Post: #1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...tress.html

Any truth to this?

"So more conceptions are likely to occur earlier in the fertile period and therefore give a higher chance of having a boy.
This theory is backed up by another peak for boys in the UK in 1973. While there was no war on, this is when the average age of women at marriage was at its lowest — 21 — and there was a surge of teenage pregnancies.
It was a time of intense sexual activity in the young. Clearly frantic fornication produces more boys....

While more boys are born at the end of wars, relatively more girls are born in times of prolonged parental stress — for example, as happened after the 1995 Japanese earthquake and in New York in the wake of the destruction of the Twin Towers in 2001.
Prolonged financial hardship also produces a similar trend. "

Post: #2

That second paragraph above smacks of epigenetics reacting to environment cues.

Post: #3

I have read that female vagina and cervix canal walls can act differently to favor either male or female sperm. Depending of the female arousal state. Meaning that with partners who arouse them (with alphas) Y sperm is given easier time, but in a lower state of arousal (with betas), X sperm is given priority. This would be nature working to give preference to boys if he can inherit alpha genes, but giving preference to girls rather then betas.

I personally trough cautiously but on overall tend to believe this as this corresponds with my empirical observations about relationship dynamics in various couples and the sex of their children. Obviously the number of couples I know to make such assumptions is too low to be statistically relevant, but I suspect there is some truth there.

This would go well together with theory of OP because there is probably more sex in couples where the man is an alpha.

Post: #4

You ever had a girl cum hard and cream all over your dick on one day and then not at all on another day ?

That only happens when she's really turned on by you, and her pussy's natural sperm killing defences totally break down.

Post: #5

https://www.parents.com/getting-pregnant...-you-want/

While there is no precise science to making a boy or girl outside of high-tech gender selection, there is a germ of truth behind the most commonly-touted (but not scientifically proven!) natural method. It involves having intercourse three days before you ovulate and zero intercourse after ovulation to maximize your chances of having a girl. For couples that want a boy, the advice is to have sex only on the day you ovulate.

...

A recent study in the UK did show an association between eating breakfast cereal, plus a diet rich in potassium, and vitamins such as B-12, C and D and giving birth to boys. It's not clear if the morning meal actually caused the boy switch to flip or whether there's a correlation to eating more calories instead. (In the study, moms who had girls generally had an average of 180 fewer calories and 300 fewer milligrams of potassium per day than women who delivered boys.)

Post: #6

So are we actually start believing some feelgood bullshit women spread on MSM to help older women to believe that, not only, they still can conceive but also choose the sex of their unborn child ?
The hamster is on steroids and cocaine in this one...

Post: #7

I can't remember the source. I have heard that older fathers are more likely to have girls.

Post: #8

I have heard that the harder you fuck her, the more likely she will have a boy.