Post: #26

(11-05-2017 06:38 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Bitch please, 99% of this world would kill for a $400 per night income. Spoiled ungrateful hos.

I just did the math. If you made $400 a night, working 5 nights a week, for 36 out the 52 weeks in a year, you'd make $72,000.

That's a lot more than I make, for way less time.

G

Post: #27

(11-05-2017 07:10 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  I just did the math. If you made $400 a night, working 5 nights a week, for 36 out the 52 weeks in a year, you'd make $72,000.

That's a lot more than I make, for way less time.

G

They have to pay to be there. On top of this the bank will ask where they are getting the money which means they would have to declare, otherwise they have to have "a guy" to funnel the money in somehow which would cost them either way.


The main reason why strippers are not making much money is because of Seeking Arrangement and so many available hookers. Those instgram girls are straight up hookers available for "booking." The guys who have money to spend can cut through the bullshit and find girls online to do all sorts of shit. The strip club will be a dinosaur.

Post: #28

I trust these gals were wisely & diligently investing their money while they had the chance...?

If not, & noting how mercenary these stripper gals can be.
I would not be surprised if we see some slut on slut violence.

Post: #29

The purpose of the article is to give legitimacy to strippers. More fuel for the fires of degeneracy. Next it will be that men should be ashamed for not wanting lap dances with the tranny stripper who sports a 5 o’clock shadow.

Post: #30

(11-05-2017 04:47 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  Theese bitches forgot a key lesson: pussy is fungible.

As far as guys are concerned, there is no difference whatsoever between a stripper you can't fuck and a hot, barely clothed bartender that you also can't fuck. If your only skillset in life is being hot, you shouldn't be shocked at hot easily supplanted you are by younger/hotter/tighter women.

Supply and demand



Social media is a double edge sword for women, while it increases the attention they get from thirsty men, it also saturate the market with women men can look at, men used to be limited to see women in the same place day after day, school, college, neighborhood, job, church. But now just as women can get attention men can turn their attention away to the next girl.

Post: #31

Post: #32

Post: #33

(11-05-2017 07:20 PM)8ball Wrote:  

(11-05-2017 07:10 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  I just did the math. If you made $400 a night, working 5 nights a week, for 36 out the 52 weeks in a year, you'd make $72,000.

That's a lot more than I make, for way less time.

G

They have to pay to be there. On top of this the bank will ask where they are getting the money which means they would have to declare, otherwise they have to have "a guy" to funnel the money in somehow which would cost them either way.


The main reason why strippers are not making much money is because of Seeking Arrangement and so many available hookers. Those instgram girls are straight up hookers available for "booking." The guys who have money to spend can cut through the bullshit and find girls online to do all sorts of shit. The strip club will be a dinosaur.

Exactly. The strip club is not a whore-house. It is a different (and should be fancy) place to go to change the mood, or have a special friend/partner over for a couple drinks.

At least, that's why I go there, though very unfrequent. I don't even watch the girls. I go there for the mood.

If the startenders provide equal value then I'm in.

Post: #34

(11-06-2017 07:13 AM)lookslikeit Wrote:  

(11-05-2017 07:20 PM)8ball Wrote:  

(11-05-2017 07:10 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  I just did the math. If you made $400 a night, working 5 nights a week, for 36 out the 52 weeks in a year, you'd make $72,000.

That's a lot more than I make, for way less time.

G

They have to pay to be there. On top of this the bank will ask where they are getting the money which means they would have to declare, otherwise they have to have "a guy" to funnel the money in somehow which would cost them either way.


The main reason why strippers are not making much money is because of Seeking Arrangement and so many available hookers. Those instgram girls are straight up hookers available for "booking." The guys who have money to spend can cut through the bullshit and find girls online to do all sorts of shit. The strip club will be a dinosaur.

Exactly. The strip club is not a whore-house. It is a different (and should be fancy) place to go to change the mood, or have a special friend/partner over for a couple drinks.

At least, that's why I go there, though very unfrequent. I don't even watch the girls. I go there for the mood.

If the startenders provide equal value then I'm in.

Say what now? I think your google translation messed that one up. What do you mean take your partner there for the mood and not look at the girls? I have to be misunderstanding what you're saying.

Also, strip clubs are basically whore houses, cost is $0-to-as much as you're willing to pay right now. Which is fine, been a part of life since day 1.

Post: #35

The only response to cunts like these.

"So, I passed through the local maternity ward and it turns out your replacements have been in the pipeline for the last 18 years, with no future shortage in sight. Tick Tock."

Post: #36

Post: #37

The stripper strike will last until their meth stash runs out.

Aloha!

Post: #38

Hoes get respect??? Maybe if you learn to close your fucking legs instead of opening them everyday!

Post: #39

(11-05-2017 07:10 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  

(11-05-2017 06:38 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Bitch please, 99% of this world would kill for a $400 per night income. Spoiled ungrateful hos.

I just did the math. If you made $400 a night, working 5 nights a week, for 36 out the 52 weeks in a year, you'd make $72,000.

That's a lot more than I make, for way less time.

G

Guarantee they aren't paying taxes on that money either.

Post: #40

(11-07-2017 09:10 AM)Remington Wrote:  

(11-05-2017 07:10 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  

(11-05-2017 06:38 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Bitch please, 99% of this world would kill for a $400 per night income. Spoiled ungrateful hos.

I just did the math. If you made $400 a night, working 5 nights a week, for 36 out the 52 weeks in a year, you'd make $72,000.

That's a lot more than I make, for way less time.

G

Guarantee they aren't paying taxes on that money either.

And that is only the strip money, many strippers work as escort from time to time.

Post: #41

(11-07-2017 05:34 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(11-07-2017 09:10 AM)Remington Wrote:  

(11-05-2017 07:10 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  

(11-05-2017 06:38 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Bitch please, 99% of this world would kill for a $400 per night income. Spoiled ungrateful hos.

I just did the math. If you made $400 a night, working 5 nights a week, for 36 out the 52 weeks in a year, you'd make $72,000.

That's a lot more than I make, for way less time.

G

Guarantee they aren't paying taxes on that money either.

And that is only the strip money, many strippers work as escort from time to time.

What????

I thought they were studying for medical school when they weren't on the pole.

Aloha!

Post: #42

Strippers are gold digging for more money.

The fact that they earn much more than a doctor in Russia is not enough for their greedy prostitute hands

Post: #43

(11-10-2017 10:37 AM)kuros Wrote:  Strippers are gold digging for more money.

The fact that they earn much more than a doctor in Russia is not enough for their greedy prostitute hands

$1000 a night with no medical school debt? They're earning more than doctors in the US of A.

Of course, that's no problem for them, as they view their sexuality as more value than literal life-giving.

Post: #44

Yes Chastity there is more to life. I have no respect for these tease whores. This is not anything new with the advent of breastaurants over the past decade or two. Now these "Startenders" are going to strip-clubs. Good for them and good riddance.

Post: #45

(11-05-2017 07:21 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  I trust these gals were wisely & diligently investing their money while they had the chance...?

If not, & noting how mercenary these stripper gals can be.
I would not be surprised if we see some slut on slut violence.

Don't they have things like Mud Wrestling night at some of these places?





That reminds me, Happy Veterans Day to all Veterans out there.

Post: #46

I wonder if the taxman is taking note of all the girls announcing they used to earn $1000 a night?

Post: #47

(11-12-2017 09:03 PM)NightVale Wrote:  I wonder if the taxman is taking note of all the girls announcing they used to earn $1000 a night?

The IRS doesn't care about your gender or sexiness. If they are getting it cash they might get away with some of the taxes, though.

Post: #48

How is the IRS gonna stop it? They only have to deposit so much. A lot of the rest of stuff they need can be bought in cash including those stupid purses and shoes they love. Even if they do get caught there's no way to verify how much they actually got.

Post: #49

(11-05-2017 06:02 AM)IveBeenFramed Wrote:  A dancer named Gizelle Marie is one of the strike organizers. “The [New York City] bartenders tell the customers not to tip us. They block us from the customers while we dance or they are sweeping our money off the stage while we dance,” she told The Post. Several videos taken from inside different clubs posted on Instagram appear to support her claim.

Gizelle Marie says most customers can’t tell bartenders apart from strippers anymore because they all basically dress the same and “the club promoters and owners encourage the behavior."

Gizelle Marie got the idea to mobilize the NYC Strippers Strike after she traveled to Washington last month to dance at a club during Howard University’s homecoming.

“I made a lot of money. It made me think to myself that a lot of the great dancers aren’t dancing in New York anymore. They moved away to other cities to work or they just completely stopped,” Gizelle said.

Gizelle Marie is "29" if we are to believe her. I suspect the truth is she is even older, and she is having problems with coping with the fact that she is aging out of stripping. Her body is growing lumpy around her armpits, sides and aftermarket ass. She can still get it, but who will throw money at her when there is a 19 year old version a few feet away?

   

   


This is the real reason why her money is drying up. Too old, time to retire. The competition is too strong to not be A level.

Post: #50

Poor thots