(02-25-2019 06:54 PM)TravelerKai Wrote: All that aside fellas. Real talk for a minute.
If you had a billion dollars in wealth. How hard would it be to do what Dan Bilzerian does times 100? Couldn't you fly in as many Asian women from Asia or have your yacht go get them? I don't have that kind of money, but if I did, it would be super fucking easy for me to get 10+ gals and have them constantly on standby down for whatever, whenever.
It's almost like these guys really are average joes in many ways. Their cunning and guile stops short in spots. He is old though and we all know by now that low Test equates to mental fog and poor judgement.
![[Image: 1542384053_864693_1542384302_noticia_normal.jpg]](https://as.com/epik/imagenes/2018/11/16/portada/1542384053_864693_1542384302_noticia_normal.jpg)
(02-26-2019 12:14 AM)Sidney Crosby Wrote: ^ It's well documented that Bilzerian was paying the girls, at least in the beginning.
(02-25-2019 11:53 PM)Ceasar Wrote: Yeah, I'd have to say, I'm not that impressed with what Bob Craft or Bezos are pulling... relative to what I do in the admittedly easier playing field of EE or SEA.
Bob Craft literally got cucked -- he bought his girlfriend a house in LA where she lives with her 1 year old baby by another man.
Dan Blizerian is in another category. I'm frequently jealous of what he pulls. He does waaaaay better than these guys. He's a natural with women, he's alpha, he's strong. Dude's already living at close to the max. You just aren't going to pull significantly more or hotter women, visit more interesting places, stay in nicer hotels, etc. etc. than what the guy is doing. You might be able to top him with $1billion, but there is no 100 times better.
Sure, he inherited $100mill. But the appeal to women isn't just his money -- it's day and night between him and Craft. The guy's a natural with women. Dude did go through Navy Seal training, although he f*cked up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAdp0DkORTE
![[Image: 1.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/3Jb12VWz/1.jpg)
![[Image: 2.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/cHpgs7J9/2.jpg)
(02-27-2019 03:36 AM)frozen-ace Wrote: Notice the victim in this case is actually the State of Florida.
I was wondering how they identified him and it was because after watching the massage, they waited for him to get in his white Bentley and then performed a traffic stop. Kraft has a private driver so he would have been sitting in the front passenger seat. A passenger in a vehicle does not have to produce identification. The driver would, but not the passenger. For a BS traffic stop, the officer would have no grounds to try and enforce / obtain the identification of Kraft. He should have refused or called his lawyer. He had just done an illegal act, and the vehicle he was driving in committed no obvious traffic violations and got stopped, and they came for HIS identification. He should have known the game was up at this point.
Instead, he switched up his disguise by arriving in a blue Bentley for round 2 the next day.
(02-25-2019 05:57 PM)redonion Wrote: Kraft has supposedly hired Jefferey Epstein's lawyer to combat this misdemeanor charge.
Either Kraft is adopting the mindset of "reputation is everything" or this story is about to get a lot worse. His rep is pretty destroyed even if he gets off scot free.
(02-27-2019 06:36 AM)RoastBeefCurtains4Me Wrote: The police documents below say they obtained a "sneak and peek warrant", which authorized them to break into the massage parlor at night to secretly install video cameras.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sneak_and_peek_warrant
The police can do all kinds of shady shit with this kind of warrant. This shit ought to be unconstithtional.
(02-27-2019 03:36 AM)frozen-ace Wrote: Notice the victim in this case is actually the State of Florida.
I was wondering how they identified him and it was because after watching the massage, they waited for him to get in his white Bentley and then performed a traffic stop. Kraft has a private driver so he would have been sitting in the front passenger seat. A passenger in a vehicle does not have to produce identification. The driver would, but not the passenger. For a BS traffic stop, the officer would have no grounds to try and enforce / obtain the identification of Kraft. He should have refused or called his lawyer. He had just done an illegal act, and the vehicle he was driving in committed no obvious traffic violations and got stopped, and they came for HIS identification. He should have known the game was up at this point.
Instead, he switched up his disguise by arriving in a blue Bentley for round 2 the next day.
(02-27-2019 12:04 PM)DarkTriad Wrote: The sketchiest part is how they got in to plant the cameras. Remember, a big part of their case is based on the girls living there full time, the couldn't plant them with the girls present. Turns out the called in a fake bomb threat to force them to leave.
Quote:When do government officials violate someone’s constitutional rights?
There are a variety of different ways a government official may violate someone’s constitutional rights. But most Section 1983 lawsuits and Bivens claims are brought when an official of the state or federal government violates someone’s Fourth, First or Eighth Amendment rights in one or more of the following ways:
Shootings by law enforcement officers against unarmed citizens and other cases of police brutality and excessive force
False arrests by law enforcement officers and malicious prosecutions when there is no probable cause or evidence of criminal wrongdoing
State and federal law enforcement officers searching through your house and seizing your property without a valid warrant
If you are a prisoner and you are beaten and injured by guards or if guards deliberately ignore your medical needs
Schools or government employers who punish or censor a student or public employee for exercising their right to free speech or religion
(02-27-2019 03:44 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:(02-27-2019 12:04 PM)DarkTriad Wrote: The sketchiest part is how they got in to plant the cameras. Remember, a big part of their case is based on the girls living there full time, the couldn't plant them with the girls present. Turns out the called in a fake bomb threat to force them to leave.
Very shady. I have to wonder in the post-911 era what judges think of fake bomb threats to justify sneak & peeks. That and the "reasonable expectation of privacy" angle of filming inside a place of residence (even if was against zoning laws to live there) would have to be overcome. It's failed in Georgia on those grounds.
If I were a defense attorney, I would be interested to know whether any of the officers attended this recent police seminar about such operations, or one similar to it. Two of the instructors are from FL and have years of experience conducting these kinds of warrants. If the Jupiter police department paid for their officers to go to this and were on board with the techniques taught therein, I'd be looking at the possibilities for a civil rights suit in addition to getting the warrant thrown out.
Quote:When do government officials violate someone’s constitutional rights?
There are a variety of different ways a government official may violate someone’s constitutional rights. But most Section 1983 lawsuits and Bivens claims are brought when an official of the state or federal government violates someone’s Fourth, First or Eighth Amendment rights in one or more of the following ways:
Shootings by law enforcement officers against unarmed citizens and other cases of police brutality and excessive force
False arrests by law enforcement officers and malicious prosecutions when there is no probable cause or evidence of criminal wrongdoing
State and federal law enforcement officers searching through your house and seizing your property without a valid warrant
If you are a prisoner and you are beaten and injured by guards or if guards deliberately ignore your medical needs
Schools or government employers who punish or censor a student or public employee for exercising their right to free speech or religion
Kraft won't give a shit about suing them under that but any number of the other defendants might.
(04-28-2019 04:22 PM)frozen-ace Wrote: SNIP
Kraft’s lawyers have argued that if human trafficking was really the issue (and the basis for the sneak and peak warrant), why not raid the place with the swat team and rescue the women?
Quote:...Also on Monday, prosecutors admitted that police did in fact break federal law when they filmed individuals at Orchids of Asia who were not the recipients of any sex acts and instead just at the location to get a massage.
It was also revealed at that same hearing that 10 individuals who appeared to be soliciting prostitution were not charged after authorities determined the footage of the men was inconclusive.
There was no explanation however for the multiple women who visited the Orchids of Asia Day Spa back in January who were being watched by members of law enforcement.
Judge Hanser, the Palm Beach County magistrate who is overseeing the Kraft case, first revealed that there were fenmale clients caught on film last Tuesday.
It did not stop there either according to Judge Hanser, who wrote that 'more than one woman had a significant portion of her spa time viewed... and the entirety of her spa time recorded and placed in Jupiter Police Department record.'
This was problematic for a number of reasons, he went on to state, with the most glaring being the fact that 'the search warrant did not allege that women were seeking illegal contact.'
In the order announcing that evidence obtained from hidden cameras and a traffic stop of Kraft would not be permissible at trial, Judge Hanser also detailed the flaws in the warrant obtained by the Jupiter Police Department to conduct their sting operation.
'The fact that some totally innocent women and men had their entire lawful time spent in a massage room fully recorded and viewed intermittently by a detective-monitor is unacceptable and results from the lack of sufficient pre-monitoring written guidelines,' said Judge Hanser.
The number of women is not known at this time.
Quote:A lawsuit was previously filed by a male client however who claimed he was at the spa while the sting was being conducted by Jupiter police.
A complaint filed in federal court y by attorneys Edward Mullins of Reed Smith and Joe Tacopania of The Law Offices of Tacopina & Seigel on behalf of a John Doe, accuses authorities of violating Doe's Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, Fourteenth Amendment right to procedural due process, and constitutional right to privacy.
Doe states that he was visiting the spa on January 19 for a massage that did not include any manual or oral sex act from a spa employee.
The filing, which was submitted in the United states District Court for the Southern District of Florida, goes on to state that Doe had a reasonable expectation of privacy as he undressed inside the spa and then received a massage while in the nude.
He is now seeking monetary, punitive and exemplary damages while demanding that no copy of any of the tapes showing men inside the spa be released to the press or public.
Doe also wants those tapes, and any copies, destroyed for good.