Post: #101

TooFineAPoint Wrote:So yes, the children aspect of it is fucked and what are the most actionable ways of dealing with that?

There are two aspects to this.

The more complex one is how to deal with people in the world who think publishing sex guides for children is totally great. I don't know the answer to that, and I won't tell you what to do.

The far less complex one is how to deal with people on RVF who overtly state that publishing sex guides for children is totally great because it increases the likelihood that young girls will sleep with him. We should ban him. Agreed?

Post: #102

(07-22-2017 11:40 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

Sebastian Wrote:I bet my parents generation is not responsible for this since they are not from here.

Reading this little Back & Forth between MMX2010 & Sebastian would be the equivalent of watching Lebron playing ball against a High School benchwarmer

Post: #103

(07-24-2017 07:28 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

TooFineAPoint Wrote:So yes, the children aspect of it is fucked and what are the most actionable ways of dealing with that?

There are two aspects to this.

The more complex one is how to deal with people in the world who think publishing sex guides for children is totally great. I don't know the answer to that, and I won't tell you what to do.

The far less complex one is how to deal with people on RVF who overtly state that publishing sex guides for children is totally great because it increases the likelihood that young girls will sleep with him. We should ban him. Agreed?

I don't have any say on who gets banned from the forum.

Post: #104

(07-24-2017 07:18 PM)TooFineAPoint Wrote:  So yes, the children aspect of it is fucked and what are the most actionable ways of dealing with that?

Ridicule. Memeing. Fake Teen Vogue covers featuring Lena Dunham and article titles such as "All you need to know about fingering your 9 year old brother."

But the only way you destroy a print publication is to kill its advertising revenue. Therefore: contacting advertisers in that issue of Teen Vogue. Better yet, memeing and ridiculing advertisers from that issue of Teen Vogue as supporting statutory rape if not sodomy.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #105

(07-24-2017 04:03 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

Blaster Wrote:My point is that Teen Vogue itself and this howto article in particular, are insignificant in the grand scheme of things. Boycotting it is simply giving the jackass who wrote it more exposure via the Streisand effect. Certainly, Moms boycotting sex in the media is nothing new. They've never been effective before and there's no reason to think they'll be effective now, at least at anything other than getting attention for themselves.

I know you listen to Jordan Peterson, so you'll have a stronger grasp of what I'm saying.

If your argument was given to people who routinely politically protest, I would accept it. But if it's given to people who never protest, I would reject it. Those who never protest cultural degeneracy need to learn to turn their rage into action, and boycotting a magazine (and telling others to do so) is an effective way to learn this.

It's the equivalent of curing your depression by cleaning your room.

Conservative activist moms are nothing new. In the 90s it was music (eg Tipper Gore). In the 2000s it was video games. Their moral outrage tactics have not changed much, nor has there been any deep, favorable change in cultural institutions that would lead me to predict the outcome this time will be any different than last time. If anything, they have less influence than ever.

Also, allow me to clarify something. I have no problem with a group of people who want to say: this magazine is pushing an agenda, don't buy it for your children. But seriously, look at the Sexual-Health-Identity section of the site. The anal sex article does cross a line not crossed by the other articles, but it didn't come completely out of nowhere. That whole section of the site is obsessed with homosexuality, gender identity and other progressive stack garbage, and of course dildos and masturbation.

But I think that if you want to deal with the progressive zeitgeist, I think a different strategy is going to be needed. You need a positive alternative that actually resonates with young people. Teenagers are naive, emotional, impressionable, and obsessed with sex, but they aren't stupid. If an article gets pulled from Teen Vogue it will just show up somewhere else.

Post: #106

Hey zatara,

How dominant are you going to feel when your beautiful little girl who's just turned 14 & decides to eschew the boob job you promised her for an anal bleaching?

Post: #107

(07-24-2017 07:22 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  No, you said your primary pleasure was knowing that another man would marry her, without knowing you ass-fucked her.

Right. So rather than having no opinion about him (like most of us do), you have a very strong opinion about him - as if he's essential to the pleasure you have with the girl.

It's not you being with her.

It you being with her, in order to get to him.

You're imagining things and/or projecting here. This is my first post in the thread:

/thread-63941...pid1616718

Laughing at him isn't what I'd call a strong opinion. Trust me, I'm with a girl first and foremost for my own raw sexual pleasure. I'm an entirely selfish lover. Everything else is marginal.

You seem to have ignored my point about MikeCF's love of sexual domination. Does that not fit with your world view? Instead, how about all the posters in the lengthy sexual domination thread on this very forum, many of them highly repped:

/thread-27278.html

What about the ROK authors of articles on sexual domination?

http://www.returnofkings.com/8666/the-do...experiment

http://www.returnofkings.com/22204/men-s...h-anal-sex

etc

You'll find plenty of people here in the manosphere recommend dominating women. Its really very common. You're probably on the wrong forum to have such puritanical views about sex, if it disgusts you that much. Domination really is a thoroughly enjoyable undertaking.

(07-24-2017 09:18 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  Hey zatara,

How dominant are you going to feel when your beautiful little girl who's just turned 14 & decides to eschew the boob job you promised her for an anal bleaching?

You puritanical types seem big on the personal attacks as a method of argument. It doesn't really add intellectual credibility to your position. Does the idea of a man sexually defiling conservative young Christian girls really rile you up that much?

I don't have a 14 year old daughter though, thanks. Definitely wouldn't waste my money on a boobjob for her if I did though. That money could be better spent on whips and chains for engaging in some light BDSM with someone else's daughter.

Post: #108

This thread be like:

Post: #109

Honestly the problem with the puritanical types who want to get rid of degenerate behavior like homosexuality and sodomy is that they aren't allowed to use violence against the barbarians who indulge in and encourage these things (usually in the name of freedom, enjoying the decline, or some other rationalization). Adulterers used to be stoned to death. Shotgun weddings were called that for a reason.

On an individual level, human history is composed of civilizers and barbarians. Men who want to build things and raise families versus those who want to rape and pillage. Women who want to have kids and serve their men instead of being short-lived whores. What's happening today is that those who would defend civilization are powerless to physically repel the barbarian elements, and the state no longer acts in the interests of the civilizations they sprouted from.

Post: #110

"Oh this thread is going on really long, I bet there's some interesting discussion in here...


.....never mind."

Post: #111

Daughters are property. Guys turning out young girls into whores should be careful to choose the daughters of lowT manlets.

You might want to enjoy the decline, but keep in mind that what also declines are police resources to track missing persons.

Post: #112

I cannot believe some of the authoritarian opinions voiced here - go take an Allahu Akbar, convert to Islam already and move to ISIS territories.

Western civilization survived for millennia by walking the simple path of strong recommendations. There was the cut-off of the good wife-material women and the loose ones. Both had proper functions. Marriage was strong.

As for the puritan faux-conservatives who lambast about video games and porn or have purity balls for their daughters - that is like using water pistols against nukes.

What is the best way to tell your daughter about life - science, Red Pill, Game understanding, the sexual market value of men and women and what happens to women when they go through hundreds of cocks.

You teach your son about Game, Red Pill, show him data. You do the same with your daughter:





Then you become a good example of a strong masculine Red Pill man that she will want to have in her life.

That way when she is met with the propaganda, the lies of the left, then she may succumb to it partly, but she will remember your words, she will remember the graphs and she will see some of the stuff you have told her.

Is that system fool-proof? Of course not - woman and men can both fall, but you have done your best. If we lived in a sane system encouraging heterosexual family building, then your chances would be 99%, in our world, they are above 50%, but that is still better than a fucking purity ball or an honor killing and an Allahu Akbar.

New life-cycle of the modern woman from her 20s to 50s:

Post: #113

In contrast the old system:






So the solution to premature anal sex of teens - is simple enlightenment, not force - with the awareness and detachment, that you have done your part. If the system is sane again, then it will be almost foolproof. No need to splatter your daughter's brains across the dinner table to "restore her honor".

Post: #114

I don't think anyone talked about killing their daughter, Zel. Islam has gotten under your skin on this.

The reality is that the 50's led to the 60's led to the 70's etc etc etc, all of which represented a loosening of patriarchal control over daughters.

Put a skilled player in a room with your 16 year old daughter and we'd soon see how well charts and polite guidance keeps her legs together. The reality is that this kind of soft patriarchy only works in regions where traditionalist morals are still the mainstream and sluts are still thoroughly shamed. You reckon you'd fare well raising a girl like that in New York?

Soft patriarchy is a gift bestowed on us by the hard patriarchy that ruled from the stone ages roughly through to WW2. Pretending that you can preach 50's fatherhood or Brady bunch kindness without finding yourself suddenly being a grandfather in a 70's fuckfest is naive, and I say that in the kindest way.

Enjoy the decline, but a decline is a decline. Soft men make hard times and hard times make hard men, by necessity. Hard men do not allow their daughters to direct their own destiny any more than they allow their wives to. You pass responsibility for her future directly from your hands to the hands of her husband. If that chafes with your dislike for islam, sorry bro. But for all islam's faults you can't tell me they're not breeding or that their women are whores. They might go over the top. The men of the west were trucking along just fine before women's lib, and they were controlling women in their own way. But let's not pretend that wise, cuddly dad didn't eventually lead us to where we are today.

I get it, really, I do. The idea of living in a society that makes it difficult to get random pussy on tap seems terrible, but you can't have your cake and eat it too on this. Either girls are constrained from their baser natures or say hello to daddy's little slut with five illegitimate dregspawn or mummy's little childless 40y/o cat lady sucking down wine and antidepressants like coke and candy.

Post: #115

While my overall opinion of this is one of disapproval, I'm not some buttoned-up church minister who wnats women covered from head to toe. I'm a man, I love sluts. Like everyone else, I licked my lips at the pictures of Kim Kardashian arse as it was broadcast to the world and felt the appeal of plunging my dick into girls arses, (at least until i tried it). But just because it is appealing in its own odd way, doesnt mean it's good for you, or for the world.

I smoked for nearly 15 years and never once did I reason that it was a good thing. Yet still, I woke up every day and smoked. I see anal as a similar vice - it might be appealing, you might want it in the moment but it's better to leave it alone because of the damage it does in the long run. It's a fucking shit trap, literally.

I'm sure the fact I have a daughter who is nearing puberty has a great deal to do with my opinion, but after seeing what the childless politicians of Europe have done, it shouldn't be a surprise that having a link to the future changes your attitudes somewhat. With the seemingly even split among members whether this is an outrage or an opportunity, it would be interesting to look at how cleanly divided the opinions are along the lines of paternal status.

Post: #116

Some 200 years ago a huge portion of the Western female population in the cities consisted of prostitutes - 10-20% in fact in cities like London.

I am not against shotgun weddings, but they only were effective because divorce was unheard of or difficult.

Stoning adulterers - that is 2000 years ago and in some cultures in Europe - it was never done frankly.

You all have are overestimating the actual pressure needed to bring back the system into moderate balance. There is no need for stoning adulterers or killing your daughters.

The current system has been created by social engineers and even now they need to constantly indoctrinate them via media, entertainment, academia from cradle to gender studies degree. They have to constantly tell the women to be sluts and go out there.

Why do you think do they need to do this? Because the female nature when left with very basic restrictions isn't automatically a carousel-riding gang-banging slut. You have to take a look at the many countries out there in EE, FSU, China etc.

And even they get an enormous amount of indoctrination. All you need to do to go back is fire the cultural marxists in Hollywood, rip away the media control from them - take back the Newspapers and TV channels, fire the marxists in schools and universities - give people like Jordan Petersen and sane scientists a mandate to recreate a science based curriculum and you will see that within 10 years you will have women behaving utterly different.

Double cudos if you have a society where Game and actual male and female nature is taught - that wasn't even the case in Christian culture and the Muslim one is twisted beyond belief anyway.

Anyone who advocates for stoning of adulterers is too authoritarian, but call me soft on that one - heh.

Post: #117

In the first world most fathers nowadays see it like Zel does. They just can't be bothered to get worked up over their daughter having casual sex. For hundreds of years there was a very practical concern about a young pregnancy with a deadbeat, it could ruin a family. With birth control and the welfare state being what they are, that sharp edge of casual sex has been filed off, so the only dads you have to worry about now are the ones who feel visceral disgust at the very notion of a teenager having casual sex. They're a rare breed, and they tend to stick together and advertise what they are.

It's not that they're scared to act, it's that without the threat of a life ruining unplanned pregnancy they genuinely DGAF.

If you're a poor young man living in a city where everyone talks about purity and chastity you've got to be smart and restrained. If you're an adult who can travel, or choose where you want to live, all bets are off.

Post: #118

Again, nobody is advocating for killing daughters.

You say "take away the cultural Marxism and things will be ok" but then you're back to the 40's in any case.

Okay, so maybe if the globalist propaganda stopped then there would be no need to "control" women. I suppose we can cross the bridge when we get to it.

But any man with a daughter coming of age can't just "put her on hold" until the culture wars have been fought and (hopefully) won.

Beyond that, Zel, your daughters are almost certainly going to be high IQ with strong genetic impulse control. That's not the case for the lower class, among which the patriarchy are sadly destined to always require a more Neanderthal approach. Keep in mind that in days of old it wasn't simply the wrath of the father that kept a young woman in check. It was the social standard of the entire community that would ostracise her for spreading her legs flippantly.

And yet girls are so hypergamous that even under those strict conditions there was no shortage of hussies who's severely diminished social status served as a warning to any girl that witnessed the fruits of her whoredom.

But today? If you've got a daughter she has to be afraid of you. Afraid of the consequences of playing the slut. I only have sons, and make no mistake it's not long before junior starts nipping at your heels, his very biology subconsciously driving him to test your alpha status. As for girls, once they hit puberty the drive among many of them to mount dick is extremely strong. If you ever find yourself in a situation where you're surrounded by even mid-pubescent girls then you'll know how they find any excuse to hang around you, accidentally dropping constant IOIs due to their total lack of self awareness.

Like I said before. When it comes to kids, charts and heart-to-heart conversations by and large are not enough to keep them on the straight and narrow.

Post: #119

Gents - think about this statement by Lunostr:

Quote:Honestly the problem with the puritanical types who want to get rid of degenerate behavior like homosexuality and sodomy is that they aren't allowed to use violence against the barbarians who indulge in and encourage these things (usually in the name of freedom, enjoying the decline, or some other rationalization). Adulterers used to be stoned to death. Shotgun weddings were called that for a reason.

Making violence against gays and slutty girls legal will create exactly Islam in the West - only much weaker, because there is no religious ideology behind it that is that brutal.

Throwing off Milo and Oscar Wilde off a roof is not going to change much.

The hard men Leonard speaks about are not the ones who execute their daughters or burn their faces with acid.

The hard men move out against the true evil shitheads who poison the minds of women and men. The hard men go out and act against the monetary elite, the globalists, the education marxists, the traitorous political class and the journalists.

Hardness against women is like fighting a war by killing the women of the enemy nation while leaving their generals and soldiers intact.

And again - I am not advocating for any Alt-Right rebellion now. The time is not right for that - the brainwashing of the population is too ripe.

The shotgun wedding was also not an actual call to shoot the groom. In our times the propaganda is so deep for the girls, that she would not want to get married at 18. Also usually they loaded the shotgun with salt, so that they could actually shoot the prospective groom. The fathers were not so dumb as to kill the father of their grandsons.

You mix here various draconian things with events like shotgun weddings which worked because the system was actually sane back then. The couple just needed a little push for their little lapsus. Nowadays all of this would not work until the hard men get rid of the ruling traitors and reestablish a saner system.

Then there would not be much need for killing the few naturally occuring mostly high-IQ gays or beating the shit out of their daughters.





Funny little tidbit - some scientists have started arguing, that genetically speaking it would be better for the gays to go back to the closet and have a few children faking to be married to a woman due to them having on average a higher intelligence. This is of course only valid in the West - not in the Middle East or elsewhere where homosexuality is mainly happening due to overzealous gender segregation and a de-facto prison culture.

Because let's face it - homosexual single-sex parents are mostly doing a shitty job. It would be better for a gay dad to have his happy family with his wife on friendship terms, while both fuck around on the side - that is how it was done since time immemorial in the West (for those who could afford it). No reason to change it.

Post: #120

(07-26-2017 07:59 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  But today? If you've got a daughter she has to be afraid of you. Afraid of the consequences of playing the slut. I only have sons, and make no mistake it's not long before junior starts nipping at your heels, his very biology subconsciously driving him to test your alpha status. As for girls, once they hit puberty the drive among many of them to mount dick is extremely strong. If you ever find yourself in a situation where you're surrounded by even mid-pubescent girls then you'll know how they find any excuse to hang around you, accidentally dropping constant IOIs due to their total lack of self awareness.

Like I said before. When it comes to kids, charts and heart-to-heart conversations by and large are not enough to keep them on the straight and narrow.

Those daughters would simply run away in our times. Next stop is more drastic and we know how that would end.

My intention is to homeschool my kids - especially daughters. Also Game and biological gender roles is part of the curriculum. And even with that there is the danger that the kids reject some of the input, because the system out there is so overwhelming.

As for education or intelligence being better - don't count on it. The difference between the lower class girl and the smarter girl is currently, that the lower class girl will have children, while the smarter girl may not - or very very late.

Our entire system is broken - there are no easy solutions unless the true enemy out there is faced first.

Edit - example - how do you fight with feminists?

Do you enter the meme war, discuss things with them on the net while each year another 20-30 million get indoctrinated in the educational gulags and the media? Nah - you shut off the feminism and gender funding, close all the departments, oust all the feminist journalists, start teaching the true biological nature of our dichotomous species and you wait. I guarantee you that within 5 years most women will claim to have never been feminists, because it was all bullshit - they just went along with it, did not know the full picture etc. They will simply be ashamed to have ever shaved their head and went on a slut-walk. War won. Female casualties zero. The few shrieking ideologues won't matter. The same war can be won with the Antifa idiots. The cultural anti-Western anti-capitalist postmodernist marxism has poisoned their minds. You stop teaching that bullshit, tell them the truth - the full truth about communism - tell them the full truth about Western civilization with all the good and some of the bad - and voila - another war won. 95% exit rate of Antifa members - most would become liberal conservatives with a slight left bent - we can live with that.

Post: #121

I think on most points we're seeing eye to eye.

The incredible thing is that when I talk about hard men I'm not even talking about guys that will beat their daughter for kissing the wrong boy, or guys that will go Liam Neeson on globalist NGOs or muslim invaders.

A lot of guys would be surprised to find out just how far a simple, authoritarian "NO" goes to checking a wife, a daughter, and even a mother. The problem is that too many low-T manlets are incapable of even mustering that minimal level of resistance to the life-destroying choices their wives and daughters make. They are utterly cucked and simply take it to be the case that their only role in the home is to make money and shut up while the wife lives her slutty fantasies vicariously through her daughter(s).

Behind just about every slut and feminist is a gutless father who never looked his daughter in the eyes at a young enough age and simply said "NO!" A man who never, when his wife began to undermine his authority, forcefully told her to grow a fucking spine and stop selling out their child's future for a cheap emotional rush by playing the good cop.

Because that's often all it takes. Just to say "no", and to mean it.

Post: #122

(07-25-2017 05:25 AM)zatara Wrote:  

(07-24-2017 07:22 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  No, you said your primary pleasure was knowing that another man would marry her, without knowing you ass-fucked her.

Right. So rather than having no opinion about him (like most of us do), you have a very strong opinion about him - as if he's essential to the pleasure you have with the girl.

It's not you being with her.

It you being with her, in order to get to him.

You're imagining things and/or projecting here. This is my first post in the thread:

/thread-63941...pid1616718

Laughing at him isn't what I'd call a strong opinion. Trust me, I'm with a girl first and foremost for my own raw sexual pleasure. I'm an entirely selfish lover. Everything else is marginal.

You seem to have ignored my point about MikeCF's love of sexual domination. Does that not fit with your world view? Instead, how about all the posters in the lengthy sexual domination thread on this very forum, many of them highly repped:

/thread-27278.html

What about the ROK authors of articles on sexual domination?

http://www.returnofkings.com/8666/the-do...experiment

http://www.returnofkings.com/22204/men-s...h-anal-sex

etc

You'll find plenty of people here in the manosphere recommend dominating women. Its really very common. You're probably on the wrong forum to have such puritanical views about sex, if it disgusts you that much. Domination really is a thoroughly enjoyable undertaking.

(07-24-2017 09:18 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  Hey zatara,

How dominant are you going to feel when your beautiful little girl who's just turned 14 & decides to eschew the boob job you promised her for an anal bleaching?

You puritanical types seem big on the personal attacks as a method of argument. It doesn't really add intellectual credibility to your position. Does the idea of a man sexually defiling conservative young Christian girls really rile you up that much?

I don't have a 14 year old daughter though, thanks. Definitely wouldn't waste my money on a boobjob for her if I did though. That money could be better spent on whips and chains for engaging in some light BDSM with someone else's daughter.

The art of dominance on women is complex and has layers. You can have a girl dripping and at your call with nothing done to her sexually. You don't know what you're taking about and maybe are just misguided. Any true dominate make whom has - cracked the code - will tell you this.

This anal noise has to stop. Anal was ALWAYS used as a means to break the will and frame of a MAN, NOT a FEMALE (go read on how sodomy was used to cuck soilders in classic days to 'put them in line')

The pussy on a woman is so complex she won't even know the inner workings and power of her own pussy and body; yet, knowing all this, men now are neglecting this magical hole for poop chutes which are made redundant on a female from the lack of a forbidden fruit - the prostate (aside as a get out of jail card for pregnancy, the anus has provided more incentive for the man than the woman - the forbidden fruit).

I refuse to give into this propaganda. I refuse to let men misguide young or impressionable men that anal is the key to being the most bold man in a female's life. All bogus things to push. All bullshit.

The truth, far too many sleeper cell men out there whom are duplicative with bad true intentions. Duplicative in that millions upon millions of men, whom enjoy double dipping in both females and males. These subversive bisexuals outnumber homosexual men and exsist on Wall Street and in jails, from high net worth, to unemployed, and transcends culture and class. There isn't a *type* of bisexual man, but they all share the same traits in subversion and diversion in steering the heterosexual straight males off his natural path; anyone who promotes this, I get suspicious of, always. I will call them out on it always as I distrust these men as they attempt to lead heterosexual men astray to join them in the dumpsters of sexual decay and deviance. Try and think who introduced AIDS to the hetro population, who is leading the charge towards sex with weirdos like trannys, who keeps on being happy to push fucked up shit in the bedroom non stop in media; it is these bisexuals, it is them whom are the Trojan Horses of society whom will piss in the waters of natural male and female relations.

Over time I have learned bisexuals are the problem and not even homosexual men. Homosexual men, whom live such a different life versus a heterosexual male they might as well be aliens or goldfish; purely off the charts sexual activity and energy that few straight men could ever have the means or time to persue without ending up dead, broke, or subjugated with kids from various random women who would in return use the power of the state to kill your soul and your finances. There has always been a pressure valve that keeps straight men in check sexually, in that to gain more and more sex, he has to expend various levels of effort and resources to get it (there is no free lunch, women will never grant a man sex unless some level of effort, value, or resources is on display - period) So for a straight men it is impossible to live the life the homosexual rabbit sex life without damaging things being done (which is why homosexual men, like rabbits, fuck themselves silly and die. Ask yourself how it is not bizarre most gay males are dead by 55, this is minus AIDS as well, a gay male in the stable Western world will die at the same time as a dirt poor man who grows up in the worst dust bowls of the third world).

Those men who partake in both (males and females) are in fact damaged, as they expose themselves to the high risk and dangerous of homosexual lifestyle. The death, disease and destruction of homosexual life follows like a cloud for bisexual men and the only power they hold is the subversion and soft power to lead straight heterosexual men astray to join them in the hell they live in (no bisexual man is 100% invested in females, as the female can never offer the bisexual man true happy and fulfillment. His stomach can never be full of the nourishment a female provides, this is what leads him astray, this is why he is dangerous). The bisexual men, all hope to bring down other straight men into the dumpsters with them, these bisexuals men are the definition of player haters. If you don't believe me, go befriend one and see how quick he will cockblocke you with pussy, they simply live to deny straight men the pleasure of good pussy. Why? Because as I mentioned someone has to pay for their unfillment, someone has to pay for their inability to gain true nourishment from a female as god intended. They will always look to make the straight male pay as he will forever hate the straight male for their ability to find true fulfilment from a female.

In the end, I won't stand for it. I won't and will never support the subjugation of the straight Heterosexual male. We are important. We are neglecting what Heterosexual men need to thrive. Our power is being weakened. Our power is to push forward corralling the complex and deep energy of women. Man's greatest puzzle is the complex peices he puts together with women. It is his purpose. The female is the most complex creature on this earth and the true gift and bounties that come from a man when he discovers, even just 10% of this, yeids such a surplus in fulfillment and happiness. Look at the stability and civilization that purely comes from man understanding and making a pair bonding deal with women to expend effort to ensure safety for the child. That is civilization, that is progress, that is beautiful. What these subversive agents want is decay and death. Amorality and agony. Where men sull around live empty and unfulfilled just as them. It is disgusting and I won't stand for it.

If people don't agree with me then make better arguments. The fact is this. You can dominste ANY WOMAN with out any type of sexual stimulation. It is a true skill and task when you get to this level so noone can make the claim that anal to a woman is a key path towards the domination of a woman. It isn't true. Stop pushing the propaganda. Stop pushing the decay and the destruction.

I'm out

Post: #123

When will you guys learn that the best way to handle Sebastian is to pretend he doesn't exist? He's like the Italy or Greece of our RVF union. He is a failed member and is best left behind.

Post: #124

(07-26-2017 09:46 AM)kosko Wrote:  If people don't agree with me then make better arguments. The fact is this. You can dominste ANY WOMAN with out any type of sexual stimulation. It is a true skill and task when you get to this level so noone can make the claim that anal to a woman is a key path towards the domination of a woman. It isn't true. Stop pushing the propaganda. Stop pushing the decay and the destruction.

I'm out

Good take on the plight of bisexual men out there. Strange that no one talks about it.

I heard it more in detail from a madam who was in the prostitution biz for 20+ years. She said that there are a ton of men out there who fuck women and men - and they pay for men. She offered me a job as a dicksucker of course - I declined and pulled 2 of her girls one day, but that is another story.

Sick world....

Post: #125

Hell....you all KNOW Kosko is right. I generally prefer not to keep female company outside of family and even I have a number of examples that come to mind where women would go batshit crazy over a guy when they aren't getting laid. In some cases( the right combination of narcissistic traits) NOT getting the sex can drive them crazy.

Here's the secret: it's kind of like hypnotism. Whether we're talking about men or women, nobody can get that kind of control over a partner unless they on some level WANT to be dominated. That's why you see so many women with domineering male personalities and so many nerd males with vampire females: both types hate themselves deep down and that drives them to be with people who will treat them like the low value they perceive themselves as.


And thats not even "respill" knowledge. Most people know this happens to women in a abusive relationships, they just don't realize that this mechanism also exists in non "abusive" relationships and in male brains.

Great example of the reverse: look upp China's fake emperor.