Post: #126

(08-10-2017 02:06 PM)someguy00 Wrote:  Yes, I have been banned over 100 times from various forums and websites.

(08-10-2017 02:06 PM)someguy00 Wrote:  I have even had a few Youtube accounts banned for me uploading porn..

Post: #127

^ suspect post. Friends gifs. Quite possibly female or faggot.

Post: #128

(08-11-2017 07:21 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  ^ suspect post. Friends gifs. Quite possibly female or faggot.

That was my first thought too.

Post: #129

^^ and nagging.



It's so ubiquitous in this gynocracy, I missed it the first time.

Post: #130

Why do some people on here take everything so seriously?

EDIT: Wait, or maybe I'm the one taking things too serious :O

Post: #131

Hey folks, I am back. My previous Whocouldibe123.... accounts keep getting banned, so I am back again with this account. I don't know why I get banned on my first post with each account, but the admin who is banning me is a butt-fucking faggot and I hope his kids are kidnapped and sold on Backpage to an HIV-positive pedophile rapist. Fuckin pussy.

Post: #132

Joke is too old. Reported!

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #133

(09-04-2017 10:56 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  Joke is too old. Reported!

Very laboured.

#LaborDay

Post: #134

(09-04-2017 10:52 PM)whocouldibe12345678 Wrote:  the admin who is banning me is a butt-fucking faggot and I hope his kids are kidnapped and sold on Backpage to an HIV-positive pedophile rapist. Fuckin pussy.

If he was a butt-fucking faggot, wouldn't he list them on there himself?

Post: #135

This is the least creative troll in forum history.

Post: #136

(09-04-2017 11:27 PM)Suits Wrote:  This is the least creative troll in forum history.

There was icouldbe987654321, but he got banned after his first post.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #137

(08-08-2017 08:05 AM)whocouldibe1234 Wrote:  My previous account, Whocouldibe123, got banned a month ago from this forum. So I had to create this new account, whocouldibe1234. LOL. I have no idea why I was banned, I had only posted 5 times:

/thread-3324-...pid1605963
/thread-63626...pid1609771
/thread-48360...pid1609725
/thread-32193...pid1606759
/thread-32287...pid1606752

I thought this was the perfect forum for my conservative banter, porn site talk, and banging chicks convo. Has anyone else been banned? A copy of my banning notice is below.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Clearly this guy should have been banned if only for spamming by creating multiple accounts consecutively. As for his first post, he got a very clear message from the system showing that he was banned for participating in a political discussion before he got 50 posts under his belt: see third link. But we only know that because he posted that screen shot. What I would like to know, as a newbie, is why are we not allowed to see why any other ex-member has been banned, so we can perhaps learn what is acceptable here and what is not? Perhaps somebody might even decide that someone was banned for a reason that is not acceptable in his opinion, and he might then choose to leave the forum. A fair and just system can only improve by openness.

Post: #138

(09-05-2017 12:00 AM)Old SEA Dog Wrote:  Clearly this guy should have been banned if only for spamming by creating multiple accounts consecutively. As for his first post, he got a very clear message from the system showing that he was banned for participating in a political discussion before he got 50 posts under his belt: see third link. But we only know that because he posted that screen shot. What I would like to know, as a newbie, is why are we not allowed to see why any other ex-member has been banned, so we can perhaps learn what is acceptable here and what is not? Perhaps somebody might even decide that someone was banned for a reason that is not acceptable in his opinion, and he might then choose to leave the forum. A fair and just system can only improve by openness.

Great. A newbie with no history of contributing value to the forum who has plenty of ideas on how the forum should be run.

Post: #139

(09-05-2017 12:10 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 12:00 AM)Old SEA Dog Wrote:  Clearly this guy should have been banned if only for spamming by creating multiple accounts consecutively. As for his first post, he got a very clear message from the system showing that he was banned for participating in a political discussion before he got 50 posts under his belt: see third link. But we only know that because he posted that screen shot. What I would like to know, as a newbie, is why are we not allowed to see why any other ex-member has been banned, so we can perhaps learn what is acceptable here and what is not? Perhaps somebody might even decide that someone was banned for a reason that is not acceptable in his opinion, and he might then choose to leave the forum. A fair and just system can only improve by openness.

Great. A newbie with no history of contributing value to the forum who has plenty of ideas on how the forum should be run.

I did not mean to offend you personally, sire, and if I did, please pardon me. But did it ever occur to you that outsiders may see things insiders don't? Now, as you can see I got a warning for breaking a rule, and therefore I studied the rules again. I did not find anything there against a newbie expressing an idea about the site, as long as it is neither political nor race related. If I am not mistaken I am even allowed to comment about religion but that's a risk I won't take. Other than those forbidden subjects, how can I politely tell you to respect others' right for free speech?

Having said that, if, as a senior member, you would care to explain to me why reasons for banning should not be posted, I will listen with great interest. I appreciate that you are much more likely to know the answer than any newbie.

Post: #140

(09-05-2017 12:35 AM)Old SEA Dog Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 12:10 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 12:00 AM)Old SEA Dog Wrote:  Clearly this guy should have been banned if only for spamming by creating multiple accounts consecutively. As for his first post, he got a very clear message from the system showing that he was banned for participating in a political discussion before he got 50 posts under his belt: see third link. But we only know that because he posted that screen shot. What I would like to know, as a newbie, is why are we not allowed to see why any other ex-member has been banned, so we can perhaps learn what is acceptable here and what is not? Perhaps somebody might even decide that someone was banned for a reason that is not acceptable in his opinion, and he might then choose to leave the forum. A fair and just system can only improve by openness.

Great. A newbie with no history of contributing value to the forum who has plenty of ideas on how the forum should be run.

I did not mean to offend you personally, sire, and if I did, please pardon me.

It's not my forum and I'm not a moderator, so you didn't offend me.

I simply enjoy pointing out how silly it is for newbies show up here and not take the time to becoming acclimated to our unique community before deciding how things should be.

(09-05-2017 12:35 AM)Old SEA Dog Wrote:  But did it ever occur to you that outsiders may see things insiders don't? Now, as you can see I got a warning for breaking a rule, and therefore I studied the rules again. I did not find anything there against a newbie expressing an idea about the site, as long as it is neither political nor race related. If I am not mistaken I am even allowed to comment about religion but that's a risk I won't take. Other than those forbidden subjects, how can I politely tell you to respect others' right for free speech?

That's not the point. You haven't taken the time to demonstrate your value to the forum and you're already indicating that you have a better idea of how this community should be managed than the moderators who have been already succeeded in growing a small fledgling forum into a huge meeting place of male minds over the course of many years.

(09-05-2017 12:35 AM)Old SEA Dog Wrote:  Having said that, if, as a senior member, you would care to explain to me why reasons for banning should not be posted, I will listen with great interest. I appreciate that you are much more likely to know the answer than any newbie.

Please note, as I wrote early, that I'm not a moderator myself and any opinions I express are purely mine. If you have a genuine question, just PM a moderator. It's easy. I've done it myself and always gotten an answer.

It's always a bad sign when a zero rep newbie starts posting about "how things should be." I view it as disrespectful to all the hard work and thought that our mod team puts into the job of managing this forum.

Post: #141

(09-05-2017 12:35 AM)Old SEA Dog Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 12:10 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 12:00 AM)Old SEA Dog Wrote:  Clearly this guy should have been banned if only for spamming by creating multiple accounts consecutively. As for his first post, he got a very clear message from the system showing that he was banned for participating in a political discussion before he got 50 posts under his belt: see third link. But we only know that because he posted that screen shot. What I would like to know, as a newbie, is why are we not allowed to see why any other ex-member has been banned, so we can perhaps learn what is acceptable here and what is not? Perhaps somebody might even decide that someone was banned for a reason that is not acceptable in his opinion, and he might then choose to leave the forum. A fair and just system can only improve by openness.

Great. A newbie with no history of contributing value to the forum who has plenty of ideas on how the forum should be run.

I did not mean to offend you personally, sire, and if I did, please pardon me. But did it ever occur to you that outsiders may see things insiders don't? Now, as you can see I got a warning for breaking a rule, and therefore I studied the rules again. I did not find anything there against a newbie expressing an idea about the site, as long as it is neither political nor race related. If I am not mistaken I am even allowed to comment about religion but that's a risk I won't take. Other than those forbidden subjects, how can I politely tell you to respect others' right for free speech?

There's forum rules, then there's forum etiquette. You're assuming the idea has not been discussed a hundred times over in the past. If you have an idea about how the site should be run, Roosh is the guy to PM about it, it doesn't need to be aired out here.

You could also PM Kona about it, but people tend to disappear when they do that, so I wouldn't recommend it.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #142

(09-05-2017 12:57 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  You could also PM Kona about it, but people tend to disappear when they do that, so I wouldn't recommend it.

At least you won't remain ignorant of what the phrase "coconuts up your ass" refers to.

Post: #143

(09-05-2017 01:02 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 12:57 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  You could also PM Kona about it, but people tend to disappear when they do that, so I wouldn't recommend it.

At least you won't remain ignorant of what the phrase "coconuts up your ass" refers to.

Shit, you mean he was being literal about that??? I thought he just had haemorrhoids.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #144

(09-05-2017 01:05 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 01:02 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 12:57 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  You could also PM Kona about it, but people tend to disappear when they do that, so I wouldn't recommend it.

At least you won't remain ignorant of what the phrase "coconuts up your ass" refers to.

Shit, you mean he was being literal about that??? I thought he just had haemorrhoids.

No, it's a rite of passage.

Post: #145

(09-05-2017 01:06 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 01:05 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 01:02 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(09-05-2017 12:57 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  You could also PM Kona about it, but people tend to disappear when they do that, so I wouldn't recommend it.

At least you won't remain ignorant of what the phrase "coconuts up your ass" refers to.

Shit, you mean he was being literal about that??? I thought he just had haemorrhoids.

No, it's a rite of passage.

So it's not merely a supposition?

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #146

I have actually joked with other members about creating a "Famous Last Words: Banned Members' Parting Shots; Greatest Hits and Misses" thread, but that's more for purposes of general humor and finger pointing hilarity. I've never gotten around to it though because I figured it would be in bad taste.

Post: #147

(09-05-2017 01:12 AM)J_Sway Wrote:  I have actually joked with other members about creating a "Famous Last Words: Banned Members' Parting Shots; Greatest Hits and Misses" thread, but that's more for purposes of general humor and finger pointing hilarity. I've never gotten around to it though because I figured it would be in bad taste.

I actually PM'ed Roosh a long time ago to get permission to start a "Famous Last Words" thread and he advised against it.

It's not good to give the trolls more attention than they deserve.

Post: #148

(09-05-2017 01:14 AM)Suits Wrote:  I actually PM'ed Roosh a long time ago to get permission to start a "Famous Last Words" thread and he advised against it.

It's not good to give the trolls more attention than they deserve.

Duly noted. Glad I mentioned it. Shall they live on in hushed whispers shared through PMs and private discussion.

Post: #149

To all the newbies in the thread wondering what is and isn't acceptable. Honestly, no need to hamsterize a simple concept. Just don't be a faggot and you'll be fine.

Post: #150

(09-05-2017 12:10 AM)Suits Wrote:  Great. A newbie with no history of contributing value to the forum who has plenty of ideas on how the forum should be run.

Chin up. You can ask Old Sea Dog his opinion of Cats.