it on approach (Gio is god) some dudes kill it on online or on seeking arrangement.

We all know approaching in person should be option 1, but game changes, technology does to, so you HAVE TO ADAPT.

My point is - dogging someone else s tactics to get laid is a circle jerk.

We should all be helping each other learn game and get laid, brick by brick building our pussy paradises.

We shouldn't be tearing eachother's down.

We're all gonna make it bros.

Post: #38

(01-04-2018 01:46 PM)kaotic Wrote:  What's hilarious is people think it's copy pasta all day long.

But to start off, isn't it mostly copy and paste? I think this is why some girls have such big egos because guys are sending them all this attention.

Listen, I didn't make this thread and I think the title is very misleading. And I'm not here to argue. You guys know my views on swiping apps, I think they are lame, but if you enjoy using them and you are happy with your results then that's all that matters.

Post: #39

Has tinder gotten harder? Yes. Does it still work? Yes. If your profile is optimized and you are in a good location, it's a great passive side stream to get laid.

I've noticed since starting my account after new years, that girls are hitting me up first. I've already scheduled two dates this week. No, they aren't fatties. Me, i'm tall and considered classically handsome. I'm not a model but most would rate me an 8.9/ten.

Tinder is so variable- it is absolutely useless in some regions and I will be the first to admit that. I used to live in Charlotte, and tinder was a gold mine there. I now live in the hills of Tennessee, but near some small cities. Tinder is decent here as well. It's no Charlotte, but then again we aren't talking the same volume of people in this area. I know of people that live just west of here that find the app useless. Just like any other part of game, location and logistics are the cornerstone of success.

Post: #40

I've had plenty of luck with online. Atleast 100 notches.

Online game is better if you have an alpha look. So is real life.

Post: #41

(01-04-2018 01:27 AM)Putin Closes Wrote:  So you're just getting girls off the street to your place without spending any money? Right. If you want a dick measuring contest pm me your pics.

Yes, please keep those measurement pics to PM, Fellas...

EDIT: Just giving you shit. No dog in this fight.

Beyond All Seas

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe.
To be your own man is a hard business. If you try it, you'll be lonely often, and sometimes
frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." - Kipling

Post: #42

(01-04-2018 02:53 PM)zoom Wrote:  But to start off, isn't it mostly copy and paste? I think this is why some girls have such big egos because guys are sending them all this attention.

Listen, I didn't make this thread and I think the title is very misleading. And I'm not here to argue. You guys know my views on swiping apps, I think they are lame, but if you enjoy using them and you are happy with your results then that's all that matters.

Occasionally maybe a copy and paste opener, but the majority are customized.

Girls have big egos because of thirsty men EVERYWHERE, not just on dating apps, IG for example.

If you're going to say apps are lame, I'm going to disagree with you and explain why.

Like I said, shitting on someones banging strategy is lame.

Post: #43

(01-04-2018 03:09 PM)kaotic Wrote:  If you're going to say apps are lame, I'm going to disagree with you and explain why.

Like I said, shitting on someones banging strategy is lame.

It's just my opinion man.

Post: #44

I've gotten a few bangs online, and I'm far from a male model. I look very masculine but I've got scars from street/bar fights, nose has been broken twice. I'm 6'3" which helps.

I think if you get even one bang off online it's worthwhile, because if you do it right there's little time investment (for example, keep a text file with stock responses so you don't have to type them all.)

Post: #45

I think OP is trolling big baller style, but I'll offer my two cents.

Dating apps are a supplement to your game. Treat them as such, and approach in real life.

If you do both of those, you should be banging your dick off.

Instead of being frustrated and butthurt that you aren't getting matches, play to your strengths (day/night game, bookstores, gym, etc).

If you are badass at approaching at a packed bar and getting bangs from those approaches, you found your niche. Take advantage of whatever works for your situation.


Edit: I have gotten a good number of bangs from online dating. I'm nothing to look at, so you might want to evaluate your photos or your summaries in the dating apps you used to utilize. There are plenty of threads that have tons of knowledge for you to absorb.

Post: #46

Others have pointed out some of the below, but I'll go further so hopefully someone can learn from the breakdown:

1. Male model = Not top tier looks, plus he's skinny looking in the first picture and smiling way too hard (plus it's a weird pose). The whole first picture screams "let's just be friends" to me. The best picture for this guy is the 2nd one. It should've been his primary. First picture is key, most people don't look past the 1st picture, especially females.

2. On top of that he's clearly at least part Asian. This automatically knocks him down a peg or two in the US market. Asian men especially have to overcome that with bankroll, or being jacked, etc... Asians in general are perceived as being meek.

3. Bringer of Rain? Old Town? What the fuck does that mean? I don't translate autist to well adjusted very well, but maybe better than most so I'll give it a shot:

"Bringer of Rain" = OP thinking that this guy will get women's pussies wet and they'll pick up on this "subtle" hint.

Old Town = OP referencing some part of the city that he's placed his fake profile in. That doesn't give you much of any benefit as it's not interesting and women don't give a fuck about where you live, they care more about other things. Besides the app shows you the distance.

4. "If you smell like [beef] and [cheese], please swipe left" - You clearly haven't read much of the text advice thread as you'd spend less time perfectly punctuating your message and definitely never reference stinky vagina and on top of that use multiple emojis to do it. This is your idea of a joke or a line that would get women interested (as the guy comes off with "options) but in reality it's just pure autism.

Post: #47

(01-04-2018 04:14 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  O). The whole first picture screams "let's just be friends"
.,......... [].....................
it's just pure autism.

Post: #48

I went out on the street for 2 hours today and opened every bangable female that walked in my vicinity. I only got 5 numbers and NONE of them have even had sex with me yet.

Conclusion: You can't get laid from day game.

Post: #49

Is it a lot of grinding?, yes. Can you get laid with slutty and hot women?, Of course. Does it take a lot of work?, in my experience. YES

Post: #50

(01-04-2018 08:05 PM)lonewolf1992 Wrote:  Does it take a lot of work?, in my experience. YES

Getting laid with any women these days usually takes lots of work and/or luck. If you are getting laid without trying you should up your standards a bit. With that said anyone saying "dont game this way, game this way" is ridiculous. Guys should be using every avenue they can to maximize their results.