Post: #26

(08-04-2017 12:06 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-02-2017 01:06 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Evolution knows that women like that are a danger to the survival of the species.

No, they are not.

Evolution is concerned with populations as a whole. Every population has individuals who make unwise decisions that result in untimely death (although from an evolutionary standpoint, her death wasn't untimely, as her daughter was already 16 and very capable of carrying on her genetic lineage).

1 in 1000 women dying by selfie would not constitute a thread to the species.

Even 12 year olds with an uncontainable genetic drive to leap from tall buildings without safety apparatus wouldn't be a danger to the survival of our species.

A contagious disease that killed off people before they could procreate would be a threat to the survival of the human species.

We don't need to exaggerate everything just to make it fit our predetermined theory on why women using social media is the worst thing that has ever happened to mankind.

NO reason to be the Dick of the Internet about it.



Of course we should not over-dramatize it. What I meant that women as a rule are far more careful in their behavior in terms of dares, physical activity, dangerous hobbies, unmotivated jumps, thrill-seeking etc.

If at one day in history women behaved all like that starting in puberty as men do, then this would take a cut in the human population. And obviously in our current population levels - 80% of humanity could jump off a cliff and as a species we would hardly feel a thing - survival would not be impacted - though it may depend which 80% takes the fall - heh.

Such dangerous behavior was at best dangerous to the tribe in the distant paths - and even then mostly regarding combat-age productive men or fertile women. (aside from children - those 2 groups were the most important for the little tribe)

Post: #27

(08-04-2017 12:41 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(08-04-2017 12:06 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-02-2017 01:06 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Evolution knows that women like that are a danger to the survival of the species.

No, they are not.

Evolution is concerned with populations as a whole. Every population has individuals who make unwise decisions that result in untimely death (although from an evolutionary standpoint, her death wasn't untimely, as her daughter was already 16 and very capable of carrying on her genetic lineage).

1 in 1000 women dying by selfie would not constitute a thread to the species.

Even 12 year olds with an uncontainable genetic drive to leap from tall buildings without safety apparatus wouldn't be a danger to the survival of our species.

A contagious disease that killed off people before they could procreate would be a threat to the survival of the human species.

We don't need to exaggerate everything just to make it fit our predetermined theory on why women using social media is the worst thing that has ever happened to mankind.

NO reason to be the Dick of the Internet about it.



Of course we should not over-dramatize it. What I meant that women as a rule are far more careful in their behavior in terms of dares, physical activity, dangerous hobbies, unmotivated jumps, thrill-seeking etc.

If at one day in history women behaved all like that starting in puberty as men do, then this would take a cut in the human population. And obviously in our current population levels - 80% of humanity could jump off a cliff and as a species we would hardly feel a thing - survival would not be impacted - though it may depend which 80% takes the fall - heh.

Such dangerous behavior was at best dangerous to the tribe in the distant paths - and even then mostly regarding combat-age productive men or fertile women. (aside from children - those 2 groups were the most important for the little tribe)

If I have to be the Dick of the Internet™ to do my part in encouraging RVF to be a productive community rather than one that stands around awkwardly making conversation along the lines of, "Western women, aren't they worst?" and high-fiving each other in agreement, then it's a title I'll gladly accept.

Post: #28

(08-04-2017 12:58 AM)Suits Wrote:  If I have to be the Dick of the Internet™ to do my part in encouraging RVF to be a productive community rather than one that stands around awkwardly making conversation along the lines of, "Western women, aren't they worst?" and high-fiving each other in agreement, then it's a title I'll gladly accept.

Actually not only RVF, but the Red Pill community in general among the Game accepting men - both have moved towards better and kinder understanding of female nature, also articles about selecting marriage candidates (even in the West) etc.

It was also Roosh who shifted that way. The American Girls Be Like thread while funny only resulted in bashing American women.

The truth is that some women as rare as they are actually accept many Red Pill truths and are fun to be around with.


Especially when she jokes about making breakfast for her boyfriend dressed only in an apron and making him sandwiches.

Post: #29

(08-02-2017 12:40 PM)kaotic Wrote:  Shit like this happens all the time, all for the thrill, all for the followers on social media.

Social media makes people do stupid shit, just see the increasing amount of people who died taking selfies.

Desperate desire to be famous + lack real talent + low barrier social media = recipe for disaster

Post: #30

Do not forget, there are LEGIONS of men salivating after these brave you go girls. We need a war like we need the air we breathe. A huge, deep, cleansing war.

But hey, remember, I AM the idiot, not these useless thots. Not the beta bucks, not the cucks, not the soys, not the aspie fans, not the asmr bots, not the sissy momma boys.

It is me who must have the wrong, negative mindset.

Post: #31

(08-03-2017 12:26 AM)TheOllam Wrote:  Hamstering is dangerous

Do not attempt thoting: